Daily Archives: February 20, 2020

The Lamb opens the Scroll

Possessing the Treasure

by Mike Ratliff

Those with discernment from God know that the “Church” is very sick because it has been deceived through decades of bad theology and spiritually weakened by leaders who are bent on ministering via pragmatism. As I write this, there are so-called Christian leaders who are proclaiming a new Golden Age for the church with millions of people each year coming to Christ in their ministries. These proclamations, however, fail to note the tragic turnover rate in their pews whereby those “millions” of converts each year exit their churches to be replaced by new “seekers” who continue to fuel the revolving door that brings in new faces while those who did not find what they were really looking for exit never to be seen again. Those making the claims of gigantic growth turn a blind eye to this problem. Why? Are they blind to what is really going…

View original post 2,269 more words

Love not the world! — The Thirsty Theologian

Christian, dwell alone! Seek not the society of the world. Know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? If you have any sympathies with the world—if it contains attractions for you—if God and the things of God are not enough for you—there is something wrong. Love not the world! Seek not its society. Seek the things above. Beware of the fascinations of company,the spells which gaiety throws over the young. Stand your ground. Be not whirled away into the tossing current of gay society on any pretext whatever.

Church of the living God, be separate—dwell alone! That is your security, your strength, your influence. Let the world see that you are not of it; that you do not need it. And you will serve it best by dwelling alone. Not by coldness, sourness, distance; but by love, geniality, gentleness, patience, by all acts of benevolence and words of peace. These are things which are only to be found by “dwelling alone.”

—Horatius Bonar, Christ Is All, ed. Darrin R. Brooker & Michael Haykin (Reformation Heritage Books, 2007), 83–84.

July 7, 2008

via Love not the world! — The Thirsty Theologian

02/20/2020 — Wretched


•The Babylon Bee crossed a line. How do we respond?
•Newspapers debunk false teachers when Christians won’t
•Reasons I did not convert to Christianity
•Kevin DeYoung shares things your congregation should never not hear
•The importance of seeing the Gospel lived out in modesty
•John Calvin vs the Libertines

Download Now (right click and save)

via 02/20/2020 — Wretched

Phil Johnson: The Details of Worship Matter — Wretched

Episode 2631-

Phil Johnson: The Details of Worship Matter

Segment 1 (00:00) At the “G3” conference, Todd introduces Phil Johnson, a preacher from Grace Baptist Church. They talk about lifting hands to pray or worship. Phil Johnson says it’s ok, but many times it’s to put on a display of faith.

Segment 2 (09:33) Todd and Phil talk about non-christians in the worship team. Phil says no, this will pollute the worship to God, regardless of musical talent. They also talk about babies in the service, but Phil Johnson doesn’t mind that.

Segment 3 (16:34) Phil is against multi-campus churches, but not churches with separate service times. He is also against altar calls, but ok with a true altar call taking place, as long as it is not a ritual.

Segment 4 (22:49) Phil explains there is a range of importance of different biblical issues, and some things are essential, such as the doctrine of Christ’s Godhead. But regardless of these secondary decisions, the Gospel is the key.

via Phil Johnson: The Details of Worship Matter — Wretched

This ‘n’ That — Do Not Be Surprised…

  • Hey, I used to live in this town! Such an interestingstory!
  • What is wrong with Washington?
  • The basics are, well, basic.
  • Here’s your weekly dose of adorable.
  • I never understood people who leave the toilet lid up. Common sense should tell you that’s a dumb idea.
  • This is a needed article about the use of the phrase “false teacher.”
  • Since I seem to be shamelessly plugging my own writing this week, here you go.
  • This is such an encouraging message about the perseverance of the saints.

Whatever is laudable in our works proceeds from the grace of God.

John Calvin

via This ‘n’ That — Do Not Be Surprised…

John MacArthur Warned Moody Years Ago About James MacDonald, Emails Reveal — Julie Roys

Eight years ago, prominent author and pastor, John MacArthur, strongly warned the Moody Bible Institute about its association with now-disgraced celebrity pastor, James MacDonald. This is according to email correspondence I recently obtained between MacArthur and Jerry Jenkins, author of the best-selling Left Behind series of books, and then-chairman of Moody’s board of trustees.

“The conflicts James needs to resolve involve serious concerns that others besides me have raised about his character and doctrine,” MacArthur wrote on  November 12,  2012. “The controversy is increasingly public. It involves charges against him from people who are or have been part of his ministry.”

Moody apparently disregarded the warning. Just two months after the email exchange, Moody published a book by MacDonald called, “Authentic: Developing the Disciplines of a Sincere Faith.” The institute also continued airing MacDonald’s radio program, Walk in the Word on the Moody Radio Network for another seven years. (Moody stopped airing the program in January 2019, when MacDonald pulled Walk in the Word from radio and TV. Moody Publishers stopped selling MacDonald’s books on February 19, 2019, about a week after Harvest Bible Chapel fired MacDonald.)

According to the emails, the exchange between Jenkins and MacArthur was prompted by MacArthur objecting to speaking at Moody’s Founder’s Week in 2013 if MacDonald was also on the program.

“The conflicts James needs to resolve involve serious concerns that others besides me have raised about his character and doctrine . . . It involves charges against him from people who are or have been part of his ministry.”

Jenkins responded by inviting MacArthur to meet with MacDonald and Jenkins for the purpose of “reconciliation.” However, MacArthur replies that he has “no personal issues with MacDonald.” Rather, he is concerned about the public “documented charges against him (MacDonald).”

These charges included MacDonald inviting T.D. Jakes—a proponent of the prosperity gospel—to speak at his Elephant Room conference just 10 months earlier. Jakes also held a view of the Trinity that many evangelicals believed to be heretical. The controversy over Jakes appearing at The Elephant Room was so serious that it prompted MacDonald to resign abruptly from The Gospel Coalition.

Other charges included MacDonald’s extravagant lifestyle. According to The Elephant’s Debt (TED), a blog critical of MacDonald that launched in the summer of 2012, MacDonald was then taking a salary over $500,000, and living on a $1.9 million estate. TED also reported that MacDonald’s church—Harvest Bible Chapel—was $65 million in debt. And the website included a long list of Harvest leaders who had left the church and voiced concerns about MacDonald.

MacArthur writes to Jenkins that he had mentioned his concerns about MacDonald to Moody Senior VP of Media Greg Thornton, asking Thornton “whether Moody was concerned about being embarrassed by the multiple scandals unfolding all around James.”

MacArthur also references a comment he made about MacDonald in public, writing, “I made only a one-word comment, saying James’s public statements and actions are ‘self-destructive.’” He adds, “My judgment has proved accurate, and more profoundly so than I believed at the time.”

Read more: John MacArthur Warned Moody Years Ago About James MacDonald, Emails Reveal — Julie Roys

February 20 Life-Changing Moments With God

He shall see the labor of His soul, and be satisfied.

Jesus said, “It is finished!” Bowing His head, He gave up His spirit. Father God, You made Jesus who knew no sin to be sin for me, that I might become righteous in Him.

This people You have formed for Yourself; we shall declare Your praise. Now Your manifold wisdom might be made known by the church to the principalities and powers in the heavenly places, according to the eternal purpose which You accomplished in Him, Christ Jesus my Lord. In the ages to come You might show the exceeding riches of Your grace in Your kindness toward me in Christ Jesus.

Having believed, I was sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, who is the guarantee of my inheritance, to the praise of His glory. I am part of a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, Your own special people, that I may proclaim the praises of You who called me out of darkness into Your marvelous light.

When Jesus’ work on the cross was finished, hope for life eternal with You, my Father, became reality. Thank You for sending Jesus to die and make this relationship possible. May my life proclaim Your praises.

Isaiah 53:11; John 19:30; 2 Corinthians 5:21; Isaiah 43:21; Ephesians 3:10–11; Ephesians 2:7; Ephesians 1:13–14; 1 Peter 2:9[1]


[1] Jeremiah, D. (2007). Life-Changing Moments With God (p. 61). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

February 20, 2020 Evening Verse Of The Day

5  But I have trusted in your steadfast love;
my heart shall rejoice in your salvation.
6  I will sing to the LORD,
because he has dealt bountifully with me.

The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Ps 13:5–6). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

Expression of Hope and Trust: Let Me Sing! (13:5–6)

5–6 Though he has experienced deep despair, the psalmist does not give up. His feet did not slip. He held on to the promise of God’s covenantal love—“your unfailing love [ḥesed]”. He is not overwhelmed by his troubles, but in his depression he says, “But I trust.” The emphatic “But I” (v. 5) is a surprising response from the heart of a depressed person. Because life may be so bitter for some, it is only by God’s grace that the heart of faith may groan, “But I.” Both vv. 5 and 6 react to this confidence in the Lord’s faithfulness to his promises by jussive and cohortative forms of the verbs: “Let my heart rejoice.… Let me sing” (see Dahood, 1:76: “Let my heart rejoice.… Then shall I sing”). The modal usage of the verbs appears to indicate the continuation of his prayer (vv. 3–4). Thus I suggest that vv. 5–6 be rendered as follows: “But since I trust in your unfailing love, may my heart rejoice in your salvation, may I sing to the Lord, ‘He has been good to me.’ ” Craigie, 143, writes, “The actual song of praise would burst forth once deliverance had been accomplished, but the knowledge that deliverance was coming created an anticipatory calm and sense of confidence.”

The effect of God’s love for which the psalmist longs is the experience of salvation (v. 5). “Salvation” (yešûʿâ, GK 3802; see 3:2) signifies the whole well-being of God’s children. They need the assurance that God cares (v. 1), as well as the experience of victory over enemies and adverse circumstances (vv. 2, 4). They also need healing in their thoughts of anguish and self-pity (v. 2). God’s “salvation” takes care of all of their needs. They will rejoice in the Lord when God shows his fatherly care: “For he has been good [gāmal] to me” (v. 6). The verb gāmal (GK 1694, “deal bountifully with,” “reward”; NIV, “has been good”) is fraught with meaning. Yahweh bestows his benefits not in small measure but in fullness, so as to give his children the experience of complete and free deliverance (116:7; 119:17). As Calvin, 1:187, states, “The word … signifies nothing else here than to bestow a benefit from pure grace.” In contrast to the enemies, who rejoice in God’s seeming absence and lack of care, the psalmist expects that the godly will ultimately rejoice in God’s salvation.[1]

5–6 In the closing stanza of the psalm, the psalmist leaves both the enemies and the situation of crisis behind. In some sense, a corner is turned at the start of v. 5. As the Hebrew grammar indicates with the wāw at the start of v. 5, and as most English translations show by rendering the wāw as “but,” a transition occurs. The psalmist moves now to trust in God’s fidelity and praise for God’s mercy. The precise reason of this transition from lament to praise is debated. Some scholars imagine that after some supplicant had prayed vv. 1–4, a priest would have arisen to announce that the psalmist’s prayer had been heard or to pronounce an actual oracle from the Lord. In this view, the closing stanza of the psalm is a word of praise in response to the priest’s message. (See, for example, in 1 Samuel 1 how Hannah first prays for help, then receives a favorable oracle from the priest, and then sings forth in praise.) Another view holds that the praise of vv. 5–6 was a later addition, added only after the psalmist’s crisis had passed: “It is a long wait after verse 4, a wait in the darkness of death.… Then—we do not know how long the wait was—things are changed.” Still another view holds that neither deliverance nor priestly oracle occurs between vv. 4 and 5. Rather, the situation of crisis still remains, but in his heart, the psalmist has come to believe that his prayer has been heard by God. And the simple conviction that God has heard the prayer leads the psalmist to change his lament to a song of praise. “It should be noted that the grief over which the suppliant is lamenting … still remains. During the praying of these Psalms no miracle has occurred, but something else has occurred. God has heard and inclined himself to the one praying; God has had mercy on him.” It is neither possible nor desirable to still the voices of this debate by imposing one of the above views at the expense of silencing the other views. It is unlikely that we will ever be able to know for sure which, if any, of these interpretations is most faithful to how the psalm was originally written or used. However, one thing is abundantly clear: the psalm, in its current and final form, ends on this note of trust and praise. The closing of the psalm has a sense of looking backward at yesterday, of living with eyes wide open in the now of today, and of gazing ahead hopefully to tomorrow. Looking backwards, the psalmist acknowledges, in your hesed I have trusted. Of today, she confesses, my heart rejoices in your salvation. And of tomorrow, she adds her vow that she will sing to the Lord. It is that sort of three-dimensional theological perspective that Psalm 13 engenders in those who pray it still.[2]

A Certain Confidence (vv. 5–6)

A marked difference exists between the psalmist’s foes and himself, and the opening of verse 5 sets them over against each other. But I, he says, trust in your unfailing love; my heart rejoices in your salvation. I will sing to the Lord, for he has been good to me (vv. 5–6). His confidence is in the covenantal love of the Lord that expresses itself in his deliverance. This is one of the passages in the Old Testament in which ‘unfailing love’ (chésed) is parallel with ‘salvation’ (yeshûʿâh). If a distinction is to be made between them, then ‘unfailing love’ is displayed in God’s acts of ‘salvation’. Hence the psalmist can overflow with loving praise and he asks God to let his heart rejoice when that salvation appears. This understanding of verse 5 (that his deliverance is yet in the future) is confirmed by the Hebrew idiom in the final verse, which means that he will sing praise ‘as soon as he has dealt bountifully with me’. Deliverance, though yet to come, is acknowledged and praised in believing trust. Believers can always look forward in anticipation of God’s deliverances, and they can be filled with ‘an inexpressible and glorious joy’ as they await on the return of Christ the ultimate salvation of their souls (1 Pet. 1:8–9).[3]

13:5–6 / Verse 5 is a confession of trust, but it also argues that God should intervene on the worshiper’s behalf. The opening but connects it to the preceding motif by way of contrast. In other words, “unlike those who would rejoice over the downfall of one who trusts in your love, I am of the sort who would rejoice in your salvation.” This confession of trust thus also exemplifies the contrasting character of the worshiper. While the Hebrew text indicates the trust is a present reality (“I have trusted,” Hb. perfect), the rejoicing is probably future. Verse 5b could be rendered either as a simple future, “my heart will rejoice,” or more likely as a wish, “May my heart rejoice” (Hb. yāgēl libbî; note this is a variation on the preceding, “my foes will rejoice,” Hb. ṣāray yāgîlû).

The closing vow of praise spells out what will be the content of that rejoicing. It should probably be translated: “I will sing to Yahweh, ‘He has been good to me.’ ” (The Hb. , translated in niv as for, probably has a recitative function. See R. J. Williams, Hebrew Syntax: An Outline [Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976], p. 73.) This is praise in anticipation of the deliverance.

Some interpreters who try to pinpoint the distress that occasioned the psalm (i.e., is it a psalm of sickness?) are frustrated by its general language. Does “Give light to my eyes” point to a physical or psychological weakness? But this open-ended language helps explain the long-standing popularity of psalms, which can be used for a variety of personal needs. This image may, in fact, derive not from the speaker’s circumstances but from the poetic imagery of a face-to-face relationship evident elsewhere in the psalm. It may be an echo of the Aaronic Benediction, “May Yahweh cause his face to give light to you” (Num. 6:25, lit.).

The change of mood reflected in this psalm is remarkable. One may be tempted to think its composer was manic-depressive or perhaps a nervous pietist who thought he should tack on some positive praise to soften his harsh complaint. Some commentators seem to suggest that the speaker abandons his feelings of lament by the time he reaches the praise a few verses later (see, e.g., A. Weiser, The Psalms [OTL; Philadelphia: Westminster, 1962], p. 163). But as argued in the Introduction, a psalm is not an autobiographical poem reflecting on a poet’s recent personal experience. It is written for other worshipers to guide their responses to their own experiences. As we have just seen, this psalm reveals an intricate, tightly knit structure that moves logically from one verse to the next. When we try to pick out one poetic line, we find it attached to every other line in the psalm. It guides us to express heartfelt emotions, to seek a release from our pitiful state, and to express praise in a way distinct from our opponents. In so doing, the psalm allows believers to voice the mixed emotions often felt toward God while in the midst of hardship, namely complaint (v. 1) and trust (v. 5). We must also note that the praise mentioned in the closing verses is promised, not necessarily actual. The psalm may thus also reflect worshipers’ emotional turmoil and their determination to praise God nonetheless. For the faith reflected in the Psalms, complaint need not indicate a lack of trust, nor does trust make complaint unnecessary. In fact, it is this trust in God that allows for the expression of such protests in the relationship.[4]

13:5 But I trust … in your salvation. The conjunction “but” (Heb. adversative waw) is the fulcrum on which David’s faith turns: “But I trust …” The “I” is emphatic and is a casus pendens: “but as for me, I trust in your unfailing love.” The backdrop of this verse is most likely political conflict, and thus “salvation” is deliverance from the political danger. This word in time and changing circumstances takes on a spiritual meaning and here very well may have such a nuance, that is, deliverance from the oppressive sense of God’s having forgotten the psalmist.

13:6 for he has been good to me. The verb expresses the idea of “completeness,” or “to deal bountifully.”[5]

Express Confidence in God’s Deliverance (13:5–6)

13:5–6. In this final section, as characteristically in his psalms, David concluded on a note of trust, gratitude, and praise of God: But I have trusted in Your lovingkindness. Despite God’s not yet having answered David’s appeal, indeed He is more than deserving of David’s praise and gratitude for (1) who He is (i.e., a God characterized by lovingkindness; cf. 5:7 comments), (2) what He has promised ultimately to do (i.e., bring full and final salvation, as in Ps 12:5), and (3) what He has already done (dealt bountifully with David [lit., brought David redemption]; for this word, see the comment on Ps 116:7).[6]

5–6. See how the note is changed. Yes! when a soul is thus enabled to act faith upon Jesus, and the divine promises in him, there will be soon cause to praise and sing aloud of God’s faithfulness and bounty. But do not fail, Reader, to observe with me what the joy of the soul here is. Not that his frames were altered; not that his heart was enlarged; not that more light was brought into his soul: these things he had, and these were all precious; but these were the effects and not the cause of his joy. No! read the verse again, and you will see that what his heart rejoiced in was God’s salvation, and God’s mercy. And what is this but Jesus, all-precious, all-satisfying, soul-comforting Jesus? I pray you, Reader, mark it down as a matter of great importance for every occasion of soul exercises, that it is Jesus, and not our frames or feelings, that is the cause of all real joy. When we put the effects for the cause, and magnify the fruit of faith instead of the glorious object of faith, we place our comfort where it is not. So that when our frames alter, as alter they soon will, where is our joy then? But if we place it in Jesus, and have it in Jesus; here we may always find it, in every rainy, dark, or gloomy day that follows.[7]

13:5, 6. Certainty

The I of verse 5 is emphatic (as in neb, etc.: ‘But for my part I …’), and so, to a lesser degree, is thy steadfast love. However great the pressure, the choice is still his to make, not the enemy’s; and God’s covenant remains. So the psalmist entrusts himself to this pledged love, and turns his attention not to the quality of his faith but to its object and its outcome, which he has every intention of enjoying. The basic idea of the word translated dealt bountifully is completeness, which neb interprets attractively as ‘granted all my desire’. But rsv can hardly be bettered, since it leaves room for God’s giving to exceed man’s asking. As for the past tense in which it is put, this springs evidently from David’s certainty that he will have such a song to offer, when he looks back at the whole way he has been led.[8]

13:5–6. Confidence and praise

Most laments end with confidence or praise; this one finishes with both. The psalmist’s praise emanates from his trust that God will hear his prayer and will respond. After all, God has unfailing love (ḥesed), the kind of love that is connected to the covenant relationship between God and Israel and which produces loyalty. God will save or rescue the psalmist. He can be sure of that, because God is good.


This psalm provides a model prayer for someone who has felt God’s judgment, but now wants to urge him towards restoration. The basis of this prayer is God’s justice. He will not punish more than is deserved. The basis of the prayer too is that God does not want the enemy of his people to overwhelm them. The ending of the book of Lamentations asks similar questions on behalf of the whole nation.

The psalmist’s sense of divine abandonment is felt by Jesus on the cross, although he asks the ‘why’ question, not the ‘how long’ question (Mark 15:34, citing Ps. 22:1). In any case, the Christian reader of the psalm may find confidence in the fact that Jesus himself experienced abandonment, and hope in the resurrection.[9]

Ver. 5. But I have trusted in Thy mercy.On the mercy of God:

  1. What is meant by the mercy of God? Mercy differs from goodness in that it supposes guilt. Without the fall of man there could have been no occasion for his redemption; and without the plan of redemption it does not appear that we could have formed any opinion of the Divine mercy.
  2. How does it remedy man’s misery? The two evils to which man is exposed are sin and death. Yet they differ only as cause and effect. Sin is the distemper, and death the issue of it. Against sin God hath provided by giving us the light of Scripture; against death by the new principle of life infused into the Christian from the time of his baptismal regeneration.

III. What is it to trust in this mercy? We cannot do so till we know what we have to fear. But men are insensible of this, because self-satisfied and resting in a mistaken confidence. To trust in God is to renounce all self-confidence, and to rely on the mercy of God. Do not mistake presumption for trust. They who do, think that God’s mercy is only to deliver from punishment. It is to deliver from sin.

  1. The joy and comfort following. “My heart shall rejoice in Thy salvation.” (A. Jones, M.A.)

Mercy and joy:

The minister of the Gospel is to proclaim free grace everywhere. But the heart must be awakened ere it can receive the truth of God’s grace.

  1. The experimental statement of David. “I have trusted in Thy mercy.” He was a sinner, but here was all his hope. This the test of true discipleship, whether we have come to trust as David did, and to hope in the mercy of God through Jesus Christ. And he knew this experimentally. Dry doctrines will not suffice alone. They would starve a soul. There must be experience. David here tells out his sorrow. He mourns God’s delays. But he trusts in God.
  2. His experience. “My heart shall rejoice in Thy salvation.” He had trusted, and he anticipates rejoicing. Here was the shelter, the anchor of his soul. The Church and the Christian can never be ship-wrecked, for the anchor holds. He speaks of a heart joy. No one can know anything about heart-rejoicing but those who have been heart-achers. “Blessed are they that mourn, for they shall be comforted.” How blessed it is to experience the stillness and the quietness of the peace of God. Compared with this, what is the world worth? (J. J. West, M.A.)

My heart shall rejoice in Thy salvation.—A renovation of heart essential to a state of salvation:

  1. Without the renovation of the heart there can be no distinct knowledge of the Gospel. The natural mind cannot receive the things of God; they are spiritually discerned. The mind must be renewed, that the man may become spiritual.
  2. Nor can there be a new nature. This is essential to the enjoyment of salvation. For how can we enjoy that which is opposed to our feelings, desires, habits? We have no enjoyment in the society of those who are the objects of our aversion. The “enmity” of the mind must be “slain” by the constraining power of the love of Christ; but this involves renovation.
  3. Unless the heart is renewed by the Spirit of God there is no possibility of accounting for the discovery and preparation of a plan of redemption at all. Was it worthy of the Divinity to do all that He has done in redemption for the sake of saving those He never intended to change and purify?
  4. This renovation of heart is essential to the enjoyment of heaven. Take an individual from the lowest ranks of society, and place him in the midst of the high-born, the educated, the refined; where will be his enjoyment? The unrenewed man, set in the midst of those who have their “conversation in heaven,” has no relish for the company, and gladly turns from it. The reason for finding no interest in heaven is—unrenewedness of heart. (J. Burnet.)[10]

Verse 5.—“I have trusted in thy mercy; my heart shall rejoice in thy salvation.” Faith rejoiceth in tribulations, and triumpheth before the victory. The patient is glad when he feels his physic to work, though it make him sick for the time because he hopes it will procure health. We rejoice in afflictions, not that they are joyous for the present, but because they shall work for our good. As faith rejoiceth, so it triumpheth in assurance of good success; for it seeth not according to outward appearance, but when all means fail, it keepeth God in sight, and beholdeth him present for our succour.—John Ball.

Verse 5.—“I have trusted in thy mercy; my heart shall rejoice in thy salvation.” Though passion possess our bodies, let “patience possess our souls.” The law of our profession binds us to a warfare; patiendo vincimus, our troubles shall end, our victory is eternal. Here David’s triumph (Psalm 18:38–40), “I have wounded them, that they were not able to rise; they are fallen under my feet. Thou hast subdued under me those that rose up against me. Thou hast also given me the neck of mine enemies,” etc. They have wounds for their wounds; and the treaders down of the poor are trodden down by the poor. The Lord will subdue those to us that would have subdued us to themselves; and though for a short time they rode over our heads, yet now at last we shall everlastingly tread upon their necks. Lo, then, the reward of humble patience and confident hope. Speramus et superamus. Deut. 32:31. “Our God is not as their God, even our enemies being judges.” Psalm 20:7. “Some put their trust in chariots, and some in horses.” But no chariot hath strength to oppose, nor horse swiftness to escape, when God pursues. Verse 8. “They are brought down and fallen; we are risen and stand upright.” Their trust hath deceived them; down they fall, and never to rise. Our God hath helped us; we are risen, not for a breathing space, but to stand upright for ever.—Thomas Adams.

Verse 5.—None live so easily, so pleasantly, as those that live by faith.—Matthew Henry.

Verse 5.—Wherefore I say again, “Live by faith;” again I say, always live by it, rejoice through faith in the Lord. I dare boldly say it is thy fault and neglect of its exercise if thou suffer either thy own melancholy humour or Satan to interrupt thy mirth and spiritual alacrity, and to detain thee in dumps and pensiveness at any time. What if thou beest of a sad constitution? of a dark complexion? Is not faith able to rectify nature? Is it not stronger than any hellebore? Doth not an experienced divine and physician worthily prefer one dram of it before all the drugs in the apothecary’s shop for this effect? Hath it not sovereign virtue in it, to excerebrate all cares, expectorate all fears and griefs, evacuate the mind of all ill thoughts and passions, to exhilarate the whole man? But what good doth it to any to have a cordial by him if he use it not? To wear a sword, soldier-like, by his side, and not to draw it forth in an assault? When a dump overtakes thee, if thou wouldst say to thy soul in a word or two, “Soul, why art thou disquieted? know and consider in whom thou believest,” would it not presently return to its rest again? Would not the Master rebuke the winds and storms, and calm thy troubled mind presently? Hath not every man something or other he useth to put away dumps, to drive away the evil spirit, as David with his harp? Some with merry company, some with a cup of sack, most with a pipe of tobacco, without which they cannot ride or go. If they miss it a day together they are troubled with rheums, dulness of spirits. They that live in fens and ill airs dare not stir out without a morning draught of some strong liquor. Poor, silly, smoky helps, in comparison with the least taste (but for dishonouring faith I would say whiff) or draught of faith.—Samuel Ward, 1577–1653.[11]

[1] VanGemeren, W. A. (2008). Psalms. In T. Longman III & D. E. Garland (Eds.), The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Psalms (Revised Edition) (Vol. 5, pp. 172–173). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

[2] Jacobson, R. A., & Tanner, B. (2014). Book One of the Psalter: Psalms 1–41. In E. J. Young, R. K. Harrison, & R. L. Hubbard Jr. (Eds.), The Book of Psalms (pp. 161–162). Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

[3] Harman, A. (2011). Psalms: A Mentor Commentary (Vol. 1–2, p. 163). Ross-shire, Great Britain: Mentor.

[4] Hubbard, R. L. J., & Johnston, R. K. (2012). Foreword. In W. W. Gasque, R. L. Hubbard Jr., & R. K. Johnston (Eds.), Psalms (pp. 86–87). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

[5] Bullock, C. H. (2015). Psalms 1–72. (M. L. Strauss & J. H. Walton, Eds.) (Vol. 1, p. 91). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

[6] Rydelnik, M. A., & Vanlaningham, M. (Eds.). (2014). Psalms. In The moody bible commentary (p. 771). Chicago, IL: Moody Publishers.

[7] Hawker, R. (2013). Poor Man’s Old Testament Commentary: Job–Psalms (Vol. 4, pp. 199–200). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.

[8] Kidner, D. (1973). Psalms 1–72: an introduction and commentary (Vol. 15, p. 95). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

[9] Longman, T., III. (2014). Psalms: An Introduction and Commentary. (D. G. Firth, Ed.) (Vol. 15–16, pp. 96–97). Nottingham, England: Inter-Varsity Press.

[10] Exell, J. S. (1909). The Biblical Illustrator: The Psalms (Vol. 1, pp. 199–200). New York; Chicago; Toronto; London; Edinburgh: Fleming H. Revell Company; Francis Griffiths.

[11] Spurgeon, C. H. (n.d.). The treasury of David: Psalms 1-26 (Vol. 1, pp. 157–158). London; Edinburgh; New York: Marshall Brothers.

February 20 The Poor Man’s Evening Portion


Now thou art commanded, this do ye: take you wagons out of the land of Egypt, for your little ones, and for your wives, and bring your father, and come. Also regard not your stuff; for the good of all the land of Egypt is yours.—Gen. 45:19, 20.

What effect must the first news of Joseph’s being alive, and his exaltation at the right hand of Pharaoh, have had upon the mind of the patriarch Jacob! And what a flood of overwhelming joy must have broke in upon the poor old man, when convinced of the certainty of the account! But what are all these feelings of nature, compared to the triumphs of grace when the poor sinner is first made acquainted with the wonders of redemption, wrought out and accomplished by one that is his brother, even our spiritual Joseph, the Lord Jesus Christ! Yes! thou risen and exalted Saviour! by faith I behold thee on the right hand of the Majesty on high; and all power thine in heaven and on earth. I hear thee giving commandments to thy servants, to take the ordinances, and the several means of grace, in thy sacred word, and like the conveyances of the wagons of Egypt, to bring all thy kindred, thy redeemed ones, to thee. Yea, Lord! I would do as thou hast said, regard not the stuff, for gladly would I leave it all behind; for it hath already too long and too powerfully occupied my poor heart, and robbed my soul of thee. I would hasten to thy presence; for sure I am, the good of all the land of heaven itself is thy brethren’s, and what is infinitely more than even heaven, thou, even thou, thyself, blessed Jesus, art thy people’s. But, Lord! how shall I look thee in the face? How shall I dare to draw nigh, conscious of my having, like the sons of Jacob, sold thee, parted with thee, denied thee, left thee, and as the Jews of old, preferred every Barabbas, every robber before thee? And wilt thou, dearest Lord, still own me, still love me, and still speak kindly to me? Oh! what praises will the realms of heaven resound with, when Jesus shall have brought home all his brethren into his Father’s house, around himself, in glory! How will then every knee (and my poor soul among the glorious number) bow before thee, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Amen and Amen![1]



[1] Hawker, R. (1845). The Poor Man’s Evening Portion (A New Edition, pp. 56–57). Philadelphia: Thomas Wardle.

February 20 Streams in the Desert

Nothing shall be impossible unto you.” (Matt. 17:20.)

IT is possible, for those who really are willing to reckon on the power of the Lord for keeping and victory, to lead a life in which His promises are taken as they stand and are found to be true.

It is possible to cast all our care upon Him daily and to enjoy deep peace in doing it.

It is possible to have the thoughts and imaginations of our hearts purified, in the deepest meaning of the word.

It is possible to see the will of God in everything, and to receive it, not with sighing, but with singing.

It is possible by taking complete refuge in Divine power to become strong through and through; and, where previously our greatest weakness lay, to find that things which formerly upset all our resolves to be patient, or pure, or humble, furnish today an opportunity—through Him who loved us, and works in us an agreement with His will and a blessed sense of His presence and His power—to make sin powerless over us.

These things are divine possibilities, and because they are His work, the true experience of them will always cause us to bow lower at His feet and to learn to thirst and long for more.

We cannot possibly be satisfied with anything less—each day, each hour, each moment, in Christ, through the power of the Holy Spirit—than to walk with God.—H. C. G. Moule.

We may have as much of God as we will. Christ puts the key of the treasure-chamber into our hand, and bids us take all that we want. If a man is admitted into the bullion vault of a bank, and told to help himself, and comes out with one cent, whose fault is it that he is poor? Whose fault is it that Christian people generally have such scanty portions of the free riches of God?—McLaren.[1]


[1] Cowman, L. B. (1925). Streams in the Desert (pp. 57–58). Los Angeles, CA: The Oriental Missionary Society.

February 20th The D. L. Moody Year Book

He that turneth away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer shall be abomination.—Proverbs 28:9.

THINK of that! It may shock some of us to think that our prayers are an abomination to God, yet if any are living in known sin, this is what God’s Word says about them. If we are not willing to turn form sin and obey God’s law, we have no right to expect that He will answer our prayers. Unconfessed sin is unforgiven sin, and unforgiven sin is the darkest, foulest thing on this sin-cursed earth. You cannot find a case in the Bible where a man has been honest in dealing with sin, but God has been honest with him and blessed him. The prayer of the humble and the contrite heart is a delight to God. There is no sound that goes up from this sin-cursed earth so sweet to His ear as the prayer of the man who is walking uprightly.[1]


[1] Moody, D. L. (1900). The D. L. Moody Year Book: A Living Daily Message from the Words of D. L. Moody. (E. M. Fitt, Ed.) (pp. 40–41). East Northfield, MA: The Bookstore.

Goldman Sachs says investors’ cavalier attitude toward the coronavirus is setting the market up for a correction

  • Markets have shrugged off coronavirus fear on earnings optimism, and Goldman Sachs is warning against what they view as complacency.
  • It’s looking increasingly likely that the market will correct in the near term, according to Peter Oppenheimer, the firm’s chief global equity strategist.

Goldman Sachs thinks investors could stand to be a little more on-edge about the coronavirus.

Optimism around corporate earnings has powered equities to new highs and prompted traders to set aside fears around coronavirus. But Goldman analyst Peter Oppenheimer thinks the market is overestimating the ability of companies to keep growing profits.

He adds that softening economic growth prospects are also being overlooked. That creates a situation where future earnings misses are more likely, which would weigh on share prices as well.

“Over the past couple of months the new highs in the market have been driven by lower bond yields and looser financial conditions despite weaker growth prospects,” Oppenheimer said. “This makes the market vulnerable to earnings disappointments.”

He continued: “While a sustained bear market does not look likely, a near-term correction is looking much more probable.”

But Oppenheimer says he understands where investors are coming from. He notes that market participants are likely being influenced by the market’s resilience in the face of the 2003 SARS epidemic.

“Investors have largely taken the view that the impact will be temporary, hopefully short-lived, and that most of the weakness should be reversed with a strong rebound in the quarters that follow,” he said.

Oppenheimer says that reaction — or the lack thereof — follows a “playbook” that investors have grown accustomed to from other market reactions to viral infections.

But he points out that China is significantly more important to the global economy than it was when hit in 2003, he said. The matches research from Goldman last week suggesting that the economic cost of coronavirus could be castrophic in the near term.

“The impact of the coronavirus on earnings may well be underestimated in the current stock prices, suggesting that the risks of a correction are high,” Oppenheimer said.

The post-coronavirus profit shakeout is already well underway. Three high-profile names added themselves to that list of companies affected on Thursday alone: Airline Air France-KLM, iPhone-maker Foxconn, and AP Moller-Maersk, the world’s largest container shipping company.

Further, Apple — the world’s most valuable company — warned Monday that the coronavirus hammered sales this quarter and will keep the company from hitting its second-quarter revenue target.

Source: Goldman Sachs says investors’ cavalier attitude toward the coronavirus is setting the market up for a correction

Most evangelical Christians live outside of North America and Europe, researcher says

Evangelical Christians make up a huge swath of the world’s population. But most of them reside in Asia, Africa, and Latin America — not in North America, a new study has found.

Source: Most evangelical Christians live outside of North America and Europe, researcher says

Need to Know: Goldman Sachs warns of imminent risk for stocks due to complacency on coronavirus

JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs are both worried about investor behavior right now. Our call of the day comes from the latter, who warns the coronavirus may be a bigger hit to U.S. earnings than investors think.

Source: Need to Know: Goldman Sachs warns of imminent risk for stocks due to complacency on coronavirus

John MacArthur: Charismatics Have Made No Contributions to Sound Doctrine | Reformation Charlotte

John MacArthur is one of the fiercest opponents to the charismatic movement alive today. While MacArthur acknowledges that there are some who are part of the movement that understand the gospel, he also rightfully states that their views are heterodox on the ministry of the Holy Spirit.

MacArthur points out that the charismatic movement is one of the most dangerous movements within the Church today.

If you were to die today, where would you go? Heaven? Hell? Not sure?

Source: John MacArthur: Charismatics Have Made No Contributions to Sound Doctrine

FBI has ordered $40,000 in hand sanitizer and face masks ‘in case the coronavirus becomes a pandemic in the United States’

The Trump administration last month declared the virus a public health emergency, but the virus has not yet met world health officials’ designation of a global pandemic that spreads widely throughout the world.

Source: FBI has ordered $40,000 in hand sanitizer and face masks ‘in case the coronavirus becomes a pandemic in the United States’

Will Censorship Prevail Over the First Amendment?

by Paul Craig Roberts (Unz Review) I remember when censorship in America was a limited phenomenon. It applied during war time—“loose lips sink ships.” It applied to pornography. It applied to curse words on the public airwaves and in movies.

Source: Will Censorship Prevail Over the First Amendment?

‘Mini Mike’ is my Fan! Donald Trump Ecstatic as Bloomberg Caught Praising Him in Old Interviews

A number of past videos of Democratic presidential contender Michael Bloomberg sharing his warm feelings towards Donald Trump are currently making the rounds on social media, and this could not go unnoticed by the US president.

Source: ‘Mini Mike’ is my Fan! Donald Trump Ecstatic as Bloomberg Caught Praising Him in Old Interviews

In our ‘crisis of contempt,’ how can Christians disagree with others—gracefully? — Denison Forum

In the midst of impeachment trials, election debates, and general political party divisions, the practice of the elementary principles of respect and kindness have seemed to vanish. An us-versus-them mentality has instead surfaced, overwhelming the political battlefield, creating an environment as hostile as the trenches of war.

We have dehumanized those with whom we disagree, labeling them as an opponent with an unforgivable viewpoint. How have we come to such a vehement perspective? When did we forget that our opponents are simply neighbors, friends, and family members? At what point did disagreeing become unpardonable? How can we remedy our hatred?

A cry for biblical love

Arthur Brooks, keynote speaker at the 68th National Prayer Breakfast held earlier this month, called our country to action with a cry for biblical love: he believes “the biggest crisis facing our nation and many other nations today . . . [is] the crisis of contempt and polarization that’s tearing our societies apart.”

Lack of respect does not adequately cover what we are combating. This derisive behavior is deeper than merely being rude. It is vicious and unkind, completely void of the love Christ commands us to offer. The conduct surrounding politics, and general disagreement across party lines, is disdainful, hurtful, and aggressive.

Mother Teresa once said, “The hunger for love is much more difficult to remove than the hunger for bread.” Loving our opponents does not mean agreeing with them. Loving those with whom we disagree means that we acknowledge their opinion and choose to truly see them, seeking to understand whatever it is they bring to the table.

We will oftentimes continue to disagree, whether based on principle of faith or otherwise. But a willingness to truly hear the viewpoint of others, without simply waiting our turn to berate their belief, is essential to forward progress.

What is civility anyway?

In response to Nancy Pelosi’s actions at President Trump’s State of the Union Address, Jonathan Turley, GOP witness in the House impeachment proceedings, tweeted, “Pelosi’s act dishonored the institution and destroyed even the pretense of civility and decorum in the House.”

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerburg received backlash for meeting with conservative journalists and commentators late last year, to which he replied, “Meeting new people and hearing from a wide range of viewpoints is part of learning, if you haven’t tried it, I suggest you do!”

If we cannot even uphold a pretense of civility, how might we begin to learn and grow together?

In an interview with the New York Times’ Nellie Bowles, professor James Calvin Davis of Middlebury College, author of In Defense of Civility, stated: “There isn’t even agreement anymore on whether civility is a good thing.” Professor Davis suggests that the very concept of civility now paints images of weakness rather than respect.

A recent article published in the Washington Post reported the findings of a survey conducted at the end of last year. The survey asked citizens several questions about the role of civility in public life. Their results suggest that, “while citizens generally think being civil is relatively important in a democracy, they don’t agree on what is uncivil.”

A call to think differently

At the National Prayer Breakfast, Arthur Brooks called his audience to think differently. His simple model is not innovative. To the contrary, it focuses on the basics of Christianity and human decency:

  • Make the problem personal.
  • Have moral courage, “standing up to those with whom you agree on behalf of those with whom you disagree.”
  • View tolerance and civility as a low standard.
  • Make accountability a requirement.
  • Seek out contempt.

Brooks proposes: “When people treat you with hatred and you answer with love, you change the country. It’s like being a missionary. This is your opportunity to show people what leadership is all about. Run toward the darkness, bring your light.”

Personal relationships across party divides are critical for our political growth as a nation. To spark true change, change that will seep into the crevices of every aspect of our lives, we must work toward unity. Growing, changing, and encouraging each other is where we start.

By listening to different opinions, we are encouraged to stretch and grow and may sometimes discover someone else’s viewpoint is better than our own. Verbally accepting and acknowledging a viewpoint that is different and better than our ideas allows us to be stronger as a whole.

Engage in kind discussion

“I tell you, on the day of judgment people will give account for every careless word they speak, for by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned” (Matthew 12:36–37).

Intentions may be pure, but the way we handle disagreement might not reflect our devotion to Christ. It is essential that we consider our verbiage through a biblical lens, especially in the sensitive areas of debate and dialogue surrounding disagreement. We must take captive our words and ensure they are spoken with discernment, for by our words we will be justified and condemned.

An article published by NBC News outlined these nine tips for disagreeing with grace:

  1. Consider your heart.
  2. Ask if you may discuss a controversial topic.
  3. Begin by communicating an understanding of your counterpart’s point of view.
  4. Find a point of agreement.
  5. Talk less.
  6. Avoid using the word but, instead choosing phrases like and at the same time.
  7. Stay on topic.
  8. Resist the temptation to be provocative.

Ensuring we begin debate dialogue or disagreement with pure intentions can set the pace for a constructive conversation. Offering respect by allowing the person with whom you speak to grant you the privilege of discussing the issue further paves the conversational ground for success. Expressing empathy, truly listening, and choosing to avoid broader topics of dissection all lead to constructive conversation.

Each of the listed tips are simple and timeless. There is not one novel principle or idea offered. And yet, they are profound in these days. They call us to pause and truly see our opponent as a person, to hear the words that they offer, to connect with them on a deeper level.

In their book, Good Disagreement?: Grace and Truth in a Divided Church, Andrew Atherstone and Andrew Goddard speak to the manner in which we disagree as a witness to Christ: “Continuing to witness to God’s grace and truth in how we walk apart: in humility and sorrow, with blessing and not cursing, with gentleness not venom.”

Brothers, sisters, and friends

It is difficult to navigate the delicate areas surrounding ideas of abortion, homosexuality, and varying notions that oppose biblical text. But, despite our inability to accept these ideas, it is critical that we recognize those with whom we disagree as brothers, sisters, and friends.

Do we agree? No.

Do we accept? Not necessarily.

Do we love? Absolutely.

We embrace our opponents as children of God, no matter their opinion or stance on a political or cultural issue. It’s not us versus them. We are all in this worldly existence together. We are all trudging through this messy, mucky, at times confusing life experience as a team.

Missional territory

To truly impact our culture, we must radically alter our perspectives. We need to grow and shift and seek discernment every single day, in our every interaction. Christ did not cast out the Samaritan woman at the well; he sought her out and loved her well. And it was through the woman’s testimony that many Samaritans came to believe.

It is our mission on this earth to spread his light and goodness. We cannot do that if we choose vehement rhetoric and stoic refusal to truly see our opponents as humans. If we cannot even meet the bare minimum of tolerance and civility, how can we go beyond that to unconditional love, support, encouragement, and growth?

Risen Motherhood, an online resource formed to encourage, equip, and challenge moms to apply the gospel to their everyday lives, recently spoke to the difficulty of love. Co-founder Emily Jensen stated, “The purest moments of love we express are often ones that feel the least lovely.”

Friends, disagreement is not lovely. It is not beautiful. But what can be birthed from disagreement, when practiced with an underlying biblical love and willingness to grow where growth can be achieved, that is beautiful. Forward progress, broken barriers between political parties, greater respect offered to opponents, all of these things are lovely.

I am immensely grateful for Arthur Brooks’ simplistic call to action at the 68th National Prayer Breakfast. He provided the encouragement we all need to seek a higher standard of kindness in disagreement and debate.

May we go about our lives with Brooks’ ending remark in mind: “You are now entering mission territory.”

via In our ‘crisis of contempt,’ how can Christians disagree with others—gracefully? — Denison Forum

Bloomberg Labels Trump ‘Real Winner’ of Nevada Democratic Debate — National Review

“Look, the real winner of the debate last night was Donald Trump, because I worry that we may be on the way to nominating someone who cannot win in November,” Bloomberg said.

via Bloomberg Labels Trump ‘Real Winner’ of Nevada Democratic Debate — National Review