DOCUMENTATION AND ADDITIONAL READING
DOCUMENTATION AND ADDITIONAL READING
“The LORD heeded the voice of a man.” – Joshua 10:14
Scripture reading: Joshua 10:12-15
When they come to this passage, liberal Bible scholars focus all their attention on explaining why we no longer need to believe that the sun literally stood still for Joshua. Don’t listen to that lie. Of course we believe this literally! The same God Who created the sun and moon and Who hung them in space is fully capable of stopping them in space if He so chooses.
If your “god” cannot do miracles like this, then you do not believe in the true God; and if you do not believe in the true God, then your fate will be no different than these five Canaanite kings. So our focus is not on whether God can make the sun stand still; of course He can! Our focus is on Joshua’s prayer and how the Almighty God of all Heaven and Earth would choose to “heed the voice of a man” (vs. 14).
For think on this: this same God Who controls the spinning of this earth and the rising of the sun each day; Who rules every nation and controls every event of human history; this same sovereign, holy and majestic God STOPS EVERYTHING the moment He hears you call out His name! He answers the deepest sighing of your soul. He bends low to hear the weakest stammering of your hurting heart. Everything else takes a back seat when God hears you call His name, and He takes action on your behalf. Find comfort in the fact that God answers your prayers.
Suggestions for prayer
Praise God for His loving heart shown to you. Thank Him for hearing your prayer. Ask Him to bring you His comfort through the working of His Spirit within you.
By Elizabeth Prata
Included in this edition of Prata Potpourri are some things that either aren’t talked about enough (Lake of Fire) or are talked about so much that the wackadoodles have gotten a-hold of the issue and twisted it beyond all recognition (angels, spiritual warfare). Here are some credible links to these and other topics.
Jim Osman and Justin Peters’ video series on Spiritual Warfare is excellent. Here is the 8-part series-
Show 1 of 8: Justin Peters & Jim Osman on the: Doctrine of the Sufficiency of Scripture as it relates to Biblical Spiritual Warfare. Justin Peters interviews Pastor & Author Jim Osman on the subject of Spiritual Warfare and Jim’s book: “Truth or Territory: A Biblical Approach to Spiritual Warfare”. Some examples of False Teaching on Spiritual Warfare are briefly discussed as well as some False Teachers are named. These issues will be discussed in greater detail in coming episodes. Jim Osman starts this series off by giving viewers a brief Testimony of how the LORD changed his thinking on this very important subject, then both Justin & Jim introduce viewers to the topic of the Doctrine of the Sufficiency of Scripture which is briefly defined and defended from 2 Timothy 3:16-17 and 2 Peter 1:3-4.
Show 1: Spiritual Warfare & Sufficiency of Scripture
Show 2: Spiritual Warfare: Truth or Territory
Show 3: Carnal Weapons: Hedges & Hexes
Show 4: Carnal Weapons: Binding & Rebuking
Show 5: Carnal Weapons: Spiritual Mapping
Show 6: Demon Possession & Sanctification
Show 7: Authority & Exorcisms
Show 8: Armor Of God: Spiritual Warfare – Ephesians 6
There have been some high-profile people proclaiming their abandonment of the faith this week. There have subsequently been a lot of response articles of various kinds. Here are two:
Are you surprised when you come across so-called Christians who claim to be followers of Jesus, but never ‘follow’ Him into a church? They say that attending church isn’t necessary to be a fully devoted Christian? I am. I am actually shocked when I deal with this among professing Christians. And it’s spreading.
Here is Derek Thomas with an essay about Loving the Church, For Better or Worse
What DOES the Bible say about angels, anyway? I love the thought of angels and I study Angelology (from credible sources). Here are two credible sources on a teaching about angels you might enjoy.
TableTalk Magazine: What does the Bible say about Angels? First in a series. I love angels and learning about them.
From Founders, something for Moms. Moms, you have a hard job and often it’s lonely. Hope this encourages you- Eight Lies Moms Believe.
From Media Gratiae: The newly released trailer of Puritan. Documentary coming soon, this summer they say!
From Nate Pickowitz, new book. If you’re interested in the American Puritans, this is a good one to pick up- John Cotton: Patriarch of New England
From Ligonier: The Final State of the Unbeliever. This will happen. Pray evangelistically and frequently! Romans 10:1 says, Brethren, my heart’s desire and my prayer to God for them is for their salvation.
In the lead-up to the Truth Matters conference in October, we will be focusing our attention on the sufficiency, authority, and clarity of Scripture. One of our previous blog series, Looking for Truth in All the Wrong Places, stronglyemphasizes those doctrines. The following entry from that series originally appeared on June 5, 2017. -ed.
God told me.
The Holy Spirit laid it on my heart.
The Spirit is compelling me.
Those phrases and others like them are frequently thrown around the church today without giving many people pause. In fact, it seems the Holy Spirit’s primary role is laying burdens on believers and compelling them to deliver specific, timely messages to the church.
But how do we know when it’s actually the Holy Spirit, and not just a heavy conscience, a strong personal desire, or emotion-driven enthusiasm? For that matter, what’s to say it wasn’t simply some bad pizza? For all the talk about the Holy Spirit directing us, speaking to us and through us, and compelling us this way and that, how do we know when God is truly leading us?
We recently asked John MacArthur about how we can discern the Spirit’s ongoing work in the lives of believers. Here’s what he said:
We ought to look for the Holy Spirit’s leadership, but we must be cautious about assigning to Him responsibility for our words and actions. Our feelings are not necessarily a trustworthy source of information, nor are they an accurate indication that God has a special message to deliver to us or through us.
God’s people need to be circumspect when it comes to His leadership, particularly through subjective impressions and inclinations. Moreover, we need to be wary of those who highjack the prophetic seat and presume to speak for God.
In the days ahead, we’re going to look at some landmark teaching from John MacArthur regarding the propensity of many believers to look for eternal truth in all the wrong places. You won’t want to miss this engaging, insightful series that deals with the pitfalls of subjectivity and postmodernity, and the sufficiency of Scripture.
In Our Dying Hour
The day may come when after a long fight with disease, we shall feel that medicine can do no more, and that nothing remains but to die. Friends will be standing by, unable to help us. Hearing, eyesight, even the power of praying, will be fast failing us. The world and its shadows will be melting beneath our feet. Eternity, with its realities, will be looming large before our minds.
What shall support us in that trying hour? What shall enable us to feel, “I fear no evil”? (Psalm 23:4.) Nothing, nothing can do it but close communion with Christ. Christ dwelling in our hearts by faith,—Christ putting His right arm under our heads,—Christ felt to be sitting by our side,—Christ can alone give us the complete victory in the last struggle.
Let us cleave to Christ more closely, love Him more heartily, live to Him more thoroughly, copy Him more exactly, confess Him more boldly, follow Him more fully. Religion like this will always bring its own reward. Worldly people may laugh at it. Weak brethren may think it extreme. But it will wear well. At even time it will bring us light. In sickness it will bring us peace. In the world to come it will give us a crown of glory that fadeth not away.
The time is short. The fashion of this world passeth away. A few more sicknesses, and all will be over. A few more funerals, and our own funeral will take place. A few more storms and tossings, and we shall be safe in harbour. We travel towards a world where there is no more sickness,—where parting, and pain, and crying, and mourning, are done with for evermore.
Heaven is becoming every year more full, and earth more empty. The friends ahead are becoming more numerous than the friends astern. “Yet a little time and He that shall come will come, and will not tarry.” (Heb. 10:37.) In His presence shall be fulness of joy. Christ shall wipe away all tears from His people’s eyes. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is Death. But he shall be destroyed. Death himself shall one day die (Rev. 20:14).
In the meantime let us live the life of faith in the Son of God. Let us lean all our weight on Christ, and rejoice in the thought that He lives for evermore. Yes: blessed be God! Christ lives, though we may die. Christ lives, though friends and families are carried to the grave. He lives who abolished death, and brought life and immortality to light by the Gospel.
He lives who said, “O death, I will be thy plagues: O grave, I will be thy destruction” (Hos. 13:14). He lives who will one day change our vile body, and make it like unto His glorious body. In sickness and in health, in life and in death, let us lean confidently on Him. Surely we ought to say daily with one of old, “Blessed be God for Jesus Christ!”
—J.C. Ryle, “Sickness” in Practical Religion: Being Plain Papers on the Daily Duties, Experience, Dangers, and Privileges of Professing Christians(London: Charles Murray, 1900), 372-374. (online source)
The narcissism of social media culture has affected too many Christian “influencers.”
Todd Starnes speaks with President and CEO of Samaritan’s Purse Franklin Graham about his support for a New Jersey mayor who opposes a law that requires public schools to teach LGBT history.
The lead singer of one of the most popular bands in Christian rock music is joining the growing chorus of believers concerned about the dumbing down of the church and the rising influence of so-called “celebrity influencers.”
“There’s a problem here,” Skillet lead singer John Cooper said on The Todd Starnes Radio Show. “We could be doing a much better job in Christendom of not elevating people because they are young, cool or look the right way or sound the right way.”
Cooper wrote a now-viral message on his Facebook page expressing his deep concerns about so-called Christian influencers who are openly renouncing their faith and others who are turning their back on biblical teachings.
“I’m bummed out,” he said. “I’m pleading with the church we can all do a better job of elevating the right people.”
While Cooper did not name names, there has been considerable news coverage given to statements made by Hillsong worship leader Marty Sampson and “I Kissed Dating Goodbye” author Joshua Harris.
Harris publicly renounced his faith in Christ while Sampson publicly said he was “genuinely losing” his faith.
“We must STOP making worship leaders and thought leaders or influencers or cool people or “relevant” people the most influential people in Christendom,” Cooper wrote in a now-viral Facebook post. “We are in a dangerous place when the church is looking to 20 year old worship singers as our source of truth,” he wrote. “We now have a church culture that learns who God is from singing modern praise songs rather than from the teachings of the Word.”
Franklin Graham, the president of Samaritan’s Purse and the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, was especially troubled by Christian influencers who seek to make headlines by renouncing their faith publicly.
“Shame on them,” Graham said. “You’ll stand before God one day and give an account to Him. God warns churches that turn their back on him and these young men who have renounced their faith have made it so public. Why did they make it so public? I think they just want publicity. Otherwise, why didn’t they just leave their faith and just be quiet about it?”
Cooper said such behavior speaks to the narcissism of social media culture.
“Social media is not your diary,” he said on my radio show. “There are things you can struggle with in your life. You don’t have to say every one of them on your Instagram page.”
Dr. David Wheeler, a professor of evangelism at Liberty University, said he is concerned about the dumbing down of the church.
“We take the flashiest bait out there and so often we end up falling in the wrong direction,” Wheeler said on my radio show. “Students love to worship, but they don’t understand that the heartbeat of worship is obedience to a holy and righteous God. It’s not just an experience. It’s not just an emotion.”
Wheeler suggested that the broader problem facing the church and the culture is an “easy kind of believism” and humanism.
“If you really know the God that I know you wouldn’t want to renounce Him,” the professor said.
To that point, Cooper implored his fellow believers to “rediscover the preeminence of the Word.
“And to value the teaching of the Word. We need to value truth over feeling,” he wrote. “Truth over emotion. And what we are seeing now is the result of the church raising up influencers who did not supremely value truth who have led a generation who also do not believe in the supremacy of truth. And now those disavowed leaders are proudly still leading and influencing boldly AWAY from the truth.”
What has made apostasy such an attractive option these days? It’s like a social contagion. Or a social media contagion at least.
Christians wringing their hands about where it all went wrong as yet another celebrity Christian leader (a descriptor I have been unable to source in the original Greek) hits the dirt in a shower of Instagram pix and Twitter glitter.
Not that they call it apostasy. They call it things like “freedom”, “repentance”, “being true to myself – finally”. All sorts of stuff. All types of salvation words to describe what is, essentially, turning one’s back on salvation.
And the question is, why the sudden rush? Is there a discount offer on? A buy-one-get-one-free? There’s certainly a rush for the door, and that’s just the visible celebs. There’s plenty of common, garden variety apostasy going on among common, garden variety soon-to-be ex-Christians.
Something has changed in these past two decades. And that something is the increase in pull factors that accompany the push factors. And churches are going to have to navigate this “push-pull” at an increasing rate in the coming decades.
You know what I mean by push and pull factors, don’t you? Push and pull factors are central to a theory of migration. So, for example, a push factor for someone to leave their country is the lack of work opportunities in their home land. They are pushed away from their land.
But for the push to be given true impetus, there must be am equal and opposite pull factor. After all, there’s not much point in leaving a land of no opportunity for another land of no opportunity. Something in that other land – in this instance, the chance of finding a job -, must be better!
And that’s exactly what we have with apostasy. The push factors have always existed, but the pull factors have increased exponentially in the secular age.
Hence if you read the tweets and the Instagram and the blogs of those who leave the faith it’s all push factor, to begin with at least
There’s the way the church deals with X; or the manner in which the church has ignored Y; or the frustration of the church over Z. All push factors. And I am under no illusions about the nature of those push factors, the real frustrations, and the credibility gap for many people struggling with church. Don’t hear me saying otherwise. These need to be addressed.
Yet at the same time I’m convinced it’s the pull factors that have combined with these push factors that have tipped this over the edge in recent years. My reading of Charles Taylor’s A Secular Age has convinced me of how much the conditions for unbelief (and belief) have changed. Simply put, there’s never been a better time to be an apostate.
To move from believer to unbeliever in past centuries was bracing, sobering, cold, and often lonely. It was the unbeliever as outcast. As one against the world. As a way of thinking that did not align with reality. Brave it may have been, but foolhardy and isolating it certainly would be.
But today? There’s another social salvation story, another faith, another bunch of saints to turn to when one turns away from the old bunch. And that pull factor has made all the difference.
Simply put, the push factor becomes all the more compelling when there’s an equal and opposite pull factor that offers the migrant a better opportunity on the other side. A new story to imbibe and a new community that will embrace you.
That’s why we get an Instragram picture such as this from Josh Harris:
The push factors Harris laid out in his previous Instagram post about the malaise of the church is countered by the pull factor of a post-Christian sexular age that will reward those whose eyes have been open to their previous blindness.
They will be welcomed with open arms like the prodigals they are. Come to think of it; the prodigal narrative is all push and pull.
The push factor of “he would have eaten the husks that were fed to the pigs“, is complemented by the pull factor of “my father’s hired help eats better than this“. Sure enough, the father runs to meet him. So too with Josh Harris. In his take on it, he fed on the stale bread of unreconstructed evangelicalism for so many years. Now it’s rainbow donuts all the way.
This is all another way of saying this thing hasn’t bottomed out. There could well be an unprecedented level of falling away over the coming decades, as many within the church are compelled by the pull factors of the Sexular Age and its salvation narrative, ably illustrated and promulgated by the likes of Harris who, ironically, continues to be a social influencer, except in the opposite direction.
If I were cynical I would say that being too old to dig and too proud to beg, he is being welcomed into the friendship circle of Mammon with open arms. There’s probably a million-best-seller somewhere in this too. One that will only increase the pull factor for those who are feeling pushed already.
READING: Psalms 46-50, Romans 9:6-33
What frightens you? Sickness? The dark? Crowds? Storms? Dogs? Loneliness? Death?
Prior to my becoming a volunteer firefighter years ago, I strongly feared heights. I simply wouldn’t put myself at a height that made me feel like I was certain to fall. Firefighting forced me to push beyond those fears, but I still don’t like the queasy feeling that develops when I look down from afar. I’ve also always feared snakes—and not for theological reasons! I just think they’re ugly and frightening.
I wonder, then, how you and I would respond if the following happened: “the earth trembles and the mountains topple into the depths of the seas, though its water roars and foams and the mountains quake with its turmoil” (Psa 46:2-3). I can’t help but think that fear would grip us, at least as long the trembling and quaking lasted. The whole picture is an alarming one.
The psalmist used this picture, though, to make a different point – that is, to remind us that our security rests in God, “our refuge and strength, a helper who is always found in times of trouble” (Psa 46:1). He who controls the world He created reigns over all, and we need not be afraid. It is indeed the case that, as the psalmist spoke in the refrains in this poem, “The Lord of Armies is with us; the God of Jacob is our stronghold” (Psa 46:7, 11).
PRAYER: “Thank You, God, for being my refuge. Help me to give You all my fears today.”
TOMORROW’S READING: Psalms 51-55, Romans 10
Our “Quick Shot” series offers brief answers to common objections to the Christian worldview. Each response is limited to one paragraph. These responses are designed to (1) answer the objection as concisely as possible, (2) challenge the objector to think more deeply about his or her claim, and (3) facilitate a “gospel” conversation. In this article, we’re offering “Quick Shot” responses to the objection, Quick Shot: “Christianity is anti-science.”
“Christianity isn’t anti-science, but it is anti-scientism. ‘Scientism’ is the belief that science is the only way to know anything. But there are many things we know without the benefit of science at all, like logical and mathematical truths (that precede scientific investigations), metaphysical truths (that determine if the external world is real), moral and ethical truths (that set boundaries for our behavior), aesthetic truths (like determining beauty) and historical truths. Christians believe that science can tell us many important things, but not all important things. How could science possibly tell us anything meaningful about the historicity of Jesus or the historical reliability of the Bible?”
Christians believe that science can tell us many important things, but not all important things. How could science possibly tell us anything meaningful about the historicity of Jesus or the historical reliability of the Bible?
Click To Tweet
“Christianity isn’t anti-science. In fact, some of the most famous scientists in history were Christians (like Johannes Kepler, René Descartes, Blaise Pascal, Isaac Newton, and Max Planck), and many current accomplished scientists are also Christ-followers (like John Polkinghorne, Francis Collins and Michael Behe). These scientists aren’t afraid to ask all the classic investigative questions; the what, when, where, how, why and who questions. Many modern scientists, however, now refuse to ask the who question, even when the best scientific evidence (like the evidence of information in DNA) points clearly to an intelligent who. They refuse to even acknowledge the possibility of a Divine who. Christianity isn’t opposed to science, just to scientists who refuse to ask all the questions. Why wouldn’t scientists be willing to ask the who question?”
Christianity isn’t opposed to science, just to scientists who refuse to ask all the questions. Why wouldn’t scientists be willing to ask the who question?
Click To Tweet
“Science and Christianity aren’t at odds with one another. In fact, science can help us make the case for the God of the Bible. Science tells us that everything in the universe came into existence from nothing, and that this was caused by something powerful, non-spatial, non-temporal and non-material. Science tells us our DNA contains true information, and the best inference for the existence of information is an intelligent mind. The God of the Bible is a reasonable candidate for the non-spatial, non-temporal, non-material, intelligent mind that could explain this scientific data. Why do you think some people reject the existence of God when the scientific evidence is most reasonably explained by God?”
Why do you think some people reject the EXISTENCE of God when the scientific evidence is most reasonably EXPLAINED by God?
Click To Tweet
Dawkins’ worldview lacks foundation for his outlandish claim that instructing children in the Christian faith is worse than sexually molesting them. His telling extreme stories of religious abuse is a cheap tactic to try and give credibility to this obviously ridiculous claim, and to hide its sinister implications.
Dawkins’ critique of typical God-proofs simply avoids the main one: the transcendental argument for the existence of God. Last time, we introduced this argument as an answer to the “ultimate Boeing 747 gambit”; this week, we present the transcendental argument to bolster the other more traditional proofs which Dawkins attempts to refute.
Note: This show’s content was re-edited and replaces the original.
Dawkins’ central argument against God’s existence–the “ultimate Boeing 747 gambit”–fails for at least two reasons. First, the gambit needs Darwinian evolution by natural selection to be true in spite of its glaring logical and factual flaws. Second, the gambit’s conclusions cannot account for the principles it used to draw its conclusions.
As if his simplistic attack against the Scripture’s moral fabric wasn’t enough, Dawkins marches forward to assault the Bible’s factual credibility. But evidence, common sense, and the modern scholarly consensus (even of the Bible’s detractors) are major obstacles to the credibility of his argument.
Unable to plug the gaping hole left by his inability to account for absolute standards of morality, Dawkins resorts in chapter seven to try and discredit the Bible as that plug. Of course, he again proceeds to critique something without any foundation for objectivity; also, he analyzes the Scripture in such a simplistic manner that you are forced to wonder if such a learned man ever actually read this Bible he attacks.
The title of Dawkins’ sixth chapter, “The Roots of Morality: Why Are We Good?,” betrays his inability as an atheist to account for the absolute standards of morality which he so readily embraces and applies throughout the book and his own life. His speculations about humanity’s moral consensus are merely descriptive, and when he finally (though half-heartedly) acknowledges this problem, the chapter ends with but a whimper.
In part one, we urged people to see the necessity of actually believing that the Christian religious claims are true. This time, we affirm Dawkins’ assertion that most religion, even much of what is said and done in the name of Christ, is untrue, and superstitious, and devised and promoted for selfish, bad reasons. Professing Christians open up the name of Christ to be slandered when they pervert and trivialize the truth or tolerate those who do the same.
Here we begin an eight-part series discussing this best-selling book by acknowledging that professing Christians are much to blame for the kinds of critiques Dawkins levies against theism. If we forsake orthodoxy, or if we keep it but trivialize it; if we say we believe something that we don’t think is true, or if we suppress our doubts, then Dawkins is right–our faith is deluded.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) is adamant about revealing what went on behind the scenes of the Russia investigation — and is looking forward to the American people learning about what happened.
Graham pointed to three investigations of the investigators that are taking place: one by his committee; one by Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, who was appointed by Attorney General Bill Barr to conduct a probe; and one by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz.
“I believe the Horowitz report will be ugly and damning,” Graham told Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo on “Sunday Morning Futures.” That report has been anticipated for months, but it has faced delays in recent months.
“Every time you turn around you find something new,” Graham explained. “Mr. Horowitz is doing a very in-depth dive” into the FBI’s use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to acquire a warrant to monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
Graham predicted that the report will finally come out in the coming weeks.
Another man linked to the early stages of the investigation — former Trump campaign member George Papadopoulos — is eager to tell his side of the story after serving a brief sentence for providing a false statement to investigators. Papadopoulos is said to have brought about the investigation by revealing to an Australian diplomat (who later alerted U.S. officials) that he had information that Russia had damaging information about Hillary Clinton.
This was after he heard about this from Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud.
Graham said that once Horowitz’s IG report comes out, he would like Papadopoulos to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Graham believes that, based on interview transcripts, Papadopolous was “clearly” not working with Russians.
The more information that gets declassified, the better, according to Graham.
“I want to declassify as much as possible … I don’t want people to believe what I said. I want them to read for themselves how bad it was,” he declared. Graham claimed that the FBI relied on the dossier compiled by Christopher Steele when they applied for the FISA warrant, despite Steele’s being “an unreliable informant” who hated President Donald Trump.
“I want it all out. I want people to see how off-the-rails this investigation got, and I want people to be held accountable, and I am patient,” he said. “I’m not in a hurry to do it. I want to do it right.”
Graham also expressed a desire to find out just who was ultimately responsible for the Russia investigation, saying he is “curious about the role the CIA played here.”
He also questioned whether it went all the way to the top. “Who knew about this in the White House?” he wondered. “Was President Obama briefed? … I’d like to know that.”
Graham’s lengthy interview touched on several other high-profile subject matters. He discussed recent polling that showed several Democratic presidential candidates beating President Trump in a general election.
“Well, I’m not buying it,” Graham said, predicting that unless Trump has a significant blunder in Afghanistan, “the president is going to clean their clock on the stage.”
Graham also criticized Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) for their recent hostility toward Israel, after the Jewish state barred them from visiting due to their support for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement aimed at economically crippling Israel.
“It’s been bipartisan up to now about Israel,” Graham said, pointing out how Israel’s enemies are enemies of the U.S. as well.
“Those who want to destroy Israel want to destroy us. Name one radical Islamic group that wants to destroy the State Israel that doesn’t want to destroy America,” he challenged, referring to Iran, ISIS and al Qaeda.
“The policies coming out of the Democratic Party toward Israel are dangerous,” he warned. “Tlaib and Omar openly calling for an economic boycott of the State of Israel, which will destroy the State of Israel.”
Graham said that the extreme positions of Democrats will lead to a Trump victory in 2020.
“The bottom line here is they are radical when it comes to Israel, they’re radical on the economy, they’re weak when it comes to fighting terrorism,” he said. “Donald Trump is going to win this election because he’s been a damn good president and what they are trying to do is make America a socialist country, and that’s not going to work.”
Earlier in the interview, Graham discussed another controversial idea endorsed by some Democrats: court packing. Several 2020 hopefuls have suggested expanding the Supreme Court’s roster.
Last week, a ground of Democratic senators filed a brief that accused the Supreme Court of being “not well,” and instructed the court to “heal” itself before it faces calls for restructuring.
Graham was having none of it.
“When you hear ‘expanding the court,’ that’s code for liberals packing the court. Over my dead body, it’s not going to happen.”
This Fox News piece is used by permission.