Daily Archives: April 27, 2019

April 27 The Power of the Gospel

Scripture Reading: 1 Thessalonians 2:1–12

Key Verse: 1 Thessalonians 2:4

But as we have been approved by God to be entrusted with the gospel, even so we speak, not as pleasing men, but God who tests our hearts.

By itself, knowledge of the gospel—the power that saves us from our sins by Jesus Christ’s death and resurrection—is powerless. In fact, many people have heard the gospel but refuse to believe its truth. It’s not until we see the gospel at work in our lives or in the lives of those around us that we realize the power it possesses.

In Paul’s letter to the church in Thessalonica, he wrote openly about the gospel and its potential impact in their lives. Just like Paul, we also are entrusted to deliver the message of the gospel. Whether with our mouths or through our actions and deeds, we should always be a witness of the power of the gospel. And here are four points we need to remember about the power of the gospel:

  1. It’s a superior message. The gospel is more important than anything we’ve ever heard, because the mind of God is in it.
  2. It’s a simple message. We can never fathom all the wisdom of God, yet His saving message is easy enough for a child to comprehend.
  3. It’s a sure message. Anyone from anywhere can be saved when they embrace the gospel.
  4. It’s a sufficient message. The Bible contains an answer for every trial or situation we encounter.

Lord, thank You for the power of the gospel—that it is superior, simple, sure, and sufficient for all my needs.[1]


[1] Stanley, C. F. (2006). Pathways to his presence (p. 122). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

April 27 A New Beginning

Scripture Reading: Romans 5:6–11

Key Verse: Hebrews 13:5

Let your conduct be without covetousness; be content with such things as you have. For He Himself has said, “I will never leave you nor forsake you.”

Do you ever wish for a new beginning? We can make such a mess of our lives that we may think: I wish I could start all over again. It would be different this time. Perhaps that would happen, but we might find ourselves in the same dilemma.

The good news of the gospel is that we can have a new start. When we receive Jesus Christ as Savior and commit our lives to Him, Christ fully forgives our sins. Our guilt is removed; our stains are washed by the blood of Christ. Though we may still reap the consequences of our past behavior, we are no longer under God’s condemnation or in sin’s captivity.

We also have the power of God to guide and help us in the present. We can be different because the Holy Spirit of God indwells us. He is our daily Companion; He is greater than our emotional or physical habits; He can deliver us.

Also, our future is secured. We have everything to look forward to since Christ will never leave us or forsake us. We may face many difficult situations, but we have Christ. We are bound for heaven through His guarantee; we cannot slip or fall from His grip. His love and grace continually surround and enfold us.

You can have a new start that never ends when you receive Christ as your Savior, Lord, and Life. He will never fail you (Heb. 13:5).

Father God, today is a new beginning for me. The past is forgiven. My future is assured. This is the day You have made. I will rejoice and be glad in it![1]


[1] Stanley, C. F. (1999). On holy ground (p. 122). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

This Is The End Of The Cycle | ZeroHedge News

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

Both new households and new businesses are in secular decline. Goosing the stock market and GDP doesn’t change this reality.

Everyone wants every cycle of expansion to last forever, but alas every cycle ends. The growth cycle that began in 2009 is finally coming to an end. The signs are everywhere, notwithstanding the torrid 3.2% GDP growth for the first quarter of 2019 (which as others have noted, is less than meets the eye.)

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the standard measure of expansion, but it is an imperfect metric. GDP can still notch gains while the majority of the economy is stagnating and assets are losing value.

Better guides to expansion than GDP are sales volumes, prices, profits, wage increases and sustained rises in new enterprises and households. All of these measures of expansion are stagnant, indicating that monetary and fiscal stimulus are no longer moving the needle.

Corporate profits are higher as a result of accounting gimmicks, not soaring sales or expanding gross profit margins. Stocks are being pushed higher by the old trick of lowering earnings estimates so that corporations can “beat by penny.”

In many once-hot real estate markets, sales are slowing while prices continued edging higher but at much slower rates than in the past. This is classic late-cycle activity: sales are declining as the pool of buyers has been drained while price increases have become marginal.

Global sales of pricey mobile phones and vehicles have slowed, indicating the exhaustion of the cycle is global. Again, this is classic late-cycle activity: trends that powered the narrative of “strong growth everywhere” are fading, despite attempts to hype some blip as a sign that strong growth is about to start up again.

New households and enterprises drive expansion. New households buy homes, furniture, home improvements, appliances and so on, while new businesses buy equipment, hire workers and sign on professional services such as accounting, insurance, etc.

Both new households and new businesses are in secular decline. Goosing the stock market and GDP doesn’t change this reality.

Prices are reaching unaffordable levels across the board: homes and rents in big cities are unaffordable, fine dining is unaffordable, property taxes are unaffordable, construction is unaffordable, autos and trucks are mostly unaffordable, fast food is increasingly unaffordable, college tuition is beyond-unaffordable, healthcare and healthcare insurance are insanely unaffordable– the list includes the vast majority of the costs of living. (Cheap TVs are getting a bit cheaper. Yea for low inflation!)

Rising prices are also classic late-cycle signs. To make a buck, everyone has to raise prices and cut what they can, and rising prices impacts sales.

As for the stock market: a blow-off top based on the misplaced confidence that strong growth is starting up again is also classic late-cycle action. The first doubts triggered the decline from October to December, and the sharp rebound this year once the Federal Reserve signaled “we’ll do whatever it takes” is very typical of the late-cycle topping process: price sags as doubts emerge about the aging expansion, then notches a nominal new high to assuage everyone that the long-in-tooth Bull is starting another multi-year expansion.

Those being paid to hype “the Bull market and the expansion will never end” narrative are experts at turning late-cycle blips into evidence that the cycle has plenty of room to run, but the more prudent observers are looking at the preponderance of evidence.

Source: This Is The End Of The Cycle

April 27 The Fullness of Your Position

Scripture reading: Ephesians 3:11–13

Key verse: Hebrews 10:10

By that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

Up until they accepted the Son of God as their Savior, Gentiles existed in a world of paganism. Paul wrote that their god had been their appetites or stomachs (Phil. 3:19). He meant that their selfish, lustful desires ruled their lives.

However, when the mystery of salvation was revealed, God established a new basis for spiritual living. Man’s emotions and desires were no longer to have charge over him. Once he became a believer, he was given a new nature with a built-in desire for the things of God. Paul called early Christians saints, a word strongly related to sanctification. Both words mean to be “set apart” for God. When we trust Christ as our Savior, we are spiritually taken out of the world and “set apart” for God in Christ.

Paul cautioned early believers to stand firm in their new faith because their citizenship was no longer of this world but of heaven. Therefore, they should live accordingly and not be drawn aside by the temptations of a pagan society.

God’s redemptive plan is no longer a mystery! Ask Him to help you understand the fullness of your position in Christ. Only then can you enjoy living completely committed to all He calls you to do.

Dear heavenly Father, help me to stand firm in my faith. Help me to understand the fullness of my position in Christ.[1]


[1] Stanley, C. F. (2000). Into His presence (p. 122). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

Many University Campuses Are Playgrounds For Insanity — Christian Research Network

“If, on the other hand, the Shapiro-friendly roommate had persistently accosted the offended snowflake in a ceaseless effort to proselytize him, that might be a different story. But in this case we are talking about a roommate minding his own business and watching a video on his own computer.”

(David Limbaugh – Daily Wire)  If you think the left hasn’t taken over university life in America, you are probably not paying close enough attention or in denial.

I’m not just talking about the liberalism of the professors and the core curriculum but about all of college life. There are glaring examples of leftist extremism everywhere you turn, and they’re so loony that even sane liberal parents should be concerned.

In September, a Michigan State University student awoke from his nap to an apparently unbearable sight, according to The College Fix. His roommate was watching a video of conservative commentator Ben Shapiro. I can guess what some of you must be thinking as you read this: “I sure am glad my kids were never exposed to such provocations, such obnoxious, inconsiderate and uncaring roommates.”

You are probably also thinking, “But if my kid had been the subject of such a triggering event, I hope he would have had the presence of mind to exercise self-help and extricate himself from the hostile environment.”  View article →

via Many University Campuses Are Playgrounds For Insanity — Christian Research Network

April 27, 2019 Afternoon Verse Of The Day

Man’s Destiny Recovered by Christ

But we do see Him who has been made for a little while lower than the angels, namely, Jesus, because of the suffering of death crowned with glory and honor, that by the grace of God He might taste death for everyone. (Heb. 2:9)

That brings us to the third point. Man’s revealed destiny, restricted by sin, has been recovered by Christ.

The ultimate curse of man’s lost destiny is death. Warning Adam about the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, God said, “For in the day that you eat from it you shall surely die” (Gen. 2:17). The cross conquered the curse. The kingdom will be restored and man will be given the crown again.

But how can it happen? If we are all sinners, how can we become sinless? The only payment for sin is death. “For the wages of sin is death” (Rom. 6:23). The only way man can ever be a king again is to have the curse removed. The only way the curse can be removed is for the penalty to be paid. If man is to be restored to reign as a king, he must die—and be resurrected a new man with sovereign qualities.

But we still ask, “How?” We know, even without God’s revelation, that we could not do this ourselves. Paul explains. Speaking of Christ, he writes:

For if we have become united with Him in the likeness of His death, certainly we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection, knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him, that our body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves to sin; for he who has died is freed from sin. Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with Him, knowing that Christ, having been raised from the dead, is never to die again; death no longer is master over Him. For the death that He died, He died to sin, once for all; but the life that He lives, He lives to God. Even so consider yourselves to be dead to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus. (Rom. 6:5–11)

I died years ago. I am perfectly healthy now, but I died a long time ago. I died the death that Paul describes in Galatians: “I have been crucified with Christ” (2:20). The moment that I put my faith in Jesus Christ, at that moment I was identified with Christ. I died with Him on the cross. For John MacArthur the curse is removed. I am now a king. I have not inherited my dominion yet, but the crown has been restored. And for every one of you who knows and loves Jesus Christ, the moment you received Him, you were identified with Him. You were crucified with Him and were buried with Him, and He has raised you up to a new life. It is life with the curse removed.

In Christ we are kings. We do not have our kingdom yet, but it is certain to be ours. To the saints of the Most High belongs the kingdom. Our old bodies are going to fall off someday, but we are not going to die. Our bodies will die, but even they will one day be resurrected in a new and eternal form. We will be immediately liberated to go into the presence of Jesus. Or, if He comes again before that happens to us, He will take us with Him into the kingdom.

To accomplish this great work on our behalf, Jesus had to become a man. He Himself had to be made for a little while lower than the angels. To regain man’s dominion He had to taste death for man. If a man dies for his own sin, he is doomed forever to hell. But Christ came to die for us, because in His dying He could conquer death.

And they sang a new song, saying, “Worthy art Thou to take the book, and to break its seals; for Thou wast slain, and didst purchase for God with Thy blood men from every tribe and tongue and people and nation. And Thou has made them to be a kingdom and priests to our God; and they will reign upon the earth.” (Rev. 5:9–10)

As you and I identify ourselves with Jesus Christ in His death, as we receive Him as Savior, the curse is removed, and we become joint heirs with Him in the eternal kingdom.

Obviously, if we are going to reign on earth as kings, there will have to be a kingdom.

And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given to them. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of the testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark upon their forehead and upon their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years. (Rev. 20:4)

Who will be on those thrones? We who are the kings. We will be kings with our great King, the King of kings. The Redeemer King will rule with His redeemed saints over the redeemed earth.

Man will be changed:

Now it will come about that in the last days, the mountain of the house of the Lord will be established as the chief of the mountains, and will be raised above the hills; and all the nations will stream to it. And many peoples will come and say, “Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob; that He may teach us concerning His ways, and that we may walk in His paths.” For the law will go forth from Zion, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. And He will judge between the nations, and will render decisions for many peoples; and they will hammer their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will not lift up sword against nation, and never again will they learn war. (Isa. 2:2–4)

The animals will be changed:

And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the kid, and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little boy will lead them.… And the nursing child will play by the hole of the cobra, and the weaned child will put his hand on the viper’s den. They will not hurt or destroy in all My holy mountain, for the earth will be full of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea. (Isa. 2:2–4; 11:6, 8–9)

Even the plants will be changed:

The wilderness and the desert will be glad, and the Arabah will rejoice and blossom; like the crocus it will blossom profusely and rejoice with rejoicing and shout of joy. (Isa. 35:1–2)

Christ tasted death for you and for me. He did it to recover our lost destiny. If you have been groping around, trying to figure out why you exist, I hope you know the reason now. There is no reason for us to be slaves. There is no reason for us to be paupers. There is only reason for us to be kings.

Men today still ask, “What is man?” The idolator and the animist says, “Man is inferior to birds and animals, even to creeping things, stones, and sticks.” And he bows down and worships the snake. The materialist says, “Man is obviously higher than any of the other animals, but he is still only the product of chance, the result of evolutionary natural selection.” Most people believe such ideas or ones equally as foolish. But God says, “Man was created to be king of the earth. Only for a little time he has been made lower than the angels.” Someday he will sit on the throne of Jesus Christ and reign with Him in His kingdom.

I trust that you will be there reigning with Christ.[1]


9. But we see Jesus, &c. As the meaning of the words, βραχύ τι, a little, is ambiguous, he looks to the thing itself, as exhibited in the person of Christ, rather than to the exact meaning of the words, as I have already said; and he presents to our meditation the glory after the resurrection, which David extends to all the gifts by which man is adorned by God’s bounty; but in this embellishment, which leaves the literal sense entire, there is nothing unsuitable or improper.

For the suffering of death, &c. It is the same as though it was said that Christ, having passed through death, was exalted into the glory which he has obtained, according to what Paul teaches us in Phil. 2:8–10; not that Christ obtained anything for himself individually, as sophists say, who have devised the notion that he first earned eternal life for himself and then for us; for the way or means, so to speak, of obtaining glory, is only indicated here. Besides, Christ is crowned with glory for this end, that every knee should bow to him. (Phil. 2:10.) We may therefore reason from the final cause that all things are delivered into his hand.

That he by the grace of God, &c. He refers to the cause and the fruit of Christ’s death, lest he should be thought to detract anything from his dignity. For when we hear that so much good has been obtained for us, there is no place left for contempt, for admiration of the divine goodness fills the whole mind. By saying for every man, he means not only that he might be an example to others, as Chrysostom says, who brings the example of a physician tasting first a bitter draught, that the patient might not refuse to drink it; but he means that Christ died for us, and that by taking upon him what was due to us, he redeemed us from the curse of death. And it is added, that this was done through the grace of God, for the cause of redemption was the infinite love of God towards us, through which it was that he spared not even his own Son. What Chrysostom says of tasting of death, as though he touched it with his lips, because Christ emerged from death a conqueror, I will not refute nor condemn, though I know not whether the Apostle meant to speak in a manner so refined.[2]


His Story

Hebrews 2:5–9

But we see him who for a little while was made lower than the angels, namely Jesus, crowned with glory and honor because of the suffering of death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone. (Heb. 2:9)

Several years ago I had the privilege of addressing a group of college students, many of whom were not believers, during Easter week. I set before them the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ as the only true answer to the problems of the world. Going through various solutions mankind pursued in the last century, things like education and social reengineering and income redistribution, I showed how each of these has failed and must fail because of the unresolved problem of sin in the human heart. At the end, one young man stood up and asked me, “If the death and resurrection of Jesus is the solution to the problems of this world, and if he has already died and been raised again, then why are the problems all still here?”

That is an excellent question, dealing with the relationship of the present world to the saving work of Jesus Christ. It is to this question that the writer of Hebrews turns as he continues to exhort his first-century readers. He has been talking about Christ’s superiority to the angels. In demonstrating that point he has made much of the risen Lord Jesus’ present reign at God’s right hand, with all authority and dominion. Now he anticipates an objection to his line of argument. His readers, after all, were facing the prospect of violent persecution; how could this be happening, people might wonder, if Christ is now enthroned in power? Our present passage offers a remarkable solution to this problem, providing a sweeping view of all of history as it is centered on the death and resurrection and exaltation of Jesus Christ.

The Problem of History: Dominion Lost

Chapter 1 left off with Christ exalted in heaven, about to overthrow all his enemies. In verse 13 the writer asks, “To which of the angels has [God] ever said, ‘Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet’?” Now he picks up that theme again, looking forward to the time when Christ’s reign is consummated. He writes, “It was not to angels that God subjected the world to come, of which we are speaking” (Heb. 2:5).

“The world to come” is the time when Christ’s lordship will be consummated over all, when all the promises and prophecies of blessing are fulfilled in his final reign. In one sense that consummation has already been secured, as Christ now reigns at God’s right hand. This is what Jesus emphasized prior to his ascension, as the basis for the Great Commission: “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me” (Matt. 28:18). He is in control of his spiritual kingdom and reigns now over the world, and especially in the lives of those who call him Lord.

Here, then, is the situation: Christ is presently reigning over his new kingdom and new humanity, yet at the same time the readers of this epistle, like us, find themselves still subject to the conditions of the old reality. This is the apparent problem, and, as he has done before, the writer of Hebrews approaches it by means of a citation from the Psalms. His use of the Old Testament demonstrates that what is happening now is part of God’s predetermined and prerevealed plan for history. In this case he quotes Psalm 8, which he sees fulfilled in the life and achievement of Jesus Christ: “It has been testified somewhere, ‘What is man, that you are mindful of him, or the son of man, that you care for him? You made him for a little while lower than the angels; you have crowned him with glory and honor, putting everything in subjection under his feet’ ” (Heb. 2:6–8).

The author introduces this passage by saying, “It has been testified somewhere.” The point is not that he is uncertain of its location; rather, it is enough for him that God has said it in Holy Scripture.

Psalm 8 gives praise to God for his majesty as revealed in creation. “O Lord, our Lord,” David begins, “how majestic is your name in all the earth!” (v. 1). In comparison, he then reflects upon man’s insignificance and marvels at God’s care for his creature. “What is man that you are mindful of him, and the son of man that you care for him?” (Ps. 8:4). J. J. Stewart Perowne describes the psalmist’s sentiment: “As the poet gazes on into the liquid depths of that starry sky there comes upon him with overwhelming force the sense of his own insignificance. In sight of all that vastness, before all that evidence of creative power, how insignificant is man!”

Nonetheless, God’s goodness to humanity is another cause for wonder. Psalm 8 continues, “You have made him a little lower than the heavenly beings, and crowned him with glory and honor. You have given him dominion over the works of your hands; you have put all things under his feet” (Ps. 8:5–6). This is a poetic reflection on what God did in the creation of men and women in his image. His image is manifested in us in part through the dominion God granted man over the garden paradise. We see this in Genesis 1:26, which reads, “Then God said, ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.’ ”

In verse 8 of Hebrews 2, the author points out how thorough mankind’s dominion was: “Now in putting everything in subjection to him, he left nothing outside his control.” Such was the lordship man was given over all the creation. Yet, the writer points out, this is not the situation we currently enjoy: “At present, we do not yet see everything in subjection to him.” Here is a statement of the problem of our race—the problem of dominion lost. What God intended for man in creation is not what we see at present.

What an understatement! As we look around, the Bible says, it certainly doesn’t appear as if man has everything under control! If God placed everything under man’s feet, then something has gone awry. If we begin making a list of those things in this world very evidently not under man’s control, it quickly becomes quite large. Man is at the mercy of weather; his food supply even today is greatly influenced by forces outside his control. Mankind is starving, bleeding, crying, and suffering all over the globe. Hurricanes, droughts, tornadoes, and floods beat against man with unmastered fury. Man may enjoy a large degree of influence over nature and the animal creation, but he does not rule them. Indeed, man is not able to control his own self—his own passions or even his own thoughts. A quick look at the newspaper will display this in terms of international, civic, and individual crises that abound on every side. “At present, we do not yet see everything in subjection to him.” That is an announcement of the problem that is extremely well backed up by the evidence.

The second and third chapters of Genesis tell us how things went wrong. God had given Adam, the representative of our race, the command not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. He was not to seek autonomy from God; though lord of the garden, he was to acknowledge his own subjection to the Creator. God then attached a threat of punishment: “In the day that you eat of it you shall surely die” (Gen. 2:17).

Genesis 3 tells the horrible tale of what happened. The serpent deceived the woman, telling her that God gave the command to Adam only to keep them from their rightful destiny. It is always the devil’s aim to persuade us that God really is not good, despite the abundant evidence of his generosity. So it was in the garden. Speaking of God’s command against eating the forbidden fruit, Satan said to her, “You will not surely die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Gen. 3:4–5). Aided by Eve, Adam ate the forbidden fruit. He did come to know good and evil: he knew the good he had forfeited and the evil he had gained by rebelling against God. Adam did not become like God, but like the devil whom he had obeyed. Matthew Henry observes:

Now, when it was too late, they saw the folly of eating forbidden fruit. They saw the happiness they had fallen from, and the misery they had fallen into. They saw a loving God provoked, his grace and favor forfeited, his likeness and image lost, dominion over the creatures gone. They saw their natures corrupted and depraved.… They saw themselves disrobed of all their ornaments and ensigns of honor, degraded from their dignity and disgraced in the highest degree, laid open to the contempt and reproach of heaven and earth, and their own consciences.

Thus man—created by God as his image-bearer, crowned with glory and honor and dominion—became subject to God’s curse even to the point of death. That curse marks mankind even now, with all its frustration and futility. Far from reigning over the creation, each and every one of us instead will return to the dust from which we came.

This is the problem of mankind: Paradise lost, and with it the dominion and blessing offered by God. This is the problem of history—the basic problem set forth at the beginning of the Bible—the answer to which is unfolded in all the rest of Scripture. God’s creation of mankind, recorded in Genesis 1:26 and poetically celebrated in Psalm 8, has been spoiled by Adam’s sin and the resulting curse of death. “At present,” the writer says, “we do not yet see everything in subjection to him.”

The Solution of History: Jesus Crowned

When we see that man’s fall into sin and death is the great problem of history, it is easier to see the focus of God’s redemptive work in the achievement of Jesus Christ. How we define a problem always determines the nature of its solution, and so it is with the solution that Jesus Christ brought for the problem of this world.

So how do people identify the problem of this world, and what solutions do they envision? Is the problem that people are ignorant? Is it that people who are basically good are simply not enlightened with the right philosophy and culture needed to form a successful society? If that is the problem, then education is the logical solution. Or is the problem that people have had bad childhood experiences, that dysfunctional environments have warped otherwise healthy creatures? If that is the problem, then social reengineering is the most appropriate solution. Or, again, is poverty the problem? Is it true that people’s basic needs are not being met, so they never get the chance to develop high-order skills that will make them model citizens? If so, then surely income redistribution is a good remedy.

But what if man’s problem runs deeper? What if the problem of this world is that man is in bondage to sin and under the curse of death? What if man’s problem is that since Adam’s fall we are sinners by nature, condemned by God and unable to walk in righteousness and peace? In that case, a more radical solution is called for, a solution far beyond the reach of man himself. God must send a Savior to take away the curse of sin and to break forever the power of sin.

This is the Bible’s assessment of man’s problem, in Hebrews as well as in Genesis 3. Man was created in glory and honor and dominion, but has fallen from that estate. The resources needed for the recovery of Paradise are now beyond the reach of his guilty and cursed hands. According to the Bible, there is only one solution to this problem, the remedy that comes not from man but from God, not from the earth but from heaven. The apostle Paul writes: “For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly.… God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Rom. 5:6–8).

This is also what the writer to the Hebrews is saying. “At present,” he says of man, “we do not yet see everything in subjection to him. But we see him who for a little while was made lower than the angels, namely Jesus, crowned with glory and honor” (vv. 8–9). On one hand there is man, captured in the darkness of his Paradise lost. Then onto the stage God sends his own Son, the New Man and Second Adam. He is the answer both to man’s problem and to the problem of history. He is the great, the last, the only hope of a dying race; in him is the fulfillment not only of man’s promised destiny but of God’s plan as set forth in Psalm 8. History has become his story. Jesus is the new Adam of the new creation; what Adam lost he has regained. All who are found in him through faith will partake of the new humanity’s reclaimed glory and honor and dominion. “We see Jesus.” This is the aim of the book of Hebrews from start to finish, to show us Jesus as the Answer, the One who reclaims what mankind was created to be and to do.

His Story: Humiliation, Glorification, Triumph

From the perspective of the Bible, history is about man’s fall from blessing and dominion through sin, and about Jesus Christ as the answer from God, the redeemer of those lost in sin, and the forerunner of the new creation in which God’s original purpose is brought to glorious fulfillment. At the center of history is the story of Jesus Christ, and the writer of Hebrews sees that story outlined in the words of Psalm 8, as he records them in verse 9: “But we see him who for a little while was made lower than the angels, namely Jesus, crowned with glory and honor because of the suffering of death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.”

Jesus’ life and story can be organized into three distinct phases, the first two of which are set forth here: his humiliation and exaltation to the right hand of God.

First is Jesus’ humiliation, which appears here with the words “who … was made lower than the angels” (Heb. 2:9). We should remember that Jesus was the second person of the Godhead before his birth at Bethlehem. He is eternally God the Son. His existence before the incarnation was one of perfect glory, yet he took up mortal flesh for the sake of his redeeming work, humbling himself beneath the angels as a man. The nadir of his humiliation came at the cross, where our Lord died a death that was shameful before men and cursed before God. Bearing the guilt of our sins, he was afflicted with the whole of God’s wrath.

Hebrews 2:9 speaks of Jesus’ “suffering of death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.” Jesus’ death was not like the death of any other man, for he was not merely man but also God. He was not a sinner, but the spotless Lamb of God. By his death Jesus took God’s curse against sin upon himself—the very curse that had ruined mankind. In the fall, man suffered death; but Christ came into the world as God and man that he might take that death upon himself and thus deliver us out of death and into life. As Paul writes in 2 Corinthians 5:21, God “made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God,” and thus be reconciled to our Maker. That is the significance of the humiliation of Jesus Christ.

In response to Christ’s obedience unto death, God raised him from the dead and exalted him to his right hand. This is the second phase of Christ’s history. He is, verse 9 says, “crowned with glory and honor because of the suffering of death.” In raising Christ from the dead, God the Father honored Jesus’ perfect obedience, vindicated his cause, accepted his sacrifice, and established his reign over the new humanity of which he is both Lord and forerunner, the firstfruits of God’s harvest. Death was not the victor over Jesus Christ, but rather the victim. Even now the Lord Jesus reigns in this second and present phase of his great and saving history, bestowing eternal life through the gospel on all who come to faith in him. Thus Paul wrote in 2 Timothy 1:10 that Jesus “abolished death and brought life and immortality to light through the gospel.”

Lord of the Age to Come

That is what is going on in this world right now, and it sets up the answer to the question with which I began: “Why is this world still such a mess?” If Christ’s death and resurrection is the solution to this world’s ultimate problem, and if he has died and has been raised again, then why do we still see these problems? The answer is that there is a third act to Jesus’ saving ministry that remains yet to come. His story is not yet complete, and in its culmination the history of this world comes to its glorious climax.

Jesus suffered humiliation for us and then God exalted him on high. But there is a third stage yet to come. The writer of Hebrews had it in mind at the beginning of this passage when he wrote, “It was not to angels that God subjected the world to come” (Heb. 2:5).

Does Christ reign now? Yes, but not visibly so. In this sense, the words applied to mankind also apply to him now: “At present, we do not yet see everything in subjection to him” (v. 8). Not every knee is now bowed before Jesus; not every tongue confesses him Lord of all. Yet Christ does reign spiritually over this age. He is advancing against his enemies with the sword of the gospel in his mighty hand. He is leading his own out of this present evil age, a people set apart to himself, who inherit eternal life even in the midst of a realm of death, who belong not to this world but to the world that is yet to come.

Let me put this another way. Christ the answer has come and achieved salvation. But the problem of this world still remains most evident. Here, then, is the final answer and it is coming soon—Christ is coming again with glory to consummate his reign, to triumph over all his enemies—sin and death and the devil and this present evil world—all of which will be placed under his feet and destroyed, making way for the new creation in holiness and light. Already this coming triumph is working in the lives of his people as they turn away from sin, in the life of the church as it receives more and more new believers, and even in the secular culture as Christians live as salt and light to extend Christ’s reign.

This raises a vital question: To which age do you belong? In which age have you placed your hopes and dreams, your treasure and your salvation? If your trust is in this world, in this age, then you will suffer its fate when Christ comes in glory to separate his own from those lost in the guilt of their sin.

The old world, in which we now live, is the one that is tangible to our senses, to our sight and our touch and to our whole mortal existence. But when Jesus Christ was crowned on high, this present age lost its claim on all who trust in him, even though it grinds forward toward its pre-appointed end. The age to come, the age of the glory of Christ, is appointed to take the place of this passing world, and through faith in Christ we are made citizens of that new creation.

To the eyes of the world it is indeed true: “We do not yet see everything in subjection to him.” But the eyes of our faith see Jesus crowned with glory and honor, reigning over the history which points to him and leads to his soon return, when every eye will see him. This is the “already/not yet” of the Christian life. Everything is already ours in Christ, though not yet realized in our experience. But by faith we see Jesus and spiritually partake of all the blessings of his coming reign.

Let us, then, ensure that we do not belong to this judged and passing world, that we escape the guilt of Adam’s failure and our own sin through faith in Christ. Let us not look back upon this present evil age with longing, but back only to the cross with gratitude, where Christ suffered death for us and broke the teeth of this present evil age. And let us look forward to the day of triumph, when Christ will come again in glory, the King coming to reign in righteousness, peace, and joy forevermore. His history has become our hope. So we say, with the writer of Hebrews, “Yes, we see the world as it is, we see and feel and lament this reign of sin and death. Yes, we see it—but that is not all we see. We see Jesus, now crowned with glory and honor, because he suffered death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for all who trust in him.”

Come, Lord Jesus, Come.[3]


9 The NIV has changed the order of the clauses by putting “because he suffered death” (lit., “through the suffering of death”) after “crowned with glory and honor,” thus separating the “crowning” from the following purpose clause and avoiding the apparent implication that the crowning was prior to his death. Lane, 42–43, avoids this implication by transferring the final clause to before both “through the suffering of death” and “crowned with glory and honor” in his translation (so also the GNB). The final purpose clause probably relates not specifically to the immediately preceding clause about crowning but rather to the whole complex of events just mentioned, namely, incarnation, death, and subsequent glory.

There is strong patristic evidence for an early alternative reading χωρίς Θεοῦ, chōris theou, “apart from God,” in place of χάριτι Θεοῦ, chariti theou, “by the grace of God,” even though the latter is found in most surviving MSS. The reading with χωρίς, chōris (GK 6006), possibly an allusion to Jesus’ abandonment by God on the cross (Mk 15:34), appears so starkly and without explanation here that it might have been changed into χάριτι Θεοῦ, chariti theou (GK 5921) to avoid embarrassment. But it is also possible it was a marginal comment on v. 8 (“nothing not subject to him—except God”; the exception is made explicit in 1 Co 15:27) that then found its way into the text by mistake.

The biblical idiom “taste death” means a full experience of death, not, as our idiom might suggest, a tentative “taste” without going through with it; see Mk 9:1 par.; Jn 8:52 (and cf. Ps 34:8; 1 Pe 2:3). Cf. the parallel phrase, “the suffering of death,” earlier in the verse. For “taste” see further on 6:4–5. Chrysostom’s argument that the author uses “taste” because the resurrection cut short Jesus’ experience of death is too subtle and does not fit the wider usage of the verb.[4]


2:8b–9 / In these verses we encounter the first instance of our author’s midrashic treatment of an ot passage—that is, where he presents an interpretation of the quotation, utilizing specific words drawn from the quotation itself. (See the same phenomenon in 3:7–4:11; 10:5–14; 12:5–11.) The result may fairly be described as a Christian commentary (i.e., seen from the perspective of the fulfillment brought by Christ) on the passage that enables the author to drive home his point and thereby also to demonstrate the continuity he finds between old and new.

The three occurrences of the pronoun him in v. 8b can be understood as referring to humanity, in keeping with the original meaning of the portion of Psalm 8 that has just been quoted. But if, as we have argued, the latter is meant, especially through the reference to “the son of man,” to allude to Jesus (cf. v. 9), then the pronouns here may also have a deliberate ambiguity. Almost certainly the author intends here, as in the quotation, to refer not merely to humanity but also to Christ.

It is clear that the author understands the quotation from Psalm 8 to refer to Christ as well as to humanity by his application of specific words from the quotation to Jesus in verse 9: who was made a little lower (or better, “for a little while lower”; see comment on v. 7) than the angels, now crowned with glory and honor. Jesus, already so crowned, has in principle “everything under his feet” (v. 8a). We do not, however, yet see that reign in the present world. Indeed, the delay is already alluded to in a key text previously quoted (1:13): “Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet” (Ps. 110:1). In fact, now we see neither man nor Christ ruling over all things; but Christ’s rule will in the future be fully consummated, and when that occurs, mankind will experience the full realization of the rule spoken of in Psalm 8 (cf. Phil. 3:21). God left nothing that is not subject to him. Our author does not specify the obvious exception noted by Paul in 1 Corinthians 15:27: “It is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ.”

But we see Jesus. This is the first mention of the personal name Jesus, which is used deliberately here to focus attention upon his humanity. It is the incarnation that makes Jesus temporarily lower than the angels, and the purpose of the incarnation is to make possible his death on behalf of all, for everyone. Taste death means simply to suffer death, as the preceding clause makes clear, and not merely a partial experience of death (cf. Mark 9:1). The incarnation and its goal, the cross, are the glorious expression of the grace of God, God’s free mercy and favor. The exaltation of Jesus, his being now crowned with glory and honor, is because he suffered death. Since it was from an exalted position that Jesus was temporarily made lower than the angels, we should not press the causal aspect too far (cf. 12:2). What is primarily in view is the sequence exalted status—humiliation—exaltation (as, e.g., explicitly in Phil. 2:6–11). At the same time, the exaltation that follows the humiliation does have a new dimension of joy and triumph, standing as it does at the end of the accomplishment of God’s plan of salvation.

The full humanity of the Son, therefore, involves the greatest of advantages, including the superiority of the Son to angels as the one who makes salvation possible by fulfilling the will of God in suffering and death. Further benefits of the humanity of Jesus are explored by our author in the remainder of this chapter.[5]


2:8b–9. The subjection of all things to Jesus was still in the future, but it was certain to occur. The certainty that Jesus will experience future glory gives hope to us. This assurance leads to the introduction of Jesus by name in verse 9.

We find three statements about Jesus in verse 9. First, Jesus became a human being. He was made a little lower than the angels. Second, as a man he experienced suffering and death. The death of Jesus provided a marvelous display of divine grace. God permitted his Son to endure suffering, and the Son willingly offered himself. He tasted death for everyone. Third, the outcome of the suffering of Christ was that he was crowned with glory and honor.[6]


9. But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels, now crowned with glory and honor because he suffered death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.

  • Jesus fulfilled the message of Psalm 8: “Being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death” (Phil. 2:8). Because of his humiliation, especially his death and burial, he was made lower than the angels for a little while. Jesus, then, is portrayed as man, who in effect has accomplished what the first Adam because of sin failed to do. Jesus became man, suffered, died, and was buried. After his humiliation was completed, he was no longer “lower than the angels.” His state of exaltation came to full realization when he was crowned with glory and honor; that is, when he ascended to heaven to take his seat at the right side of the Majesty in heaven (Heb. 1:3). Jesus rules supreme as king of the universe!

Because of man’s disobedience in Paradise and the curse God placed upon him (Gen. 3:17–19), sinful man could never fully experience the state that is described in Psalm 8. But, says the author of the epistle, we see Jesus. He suffered death and gained the victory. He wears the crown of glory and honor, and rules the universe. In fact, even though the author does not explicitly state it, all things are subject to Christ (see 1 Cor. 15:27; Eph. 1:22). Jesus said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me” (Matt. 28:18).

  • Christ is introduced as Son in the first chapter; here he is called Jesus. By using the personal name Jesus, the author of the epistle draws attention to the historical setting of Jesus’ suffering and death. We assume that the name was vivid in the minds of the first readers of the epistle because of the steady preaching of the gospel. These readers were acquainted with the details of the life, death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus.
  • The name Jesus calls to mind the concept salvation. Jesus, the Savior, gained glory and honor for himself and life eternal for his people. The death of Jesus was purposeful in that it provided benefits, as the author writes, “for everyone.” This expression does not imply universal salvation, for the writer in the broader context mentions that “many sons” (not all the sons) are brought to glory (2:10) and that they are called Jesus’ brothers (2:11–12).

Jesus accomplished the redemption of his people by tasting death, so that his people may live and rule with him. The text does not say that Jesus died, but that he tasted death for everyone. This phrase is not just a Hebraic idiom for the verb to die, which also occurs in Matthew 16:28; Mark 9:1; Luke 9:27; and John 8:52. The words to taste death are “a graphic expression of the hard and painful reality of dying which is experienced by man and which was suffered also by Jesus.”

Jesus experienced death in the greatest degree of bitterness, not as a noble martyr aspiring to a state of holiness, but as the sinless Savior who died to set sinners free from the curse of spiritual death.

  • The phrase by the grace of God has been replaced in some manuscripts by the words apart from God. The evidence for this latter reading, although not strong, indicates that the phrase may be a reference to Jesus’ death on the cross when he cried out, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” (Matt. 27:46). The reading apart from God gains support when we see that twelve of the thirty-eight New Testament uses of the Greek word for “apart” occur in the Epistle to the Hebrews. On the other hand, the phrase by the grace of God—with slight variations—is common in the Gospels and in the Epistles.

On the basis of the author’s intent, if that can be ascertained, we could defend the reading apart from God. And we could argue that it is easier to explain how in the original the word grace was substituted for the term apart than to explain the converse. But the fact that the earliest manuscript, dating back to a.d. 200, has the reading grace is significant. A solution to this rather difficult problem is often sought in conjecture. One theory is that a scribe reading Hebrews 2:8 (“God left nothing that is not subject to him”) added a note in the margin that said, “nothing apart from God.” He did so because of Paul’s comment in 1 Corinthians 15:27 (“For he ‘has put everything under his feet.’ Now when it says ‘everything’ has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ”). According to this theory, then, the note eventually became part of the text when the word grace was substituted for the term apart. Perhaps the conjecture ought to be taken seriously; yet the phrase by the grace of God needs interpretation.

  • What is meant by the phrase “tasting death for everyone by the grace of God”? The grace of God is equivalent to the love of God (by analogy to Rom. 5:15; 2 Cor. 8:9; Gal. 2:20–21; Eph. 1:7; 2:5, 8; Titus 2:11; 3:7). In the words of John Calvin, “The cause of redemption was the infinite love of God towards us, through which it was that he spared not even his own son.”[7]

[1] MacArthur, J. F., Jr. (1983). Hebrews (pp. 58–60). Chicago: Moody Press.

[2] Calvin, J., & Owen, J. (2010). Commentary on the Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Hebrews (pp. 60–61). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.

[3] Phillips, R. D. (2006). Hebrews. (R. D. Phillips, P. G. Ryken, & D. M. Doriani, Eds.) (pp. 56–64). Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing.

[4] France, R. T. (2006). Hebrews. In T. Longman III & D. E. Garland (Eds.), The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Hebrews–Revelation (Revised Edition) (Vol. 13, pp. 52–53). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

[5] Hagner, D. A. (2011). Hebrews (pp. 46–47). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

[6] Lea, T. D. (1999). Hebrews, James (Vol. 10, p. 27). Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman Publishers.

[7] Kistemaker, S. J., & Hendriksen, W. (1953–2001). Exposition of Hebrews (Vol. 15, pp. 66–68). Grand Rapids: Baker Book House.

Accused ‘spy’ Maria Butina wouldn’t be in jail if she ‘wasn’t Russian’ – attorney

Russian national Maria Butina has been sentenced to 18 months in prison in the United States, after she pleaded guilty to conspiring to act as an unregistered foreign agent. READ MORE: https://on.rt.com/9t4o RT LIVE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFAcqaNzNSc Check out http://rt.com Subscribe to RT!

Maria Butina: Guilty of Being a Russian National in America

Article Image

by Stephen Lendman (stephenlendman.org – Home – Stephen Lendman)

On Friday, Maria Butina was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment for political reasons. She’s innocent of phony charges. More on the imperial state’s injustice against her below.

It’s the wrong time to be an unwanted alien, a Muslim from the wrong country, or a Russian national in America. Worse still, there hasn’t been a right time in the modern era, especially post-911.

The US is waging propaganda, sanctions, and hot wars against nations it doesn’t control — what the scourge of imperialism is all about.

No nation poses a greater threat to humanity’s survival, none more disdainful of human and civil rights on a global scale, none more contemptuous of the rule of law, none that more mocks what democratic values are supposed to be.

The US is a fascist police state masquerading as democratic rule, a notion it abhors at home and abroad, wanting it eliminated wherever it exists.

Venezuela is Exhibit A, the hemisphere’s model democracy Trump regime hardliners are waging war on by other means — wanting the country transformed into a US vassal state, along with gaining control over its world’s largest oil reserves and other valued resources.

Bipartisan hardliners in Washington consider Russia and China their main adversaries — because of their sovereign independence, opposition to the US imperial agenda, not being submissive to its will, and growing world influence at a time the self-styled “indispensable state” makes more enemies than friends.

It’s in decline while Russia, China, and other nations are rising — despite spending countless trillions of dollars to remain the dominant global superpower, poured down a black hole of waste, fraud and abuse.

The US was at the height of its power post-WW II, maintained for some years in the post-war era, decline beginning and continuing in recent decades, notably post-9/11.

It’s the same dynamic that doomed all other empires in history – a nation in decline because of its imperial arrogance, hubris, waging endless wars against invented enemies, and unwillingness to change.

The long ago founded republic no longer exists, replaced by the imperial state — featuring military Keynesianism, ruinous military spending while vital homeland needs go begging, eroding social justice, and police state rule.

Tolerating no opposition to its rage for global dominance and permanent war agenda are its defining features, along with judicial unfairness and tyranny replacing the rule of law.

America’s gulag operates globally, the world’s largest by far. Captives include thousands of political prisoners, some perishing, others emotionally and physically tormented and irreparably scared in solitary confinement, torture by other means — intended to turn humans into zombies.

Former political prisoner/the late  Marilyn Buck called prisons warehouses to “disappear the unacceptable…deprive the(m) of their liberties, their human agency, and to punish… stigmatiz(ing) prisoners through moralistic denunciations and indictment based on bad genes – skin color (ethnicity, or other characteristics) as a crime.”

Millions of prisoners aren’t incarcerated “because they are ‘criminal,’ but because they’ve been accused of breaking (a law) designed to exert tighter social control and state repression,” scapegoating, demonizing, and criminalizing them for their beliefs and activism.

America’s militarized police state brutalizes them, locking them in cages for advocating peace, resisting injustice, defending freedom, equality, and human rights, along with believing another world demands resistance over injustice and other forms of tyrannical rule.

Post-9/11, anything goes more than ever in America is how its authorities operate — abroad by targeting nations for regime change, at home by injustice against unwanted aliens and Muslims from the wrong countries, as well as nationals from vilified countries like Russia.

Media disseminated fear-mongering wrongfully vilifies Muslims from the wrong countries and Russians as terrorists.

Last July, Maria Butina was arrested and detained without bond, falsely charged with operating as an unregistered Russian agent.

At the time, Moscow’s envoy to the US Anatoly Antonov accused Washington of “unjustly hunting for Russian citizens not only in the US but in other countries too.”

Butina’s lawyer Robert Driscoll explained that she’s “not an agent of the Russian Federation, not a proxy for any of the serious and substantial issues that our country has with Russia right now.”

Despite innocent of false charges against her and posing no flight risk, she was denied bail, held for most of the past nine months in punishing solitary confinement — brutalizing her for being a Russian national, no other reason.

To mitigate and hopefully end her suffering, she pleaded guilty to conspiracy against the US (sic), saying she acted as a foreign agent which she’s not.

Russian lower house’s International Affairs Committee chairman Leonid Slutsky slammed her persecution, saying:

“The vaunted American justice in Butina’s case is an example of modern political inquisition. All charges were fabricated.”

“The entire process is clearly politicized, starting with the fact that she was detained on the eve of the meeting of the Russian and US presidents in Helsinki, and it was hardly a coincidence.”

Her 18-month sentence includes nine months already served. She’ll be released early next year and deported to Russia unless the imperial state decides to brutalize her longer.

Before sentencing on Friday, she in court said “I came to the United States not under any orders, but with hope, and now nothing remains but penitence.”

On return to Russia, she’ll be treated like a human being, her rights respected, and hopefully much more.

The Kremlin should go all out on  her behalf — to help her return to normal life after the horrific ordeal she endured unjustly at the hands of a ruthless regime.

There was no reason for her to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) — long ago outdated Nazi era legislation, requiring agents representing foreign governments to disclose their relationship, along with information about their personnel, activities and finances.

Butina was innocent of charges against her, targeted solely for being a Russian national in the US at the wrong time.

She’s one of countless others brutalized by the imperial state. Her lawyer Robert Driscoll noted that “(a)nyone who thinks that someone who wasn’t Russian would be in this situation is fooling themselves.”

Sentencing US District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Tanya Chutkan told Butina the following on Friday:

“No doubt you have suffered greatly due to the national atmosphere, including salacious details proven to be untrue.”

It begs the question! Why didn’t Chutkan order her immediate release, along with apologizing for the gross injustice against her.

Equal justice under law in the US is a meaningless figure of speech. Politicized injustice targets individuals like Butina.

Federal courts stacked with right-wing extremists, including the Supremes, are ideologically conservative and reactionary.

Serving corporate interests and the imperial state, they’re hostile to equal justice under law the way it’s supposed to be. Countless others like Butina are wrongfully imprisoned in the US.

In a long ago dissenting opinion on a Supreme Court ruling, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said the following:

“The Court has taken its task to be the constitutionalization of a totally immoral, rapacious, economic system instead of the promotion of justice, domestic tranquility, the general welfare, and the blessings of liberty.”

The same goes for federal, most state, and local courts at lower and higher levels — supporting privilege over justice for all, along with serving the imperial state.

A Final Comment

In response to Butina’s sentence, Russia’s Foreign Ministry issued the following statement, saying:

“We consider the decision by a Washington court to sentence Maria Butina to 18 months behind bars as politically motivated.”

“This sentence is an ugly stain on the American justice system, which has followed a blatant political order to the letter.”

“Our compatriot has been sentenced just for her being a Russian citizen. She has become a victim of tight rivalry between various US political forces and the unbridled anti-Russian campaign in the spirit of McCarthyism.”

For time immemorial, notably in the modern era, especially post-9/11, the US is pockmarked by “ugly stains” — the rule of law long ago abandoned, US viciousness replacing it, an unparalleled threat to humanity.

Source: https://stephenlendman.org/2019/04/maria-butina-guilty-of-being-a-russian-national-in-america/

Putin Accuses Democrats of Jailing Butina To ‘Save Face’ From Mueller Probe Disaster

FILE PHOTO: Maria Butina appears in a police booking photograph released by the Alexandria Sheriff’s Office in Alexandria, Virginia, U.S. August 18, 2018. Alexandria Sheriff’s Office/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo

BEIJING (Reuters) – Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday made his first comments on a U.S. court sentencing admitted Russian foreign agent Maria Butina to 18 months in prison, calling her treatment a travesty of justice.

Butina was sentenced on Friday after the Siberia native, her voice breaking with emotion, begged a judge for mercy and expressed remorse for conspiring with a Russian official to infiltrate a gun rights group and influence U.S. conservative activists and Republicans.

Speaking in Beijing, Putin said the sentence looked like an attempt by U.S. law enforcement and judicial officials to save face.

“It’s an outrage,” Putin told reporters.

“It’s not clear what she was convicted of or what crime she committed. I think it’s a prime example of ‘saving face.’ They arrested her and put the girl in jail. But there was nothing on her, so in order not to look totally stupid they gave her, fixed her up, with an 18-month sentence to show that she was guilty of something.”

Reporting by Vladimir Soldatkin in Beijing and Polina Devitt in Moscow; Editing by Andrew Osborn

Source: Putin Accuses Democrats of Jailing Butina To ‘Save Face’ From Mueller Probe Disaster

No scandals? Biden repeats an old Obama whopper | American Thinker Blog

Is Sloppy Joe still hankering for that coveted Obama endorsement?

Democratic presidential frontrunner Joe Biden’s out and about, repeating the old, tired saws of the Obama administration.

According to Fox News:

Former vice president and newly-minted 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Bidenappeared on “The View” on Friday morning and told hosts that his proudest moment of serving with President Barack Obama was that there was “not one whisper” of scandal during the time they served together in the White House.

Biden said that, coincidentally, he and Obama both told press on the same day while in different parts of the country that the thing they were most proud of while in the White House was that there was “not one whisper of a scandal.”

“Not one,” Biden said. “And that’s because of Barack.”

His comments came the day after Biden made his long-awaited announcement that he would be campaigning for the 2020 presidency.

So let’s get this straight here: The Benghazi coverup never happened. The IRS targeting of dissidents never happened, either. The Gold River pollution on traditional Native American lands by the EPA never happened. Solyndra never happened. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton never had an illegal private server in some guy’s bathroom. She never sold 20% of the U.S. uranium supply to Russia, and her bleachbitting of her subpoenaed emails was perfectly scandal-free, as well as her smashing of Blackberries with hammers. The fact that top-secret emails turned up in Anthony Weiner’s perverted computer, for the New York cops to read, was a nothingburger. And if you like your doctor…

Actually, the Obama administration was probably the most scandal-plagued of all administrations, and for one important reason: There was never any housecleaning. Do a bad act and let your Democratic Party affiliation be your protection. I have always suspected that former FBI director James Comey’s exoneration of Hillary Clinton for her private email legal violations was the big thing that made voters break for Donald Trump in 2016. The one set of laws for one elite, and the second set for everyone else, was what got Obama’s team thrown out.

Now we are coming off more Obama scandals from the Mueller report – with President Obama in possession of Clinton’s deleted emails, and questions raised about unmaskings and bad uses of FISA warrants, and Joe Biden brings up the years-old baloney about Obama being scandal free?

Something tells me this is about trying to reset a ‘narrative’ now that the walls are closing in on Obama. Sound like old Joe may be singing for his supper, still trying to get that coveted Obama endorsement.

Source: No scandals? Biden repeats an old Obama whopper

Strassel: Why Didn’t Mueller Investigate Whether Steele Dossier Was Russian Disinfo? | ZeroHedge News

Since the release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s redacted report, several questions have been asked as to why certain things were not investigated, and key players were never interviewed, according to President Trump.

Perhaps the most glaring omission is Mueller’s failure to consider that the infamous “Steele Dossier” – which used Kremlin sources – could have been Russian disinformation itself. 

Asking that very question, the Wall Street Journal’s Kimberly Strassel opines on this “stunning omission.”

Kimberly Strassel via the Wall Street Journal

Politicians keep reminding us not to lose sight of special counsel Robert Mueller’s broader assignment: to investigate Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. If only someone had reminded Mr. Mueller.

One of the biggest failures of the Mueller probe concerns not what was in the final report, but what was not. Close readers will search in vain for any analysis of the central document in this affair: the infamous “dossier.” It’s a stunning omission, given the possibility that the Russians used that collection of reports to feed disinformation to U.S. intelligence agencies, sparking years of political maelstrom.

The dossier—compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele on behalf of Fusion GPS, an opposition-research firm working for the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee—fed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the media the principal allegations of the “collusion” narrative. It claimed Paul Manafort was at the center of a “well-developed” Trump-Russia “conspiracy”; that Carter Page served as his intermediary, conducting secret meetings with a Kremlin official and the head of a state energy company; that Michael Cohen held a clandestine meeting in Prague with Vladimir Putin cronies; and that the Russians had compromising material on Donald Trump, making him vulnerable to blackmail. The dossier was clearly important to the FBI probe. Its wild claims made up a significant section of the FBI’s application for a secret surveillance warrant on Mr. Page.

The Mueller report exposes the dossier claims as pure fiction. Yet in describing the actions of the Trump campaign figures the FBI accused, the report assiduously avoids any mention of the dossier or its allegations. Mr. Mueller refers to Mr. Steele and his work largely in passing, as part of the report’s description of how former FBI Director James Comey informed Mr. Trump of the dossier’s existence. The dossier is blandly described several times as “unverified allegations compiled” by Mr. Steele.

Once Mr. Mueller established that the dossier was a pack of lies, he should have investigated how it gained such currency at the highest levels of the FBI. Yet his report makes clear he had no interest in plumbing the antics of the bureau, which he led from 2001-13. Instead, he went out of his way to avoid the dossier and give cover to the FBI.

The special counsel had another, more pressing reason to look at the dossier: It fell within his core mission. Since its publication by BuzzFeed in January 2017, we’ve learned enough about Mr. Steele and Fusion GPS to wonder if the Russians used the dossier for their own malign purposes.

In the first telling, Mr. Steele was described by friendly media as simply a “former Western intelligence official” with a history at Britain’s overseas intelligence service. It turns out he worked in Russia. Mr. Steele spent his first years of service under diplomatic cover in Moscow, later in Paris. And in 1999 he was among 117 British spies whose covers were publicly blown by a disgruntled ex-MI6 officer.

The former spy, known to the public and therefore to Russia, also became known for sending reports to the U.S. government. Last year former Obama State Department official Jonathan Winer explained that in 2009 he became friendly with the self-employed Mr. Steele, and starting as early as 2013 ensured that “more than 100 of Steele’s reports” on Russia topics were shared with the State Department. Given that the dossier is largely based on Russian sources, some supposedly connected to the Kremlin, did the Kremlin know about this arrangement and see an opportunity to spoon-feed the U.S. government disinformation?

We’ve also learned more about Mr. Steele’s and Fusion’s connections to Russians. Mr. Steele sent a series of emails to Justice Department employee Bruce Ohr in 2016 inquiring about the status of a visa for Oleg Deripaska, an oligarch with Kremlin ties. Fusion GPS was working alongside Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Russian lawyer who arranged the infamous meeting with Donald Trump Jr. in June 2016. Fusion was hired as part of a team to help Ms. Veselnitskaya undermine Bill Browder, the man behind the Magnitsky Act, a law that imposes sanctions on Russians for corruption and human-rights violations.

How did Mr. Mueller spend two years investigating every aspect of Russian interference—cyberhacking, social-media trolling, meetings with Trump officials—and not consider the possibility that the dossier was part of the Russian interference effort?

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz and Attorney General William Barr may answer some of the questions Mr. Mueller refused to touch. Thanks to the special counsel we know Republicans weren’t playing footsie with Russians. But thanks to BuzzFeed, we know that Democrats were. America deserves to know how far that interaction extended.

Write to kim@wsj.com.

Source: Strassel: Why Didn’t Mueller Investigate Whether Steele Dossier Was Russian Disinfo?

Who checks the fact-checkers? Facebook leaves verification to groups funded by Soros, US Congress | RT News

In its crusade against ‘fake news’, Facebook has vowed to fight for impartiality. However, when it comes to fact-checking, it seems to rely on sources, which have links to the US government, and renowned political meddlers.

For more than two years, the social media giant has been seeking to convince the public that it does its best to take a stand against malicious disinformation spread through its network and presented a whole bunch of instruments aimed at revealing and countering false narratives.

It appears, though, that Facebook heavily relies on decisions taken by some third-parties in its ‘anti-disinformation’ policy.

Submissions from the so-called fact-checkers – alongside some feedback from users – seem to be the primary source on which Facebook relies when saying a post is ‘false’.

One-fits-all solution?

Facebook proudly boasted that all the “partners” it cooperates with were “certified” through what it calls “the non-partisan International Fact-Checking Network” or IFCN.

However, the social network’s choice of people to trust with the power to decide what is true or false does raise questions. This seemingly impressive “international network” Facebook mentions is a project run by Florida-based private school of journalism – the Poynter Institute for Media Studies.

The project, which Facebook apparently uses as a sole instrument to find trustworthy “partners,” seems to be way more than just a selfless initiative aimed at helping people navigate through questionable information.

Also on rt.com AP & Snopes quit ‘fact-checking’ for Facebook as NewsGuard’s blacklist model pushes ahead

The IFCN was launched in 2015 following a generous donation totaling $300,000, which the Poynter Institute received from two sources. One of them is the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) – a “soft-power” organization, which is funded primarily through annual allocations from the US Congress. Another one is the Omidyar Network – a foundation run by the eBay founder and self-described “progressive” billionaire Pierre Omidyar.

Although he has not yet apparently gained as much fame – or infamy for that matter – as another US billionaire and renowned political meddler, George Soros, Omidyar has also lately shown himself as a major patron of regime-change operations. As early as in 2014, the US media reported that Omidyar supported anti-government groups in Ukraine that opposed the then President Viktor Yanukovych, who was ousted during Maidan.

A report by Forbes also suggested that the billionaire was one of the major funders of the Kiev-based Hromadske TV, which harbored anti-Russian views while backing the violent 2014 coup. Most recently, a group of journalists revealed that Omidyar funds a wide range of media outlets through foundations, nonprofits and other cutouts that in fact promote the liberal interventionist agenda.

Notably, two years after the launch of the IFCN Omidyar teamed up with none other than another “liberal interventionist” – Soros – to channel some $1.3 million into the project to support its development.

The Poynter Institute itself also has the Omidyar Network as well as the Democracy Fund – another foundation linked to the eBay founder – on its list of major donors, alongside Open Society Foundations (OSF) run by Soros and the NED.

Providers of ‘ultimate truth’

The list of “certified” fact-checkers provided by the IFCN certainly looks impressive. It includes such international news agencies as Associated Press and Agency France Press (AFP), which appear on the list along with its branch offices in a dozen and a half countries. In total, the ‘network’ describes 66 organizations as “verified signatories” of the self-styled “code of principles” it developed.

However, the impartiality question remains. At least some of the organizations listed as reliable suppliers of the ultimate truth and described as “partners” by Facebook in fact receive substantial funding from the likes of Soros and Omidyar – or even directly from Western governments.

One of these organizations called PolitiFact even enjoys what it calls “administrative support” from the Poynter Institute while receiving significant funding from Facebook itself. The US-based fact-checker also collected regular donations from Omidyar’s Democracy Fund since at least 2013, which amounted to between $125,000 and $250,000.

Also on rt.com Meet Pierre Omidyar, billionaire patron of US regime change operations, neocons & activist media

Across the pond, the British Full Fact charity lists the Omidyar Network and Open Society Foundations among its top-5 donors. And in the Philippines Omidyar is backing the Rappler, a news site that also made its way to the IFCN fact-checkers’ list while opposing President Rodrigo Duterte.

Together, Omidyar’s Luminate Group and Soros’ OSF also provided a quarter of the funding, which a South Africa-based fact-checker, the ‘Africa Check’, received in 2018. Meanwhile, another such organization based in Turkey and called Teyit got its funds directly from Western governments in the form of “financial support”provided by the British embassy in Ankara as well as the European Endowment for Democracy – a foundation financed directly by most EU states along with Switzerland and Norway.

Some of the organizations on the list also manage to collect donations both from Western governments and the “liberal interventionists.” One such example is the Columbian ‘La Silla Vacia’ group, which received 14.5 percent of its funding from Soros, 9.5 percent from the British embassy and another four percent from the NED.

It seems, after all that, the accusations of “bias” Facebook complained so bitterly about in 2018 might be not as unsubstantiated as the social media giant would like it to appear. Back then, Facebook’s project manager, Tessa Lyons, rhetorically asked if it is possible to have a set of fact-checkers that are widely recognized as objective in today’s world. That’s a really good question, which Facebook might need to ask itself again.

Source: Who checks the fact-checkers? Facebook leaves verification to groups funded by Soros, US Congress

Ukraine Tapped By Obama Admin To Hurt Trump, Help Clinton And Protect Bidens | ZeroHedge News

In January, 2016, the Obama White House summoned Ukrainian authorities to Washington to discuss several ongoing matters under the guise of coordinating “anti-corruption efforts,” reports The Hill‘s John Solomon.

The January 2016 gathering, confirmed by multiple participants and contemporaneous memos, brought some of Ukraine’s top corruption prosecutors and investigators face to face with members of former President Obama’s National Security Council (NSC), FBI, State Department and Department of Justice (DOJ).

The agenda suggested the purpose was training and coordination. But Ukrainian participants said it didn’t take long — during the meetings and afterward — to realize the Americans’ objectives included two politically hot investigations: one that touched Vice President Joe Biden’s family and one that involved a lobbying firm linked closely to then-candidate Trump. –The Hill

The Obama officials – likely knowing that lobbyist Paul Manafort was about to join President Trump’s campaign soon (he joined that March), were interested in reviving a closed investigation into payments to US figures from Ukraine’s pro-Russia Party of Regions – which both Paul Manafort and Tony Podesta did unregistered work for, according to former Ukrainian Embassy political officer Andrii Telizhenko.

The 2014 investigation focused heavily on Manafort, whose firm was tied to Trump through his longtime partner and Trump adviser, Roger Stone.

Agents interviewed Manafort in 2014 about whether he received undeclared payments from the party of ousted Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, an ally of Russia’s Vladimir Putin, and whether he engaged in improper foreign lobbying.

The FBI shut down the case without charging Manafort

Telizhenko and other attendees of the January, 2016 meeting recall DOJ employees asking Ukrainian investigators from their National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) if they could locate new evidence about the Party of Regions’ payments to Americans.

“It was definitely the case that led to the charges against Manafort and the leak to U.S. media during the 2016 election,” said Telizhenko – which makes the January 2016 gathering in DC one of the earliest documented efforts to compile a case against Trump and those in his orbit.

Nazar Kholodnytskyy, Ukraine’s chief anti-corruption prosecutor, told me he attended some but not all of the January 2016 Washington meetings and couldn’t remember the specific cases, if any, that were discussed.

But he said he soon saw evidence in Ukraine of political meddling in the U.S. election. Kholodnytskyy said the key evidence against Manafort — a ledger showing payments from the Party of Regions — was known to Ukrainian authorities since 2014 but was suddenly released in May 2016 by the U.S.-friendly NABU, after Manafort was named Trump’s campaign chairman.

“Somebody kept this black ledger secret for two years and then showed it to the public and the U.S. media. It was extremely suspicious,” said Kholodnytskyy – who specifically instructed NABU not to share the “black ledger” with the media.

“I ordered the detectives to give nothing to the mass media considering this case. Instead, they had broken my order and published themselves these one or two pages of this black ledger regarding Paul Manafort,” he added. “For me it was the first call that something was going wrong and that there is some external influence in this case. And there is some other interests in this case not in the interest of the investigation and a fair trial.”

Manafort joined Trump’s campaign on March 29, 2016 and became campaign manager on May 19, 2016. The ledger’s existence leaked on May 29, 2016, while Manafort would be fired from the Trump campaign that August.

NABU leaked the existence of the ledgers on May 29, 2016. Later that summer, it told U.S. media the ledgers showed payments to Manafort, a revelation that forced him to resign from the campaign in August 2016.

A Ukrainian court in December concluded NABU’s release of the ledger was an illegal attempt to influence the U.S. election. And a member of Ukraine’s parliament has released a recording of a NABU official saying the agency released the ledger to help Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Ignoring others, protecting Bidens

Kostiantyn Kulyk – deputy head of the Ukraine prosecutor general’s international affairs office, said that Ukraine also had evidence of other Western figures receiving money from Yanukovych’s party – such as former Obama White House counsel Gregory Craig – but the Americans weren’t interested.

“They just discussed Manafort. This was all and only what they wanted. Nobody else,” said Kulyk.

Another case raised at the January 2016 meeting involved the Bidens – specifically Burisma Holdings; a Ukrainian energy company which was under investigation at the time for improper foreign transfers of money. Burisma allegedly paid then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter more than $3 million in 2014-15 as both a board member and a consultant, according to bank records.

According to Telizhenko, U.S. officials told the Ukrainians they would prefer that Kiev drop the Burisma probe and allow the FBI to take it over. The Ukrainians did not agree. But then Joe Biden pressured Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to fire Ukraine’s chief prosecutor in March 2016, as I previously reported. The Burisma case was transferred to NABU, then shut down.

The Ukrainian Embassy in Washington on Thursday confirmed the Obama administration requested the meetings in January 2016, but embassy representatives attended only some of the sessions.

Last Wednesday on Fox and Friends, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said “I ask you to keep your eye on Ukraine,” referring to collusion to help Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

What’s more, DOJ documents support Telizhenko’s claim that the DOJ reopened its Manafort case as the 2016 election ramped up – including communications between Associate Attorney General Bruce Ohr, his wife, Nellie, and ex-British spy Christopher Steele, as Solomon writes.

Nellie Ohr and Steele worked in 2016 for the research firm, Fusion GPS, that was hired by Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to find Russia dirt on Trump. Steele wrote the famous dossier for Fusion that the FBI used to gain a warrant to spy on the Trump campaign. Nellie Ohr admitted to Congress that she routed Russia dirt on Trump from Fusion to the DOJ through her husband during the election.

DOJ emails show Nellie Ohr on May 30, 2016, directly alerted her husband and two DOJ prosecutors specializing in international crimes to the discovery of the “black ledger” documents that led to Manafort’s prosecution.

“Reported Trove of documents on Ukrainian Party of Regions’ Black Cashbox,” Nellie Ohr wrote to her husband and federal prosecutors Lisa Holtyn and Joseph Wheatley, attaching a news article on the announcement of NABU’s release of the documents.

Politico reported previously that the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington assisted the Hillary Clinton campaign through a DNC contractor, while the Ukrainian Embassy acknowledges that it got requests from a DNC staffer to find dirt on Manafort (though it denies providing any improper assistance.”

As Solomon concludes: “what is already confirmed by Ukrainians looks a lot more like assertive collusion with a foreign power than anything detailed in the Mueller report.”

Source: Ukraine Tapped By Obama Admin To Hurt Trump, Help Clinton And Protect Bidens

Will The Senior-Level FBI Agents, Who Placed Spies In The Trump Campaign, Ever Be Held Accountable? | ZeroHedge News

Authored by Mike Whitney via The Unz Review,

Did the FBI spy on the Trump campaign?

Yes

Did the FBI place spies in the Trump campaign?

Yes

Do we know the names of the spies and how they operated?

Yes

Were the spies trying to entrap Trump campaign assistants in order to gather information on Trump?

Yes

Did the spies try to elicit information from Trump campaign assistants in order to justify a wider investigation and more extensive surveillance?

Yes

Were the spies placed in the Trump campaign based on improperly obtained FISA warrants?

Yes

Did the FBI agents procure these warrants based on false or misleading information?

Yes

Could the FBI establish “probable cause” that Trump had committed a crime or “colluded” with Russia?

No

So the ‘spying’ was illegal?

Yes

Have many of the people who authorized the spying, already been identified in criminal referrals presented to the Department of Justice?

Yes

Have the media explained the importance of these criminal referrals or the impact that spying has on free elections?

No

Is the DOJ’s Inspector General currently investigating whether senior-level agents in the FBI committed crimes by improperly obtaining warrants to spy on members of the Trump team?

Yes

Did the FBI spy on the Trump campaign to give Hillary Clinton an unfair advantage in the presidential race?

Yes

Did the FBI spy on the Trump campaign to gather incriminating information on Trump that could be used to blackmail, intimidate or impeach him in the future?

Yes

Does spying pose a threat to our elections and to our democracy?

Yes

Do many people know that there were spies placed in the Trump campaign?

Yes

Have these people effectively used that information to their advantage?

No

Have they launched any type of public relations offensive that would draw more attention to the critical issue of spying on a political campaign?

No

Have they saturated the airwaves with the truth about “spying” the same way their rivals have spread their disinformation about “collusion”?

No

Do they understand that the country is currently embroiled in a fratricidal, scorched earth political civil war in which one side is determined to prevail at all cost?

No

Do they understand that the people who authorized the spying and who perpetrated the coup will do everything in their power to prevent that information from getting out?

No

Does it look like senior-level agents at the FBI, the CIA, the DOJ, the NSA and the Obama White House knew that there were spies in the Trump campaign?

Yes

Did these same senior-level agents at the FBI, the CIA, the DOJ, the NSA and the Obama White House cooperate in a plan to undermine and delegitimize the Trump presidency?

Yes

Did they use false or misleading information to infer the president was an agent of a foreign power?

Yes

Did they know this false and misleading information was unreliable, unverified raw intelligence that was paid for by the DNC and Hillary Clinton?

Yes

Was there a conspiracy to remove Trump from office or to sabotage his presidency through the dissemination of false information?

Yes

Does the use of spies, wiretapping, “unmasking”, strategically-leaked information to the media, and other forms of electronic surveillance suggest that there are organized elements within the permanent bureaucracy which no longer accept the democratic process?

Yes

Is it fair to say that these people are the enemies of free elections?

Yes

Is it possible for patriotic officials in the Justice Department and in the U.S. Congress to stand up to this powerful deep state apparatus, expose what happened during the 2016 presidential campaign, identify the perpetrators, and bring them to justice?

It is possible, but not likely.

Source: Will The Senior-Level FBI Agents, Who Placed Spies In The Trump Campaign, Ever Be Held Accountable?

Head of NASA Praises Prayer and Christian Influence In Government: Left Has Orbital Meltdown

Absolute Truth from the Word of God

Did you know that The Supreme Court has said a religion need not be based on a belief in the existence of a supreme being? In the 1961 case of Torcaso v. Watkins, the court described “secular humanism” as a religion.

And in 2005, a Federal court deemed “Atheism” a religion.

Read about that decision here:

From wnd.com     written in 2005

Court Rules Atheism a Religion

Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate’s right to start study group

A federal court of appeals ruled yesterday Wisconsin prison officials violated an inmate’s rights because they did not treat atheism as a religion.

“Atheism is [the inmate’s] religion, and the group that he wanted to start was religious in nature even though it expressly rejects a belief in a supreme being,” the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals said.

The court decided the inmate’s First Amendment rights were violated because the prison refused…

View original post 1,614 more words

Wrong Again Joe Biden: Obama Admin So Corrupt 70 Inspector Generals Urged Congress to Stop Obama IG Crackdown! — The Gateway Pundit

Joe Biden said his proudest moment of Obama’s Presidency was that there was not “one whisper of scandal”.

What a crock! Nearly six dozen federal inspector generals approached Congress to ask lawmakers to step in and stop Obama’s crackdown on their efforts to audit and investigate the corrupt Obama Administration. And, Hillary’s department didn’t even have an inspector general!

Joe Biden, former Obama VP and Democrat candidate for President stated that his proudest moment of the Obama administration was that it had not “one whisper of scandal.”

But looking back, the Obama administration was arguably the most corrupt in US history for many reasons.

For example, FOXNews reported

Nearly six-dozen watchdog agencies are asking Congress to step in after the Obama administration clamped down on access to government records they say are vital for their investigations into waste, fraud and abuse.

The Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency sent an Aug. 3 letter to congressional leaders ahead of a hearing scheduled for Wednesday where they will ask lawmakers to pass legislation reversing a controversial decision made July 20 by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel. The OLC is now requiring investigators to get permission to review sensitive documents from the very agencies they are monitoring.

This decision, the letter said, “represents a serious threat to the independent authority” of all inspectors general.

IGs are assigned to audit and conduct internal reviews of federal agencies, and recently have been responsible for investigating the IRS targeting scandal, TSA security gaps, personal email use at the State Department and other issues.

The council represents about 70 IG offices across the government, including for the Federal Communications Commission, the National Security Agency and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. While the July 20 ruling applies to the DOJ, some are worried it will prompt other departments to set similar restrictions.

In addition to this, it should come as no surprise but during Hillary Clinton’s entire tenure as Secretary of State in the Obama administration, President Obama never nominated nor filled an Inspector General position.

The Wall Street Journal reported in 2015 –

The State Department had no permanent inspector general—the lead watchdog charged with uncovering misconduct and waste—during Hillary Clinton’s entire tenure as secretary, leaving in place an acting inspector who had close ties to State Department leadership.

President Barack Obama didn’t put forward a nominee to lead the inspector general’s office while Mrs. Clinton led the State Department, making it the only agency with a presidentially appointed inspector general that had neither a confirmed nor nominated head watchdog…

Of course, this is just the tip of the iceberg.  History will show that the Biden – Obama – Clinton administration was the most corrupt and criminal administrations in history!

Hat tip Nick Weil

via Wrong Again Joe Biden: Obama Admin So Corrupt 70 Inspector Generals Urged Congress to Stop Obama IG Crackdown! — The Gateway Pundit

HERE IT IS: Complete List of the Many Times Obama Spied on Candidate and President Trump and Numerous Others — The Gateway Pundit

In March 2017 we reported a list of more than a dozen proven victims of Obama’s illegal wiretaps.  Now we can add to that list the many times when candidate and President Trump and his team were spied on.

In March 2017 President Trump tweeted the following –

President Trump continued with a tweet asking whether it was legal for Obama to be spying on his campaign –

President Trump then tweeted that a good lawyer could probably make a great case out of Obama’s spying –

In response to his tweets the Mainstream Media (MSM) went crazy and called President Trump crazy and a liar.  So we listed the many times that Obama reportedly spied on others outside of the Trump campaign presented below –

(WikiLeaks released the following list on February 23rd (see link here) of Obama Administration wire taps.)* The US National Security Agency bugged a private climate change strategy meeting; between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin;
* Obama stole sensitive Italian diplomatic cables detailing how Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu implored Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to help patch up his relationship with US President Barack Obama, who was refusing to talk to Netanyahu;
* Obama intercepted details of a critical private meeting between then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, Merkel and Berluscon, where the latter was told the Italian banking system was ready to “pop like a cork”.In addition to the above list we also noted that Obama wire tapped various individuals in the US media that were reporting information not flattering to the Obama Administration.  It is widely known that Obama’s Justice Department targeted journalists with wiretaps in 2013:* In 2013 the liberal Washington Post expressed outrage after the revelation that the Justice Department had investigated the news gathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks.  The reporter, Fox News’ James Rosen and his family, were part of an investigation into government officials anonymously leaking information to journalists. Rosen was not charged but his movements and actions were tracked.* Also in 2013, members of the Associated Press were a target of surveillance.  The ultra liberal New Yorker even noted that “In moderate and liberal circles, at least, the phone-records scandal, partly because it involves the dear old A.P. and partly because it raises anew the specter of Big Brother, may well present the most serious threat to Obama’s reputation.”

* Reporter Sharyl Attkisson said in 2014 that her personal computer and CBS laptop were hacked after she began filing stories about Benghazi that were unflattering to the Obama administration.  A source who checked her laptop said the hacker used spyware “proprietary to a government agency,” according to an article in the New York Post.

Finally, we reported that WikiLeaks tweeted that the Obama Administration spied on their journalists as well:

Now we know that Obama spied on the Trump campaign, Presidency and his team as well. 

Shortly after President-elect Trump won the election and before President Trump’s tweets in March 2017 noted above, it was reported that –

On Thursday November 17th, 2016, NSA Director Mike Rogers traveled to New York and met with President-Elect Donald Trump.

It is suspected that Rogers went to Trump Tower unannounced to share with him that he was being spied on.  President-elect Trump moved his transition team from Trump Tower to one of his golf courses the very next day after Admiral Rogers’ visit –

President-elect Donald Trump is moving the transition meetings Friday from Trump Tower in New York to Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, said transition team officials.

By March 22, 2017, it was confirmed by Congressman Devin Nunes that Trump associates were spied on by American intelligence (the Obama Administration) –

Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., whose congressional committee is investigating whether Russia interfered with the U.S. 2016 election, said he had been given access to intelligence reports that confirm Trump’s associates were spied on by American intelligence – operating under the auspices of President Obama.

We know that Trump volunteer George Papadopoulos was spied on my multiple characters from US and foreign entities (none Russian) in Europe in early 2016, long before the FBI said they started their Trump-Russia sham investigation in July 2016. Papadopoulos was set up in his interactions with the Deep State spies in Europe and by Italian, Australian and UK related spies and spy entities all working with the Obama Administration.

We also know that General Mike Flynn, Carter Page, Sam Clovis and other Trump team members were spied on by Stefan Halper, one of the same spies who interacted with Papadopoulos.  The Trump team was spied on by others as well.

We know that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein discussed wearing a wire into the White House.  (We really don’t know if he did wear the wire or not.)

We also know that former and now fired FBI Director James Comey met with President-elect and then President Trump and took notes for the sole purpose of spying on Trump.  He then leaked his reports to the MSM.  President Trump responded with the following –

The MSM again went into overdrive speculating that President Trump had tapes like Nixon did during Watergate.  As it turned out the President had no tapes(What the MSM never asked is whether Comey wire tapped the meetings with Trump and if so, whether Trump knew it when he fired off the above tweet!  Time will tell.)

Now this past week we find out that Obama and his Deep State cronies appear to have spied on the President in the White House.  The wife of former Chief of Staff to Mike Pence Joshua Pitcock was working for dirty cop Peter Strzok and investigating into Hillary Clinton’s crimes.  This comes after it was reported that lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were “cultivating sources” to spy and inform them on President Trump.

 

The Obama Deep State gang of dirty cops and crooked diplomats spied on everybody.  The question is – who didn’t they spy on?

via HERE IT IS: Complete List of the Many Times Obama Spied on Candidate and President Trump and Numerous Others — The Gateway Pundit

Saudi Arabia Publicly Executes 37 ‘Criminals’ Under Sharia Law Including Teenager Who Sent Messages Over WhatsApp To Warn People Of Government Violence — Now The End Begins

Abdulkareem al-Hawa was put to death in front of a baying crowd along with 36 other men who were executed this week in the barbaric desert kingdom

Pay close attention to this article and read it very carefully, this is what life is truly like when you live in a country that is governed by Sharia Law. The Law of Mohammed is cruel and unforgiving, justice is not a factor, it is only about exercising raw power to dominate and oppress.

I am not against Muslims as people, they are free to come here to America and assimilate into our culture. I would love to see them all come to s saving knowledge of Jesus Christ as Saviour and avoid the fiery Hell that Mohammed has been burning in since June 8, 632 AD. But I am resolutely against the tyrannical religion of Islam and its diabolical Sharia Law.

Since 9/11, there have been over 34,911 Islamic terror attacks, in the month of March alone there were 132 Islamic terror attacks, resulting in 729 killed, 776 injured and taking place in 23 countries. Look closely at the man being crucified in the picture at the top of the article, that’s not Jesus Christ paying for your sins. That’s a petty criminal receiving “justice” from Sharia Law. Don’t forget that.

Saudi Arabia mass execution – Lad, 16, tortured with electricity and BEHEADED just for sending WhatsApp messages about protests

FROM THE UK SUN: Abdulkarim al-Hawaj, 21, was a schoolboy when he was detained and accused of being a “terrorist” for sending texts online about an anti-government demonstration.

He was a Shiite Muslim – which is a persecuted minority group in Sunni-dominated Saudi – living in the troubled Eastern province.

Abdulkarim was beaten and tortured with electricity while his hands were chained above his head when he “confessed” to his crimes, human rights charity Reprieve said.

This week, he had his head cut from his body in front of a baying, bloodthirsty crowd along with 36 other men in the medieval country.

BUTCHERED FOR SENDING TEXT MESSAGES

Sentencing a person to death who is aged under 18 is banned under international law. Another victim, Mujtaba al-Sweikat, was a teenager who was set to start a new life in the US, studying at Western Michigan University, when he was arrested for attending an anti-government protest.

The then-17-year-old – who had enrolled in English language and finance – was badly beaten including on the soles of his feet before he “confessed” to crimes against the state. Human rights charities claim he was also tortured into confessing and convicted in a “sham trial.”

Why are so many left-wing progressives in America so silent about Islam’s totalitarian tendencies?

People afraid of being called Islamophobes have created space for hardline Muslim men to promote sharia courts, the wearing of the full-face veil, arranged marriage, female genital mutilation (FGM), and gender segregation in public places.

liberals-stand-with-islam-muslims-sharia-law

Despite his university protesting his sentence, insisting he had “great promise,” Mujtaba was also beheaded this week. Reprieve Deputy Director Harriet McCulloch insists both men were sharing information about “peaceful” demonstrations.

She said: “Many things can be used to justify a death sentence in Mohammed Bin Salman’s Saudi Arabia, including ‘disobedience against the King’, ‘preparing banners with anti-state slogans’ and ‘incitement via social media’.

“Mujtaba al-Sweikat and Abdulkarim al-Hawaj were teenagers sharing information about peaceful protests on their mobile phones. Saudi Arabia’s western allies must act now, to prevent any more young people being killed for exercising their right to freedom of expression.”

Another man, Munir al-Adam, was just 23, when he was arrested at a government checkpoint in 2012. His feet were so badly beaten he was forced to crawl on his hands and knees for days, it has been reported.

Munir lost the hearing in one of his ears, following a childhood accident, but was left completely deaf after the horrific torture, it has been alleged. He told a judge that he agreed to sign the confession because he was exhausted by the brutal and relentless torture.

The killings were carried out in Riyadh, the Muslim holy cities of Mecca and Medina, central Qassim province and Eastern Province, home to the country’s Shiite minority. Lynn Maalouf, Middle East Research Director at Amnesty International, said the mass execution was a chilling demonstration of the Saudi Arabian authorities callous disregard for human life.

She said: “It is also yet another gruesome indication of how the death penalty is being used as a political tool to crush dissent from within the country’s Shiite minority.”

For Abdulkareem al-Hawaj’s family, perhaps it was consolation their son’s decapitated head and body was not impaled and put on display as a warning to others. Others were not so fortunate.

‘CALLOUS DISREGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE’

The 37 citizens killed during  beheading bloodbath had all been convicted of terrorism offences in the hardline kingdom. It emerged one man had even been crucified. Saudi lawmakers insist the men were charged with “adopting terrorist extremist ideology, forming terrorist cells” and harming the “peace and security of society”.

Those executed had been involved in attacking a base killing a number of security officers, the Saudi Press Agency statement said. The slaughter of mainly minority Shiites is likely to stoke further regional and sectarian tensions between rivals Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Saudi dissident Ali Al-Ahmed, who runs the Gulf Institute in Washington, identified 34 of those executed as Shiites based on the names announced by the Interior Ministry.

“This is the largest mass execution of Shiites in the kingdom’s history,” he said.

SHAM TRIALS

In fact it marked the largest number of executions in a single day in Saudi Arabia since January 2, 2016, when the kingdom executed 47 people for terrorism-related crimes. The Interior Ministry’s statement said those executed had adopted extremist ideologies and formed terrorist cells with the aim of spreading chaos and provoking sectarian strife.

It said the individuals had been found guilty according to the law and ordered executed by the Specialised Criminal Court in Riyadh, which handles terrorism trials, and the country’s high court.

Amnesty International said 11 of the men were convicted of spying for Iran and sentenced to death after a “grossly unfair trial.” At least 14 others executed were convicted of violent offences related to their participation in anti-government demonstrations in Shiite-populated areas of Saudi Arabia between 2011 and 2012.

The Interior Ministry said the body of one of the executed men Khaled bin Abdel Karim al-Tuwaijri was publicly pinned to a pole. The statement did not say in which city of Saudi Arabia the public display took place. READ MORE

Saudi Arabia executes 37 Shias on minor charges

Human rights groups have been outraged over Saudi Arabia’s execution of 37 men this week. Most of these men were of the Shia minority and were punished on terror, violence and unrest-related charges. However, their actual crimes consisted of “disrespecting authority”. Gulf Affairs Institute Director Ali Al Ahmed joins In Question to discuss the outcry with RT America’s Manila Chan.

via Saudi Arabia Publicly Executes 37 ‘Criminals’ Under Sharia Law Including Teenager Who Sent Messages Over WhatsApp To Warn People Of Government Violence — Now The End Begins

Weekend Snapshot – Top Stories This Week · Apr. 27, 2019

Mueller Is Done, but the Democrats’ MAGA Obstruction Continues

Democrats have spent the last two years using their “Russia collusion” subterfuge to undermine real progress for all Americans — and will spend the next two years doing the same thing.


Fake News About Fake News

Leftmedia outlets claim the Mueller report actually vindicates their reporting over the last two years.


Clinton the Consummate Hypocrite on ‘Obstruction’

“Any other person who had engaged in those acts would certainly have been indicted.”


Democrats Redistribute Your Income, but Keep Theirs

The most prominent 2020 presidential candidates are downright miserly with charity.


College: An Overpriced Scam

Mike Rowe argues Americans are “obsessed with credentialing,” and it’s costing kids big time.


Warren’s ‘Universal Free College’ Plan Is No Free Lunch

It’s classic Marxism: Take from the rich to pay for government wealth redistribution.


Christians Persecuted by Islamists Worldwide

But isn’t it revealing that so many folks refuse to use the word “Christian”?


Sanctuary Jurisdictions Are Not Practicing Federalism

The Ninth Circuit Court is the latest to rule against the Trump administration’s enforcement.


SCOTUS Leans Toward Census Citizenship Question

Once again the High Court looks poised to reverse a lower court’s anti-Trump ruling.


Time to Enforce the Law on Visa Overstays

Trump orders the DOJ and DHS to look for more ways to limit the number of visa overstays.


Biden Makes It 20 for 2020

The former vice president hopes to capitalize on division in a phony call for unity.



Quote Of The Week

“Christians are murdered by Muslims far, far, far more than the reverse. Yet ‘Islamophobia’ is a common term while you hardly hear anything about ‘Christophobia.’ Why do you think that is?” —Matt Walsh

Source