Daily Archives: December 31, 2016

“This Is the Moment for an Israeli Victory” – Pipes in NRO, #1499

by Daniel Pipes
National Review Online
December 31, 2016

The U.S.-sponsored Israeli–Palestinian “peace process” began in December 1988, when Palestinian Liberation Organization leader Yasir Arafat met American conditions and “accepted United Nations Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, recognized Israel’s right to exist and renounced terrorism” (actually, given Arafat’s heavily accented English, it sounded like he “renounced tourism”).

It was huge news in December 1988 when Arafat said he renounced terrorism.

That peace process screeched to an end in December 2016, when the U.N. Security Council passed Resolution 2334. Khaled Abu Toameh, perhaps the best-informed analyst of Palestinian politics, interprets the resolution as telling the Palestinians: “Forget about negotiating with Israel. Just pressure the international community to force Israel to comply with the resolution and surrender up all that you demand.”

As 28 years of frustration and futility clang to a sullen close, the time is nigh to ask, “What comes next?”

I propose an Israeli victory and a Palestinian defeat. That is to say, Washington should encourage Israelis to take steps that cause Mahmoud Abbas, Khaled Mashal, Saed Erekat, Hanan Ashrawi, and the rest of that crew to realize that the gig is up, that no matter how many U.N. resolutions are passed, their foul dream of eliminating the Jewish state is defunct, that Israel is permanent, strong, and tough. After the leadership recognizes this reality, the Palestinian population at large will follow, as will eventually other Arab and Muslim states, leading to a resolution of the conflict. Palestinians will gain by finally being released from a cult of death to focus instead on building their own policy, society, economy, and culture.

Time for Mahmoud Abbas (L),Khaled Mashal, and the rest of that crew to realize that the gig is up – and they lost.

While the incoming Trump administration’s Middle East policies remain obscure, President-elect Trump himself vociferously opposed Resolution 2334 and has signaled (for example, by his choice of David M. Friedman as ambassador to Israel) that he is open to a dramatically new approach to the conflict, one far more favorable to Israel than Barack Obama’s. With his life-long pursuit of winning (“We will have so much winning if I get elected that you may get bored with winning”), Trump would probably be drawn to an approach that has our side win and the other side lose.

Victory also suits the current mood of Israel’s prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu. He’s not just furious at being abandoned in the United Nations, he has an ambitious vision of Israel’s global importance. Further, his being photographed recently carrying a copy of historian John David Lewis’s Nothing Less than Victory: Decisive Wars and the Lessons of History (Princeton University Press, 2010) signals that he is explicitly thinking in terms of victory in war; Lewis in his book looks at six case studies, concluding that in each of them “the tide of war turned when one side tasted defeat and its will to continue, rather than stiffening, collapsed.”

Netanyahu carrying John David Lewis’s “Nothing Less than Victory.”

Finally, the moment is right in terms of the larger trends of regional politics. That the Obama administration effectively became an ally of the Islamic Republic of Iran scared Sunni Arab states, Saudi Arabia at the fore, into being far more realistic than ever before; needing Israel for the first time, the “Palestine” issue has lost some of its salience and Arab conceits about Israel as the arch enemy have been to some extent abandoned, creating an unprecedented potential flexibility.

For these four reasons — Security Council Resolution 2334, Trump, Netanyahu, and Iran — the moment is right to meet the new year and the new administration with a revamped Middle East policy, one aiming for the Palestinians to “taste defeat.”

Daniel Pipes (@DanielPipes) is president of the Middle East Forum

2016: The Year Liberal Ideas Failed

Hillary Clinton lost because she took her eyes off the Rust Belt and foolishly tried to expand the map into Arizona and Georgia. Clinton lost because she was unlikable and dishonest. Clinton lost because she ran against Donald Trump rather than for something. Clinton lost because 2016 was a change election, and she was the candidate of the status quo.Trump won because he saw an opening in the Midwest that no one else saw. Trump won because his relentless messaging (Crooked Hillary and Make America Great Again) reaffirmed Clinton’s weaknesses and emphasized his own strengths. Trump won because…

VISIT WEBSITE

Obama’s Legacy: “Impotent, Angry and Shallow Brained” Says Vladimir Putin

Absolute Truth from the Word of God

748413

Barack Obama now has his legacy, and like it or not – this accurately sums up his eight years in office.  He will be exiting the White House as a weak, angry and yes – “shallow brained” do-nothing destroyer of the country he was sworn to protect.

And to make matters worse for the outgoing president – historians will write that his legacy was summed up and bestowed upon BHO by none other than Vladimir Putin of Russia.

Fromtheobserver.com

Russians Attack ‘Political Corpse’ Obama

The silent, months-long contempt expressed by the Russian political class toward the departing White House Administration was suddenly interrupted on Thursday by U.S. President Barack Obama’s announcement of a new set of anti-Russian sanctions.

In Russian media, in the political class and among government officials, the reaction in Moscow was fierce, vocal and pugnacious.

Obama’s decision to expel Russian diplomats—in addition to…

View original post 1,149 more words