Daily Archives: September 28, 2019

September 28 God’s Gold Medal

Scripture Reading: John 16:31–33

Key Verses: James 1:2–3

My brethren, count it all joy when you fall into various trials, knowing that the testing of your faith produces patience.

When difficult times come into your life, what is your response? While it may seem easier to “quit while you’re ahead,” this is not the kind of attitude God wants us to demonstrate. Instead, we are to hold our heads high and press on through the pain.

This comes as a shock to many new believers. After placing their faith in Jesus, they are often surprised when some unexpected hardship appears. This reveals a terrible misconception. The Bible does not promise an easy life once we accept Jesus as Lord. In fact, the Word assures us of quite the opposite! Jesus Himself declared that if we are found in Him, the world will give us great trouble (John 16:33).

In James 1:2, we are instructed to consider our struggles as a source of “pure joy” (niv). This makes sense only when we see our difficulties through God’s eyes—as opportunities for growth. An untested faith is weak and ineffective. Just like our muscles, our faith must be exercised against some resistance. When we face these trials with wisdom and endure them with godly determination, we will find blessings we never thought possible.

At the end of the struggle, we will see God standing with our reward: the crown of life (James 1:12). This is an athletic reference—essentially, the “crown of life” is God’s gold medal for a job well done.

Do you want God’s recognition of your spiritual victory? Then press on through the hardship with assurance and perseverance.

Help me persevere with assurance, Lord. I want to receive a crown of life![1]


[1] Stanley, C. F. (2006). Pathways to his presence (p. 283). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

In Preparation for the Lord’s Day: On Christ Salvation Rests Secure — The Thirsty Theologian

On Christ Salvation Rests Secure

imageOn Christ salvation rests secure;
the Rock of Ages must endure;
nor can that faith be overthrown
which rests upon the “Living Stone.”

No other hope shall intervene;
to Him we look, on Him we lean;
other foundations we disown
and build on Christ the “Living Stone.”

In Him, it is ordained to raise
a temple to Jehovah’s praise
composed of all the saints, who own
no Savior but the “Living Stone.”

View the vast building, see it rise;
the work how great! the plan how wise!
O wondrous fabric, pow’r unknown
that rests it on the “Living Stone.”

But most adore His precious name;
His glory and His grace proclaim;
for us, condemned, despised, undone,
He gave Himself, the “Living Stone.”

Hymns to the Living God (Religious Affections Ministries, 2017).

Right tune, wrong hymn:


The current hymnal for this series is Hymns to the Living God, published by Religious Affections Ministries. This is such a good hymnal that I’m pretty sure I could happily post every hymn it contains, but I’ll be limiting selections to hymns I have never posted here before, especially those unfamiliar to me (of which there are many). For more information and to purchase this hymnal, visit Religious Affections Ministries.

via In Preparation for the Lord’s Day: On Christ Salvation Rests Secure — The Thirsty Theologian

September 28 The Making of an Encourager

Scripture Reading: 2 Corinthians 5:18–20

Key Verse: 2 Corinthians 5:20

We are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were pleading through us: we implore you on Christ’s behalf, be reconciled to God.

In 2 Corinthians, Paul outlined several responsibilities we have as believers living by the grace of God. First, we are to comfort others with the same comfort we received from God. Second, we are to be reconcilers between sinful man and holy God. In the original Greek the word reconcile denotes a change from enmity to friendship. A person exchanges his sinfulness for a life of forgiveness and grace through Jesus Christ.

How many people do you know who are lost in sin and still feel worthy of God’s love? Not many. Most have an overwhelming sense of guilt. They think there is no way for God to love them. But God loves each of us unconditionally. His forgiveness is based not on what we do right but on what Jesus did for us at Calvary.

Once saved, we become representatives of His love to people who desperately seek freedom from sin. To other believers, we are to be encouragers, committed to holding one another up in prayer and love.

Ask the Lord to guide you as you go through the day. Lay aside your judgmental attitude, and always remember you were once lost in sin until Jesus came to you through someone who was willing to share His love. Be committed to being trustworthy. When a person tells you an intimate detail, guard it with your life and refuse to betray his trust.

Father God, I want to be an encourager. Show me how to comfort others and direct them to reconcile with You.[1]


[1] Stanley, C. F. (1999). On holy ground (p. 283). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

September 28 Bearing Spiritual Fruit

Scripture reading: Galatians 5:22–25

Key verse: John 15:5

I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing.

Planning how to respond to a rival’s torts and retorts is easy enough. We can pray and try to mentally prepare ourselves to be strong in our character and take the high road. But as Christians, we realize Satan wishes to bring us down. We all have experienced the difficulty in sticking to a preconceived formula when a relationship takes another bad turn.

Ephesians 6:12 tells us that our struggle is not against flesh and blood but against spiritual forces of wickedness in high places—against Satan’s army. Don’t take your rival’s barbs personally, and don’t respond in a way that assaults his personhood. Your real contention is with an element that you can’t even see.

The strength to react in this manner is not self-generated. Instead, your capacity to respond properly to testy people in testy situations comes only from the Holy Spirit with whom you are indwelt. The power of Jesus can turn bitter water into sweet wine.

Notice that love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control are fruit of the Spirit, spelled with a capital S. It is the Spirit of Jesus within you that will prompt right responses.

John 15:5 says that ensuring proper reactions is as natural as the agricultural process: all you must do is abide in the True Vine to bear the fruit of the Spirit.

Heavenly Father, help me abide in the Vine and bear the fruit of Your Spirit. Release your love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control to flow through my life.[1]


[1] Stanley, C. F. (2000). Into His presence (p. 283). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

Russiagate and Ukrainegate Scams – Further Proof of America’s Deplorable State – Stephen Lendman

Article Image

by Stephen Lendman (stephenlendman.org – Home – Stephen Lendman)

Discredited as a scam doesn’t matter. Russiagate remains the Big Lie that won’t die — Ukrainegate following the same pattern as long as Trump remains president.

The NYT is in the vanguard of wanting Trump discredited and forced from office for triumphing over media darling Hillary — not for wars of aggression, corporate favoritism, one-sided support for Israel over Palestinian rights, and other unacceptable actions similar to policies of his predecessors.

Supporting the Ukrainegate scam, its editors headlined: “Why the Trump Impeachment Inquiry Is the Only Option,” saying:

“The peaceful transfer of presidential power through free and fair elections is the crowning glory of American democracy. It concretizes the people’s will, conferring legitimacy, assuring stability.”

Fact: Democracy in America is fake, not real. Its ruling authorities serve privileged interests exclusively, ordinary people with no say over how they’re governed.

Fact: What the self-styled newspaper of record knows and should explain, it conceals, pretending the nation’s fantasy democracy is real – what never existed from inception.

The Times: Trump’s “policymaking…assault(s) the vital institutions of governance…(P)ublic-spirited people…wondered at what point the checks and balances of American governance might have to be restored by means of the most radical check of all. That point has now been reached.”

Fact: All of the above is mean-spirited Trump bashing without substance.

Most important is no mention of his most grievous crimes of state, his imperial wars the Times and other establishment media cheerlead.

The same goes for his support for Wall Street, the military, industrial, security complex, and other predatory corporate interests. Establishment media are hostile to political figures for beneficial social change.

Trump’s disdain for working Americans went unmentioned, nothing said about the deplorable state of the economy for main street, ordinary people enduring depression conditions for over a decade, real unemployment at near-1930s levels.

Underemployment is a national catastrophe. Most employed Americans have rotten jobs, earning poverty wages, a few missed paychecks from homelessness, hunger and despair in the world’s richest country — the United States of I don’t care about its “huddled masses yearning to breathe free.”

Ukrainegate is a much ado about nothing scam. Joe Biden should have been investigated long ago.

Paul Craig Roberts explained that as Obama’s vice president, he forced Ukraine’s Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin from office over an investigation of his son Hunter’s dubious dealings as a board member of a Ukrainian company.

Shokin issued a statement, explaining that Biden “directly manipulated the political leadership of Ukraine on false pretexts…”

Roberts: He “threatened (then Ukrainian president Poroshenko), releasing one billion dollars to Poroshenko when he did Biden’s will and stopped the investigation of a firm in which Biden’s son had substantial interests.”

The NYT and other establishment media buried the story, Biden’s criminality concealed.

Shokin: “Poroshenko asked me to resign due to pressure from the (Obama regime), in particular Joe Biden.”

The vast majority of Americans know nothing about this sordid episode because establishment suppress criminality committed by their favorites — Trump targeted for winning an election he was supposed to lose.

The US Justice Department should investigate Biden, accountability long overdue for decades of wrongdoing.

Much like it served as Hillary’s press agent during the 2016 campaign, the Times fawns over Biden, earlier calling him “a levelheaded leader for a country wracked by political conflict, a rationale he believes could attract a broad cross-section of voters who want to move on from Mr. Trump,” adding:

“Mr. Biden is seen by many Democrats as a trustee of former President Barack Obama’s legacy (sic), perhaps capable of restoring the consensus-seeking liberalism (sic) of Mr. Obama’s administration.”

There’s nothing “liberal” about terror-bombing seven countries, toppling democratic governments, supporting tinpot despots, forced-feeding neoliberal harshness on America’s most disadvantaged in deference to Wall Street and other corporate interests, being the nation’s Deporter-in-Chief, institutionalizing indefinite detentions by EO, his secret kill list, appointing himself judge, jury and executioner, breaching most positive campaign promises made, disgracing the office he held for 8 years.

Biden partnered in all of the above, a war criminal, responsible for wrongdoing multiple times over, belonging in prison, not high office, Obama with him.

The Times lied calling Ukrainegate “the quintessence of an impeachable offense.”

It doesn’t remotely rise to the level of “high crimes and misdemeanors” required to remove a public figure from office.

It’s common practice in Washington, happening time and again by countless US war party members throughout the nation’s history.

Biden was caught red-handed, engaging in criminal conduct by threatening Ukraine’s president, his denial falling flat.

The Times lied, falsely claiming “no evidence of (Biden’s) wrongdoing” was found. Ukraine’s dismissed prosecutor general exposed him, his accusations buried by the broadsheet.

The Times: “(T)he law is clear that impeachment does not require a crime.”

The Constitution’s Article II, Section 4 is clear and unequivocal, stating: 

“The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The Times and other establishment media are guilty of pseudo-journalism, propaganda over news fit to print, serving powerful interests at the expense of peace, equity and justice they deplore.

As for Biden, his decades in public office exposed the true measure of the man — opposing virtually everything just societies hold dear.

He backs and continues backing all US wars of aggression, voted for the USA Patriot Act and other post-9/11 police state laws, opposed Net Neutrality in deference to communications industry donors.

He supports the devastating war on drugs, the US gulag prison system operating globally, imprisoning Blacks, Latinos, and other disadvantaged Americans en masse. 

Undemocratic Dems and establishment media consider him safe, a longtime corporate America favorite, one-sidedly supporting wealth and power, disdaining ordinary people everywhere.

“Lunch bucket Joe” is a long ago debunked ruse. There’s not a dime’s worth of difference between him and Trump except syle — an old-time establishment pol v. a a brazen billionaire businessman, now head of his party and president.

No matter which candidates represent both wings of the US war party in November 2020, dirty business as usual will triumph like always before.

— Read on stephenlendman.org/2019/09/russiagate-and-ukrainegate-scams-further-proof-of-americas-deplorable-state/

Trump begins impeachment counterattack against hypocrites, spies, and Democrats | Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion

He’s been here before with the Mueller investigation, but the stakes are even higher now

It seems House Democrats are dead set on impeaching our duly elected president and that extraordinary measures were taken to ensure there’s the smoke-and-mirrors appearance of a there there.  They are not going to have an easy time of it, however, because President Trump and his team are coming out swinging.

I’ve been watching Democrats’ most recent attempt to undo the 2016 presidential election with a mixture of disbelief, nausea, and disgust.  The double-standards and hypocrisy are staggering.

— Read on legalinsurrection.com/2019/09/trump-begins-impeachment-counterattack-against-hypocrites-spies-and-democrats/

Last week’s repo meltdown points to 2008 financial crisis & may lead to new bank crashes – Keiser Report — RT Business News

Forecasting the imminent demise of European banks, an expert talks RT’s Keiser Report through last week’s repo market meltdown and what it may indicate.

The treasuries that settled last week didn’t go well on the funding market – the Fed had to step in and do a $75 billion repo facility on an overnight basis for these treasury securities,” Nik Bhatia of OpenNode.co and Tantra Labs told RT, defining repos as repurchase agreement loans that are secured by treasury collateral.

He emphasized that while the treasury market itself is rather well-bid, the “treasury collateral was at a counter-party that other banks stopped trusting last week.”  Bhatia claims the situation is strongly reminiscent of 2008’s financial crisis, when a number of global financial heavyweights went out of business, like Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers. Asked for his prediction as to who could be knocked out next, the expert said it would likely be one of the Europeans.

Hard to speculate. My guess is that it is a European bank. We’ve seen a lot of trouble there over the last several years with the banking system. Somewhere in Germany, France or Switzerland,” Bhatia claimed.

— Read on www.rt.com/business/469838-keiser-repo-treasury-banks/

Charismatic And Emergent Churches Embracing New Age Paganism As Occultic Practice Of The Enneagram Replacing Teaching Of Bible Doctrine — Now The End Begins

Matt Brown, founding and lead pastor of Sandals charismatic Church in Riverside, California, recently defended why he uses the Enneagram as a tool in his sermons.

With each passing month, all the skinny jeans-wearing ‘pastors’ who now run the charismatic and emergent churches across America dive deeper and deeper into apostasy and paganism, and dragging their congregations down with them. And don’t lightly dismiss these people, either. These man-bun pastors run churches that comprise the largest section of professing Christianity certainly here in America, and perhaps around the world as well. Meet Matt Brown, pastor of the charismatic Sandals church in California, he wants you to listen to his nine-week sermonon how the enneagram, a tool of the ancient pagan mystics, can ‘radically transform’ your spirit life.

  • “Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;” 1 Timothy 4:1,2 (KJV)
  • “Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first” 1 Thessalonians 2:3 (KJV)

The falling away is happening right here and right now, the very same one that our apostle Paul foretold us of 2,000 years ago. Yes, we are thatclose to experiencing the Pretribulation Rapture of the Church, and as we wait for that Voice Like A Trumpet, we are watching the Church that Jesus shed His own blood to start crumbling like stale bread in the noonday sun. If your church teaches the Enneagram, get out of it and find a real church that stands on the authority of the King James Bible, and preaches Bible doctrine rightly divided. Or you can put on some skinny jeans, grow a man bun, and renew your membership in the Church of Laodicea that Jesus will spue from His mouth shortly. The choice is up to you.

‘Spirit-Filled’ Pastor Defends Why He’s Preaching About the Enneagram

FROM CHARISMA MAGAZINE: Last year, Brown preached a nine-week sermon series based on the Enneagram, and for the last three weeks he has discussed the Enneagram from the pulpit as a component of Sandals’ “Relational Remix” series.

The Enneagram is a personality system that posits there are nine basic personality types. The Enneagram has become widely popular in some Christian circles within the past few years, but the system’s origins are somewhat disputed. Some credit it to Christian mystics from the fourth century, while others attribute it to pagan, Eastern or psychoanalytic sources.

In an online video of his sermon, Brown says whether the Enneagram has pagan or Eastern roots does not change his feelings about including it in sermons.

“You don’t have to be a believer to have information,” Brown says. “You just have to be a believer to be saved. The Bible reveals how God can use non-Christians and their wisdom to help us become real with ourselves. When I tell people we’re studying the Enneagram, they [go], ‘Oh my gosh, that’s pagan. That’s Eastern.’ Yeah, do you know what the Bible’s full of? Pagan and Eastern non-believers that God uses repeatedly to point out his truth. And do you know why that is? A broken clock is right twice a day.”

Brown points out that in Titus 1:12, Paul cites a pagan philosopher and false prophet to make a point about the Cretan people. He says this show that God will use a right point regardless of the source. In the same way, he says the Enneagram is a useful tool, regardless of its origins.

“People say, ‘Well, you can’t use the Enneagram—it’s Eastern,’” Brown says. “If God could use magicians from the East to point out Jesus, he can use the Enneagram to point out you.”

Brown says that while some people will misuse it, he likes the Enneagram because it ultimately helped save his marriage and his ministry from the brink of collapse. He says God used the Enneagram to help him see himself, others and God in a fresh way, and he just wants to do the same thing for his church.

“My prayer for you is that God would use this to bless your life, because in order to change your life, in order to become what’s right, you need to see what’s wrong,” Brown says. “And the Enneagram gives you lenses to see what you’re doing that’s wrong.”

Watch the video to hear Brown’s full explanation of the Enneagram, the nine types and how understanding it can help your spiritual walk with God. READ MORE

Using the Enneagram to Change the Way I Relate | Sandals Church

FROM THEIR YOUTUBE PAGE: Do some of your relationships need a remix? Are you doing the same thing over and over again and hoping for a different outcome? In this message, Pastor Matt explains why a church is using the enneagram and how it can help change our relationships. (SPOILER ALERT: Matt Brown is teaching New Age paganism. You’re welcome.)

via Charismatic And Emergent Churches Embracing New Age Paganism As Occultic Practice Of The Enneagram Replacing Teaching Of Bible Doctrine — Now The End Begins

Saturday Sampler: September 23 — September 28 — The Outspoken TULIP

Everything you need to know about social media memes  can be learned from Michelle Lesley in her post, Memeology 101. It’s somewhat lighthearted, yet it offers helpful guidelines for reading and sharing memes.

In her blog, Growing 4 Life, Leslie A contrasts Real Christianity with cultural Christianity. I love the way she bases everything on the Word of God.

Women, as well as men, gave their lives as martyrs as a result of the Reformation. Lady Jane Grey, for example, was beheaded for refusing to participate in the Roman Catholic Mass. Christina of Heavenly Springs shares Lady Jane Grey’s Letter to Her Sister on the Eve of Her Execution as a tribute to the Word of God. You might also read Encouragement from a Reformers Wife. The ladies of the 16th Century were definitely not wimps!

Writing for Parking Space 23,  Zach Putthoff lists 8 Truths About Speech & the Christian Life by drawing practical principles from James 2:2-12.

John Ellis often uses adayinhiscourt to say things that Christian adults don’t want to hear — but need to know. Youth Group Lock-Ins: Proof of Adults’ Naivety (or Their Bad Memory) isn’t a  comforting article, but parents really ought to read it.

Let’s have a second post from Michelle Lesley. Throwback Thursday – Wise to the Ways of the Worldly: 4 Ways Worldliness Sneaks In, and the Scriptures to Slay It may not be  as fun as Memeology 101, but every one of us needs its message.

As a contributor to The Cripplegate, Jesse Johnson walks us through 3 steps to understanding a tricky passage (cf. John 20:23). Employing these steps might help you develop godly discernment, thereby strengthening you against false teaching.

Do you know How to hear God’s voice 100% of the time? If  not, consider Elizabeth Prata’s essay in The End Time as a helpful guide to discerning when He is speaking. I can guarantee that, if you follow her counsel — which she borrows from Chris Rosebrough — you’ll never struggle to discern God’s voice again.

Note: next Saturday Justin Peters will be at First Baptist Church Weymouth (where John and I are members) leading a Discernment Conference. Because of this conference, I won’t be posting either a Saturday Sampler or a Sunday Hymn next weekend. I apologize for any inconvenience.

via Saturday Sampler: September 23 — September 28 — The Outspoken TULIP

September 28, 2019 Afternoon Verse Of The Day

The Groaning of Believers

And not only this, but also we ourselves, having the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our body. For in hope we have been saved, but hope that is seen is not hope; for why does one also hope for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, with perseverance we wait eagerly for it. (8:23–25)

Not only does the natural creation groan for deliverance from the destructive consequences of sin into the promised new universe, but also we ourselves, that is, believers. It is the redemption of believers that is central to God’s ultimate cosmic regeneration, because believers—as His own children, redeemed and adopted into His heavenly family in response to their faith in His beloved Son, Jesus Christ—are the heirs of His glorious, eternal, and righteous kingdom.

Every true believer agonizes at times over the appalling manifestations and consequences of sin—in his own life, in the lives of others, and even in the natural world. Because we have the first fruits of the Spirit, we are spiritually sensitized to the corruption of sin in and around us.

Because the Holy Spirit now indwells us, His work in us and through us is a type of spiritual first fruits. They are a foretaste of the glory that awaits us in heaven, when our corrupted and mortal bodies are exchanged for ones that are incorruptible and immortal. Although we will not be totally free of sin’s power as long as we are in our present bodies, the Lord has given us complete victory over the dominion and bondage of sin. When we experience the Holy Spirit’s empowering us to turn from iniquity and to truly worship, serve, obey and love God, we have a taste of the future completed and perfected renewal He will work in us at the resurrection.

Because every genuine believer is indwelt by the Holy Spirit (Rom. 8:9), every genuine believer will to some degree manifest the fruit of the Spirit that Paul enumerates in Galatians 5:22–23, namely, “love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control.” Every time we see Him working His righteousness in and through us, we yearn all the more to be freed of our remaining sin and spiritual weakness. Because of our divinely-bestowed sensitivity to sin, we ourselves groan within ourselves over the dreadful curse of sin that is still manifested by our remaining humanness.

Acknowledging his own sinfulness, David cried out, “My iniquities are gone over my head; as a heavy burden they weigh too much for me, … Lord, all my desire is before Thee; and my sighing is not hidden from Thee. My heart throbs, my strength fails me; and the light of my eyes, even that has gone from me” (Ps. 38:4, 9–10).

Paul grieved over the remnants of his humanness that clung to him like a rotten garment that could not be cast off. That reality brought him great spiritual frustration and anguish. “Wretched man that I am!” he lamented, “Who will set me free from the body of this death?” (Rom. 7:24). In another epistle he reminds all believers of their same plight: “For indeed while we are in this tent, we groan, being burdened, because we do not want to be unclothed, but to be clothed, in order that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life” (2 Cor. 5:4). As long as we are in the “tent” of our human body, we will never fully escape sin’s corruption in our lives. That truth causes Christians to suffer times of deep inner distress over the debilitating sinfulness that still clings to them.

As believers, we therefore find ourselves waiting eagerly in anticipation of our adoption as sons, the redemption of our body. The New Testament speaks of believers as those who are already the adopted children of God, but whose adoption awaits ultimate perfection. Just as there is never salvation that is not completed, neither is there divine adoption that is never completed. A child of God need never fear that he might be cast out of his spiritual family or never enter his heavenly home.

Puritan pastor Thomas Watson said,

The godly may act faintly in religion, the pulse of their affections may beat low. The exercise of grace may be hindered, as when the course of water is stopped. Instead of grace working in the godly, corruption may work; instead of patience, murmuring; instead of heavenliness, earthliness.… Thus lively and vigorous may corruption be in the regenerate; they may fall into enormous sins.… [But] though their grace may be drawn low, it is not drawn dry; though grace may be abated, it is not abolished.… Grace may suffer an eclipse, not a dissolution.… a believer may fall from some degrees of grace, but not from the state of grace. (A Body of Divinity [reprint, Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, 1974], pp. 280, 284–85)

Scripture teaches that the believer’s salvation is secured by God the Father, by the Son, and by the Holy Spirit. Referring to God the Father, Paul assured the Corinthians, “He who establishes us with you in Christ and anointed us is God, who also sealed us and gave us the Spirit in our hearts as a pledge” (2 Cor. 1:21–22; cf. 2 Tim. 2:19). The Father not only grants salvation to those who trust in His Son but also seals their salvation and gives the indwelling Holy Spirit as the guarantor. “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,” Peter declared, “who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you, who are protected by the power of God through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time” (1 Pet. 1:3–5). Although persevering faith is indispensable to salvation, Peter emphasizes that, by God the Father’s own initiative and power, He “caused us to be born again” and in that same power He sustains us toward the inheritance that our new birth brings, an inheritance that is “imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away.” It is divinely “reserved in heaven” for each believer, who is divinely preserved to receive it. Whoever belongs to God belongs to Him forever.

In order to point up the absolute and incontrovertible security of those who trust in Jesus Christ, the writer of Hebrews declared, “In the same way God, desiring even more to show to the heirs of the promise the unchangeableness of His purpose, interposed with an oath, in order that by two unchangeable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie, we may have strong encouragement, we who have fled for refuge in laying hold of the hope set before us. This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, a hope both sure and steadfast and one which enters within the veil” (Heb. 6:17–19).

God the Son also secures the believer’s salvation. “All that the Father gives Me shall come to Me,” Jesus declared, “and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not cast out” (John 6:37). Paul assured the Corinthian church, which had more than its share of immature and disobedient believers, that “even as the testimony concerning Christ was confirmed in you, so that you are not lacking in any gift, awaiting eagerly the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ, who shall also confirm you to the end, blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Cor. 1:6–8; cf. Col. 1:22). In other words, their relationship to Christ not only had been confirmed when they were justified but would remain confirmed by the Lord Himself until their glorification at His return (cf. 1 Thess. 3:13). Later in that epistle Paul reminds us that “faithful is He who calls you, and He also will bring it to pass” (1 Thess. 5:24). The ongoing, mediatorial, intercessory work of Jesus Christ in heaven unalterably secures our eternal reward.

God the Spirit also secures the believer’s salvation, by a work that Scripture sometimes refers to as the Spirit’s sealing. In ancient times, the seal, or signet, was a mark of authenticity or of a completed transaction. The seal of a monarch or other distinguished person represented his authority and power. For example, when Daniel was thrown into the den of lions, King Darius had a large stone placed across the entrance and sealed “with his own signet ring and with the signet rings of his nobles, so that nothing might be changed in regard to Daniel” (Dan. 6:17). In an infinitely more significant and spiritual way, the Holy Spirit seals the salvation of every believer, which, by divine promise and protection, can never be altered.

Paul assured the Corinthian believers that “He who establishes us with you in Christ and anointed us is God, who also sealed us and gave us the Spirit in our hearts as a pledge” (2 Cor. 1:21–22). In similar words, he assured the Ephesians that “In Him [Christ], you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation—having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise” (Eph. 1:13; cf. 4:30).

The ideas of partial or temporary salvation not only are foreign to the teaching of Scripture but completely contradict it. No true believer need ever fear loss of salvation. At the moment of conversion his soul is redeemed, purified, and eternally secured in God’s family and kingdom.

Believers should be concerned about sin in their lives, but not because they might sin themselves out of God’s grace. Because of God’s promise and power, that is impossible. Until we are glorified and fully liberated from sin through the redemption of our body, we still have unredeemed bodies that make it very much possible for sin to harm us and to grieve our Lord. As the term is often used in the New Testament, body is not limited to a person’s physical being but relates to the whole of his unredeemed humanness, in particular to the remaining susceptibility to sin.

It is only the body, the mortal humanness of a believer, that is yet to be redeemed. The inner person is already a completely new creation, a partaker of God’s nature and indwelt by God’s Spirit. “Therefore if any man is in Christ,” Paul says, “he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come” (2 Cor. 5:17). Peter assures us that God’s “divine power has granted to us everything pertaining to life and godliness, through the true knowledge of Him who called us by His own glory and excellence. For by these He has granted to us His precious and magnificent promises, in order that by them you might become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world by lust” (2 Pet. 1:3–4).

Because believers are already new creatures possessing the divine nature, their souls are fit for heaven and eternal glory. They love God, hate sin, and have holy longings for obedience to the Word. But while on earth they are kept in bondage by their mortal bodies, which are still corrupted by sin and its consequences. Christians are holy seeds, as it were, encased in an unholy shell. Incarcerated in a prison of flesh and subjected to its weaknesses and imperfections, we therefore eagerly await an event that is divinely guaranteed but is yet to transpire—the redemption of our body.

Paul has already explained that “if we [believers] have become united with Him [Christ] in the likeness of His death, certainly we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection, knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him, that our body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves to sin” (Rom. 6:5–6). The old man with his old sinful nature is dead, but the corrupted body in which he dwelt is still present. That is why, a few verses later, Paul admonishes believers not to “let sin reign in your mortal body that you should obey its lusts” and not to “go on presenting the members of your body to sin as instruments of unrighteousness; but present yourselves to God as those alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God” (vv. 12–13). Because we are still capable of sinning, we should be continually on guard to resist and overcome sin in the Spirit’s power (vv. 14–17).

Paul also has already explained “that the Law is spiritual; but I am of flesh, sold into bondage to sin. For that which I am doing, I do not understand; for I am not practicing what I would like to do, but I am doing the very thing I hate” (Rom. 7:14–15). “But if I do the very thing I do not wish to do,” he continues, “I agree with the Law, confessing that it is good. So now, no longer am I the one doing it, but sin which indwells me. For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh; for the wishing is present in me, but the doing of the good is not” (vv. 16–18).

It is encouragingly hopeful for Christians to realize that their falling into sin does not have its source in their deepest inner being, their new and holy nature in Christ. When they sin, they do so because of the desires and promptings of the flesh—that is, their bodies, their remaining humanness—which they cannot escape until they go to be with the Lord. Summing up that vital truth, Paul said, “Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, on the one hand I myself with my mind am serving the law of God, but on the other, with my flesh the law of sin” (Rom. 7:25).

As noted above, our souls are already fully redeemed and are fit for heaven. But the fleshly, outer clothing of the old, sinful person is still corrupted and awaits redemption. “For our citizenship is in heaven,” Paul explains, “from which also we eagerly wait for a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ; who will transform the body of our humble state into conformity with the body of His glory, by the exertion of the power that He has even to subject all things to Himself” (Phil. 3:20–21).

It is hardly possible not to wonder what kind of resurrected and redeemed body believers will have in heaven, but it is foolish to speculate about it apart from what Scripture teaches. Anticipating such curiosity, Paul told the Corinthians:

Someone will say, “How are the dead raised? And with what kind of body do they come?” You fool! That which you sow does not come to life unless it dies; and that which you sow, you do not sow the body which is to be, but a bare grain, perhaps of wheat or of something else. But God gives it a body just as He wished, and to each of the seeds a body of its own. All flesh is not the same flesh, but there is one flesh of men, and another flesh of beasts, and another flesh of birds, and another of fish. There are also heavenly bodies and earthly bodies, but the glory of the heavenly is one, and the glory of the earthly is another. There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for star differs from star in glory. (1 Cor. 15:35–41)

Paul’s point in the first analogy is that a seed bears no resemblance to the plant or tree into which it will grow. As far as size is concerned, some relatively large seeds produce small plants, whereas some smaller seeds produce large trees. Many different kinds of seed look much alike, and the total variety of seeds has yet to be calculated. If given a handful of seeds that were all different and came from various parts of the world, not even an experienced farmer, much less the average person, could identify all of them. Not until it is sown and the resulting plant begins to mature can the kind of seed be accurately identified. The same principle applies in relation to our natural and spiritual bodies. We cannot possibly determine what our future spiritual bodies will be like by looking at our present physical bodies. We will have to wait to see.

Paul also points out the obvious fact that animate creatures vary widely in their appearance and nature, and that, without exception, like produces like. The genetic code of every living species is distinct and unique. No amount of attempted interbreeding or change of diet can turn a fish into a bird, or a horse into a dog or cat.

There is also variety in the heavenly bodies, an immeasurably greater variety than people in Paul’s day were aware of. The apostle’s point in mentioning the animals and heavenly bodies seems to be that of calling attention to the vast magnitude and variation of God’s creation and to the inability of man even to come close to comprehending it.

The Bible discloses very little about the nature of a believer’s resurrected body. Paul goes on to tell the Corinthians, “So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown a perishable body, it is raised an imperishable body; it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power: it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body” (1 Cor. 15:42–44).

Because we will ultimately be like Christ, we know that our resurrected bodies will be like His. As noted above, Paul assures us that, “if we have become united with Him in the likeness of His death, certainly we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection” (Rom. 6:5). In his epistle to Philippi he explains further that our Lord “will transform the body of our humble state into conformity with the body of His glory, by the exertion of the power that He has even to subject all things to Himself” (Phil. 3:21).

During the period between His resurrection and ascension, Jesus’ body still bore the physical marks of His crucifixion (John 20:20) and He was able to eat (Luke 24:30), He still looked like Himself, yet even His closest disciples could not recognize Him unless He allowed them to (Luke 24:13–16, 30–31; John 20:14–16). He could be touched and felt (John 20:17, 27), yet He could appear and disappear in an instant and could pass through closed doors (John 20:19, 26).

Although our redeemed bodies will in some way be like Christ’s, we will not know exactly what they will be like until we meet our Savior face to face (1 John 3:2). Paul’s primary purpose in 1 Corinthians 15 and Romans 8 is to emphasize that our resurrected bodies, regardless of their form, appearance, or capabilities, will be sinless, righteous, and immortal.

He continues to explain that in hope we have been saved. Hope is inseparable from salvation. Our salvation was planned by God in ages past, bestowed in the present, and is now characterized by hope for its future completion.

The believer’s hope is not based on wishful thinking or probability, but on the integrity of the clear promises of the Lord. As already cited above, “All that the Father gives Me shall come to Me,” Jesus declared, “and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not cast out” (John 6:37). Our hope is not that we might not lose our salvation but that, by our Lord’s own guarantee, we cannot and will not lose it.

The writer of Hebrews assures us that “God, desiring even more to show to the heirs of the promise the unchangeableness of His purpose, interposed with an oath, in order that by two unchangeable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie, we may have strong encouragement, we who have fled for refuge in laying hold of the hope set before us. This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, a hope both sure and steadfast and one which enters within the veil” (Heb. 6:17–19). Paul refers to our hope of salvation as a helmet, symbolizing our divine protection from the blows of doubt that Satan sends to crush our hope (1 Thess. 5:8).

As Jesus made clear in the parable of the wheat and tares (Matt. 13) and in the story of the fruitless branches (John 15), there will always be some who bear the name of Christ who do not genuinely belong to Him. And, by the same token, there are true believers whose lives sometimes give little evidence of salvation. But as we shall continue to see to the end of this chapter, the Word of God is unequivocal in declaring that everyone who is saved by Jesus Christ will forever belong to Him. Although it is quite possible for a sinful Christian to struggle with the assurance of salvation and with the joy and comfort which that assurance brings, it is not possible for him to lose salvation itself.

It is true, on the other hand, that the completion of our salvation is presently a hope and not yet a reality. Explaining the obvious, Paul states the axiomatic truth that hope that is seen is not hope; for why does one also hope for what he sees? In other words, in this life we cannot expect to experience the reality of our glorification but only the hope of it. But since the believer’s hope is based on God’s promise, the completion of his salvation is more certain by far than anything he sees with his eyes. As we shall see later, the believer’s salvation is so secure that his glorification is spoken of in the past tense (see Rom. 8:30).

Therefore, Paul continues, if we hope for what we do not see, with perseverance we wait eagerly for it. “For I am confident of this very thing,” Paul assured the Thessalonian believers, “that He who began a good work in you will perfect it until the day of Christ Jesus” (Phil. 1:6). Because salvation is completely God’s work and because He cannot lie, it is absolutely impossible for us to lose what He has given us and promises never to take away. It is in light of that absolute certainty that Peter admonishes: “Gird your minds for action, keep sober in spirit, fix your hope completely on the grace to be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ” (1 Pet. 1:13). It is for their faithfully holding to that hope that Paul commends the Thessalonians, assuring them that he, Silvanus, and Timothy were “constantly bearing in mind [their] work of faith and labor of love and steadfastness of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ in the presence of our God and Father, knowing, brethren beloved by God, His choice of you” (1 Thess. 1:3–4). In other words, our certainty of salvation does not rest in our choosing God but in His choosing us, even “before the foundation of the world” (Eph. 1:4).[1]

The Redemption of Our Bodies

Romans 8:22–25

We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time. Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies. For in this hope we were saved. But hope that is seen is no hope at all. Who hopes for what he already has? But if we hope for what we do not yet have, we wait for it patiently.

In the passage of Romans 8 that begins with verse 22, and (in the following paragraph) ends with verse 27, we find a word that is repeated three times and yet is found nowhere else in this letter. In fact, it is found only six more times in the entire New Testament. It is the Greek word stenazō (variants, sustenazō and stenagmos), and it is translated “groan” (v. 23), “groans” (v. 26), and “groaning” (v. 22). The interesting thing is that it is applied to three different entities in these verses: to creation, to ourselves, and to the Holy Spirit.

Of creation Paul says, “We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time” (v. 22).

Of ourselves he says, “Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies” (v. 23).

Of the Holy Spirit he says, “… We do not know what we ought to pray for, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groans that words cannot express” (v. 26).

Two of these references are hard to understand. Since Paul is thinking of the inanimate creation and not men, angels, or demons in verse 22, it is hard to imagine how mere matter or even plants or animals can be conceived of as groaning. It is also difficult to envision the Holy Spirit’s groans, though for different reasons. The one part of these verses that is not difficult to understand is our groaning, since groaning is a part of daily life with which almost anyone can easily identify.

Still, we need to see two things about this human groaning if we are to understand the verses to which we now come.

First, the groaning mentioned in verse 23 is that of believers in Jesus Christ and not that of all people generally. Paul makes this explicit when he writes that “we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly.” I do not think this excludes the kind of groanings that Christians share with other people, expressions of grief caused by physical suffering or the loss of a loved one, for instance. But it means more. Christians grieve over the presence of sin in their lives, which unbelievers do not. In fact, believers grieve for sin increasingly as they grow in Christ. Christians also groan as the result of persecutions suffered for the sake of their life and witness, and this is also different from what non-Christians experience.

Second, the groaning of Christians is not mere grief over the things I mentioned. It is expectant grief, that is, grief that looks forward to a time when all that is causing pain will be removed and salvation will be consummated. Christian groaning is a joyful grief that gives birth to a sure hope and patient endurance.

The passage itself shows this, since hope and patience are the notes on which the verses end. But there is also a powerful image at the start of this paragraph that shows how the groans of Christians are to be interpreted. Paul uses the image of childbirth: “… the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth” (v. 22), adding that “we ourselves … [also] groan” (v. 23). This is an important analogy, because it points beyond the cause of grief to its joyful consummation. The pains of childbirth are real pains, severe ones. But they are not endless; they last only for a time. Nor are they hopeless. On the contrary, they are filled with joyful expectation, since under normal circumstances they climax in the birth of a child.

Paul is saying that our griefs as Christians are like that. We groan, but we do so in expectation of a safe delivery.

Groans and Glory

This is a thoughtful continuation of the arguments Paul has been working out since the beginning of Romans 8. The theme of the chapter is the Christian’s assurance that he or she has been saved by Christ and will be kept in this salvation by the love and power of God the Father.

The first part of the chapter distinguished between those who are truly saved and those who are not. Paul was aware of the dangers of presumption, of claiming an assurance that one has no right to unless one’s conduct shows that the Spirit of Jesus Christ really is within. But having made that point—that those who are Christ’s will live for Christ—Paul then got into his major argument, showing that true Christians can know they are saved and be confident in that assurance. We have seen that there are four proofs: (1) the fact that those who are Christians really do live for Christ; (2) the internal sense Christians have of being members of God’s family; (3) the Holy Spirit’s direct witness with our spirits; and (4) suffering. Paul said, “Now if we are children, then we are heirs—heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory” (v. 17).

But that is a problem, as we saw when we studied that verse. Sufferings? We would think that it would be the absence of sufferings, not their presence, that would prove we belong to Christ. If God loves us, shouldn’t he keep us from suffering? Or isn’t he able to? When things get hard it is natural that we begin to doubt God’s favor rather than being assured of it.

That, of course, is why Paul has digressed to talk about suffering and why he is talking about our groanings now. It is why he has explained the involvement of creation in our present distress. What he is saying is that the sufferings we and “the whole creation” endure are the sufferings of childbirth and are therefore proof that the new age is coming. And it is why, although we do groan, we do not groan hopelessly. On the contrary, our groanings intensify our hope and enable us to wait patiently for the consummation.

The Resurrection of the Body

These verses also do something else that is important. They give substance to the Christian hope. That is, they begin to flesh out the main features of the consummation for which we are waiting. In verse 23 this is done by means of three word pictures or images: (1) “the firstfruits of the Spirit,” (2) “our adoption as sons,” and (3) “the redemption of our bodies.” It is easiest to take them in reverse order.

What does Paul mean by the redemption of our bodies? This is an easy question to answer: he means the resurrection, the chief element in the hope of Christians.

This is an important idea to bring in at this point for at least two reasons. First, Paul has been talking about our sufferings, and it is chiefly in our bodies that we experience them. Physical suffering, whether from illness or abuse inflicted by persecutors, is experienced in the body. And there is even a sense in which psychological wounds are physical, though we do not usually think of them that way. We experience them in our minds, which are hard to distinguish from mere brain matter and neurological connections, but the effects are often directly physiological since they are seen in such things as sleeplessness, ulcers, hypertension, and other maladies.

Second, we are our bodies, as well as our spirits and souls. Therefore, salvation must include our bodies if it is to be complete.

Suppose someone should ask you, “Are you saved?” How would you answer? As a Christian it would be proper to answer in three ways. You could say, “Yes, I have been saved.” In that case, you would be pointing back to the death of Jesus Christ on your behalf and to that past work of the Holy Spirit in turning you from a path of sin and joining you to Jesus. You could also say, “I am being saved.” If you said that, you would be pointing to the continuing work of the Holy Spirit in your life, much as Paul did in the earlier part of this chapter. You would be thinking of the Spirit’s work of sanctification. Finally, you could also say, “I am going to be saved.” In that case, you would be thinking of the resurrection, when the work of God—begun by the death of Christ and continued by the work of the Holy Spirit in joining you to Jesus and sanctifying you—will be completed. Paul is thinking of that consummation here.

But there is one more question directly related to our text. Paul is writing about the Christian’s resurrection, but that is not the word he uses to refer to it. He calls it “the redemption of our bodies.” Redemption usually refers to the work of Christ in delivering us from sin’s bondage by his death. Why does Paul use “redemption” instead of “resurrection” here?

Robert Haldane, one of the best of all commentators on Romans, suggests an interesting answer:

When this term is … used, it commonly denotes two things—the one, that the deliverance spoken of is effected in a manner glorious and conspicuous, exhibiting the greatest effort of power; the other, that it is a complete deliverance, placing us beyond all danger. On this ground, then, it is evident that no work is better entitled to the appellation of redemption than that of the reestablishment of our bodies, which will be an illustrious effect of the infinite power of God. It is the work of the Lord of nature—of him who holds in his hands the keys of life and death. His light alone can dispel the darkness of the tomb. It is only his hand that can break its seal and its silence. On this account the apostle appeals, with an accumulation of terms, to the exceeding greatness of the power of God to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power, which he wrought in Christ when he raised him from the dead (Eph. 1:19, 20).

It is no wonder that we groan in these bodies. They are the seat of physical weakness, on the one hand, and of our sinful natures, on the other. But we groan in hope, knowing that these weak and sinful bodies are going to be transformed into bodies that are strong, sinless, and glorious, like the resurrection body of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Our Adoption as Sons

The second image that Paul offers of our sure hope of future glory is “adoption,” speaking of “our adoption as sons.” This is the same word that we have already seen in verse 15, where it was translated “sonship.”

But that creates a problem. In verse 15 our adoption was treated as something that has already taken place. That is the way we considered it when we were at that point in the chapter. I spoke of our having been taken out of the family of Satan and having been brought into the family of God. It corresponds to the way a young couple today might adopt a child who has no parents or has parents who are unable to care for him or her. But in verse 23 adoption is treated as something still in the future, something for which “we wait eagerly.” How can adoption be both past and future at the same time?

The answer, of course, is that the word is used in two senses. In one sense we have already received our adoption, since we have been brought into God’s family. Nothing is ever going to change that family relationship. Yet in a second sense we still wait for our adoption, because we do not yet enjoy all its privileges.

I am convinced that when Paul speaks of “our adoption as sons” in verse 23, he is thinking of the special Roman custom of adoption and not of what we usually think of when someone uses that word. The Romans (as well as the Greeks) had adoption in our sense, that is, when a child is taken out of one family and is placed into another. But the Romans also had an important ceremony in which the son of a leading Roman family would be acknowledged publicly as the son and heir. It corresponded somewhat to the Jews’ bar mitzvah, when a Jewish boy becomes a “son of the covenant,” though among Romans it was less religious and more a matter of adulthood and the right of inheritance.

In the opening pages of Lloyd C. Douglas’s religious novel The Robe, the young daughter of the Gallio family, Lucia, is reflecting on the day her brother Marcellus was adopted in such a ceremony. Marcellus was seventeen years old. Douglas writes, “What a wonderful day that was, with all their good friends assembled in the Forum to see Marcellus—clean-shaven for the first time in his life—step forward to receive his white toga. Cornelius Capito and Father had made speeches, and then they had put the white toga on Marcellus. Lucia had been so proud and happy that her heart had pounded and her throat had hurt, though she was only nine then, and couldn’t know much about the ceremony except that Marcellus was expected to act like a man now—though sometimes he forgot to.”

Later Marcellus describes the occasion to a friend named Paulus: “When a Roman of our sort comes of age, Paulus, there is an impressive ceremony by which we are inducted into manhood.… Well do I remember—the thrill of it abides with me still—how all of our relatives and friends assembled, that day, in the stately Forum Julium. My father made an address, welcoming me into Roman citizenship. It was as if I had never lived until that hour. I was so deeply stirred, Paulus, that my eyes swam with tears. And then good old Cornelius Capito made a speech, a very serious one, about Rome’s right to my loyalty, my courage, and my strength. I knew that tough old Capito had a right to talk of such matters, and I was proud that he was there! They beckoned to me, and I stepped forward. Capito and my father put the white toga on me—and life had begun!”

As I say, I am convinced that this is what Paul has in mind in verse 23. You will recall that earlier he had spoken of our being “heirs of God and co-heirs of Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings” (v. 17). We are sharing in the sufferings now, but the day is coming when we shall enter into the full rights of our inheritance in glory.

Firstfruits and the Full Harvest

The third picture of the consummation to which believers in Christ are moving is a harvest, suggested by the words “firstfruits of the Spirit.” This does not refer to the fruit of the Spirit, as Paul does in Galatians (“But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control,” Gal. 5:22–23). It refers to the Holy Spirit himself as the “firstfruits,” which is a harvest image drawn from Jewish life.

The custom is described in Leviticus 23:9–14, which says in part, “When you enter the land I am going to give you and you reap its harvest, bring to the priest a sheaf of the first grain you harvest. He is to wave the sheaf before the Lord so it will be accepted on your behalf; the priest is to wave it on the day after the Sabbath” (vv. 10, 11). The portion of the harvest presented to the priest was called the firstfruits, and it was in the nature of an offering that consecrated the entire harvest. In this Old Testament ceremony the firstfruits were something the devout Jewish worshiper gave God. But in the New Testament Paul usually reverses this and speaks of the firstfruits as what God gives us as an earnest or down payment on the full blessings to come.

The full blessing is the harvest, a joyful time for which those who labor are willing to endure great hardship.

John Stott sums this up by saying, “So the Holy Spirit, who is the Spirit of sonship and makes us the children of God (v. 15), and then witnesses with our spirit that we are God’s children (v. 16), is also himself the pledge of our complete adoption to be the sons of God, when our bodies are redeemed.” In this, as also in the development of the other two themes, we are reminded of some of the things Paul said earlier.

Hope and Patient Endurance

At the beginning of this study I discussed the word groan, pointing out that it is used of the creation, ourselves, and the Holy Spirit. I said that the usage we understand best is our own groaning, since we groan in our bodily weakness and fleshly sins. But groaning is not the only thing Paul says we do. He also says that “we hope” (v. 25) and “we wait” (vv. 23, 25), adding in the later case that we do it both “eagerly” and “patiently.”

  1. We hope. Hope is one of the very great words of the Christian vocabulary, occurring in such important phrases as our “blessed hope” (Titus 2:13) and “the hope of glory” (Col. 1:27). It is one of the three great virtues listed in 1 Corinthians 13:13 (“These three remain: faith, hope and love”). Paul has already written about hope in Romans 5: “… we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not disappoint us, because God has poured out his love into our hearts by the Holy Spirit, whom he has given us” (vv. 3–5).

The word hope has two senses: (1) an attitude of hopefulness, and (2) the content of that for which we hope. Both uses of the word occur in our text, the idea of content in verse 24 (“in this hope we were saved”) and the attitude of hopefulness in verses 24 and 25 (“we hope”).

What is striking about the Christian attitude of hopefulness is that it is a “sure and certain hope” and not mere wishful thinking. What makes it sure and certain is the content. The specific content is the return of Jesus Christ together with the things we have been mentioning in these verses: the resurrection of the body, the adoption of God’s children, and the gathering of God’s harvest. These things are all promised to us by God. Hence, the Christian hopes in confidence, a confidence grounded not in the strength of one’s emotional outlook but on the sure Word of God, who cannot lie. If God says that these things are coming, it is reasonable and safe for us to hope confidently in them.

  1. We wait. More specifically, we wait for them, which is the second verb Paul uses. Verse 23 says, “We wait eagerly.” Verse 25 says, “We wait … patiently.” It is important to take the two adverbs together, because biblical “patience” is not passivity. This is an active, though patient waiting. It expresses itself in vigorous service for Christ even while we wait for his appearing.

The word eagerly makes us think of the creation waiting “in eager expectation for the sons of God to be revealed,” which Paul introduced in verse 19, though the Greek words are not the same. In verse 19 Paul pictured creation standing on tiptoe, as it were, looking forward with outstretched neck in eager anticipation of the consummation. It is a grand picture, and it is what we are to be doing, too. It is one mark of a true Christian.

Here is how D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones puts it:

Hope is the measure of true Christianity, which is through and through other-worldly. Pseudo-Christianity always looks chiefly at this world. Popular Christianity is entirely this-worldly and is not interested in the other world. But true Christianity has its eye mainly on the world which is to come. It is not primarily concerned even with deliverance from hell, and punishment, and all the things that trouble us and weary us. That really belongs to the past. True Christianity “sets its affection on things which are above, not on things which are on the earth.” It is that which says, “We look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal” (2 Cor. 4:17, 18).

Paradoxically, of course, it is only these heavenly-minded people who are able to make any real or lasting difference in the world.[2]

25 Whether to translate διʼ ὑπομονῆς, di’ hypomonēs (GK 5705), as “with perseverance” (so NASB), “patiently” (so NIV; cf. NRSV), or “with fortitude” is a difficult decision. If God’s promise is chiefly in view (cf. Abraham in 4:18), then “patiently” is appropriate, but if the hardships and sufferings that remain to be faced are in view (note the emphasis on suffering in the context), then the more usual force of the word as “perseverance” or “endurance” should be preferred. One can understand the reason for the combined rendering sometimes chosen, e.g., “we wait with patient endurance” (cf. REB).[3]

25 Paul rounds off this subsection with a return to its central theme: the need, in this age of salvation history, for “earnest waiting.” In the “if” clause, Paul resumes the point he made in v. 24b and draws a conclusion from it: hoping for what one does not see means that we must wait for it with “patient fortitude.” While this emphasis on what is not seen may be nothing more than a reiteration of what hope, by its nature, is, the logic of this verse may imply that Paul is thinking more distinctly theologically about the matter. For, as Paul puts it in 2 Cor. 4:18b, “the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal” (see also Heb. 11). If this thought lies behind what Paul is saying here, then the logic of this verse is strengthened. We Christians can wait expectantly and with fortitude for hope to manifest itself precisely because that for which we hope is unseen and thereby part of the eternal and sure purposes of God. The NT elsewhere makes clear that believers above all need “patient endurance” in their trials as they look forward to the climax of God’s work in their lives. The word suggests the connotation of “bearing up” under intense pressure. This is the virtue required by Christians as we eagerly await “the hope of the glory of God.”[4]

8:23–25 / Paul now applies what he said of creation (vv. 19–22) to believers. Verse 23 contains two emphatic first person plural pronouns in Greek, stressing that we ourselvesgroan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption as sons.

Paul is found to be fighting on two fronts in verses 18–30. On the one hand, he stresses human solidarity with fallen creation, which is in “bondage to decay” (v. 21). Christians too are part of this bondage. Their bodies are susceptible to cancer, their businesses to failure, their families to brokenness. But this is not the sum of the matter (Not only so, v. 23), for the firstfruits of the Spirit guarantee their future adoption as sons and daughters and the redemption of our bodies (v. 23). This is Paul’s second front. Believers are determined not by groanings, but by the Spirit; not by the way things are, but by the way they will be. The word for firstfruits, aparchē, which originally derived from the practice of ot sacrifice, carries here a metaphoric sense of something given by God in pledge of a full gift to come, similar to the guarantee of the Spirit in 2 Corinthians 1:22 and 5:5. The Spirit is God’s firstfruits or pledge, the ground of hope for living in the tension between suffering and glory.

The theme of hope continues in the memorable phraseology of verses 24–25. The opening phrase, For in this hope we were saved, is vexingly ambiguous. In Greek, hope is thrust to the beginning of the sentence and is therefore emphatic. It is unlikely that Paul means we were saved by hope, for salvation normally comes by faith or grace, not by hope. It seems more probable, as the Greek duly allows, that we were saved to live in the condition of hope, or saved for hope. The aorist passive indicative, we were saved, would make salvation the premise upon which hope rests. As in verse 20, then, hope is the condition in which those who are saved live.

What has been done for us on the cross permits us to say, we were saved, but what remains to be done in us requires that we wait for it patiently. Hope does not belong to the empirical world. It is unseen and its goal is as yet unpossessed, and hence hope is inseparable from patience (v. 25; Heb. 6:15). The Greek word for patience, hypomonē, suggests perseverance and endurance, especially in the face of toil and suffering (cf. 5:3–5). Patience renounces the ego and its claims and submits to God’s will, way, and timing. Like patience, hope is purified through submission. Only where one has forsaken personal aspirations and agendas can one stake one’s hopes on the promises of God. Hope belongs to the One who holds the future, not in the things which occupy the present.[5]

23–25. Not only this, but also we ourselves, who possess the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, as we eagerly await our adoption, that is, the redemption of our bodies. For it was in hope that we were saved; but when once something hoped for is seen it is no longer an object of hope, for who hopes for what he sees? But since we hope for that which we do not see, we wait for it with patient endurance.

  • Our Own Groaning

Not only does the whole subhuman creation groan, but so do also “we ourselves,” says Paul, thus including himself, as well as those whom he addresses, in the sphere of those who groan. When he adds “who possess the first fruits of the Spirit” does he mean, “We groan even though we possess,” etc. or “because we possess,” etc.? Either would make excellent sense. He may have meant, “Even though we are already so rich, we are reaching out for riches even more precious.” Or he may have intended to convey the thought, “Since we already have the Spirit, we are convinced that more, much more, is still in store for us. We are therefore eagerly yearning to receive it.” In view of the fact that we are not sure which of these alternatives was uppermost in the apostle’s mind, it may well be best, in our translation, to leave the participle exactly as it is, namely, having or possessing. Personally I, along with many other commentators, rather favor the concessive interpretation, since it seems to harmonize best with the idea of great surprise implied in the emphatic introduction, “also we ourselves … even we ourselves,” as if to say, “Though we have already received so much, we are still groaning within ourselves for more.”

Paul says, “we ourselves, who possess the firstfruits of the Spirit.” What does he mean?

From Exod. 23:19; Deut. 18:4, and other passages, we learn that the Israelites were told to offer to God the firstfruits of the soil (grain, wine, oil), and even of the wool from the shearing of the sheep. But the reverse is also a fact. God too gives firstfruits. He gives the firstfruits of the Spirit, so that Paul could state that he himself and those whom he addresses are now in possession of this blessing.

Was the apostle referring to a certain supply of the Spirit that had been poured out so far, with more of the Spirit to follow later? See L.N.T. (A. and G.), p. 81, an opinion that is rather popular, especially among people who frequently refer to “the second blessing.” It is, however, erroneous.

There is no reason to doubt that the apostle, here in Rom. 8:23, is referring to the Holy Spirit himself. That Spirit is himself the firstfruits or pledge of subsequent salvation in all its fulness, in store for God’s children at Christ’s Return. There is no reason to believe that Paul refers to one thing in Eph. 1:13, 14, and to something else here in Rom. 8:23.

“Also we ourselves … even we ourselves groan within ourselves, as we eagerly await our adoption, that is, the redemption of our bodies.” How is it to be understood that even Christians groan? Is it not reasonable to assume that the groaning of God’s children resembles that of Nature (verse 22)? If then the groaning of the whole creation consisted of two elements, namely, (a) experiencing pain and (b) looking forward in hope, we may conclude that the same holds also for those who possess the firstfruits of the Spirit, God’s dear children.

Is Paul thinking of the fact that Christians realize that they are still very imperfect? So sinful that at times they cry out, “Wretched man that I am, Who will rescue me from this body of death?” (Rom. 7:24)? That they are indeed imperfect is clear from Scripture throughout. Nevertheless, the present context—think especially of the combination pain and hope—points also in a different direction. The very fact that God’s children even now possess—that is, are indwelt by—the Holy Spirit, arouses within them a painful sense of lack. What they already have makes them hungry for more; that is, for salvation in all its fulness. It is in this sense that pain and hope are here combined.

Even now believers have been adopted as God’s sons (8:15, 16). But, in another sense, they are still waiting for their adoption. They are waiting for the public display of their standing as children of God. As of right now their bodies are still subject to death. But one day their souls will have been completely delivered from sin, and their bodies will have become transformed, so that they will resemble the glorious body of the Lord Jesus Christ himself. To that great day they now look forward in hope (Rom. 8:11; 1 Cor. 15:50–55; 2 Cor. 5:2, 3; Phil. 3:21; 1 John 3:2).

Verse 24 takes up this subject of the Christian’s hope. The translation of this verse in the A.V. is, however, not the best (to put it mildly). It is as follows:

“For we are saved by hope; but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?”

We naturally ask, “Has Paul changed his theology? Did he not always tell us that we were saved by faith (Rom. 1:16, 17; 3:22, 26, 28, 31; 4:5, 11, 12, 16, 20, 24; 5:1, 2), and is he not going to confirm this same truth later on (Eph. 2:8)? Yet here I read that we are saved by hope! Besides, what does the apostle mean when he mentions “hope that is seen”? How can a person see hope?

In order to understand Rom. 8:24 we should start out by affirming that the rendering “We are saved by hope” is wrong. Paul wrote “in hope.” What he meant was that when, sometime in the past (probably at different dates for each person) we were saved, that salvation was not delivered to us complete in one package. It did not arrive “cut and dried.” On the contrary, it came to us “with a promise of more to follow.” Such elements included in salvation, as election, calling, regeneration, basic conversion, faith, justification, and even, in part, sanctification, had already occurred. Still to come were further progress in sanctification, and finally, at death, and even more fully at Christ’s Return, glorification. It is clear, therefore, that Paul could write, “We were saved in hope.”

Christian hope, however, must be distinguished from the “hope” we speak about in daily life. Such hope often amounts to no more than a desire that something nice may happen to us, plus a belief that it might just take place. In fact, such hope can frequently be defined as “that which precedes disappointment.” Its picture is at times that of a drowning man grasping at a straw. But Christian hope is “an anchor for the soul, safe and sure, entering into the inner sanctuary, behind the curtain, where Jesus has gone as a forerunner on our behalf.” (Heb. 6:19, 20).

As to the rest of the verse (24), everything becomes clear when we realize that the word hope can have three different meanings. It can indicate (a) a feeling or even a conviction that what is desired will take place; (b) the person who is considered able to make it take place, as in “Our Hope for years to come,” and (c) the thing hoped for. It would seem that in Greek this last meaning is more common than in English. So we translate the remainder of verse 24 as follows:

“But when once something hoped for is seen, it is no longer an object of hope, for who hopes for what he sees?”

The truth here expressed is obvious: when that for which a person was hoping has arrived, and is now standing or lying in front of him, so that he sees it (implying: and can take hold of it), it ceases to be an object of hope.

Paul is emphasizing the necessity of making use of the anchor of hope. He is, as it were, saying, “Just as faith is necessary to appropriate the salvation which Christ merited for you in the past, so hope is necessary to take to yourselves future blessings. Those bounties are reserved for all who humbly confess their shortcomings and rely wholly on God, the Merciful Giver. Remember, you were saved ‘in hope.’ ”

The present-day practical application is clear. There are those who seem to think that they have already arrived. They believe that the petition “Forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors” (Matt. 6:12) was not meant for them. Perhaps they also believe that they have received “the second blessing” and are therefore superior Christians. There are even those who make propaganda for the error that also the body is already perfect, sickness being a figment of the imagination. Any future “redemption of the body” (8:23) has little significance for them. To them all Paul is, as it were, saying, “You have done away with the biblical doctrine of salvation in hope, for how can one hope for what he already has … or thinks he has?”

The objection might be raised, “But the apostle was not living in our day. Was there any reason why he felt it to be necessary in this epistle to stress the importance of hope, in the life of the believer? Are we able to prove that there were people in the Roman church who considered themselves strong, and able, accordingly, to dispense, at least to some extent, with hope, since they had already arrived?”

The answer is in the affirmative. By and large the Roman church ranked high in Paul’s estimation. See 1:8; 15:14. But there were exceptions, as the following passages indicate:

“Do not think too highly of yourself” (12:3).

“You, then, why do you judge your brother?” (14:10).

“Therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another” (14:13).

“We who are strong ought to bear with the failings of the weak, and not to please ourselves” (15:1).

The conclusion is truly beautiful: “But since we hope for that which we do not see, we wait for it with patient endurance.”

This reminds us of a similar Pauline passage, namely, “We fix our eyes not on the things that are seen, but on the things that are not seen; for the things that are seen are temporal, but the things that are not seen are eternal” (2 Cor. 4:18). In the meantime:

Ye fearful saints, fresh courage take;

The clouds ye so much dread

Are big with mercy and shall break

In blessings on your head.

His purposes will ripen fast,

Unfolding every hour,

The bud may have a bitter taste,

But sweet will be the flower.

William Cowper, 1772[6]

[1] MacArthur, J. F., Jr. (1991). Romans (Vol. 1, pp. 458–465). Chicago: Moody Press.

[2] Boice, J. M. (1991–). Romans: The Reign of Grace (Vol. 2, pp. 877–884). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.

[3] Harrison, E. F., & Hagner, D. A. (2008). Romans. In T. Longman III &. Garland, David E. (Ed.), The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Romans–Galatians (Revised Edition) (Vol. 11, p. 140). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

[4] Moo, D. J. (2018). The Letter to the Romans. (N. B. Stonehouse, F. F. Bruce, G. D. Fee, & J. B. Green, Eds.) (Second Edition, pp. 544–545). Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

[5] Edwards, J. R. (2011). Romans (pp. 215–216). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

[6] Hendriksen, W., & Kistemaker, S. J. (1953–2001). Exposition of Paul’s Epistle to the Romans (Vol. 12–13, pp. 269–273). Grand Rapids: Baker Book House.

Assange Supporters Rally Outside Belmarsh Prison – Video | Sputnik International

On Friday, WikiLeaks announced a worldwide protest that is set to take place in at least eight cities around the globe. The participants will demonstrate against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s extradition to the US.

Source: Assange Supporters Rally Outside Belmarsh Prison – Video

Michelle Obama Hangs With Wall Street ‘Fat Cats’ in Malibu | Newsmax

Former President Barack Obama used to rip the Wall Street “fat cat” bankers. Now, his wife is hanging with them, according to a Fox Business report.The former first lady is living the 1% lifestyle her and her husband have long railed against, dropping as much at $30,000 for…

Source: Michelle Obama Hangs With Wall Street ‘Fat Cats’ in Malibu

‘Torment’: Assange Spends Up to 23 Hours a Day in ‘Sordid’ Solitary Confinement, His Father Says | Sputnik International

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who was sheltered for seven years in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London after being accused of obtaining and disclosing US national defence secrets on his whistleblowing platform, is currently being held in a British prison following his arrest in April 2019.

Source: ‘Torment’: Assange Spends Up to 23 Hours a Day in ‘Sordid’ Solitary Confinement, His Father Says

Trump Kicks Off Weekend With Harsh Dig At ‘Do Nothing Democrat Savages’ | The Daily Caller

President Donald Trump took specific aim at several of his Democratic critics in Congress on Twitter early Saturday morning.

Trump referenced Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (NY), Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (CA) and freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, calling them “Do Nothing Democrat Savages.”

“Can you imagine if these Do Nothing Democrat Savages, people like Nadler, Schiff, AOC Plus 3, and many more, had a Republican Party who would have done to Obama what the Do Nothings are doing to me. Oh well, maybe next time!” he tweeted.

Can you imagine if these Do Nothing Democrat Savages, people like Nadler, Schiff, AOC Plus 3, and many more, had a Republican Party who would have done to Obama what the Do Nothings are doing to me. Oh well, maybe next time!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 28, 2019

Trump had just one day earlier called for Schiff’s resignation after the Intelligence Committee chair fabricated the context and content of the president’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, later trying to explain that away as a “parody.” (RELATED: Schiff Admitted To Fabricating Part Of Trump’s Ukraine Call — These Outlets Ignored That Fact)

“Rep. Adam Schiff totally made up my conversation with Ukraine President and read it to Congress and Millions. He must resign and be investigated. He has been doing this for two years. He is a sick man!” Trump tweeted Friday morning.

Rep. Adam Schiff totally made up my conversation with Ukraine President and read it to Congress and Millions. He must resign and be investigated. He has been doing this for two years. He is a sick man!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 27, 2019

But despite the president’s complaints about the actions of Schiff, Nadler, Ocasio-Cortez and others, his reelection campaign appears to be enjoying a fundraising boom. According to Eric Trump, the campaign has “now raised almost $15 million in small dollar donations (including 50,000 NEW donors) since @SpeakerPelosi started this impeachment charade 72 hrs ago!”

UPDATE: We have now raised almost $15 million in small dollar donations (including 50,000 NEW donors) since @SpeakerPelosi started this impeachment charade 72 hrs ago! Unbelievable numbers!! Keep it going — you and the dems are handing @realDonaldTrump the win in 2020! ????????????????

— Eric Trump (@EricTrump) September 27, 2019

Trump followed up his complaint with a tweet in all caps reading simply: “PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT!”


— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 28, 2019

Source: Trump Kicks Off Weekend With Harsh Dig At ‘Do Nothing Democrat Savages’

Republican Wants Adam Schiff Censured For Making Up Trump Quotes | The Daily Wire

A Republican congressman is calling on colleagues to punish Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) for claiming President Donald Trump said things he never said.

Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) said impeachment of a president is a serious matter, adding “it is therefore inexcusable to toy with the process and mislead the American public with such a statement.”

Bigg is calling for the House to censure Schiff. His resolution says in part: “Whereas, instead of quoting directly from the available transcript, Chairman Schiff manufactured a false retelling of the conversation between President Trump and President Zelensky; Whereas, this egregiously false and fabricated retelling had no relationship to the call itself; Whereas, these actions of Chairman Schiff misled the American people, bring disrepute upon the House of Representatives, and make a mockery of the impeachment process, one of this chamber’s most solemn constitutional duties.”

Schiff, who serves as chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, led a hearing this week that featured testimony from acting Director of National Intelligence  Joseph Maguire. Midway through his opening statement, the California Democrat decided to deliver a summation of what he said transpired in a July 25 phone call between President Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky.

“What happened on the call?” Schiff said. “Zelensky begins by ingratiating himself, and he tries to enlist the support of the president. He expresses his interest in meeting the president and says his country wants to acquire more weapons to defend itself. And what is the president’s response? Well, it reads like a classic organized crime shakedown. Shorn of its rambling character and in not so many words, this is the essence of what the president communicates.”

Schiff then “quoted” Trump.

“‘We’ve been very good to your country, very good, no other country has done as much as we have, but you know what, I don’t see much reciprocity here. I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from you, though. And I’m going to say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand, lots of it, on this and on that. I’m going to put you in touch with people, not just any people, I’m going to put you in touch with the Attorney General of the United States, my Attorney General Bill Barr. He’s got the whole weight of the American law enforcement behind him. And I’m going to put you in touch with Rudy — you’re going to love him, trust me. You know what I’m asking, and so I’m only going to say this a few more times in a few more ways. And by the way, don’t call me again, I’ll call you when you’ve done what I’ve asked.’

“This is in sum and character what the president was trying to communicate with the president of Ukraine. It would be funny if it wasn’t such a graphic betrayal of the president’s oath of office,” Schiff said.

Rep. Mike Turner, Ohio Republican, ripped Schiff’s fake quotes, saying, “I actually had someone text me, ‘is he just making this up?’ And yes, yes, he was because sometimes fiction is better than the actual words or the text. But luckily, the American public are smart.”

Schiff responded at the time, saying: “As an aside, I want to mention that my colleague is right on both counts. It’s not OK, but also, my summary of the president’s call was meant to be at least part in parody. The fact that’s not clear is a separate problem in and of itself. Of course, the president never said if you don’t understand me, I’m going to say it seven more times. My point is that’s the message that the Ukraine president was receiving in not so many words.”

Trump also blasted Schiff for the made-up quotes. “Rep. Adam Schiff totally made up my conversation with Ukraine President and read it to Congress and Millions. He must resign and be investigated. He has been doing this for two years. He is a sick man!”

Source: Republican Wants Adam Schiff Censured For Making Up Trump Quotes

“Where’s the Senate?” – Rudy Giuliani Joins Chorus of GOP Voters Wondering Why Senate Has Turned Its Back on President Trump — The Gateway Pundit

In January 2019 the Republicans with 53 members kept control of the United States Senate.

During the election Republicans promised to investigate the investigators.

Republicans were going to go after all of the corrupt Obama officials in the deep state who were spying on President Trump during his campaign, the transition period and his presidency.

This week we found out the Deep State is still spying on President Trump.  A CIA official filed a “whistleblower” report based on second-hand water cooler rumors about President Trump.  The partisan CIA operative then filed a complaint anonymously in the latest coup attempt on President Donald Trump.


After eight months Republican leaders in the US Senate have failed to call ONE WITNESS from the deep state to testify before their GOP led committees.

But they have called Donald Trump Jr. in to testify so they could harass and interrogate the president’s son some more.

So Where the Hell Are the Senate Republicans?

Why do they remain silent?  Where is the subpoena for Joe Biden or Hunter Biden to testify on their $1.5 BILLION pay-for-play scheme?  Where are the subpoenas for Jim Comey, Andrew McCabe, John Brennan, Hillary Clinton, James Clapper, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and the latest CIA whistleblower?

The Senate Republicans are AWOL as Democrats continue their coup to remove President Trump.

On Saturday Rudy Giuliani asked the same question, “Where’s the Senate?”

The silence of the Senate Republicans shows their support for the coup plotters.
Voters need to remember this moment.

via “Where’s the Senate?” – Rudy Giuliani Joins Chorus of GOP Voters Wondering Why Senate Has Turned Its Back on President Trump — The Gateway Pundit

Conspiracy? What’s the reason Trump is after Joe Biden? | RT

A prominent critic of Donald Trump has offered an explosive interpretation of the US president’s now infamous ‘Ukraine phone call’ as the ongoing impeachment investigation picks up steam. Trump struck back at Democrat Adam Schiff, accusing him of ‘making up his version’ of the conversation.

Campus Crusade Leader Invites Roman Catholic Mystic to Speak at Event — Christian Research Network

“By contemplation, I am basically referring to the work of creating and sustaining an inner life of peace, quiet, listening to the Divine/Mystery/Higher Power/God , and letting the overflow of that love stretch into other realms of life.”

(Jeff Maples – Reformation Charlotte)  CRU — formerly Campus Crusade for Christ — has been exposed as a social justice political organization with the sole intention of turning young, Christian-minded students into progressive activists….

Ranging from LGBTQ activism to Cultural Marxism and intersectionality, CRU has hosted a number of events with the intent of advancing both political and theological liberalism.

Sojourners is an ecumenical publication founded by the progressive political activist and theological mystic, Jim Wallis, who has admitted to — along with SBC leader, Russell Moore — receiving funding from George Soros to advance an open-borders agenda in the US. Sojourners hosts a number of Roman Catholics and mystics — among them, Kaitlin CurticeView article →


Cru (Campus Crusade for Christ)

Progressive (Social Justice) “Christianity”

New Age Spirituality

Roman Catholicism

via Campus Crusade Leader Invites Roman Catholic Mystic to Speak at Event — Christian Research Network

EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton’s Attorney Is Preventing Roger Stone from Obtaining ‘Evidence’ of Russia Hacking from Crowdstrike! — The Gateway Pundit

Roger Stone is under indictment for lying to Congress.  Stone attempted to obtain evidence that would help his case from Crowdstrike, the Google owned entity that holds the only ‘evidence’ that Russia hacked the DNC’s emails before the 2016.

Stone is being prevented from obtaining Crowdstrike’s ‘evidence’ by Hillary Clinton’s attorney!

Stone was arrested early in the morning in January 2019 at his house by twenty-some FBI agents who tipped off CNN that they would be there.   CNN aired live the machine gun toting agents surrounding his house and in the water near his Florida residence, while performing their Deep State arrest.

This Hollywood production was related to indictments that Stone lied in front of CongressOf course, Hillary, Mueller, Comey, McCabe, etc… all walk free for committing this same crime and much more.

Stone, a Fort Lauderdale resident who served as a consultant to Trump’s campaign until August 2015, was indicted in January by a federal grand jury on charges of making false statements to Congress, obstructing a congressional proceeding and tampering with a witness in connection with that proceeding.

According to the Florida Bulldog

On May 10, defense lawyers for Trump’s longtime friend and political advisor Roger Stone filed a motion to compel the Justice Department to produce unredacted versions of CrowdStrike’s reports to the DNC.

Much of Stone’s legal defense was rooted in an effort to suppress all the evidence obtained in 18 search warrants, citing a conservative conspiracy theory that he argued invalidates the warrants. That theory contends the 44,053 stolen emails from the DNC, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, were leaked by an insider, not hacked by Russians operating as “Guccifer 2.0”.

According to Stone, CrowdStrike’s handling of the Democrats’ computers undermined its investigation and conclusions and tainted the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment that Russia was behind the intrusion or that Russia delivered the stolen data to WikiLeaks.

The government later informed Stone’s lawyers, including Fort Lauderdale’s Robert Buschel, Bruce Rogow and Grant Smith, that it did not have an unredacted version of CrowdStrike’s report.

On Thursday, Hillary Clinton’s attorney representing the DNC filed a response to Roger Stone’s request claiming Crowdstrike is under attorney-client privilege and therefore does not have to provide Crowdstrike’s ‘evidence’ that Russia hacked the DNC – the same ‘evidence’ the FBI relied on to determine that Russia hacked the DNC that was the basis for the Mueller Special Counsel.

In this case, perhaps the most significant in US history, the FBI relied on another firm (Crowdstrike) hired by the DNC to determine that Russia hacked the DNC! 

Now Crowdstrike is refusing to provide the evidence based on attorney-client privilege.  (It’s questionable why Crowdstrike wouldn’t provide the information if they had it?)

Looking further into the document filed by Crowdstrike and the DNC, we see that the document was signed by an attorney by the name of Mark E. Elias, from Perkins Coie LLP –

As we’ve reported numerous times, Crowdstrike claimed that Russia hacked the DNC’s emails but they and the FBI have yet to provide any evidence to support this claim.  However, others have provided evidence to the contrary.

We reported that former NSA employee and whistle blower, Bill Binney, has reviewed the DNC emails released and provided online by WikiLeaks and it shows that the data coming from the DNC was not hacked (as claimed by Crowdstrike who the FBI relied on for confirmation) but rather copied to a disk or flash drive!

Binney says:

The problem with the Mueller report and the Rosenstein indictment is it’s all based on lies. I mean the fact they’re still lying about the, saying the DNC was hacked by the Russians and the Russians gave it to WikiLeaks.

Well, we had some of our people and our group, the VIPS, the Veteran Intelligence Professionals, look at the data that WikiLeaks posted on the DNC data. They actually posted the DNC data…

…that entire set of data was read to a thumb drive or a CD Rom then physically transported. Now this is what Kim Dotcom is saying. This is what Julian Assange basically was inferring. Others have been saying the same things.”

So we have known for some time that the Russians did not hack the DNC and did not provide emails to Wikileaks as the FBI claims based on information from Crowdstrike. We also know that Crowdstrike lied and stated that Russia hacked the Ukraine during the Russian – Ukraine crisis.  This was proven false and Crowdstrike had to retract its bogus claims.

So here we are now, nearly three years since Crowdstrike claimed Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s attorney is preventing Roger Stone from access to the information that Crowdstrike has to support this assertion.  Of course Hillary was involved!

Hat tips D. Manny and Kevin O.

via EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton’s Attorney Is Preventing Roger Stone from Obtaining ‘Evidence’ of Russia Hacking from Crowdstrike! — The Gateway Pundit

EVIL ON PARADE: The Marxists Running the Democrat Party Today Lust for Absolute Power – Seizing it, Wielding It and Humiliating Their Opposition — The Gateway Pundit

Democrats fantasize about murdering President Trump during New York City play.

Tucker Carlson opened his show on Friday night with the latest updates on the Democrat-media coup against Donald Trump.

In his open he played a clip of Speaker Nancy Pelosi now accusing Russia of being involved in the Democrats’ latest made-up Trump scandal.

Of course, Pelosi and Democrats have absolutely zero evidence to push forward this theory or this impeachment scandal.  And, they certainly have no evidence that Russia is involved in anyway.

But as Tucker noted, Democrats no longer deal in facts. They deal in emotions and a blood-lust for power.

You can see this same scenario played out in all of their actions.
They’re not about making your life better. They are about humiliating you.

Here is a good example of Democrats wielding power and not facts over their opponents. On Friday a Democrat subcommittee chairman prevented Republican Rep. Jim Jordan from speaking openly during a hearing.

Rep. Jim Jordan was not allowed to speak openly during a sub-committee hearing.
Rep. Hank Johnson, one of the stupidest lawmakers in Congress today, shut him down during his questioning of a far left media hack.

Hank Johnson relished his power over Jordan.

Daniel Greenfield at Frontpage Magazine described perfectly this Marxist takeover of the Democrat party and their blood-lust to destroy, demean, torture and humiliate their enemies in their quest for absolute power.

Elections are a humiliating process that force lefties to lie to voters, hide their agendas, and appeal to the people they despise to be allowed to rule them. Even when they win, a sour taste lingers afterward.

The Left desperately wants impeachment proceedings because it wants to exercise direct power.

People wonder what the Left really wants? Post-gender bathrooms, banning cows, and paying reparations to drug dealers are just random policies. They’re not the endgame.

Unless the Democrats take the Senate, impeachment would be a meaningless show trial. But Marxist regimes love show trials of political opponents. The Marxist element in the House desperately wants a show trial of President Trump because such a proceeding is an explicit rejection of our political system.

The push to impeach President Trump did not begin organically with a crime allegedly committed in office, but began before he even took office and, in some elements of the media, before he even won. The premise of impeachment has always been an inherent unfitness. The actual basis for impeachment has always been a corollary to that claim of an inherent unfitness that preceded even the election.

Inherent unfitness expresses the idea that the voters never had any right to elect President Trump.

Impeachment is not just meant to be a trial of President Trump, but of the voters who chose him. Its outcome, whatever the composition of the Senate, is meant to be an argument for remaking the system of elections, whether by abolishing the Electoral College or tampering with the judiciary, that would take the power further out of the hands of the voters and concentrate them with the right sorts of people.

The right sorts of people usually being wealthy and influential lefties in California and New York.

But the real appeal of impeachment is more emotional than strategic. President Trump’s victory threatened lefties by suggesting that, despite the Obama era, they are not actually in control.

“Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship,” O’Brien tells the hapless Winston Smith in the novel 1984. “The object of power is power.”

Marxist regimes love show trials because they allow them to destroy and humiliate their enemies.

“How does one man assert his power over another, Winston?” O’Brien asks.

“By making him suffer,” Winston replies.

Read the rest here.

via EVIL ON PARADE: The Marxists Running the Democrat Party Today Lust for Absolute Power – Seizing it, Wielding It and Humiliating Their Opposition — The Gateway Pundit