Tag Archives: book-review

More Gems from Thomas Sowell | CultureWatch

One can never get enough quotes from the pen of Sowell:

By my count I have over 30 volumes by the great Thomas Sowell. Also by my count, I have some 135 articles on my CultureWatch website featuring him, either directly or indirectly, with quotes, book reviews or article reviews. That should tell you that I have a very high regard for Sowell.

He is a very important thinker, commentator and writer, and amazingly he is still going strong at 95. The Black American economist started off as a Marxist but went on to become one of America’s greatest conservatives and free marketeers. There are not all that many other folks like him, although the late Walter Williams came very close indeed. See more on him here: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2020/12/04/walter-williams/

As to Sowell, I have a number of articles in which I discuss the man and his work. Here are just two of them: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2019/11/26/the-failed-vision-of-the-anointed/

https://billmuehlenberg.com/2023/10/24/sowell-on-social-justice/

And I have a number of pieces simply featuring terrific quotes from him, such as this one: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2024/12/15/30-classic-quotes-on-education-by-thomas-sowell/

Here I will offer some more quotes. Many of his volumes I could run with here, but simply making use of the 450-page book, The Thomas Sowell Reader (Basic Books, 2011) would be one good way to start getting into Sowell if you need an introduction.

The final chapter in the book is titled “Random Thoughts” and it contains around 100 of his short, punchy and brilliant quotes. Let me offer you some of them here:

“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.”

“Let’s face it, most of us are not half as smart as we sometimes think we are — and for intellectuals, not one-tenth as smart.”

“There is no greater indictment of judges than the fact that honest people are afraid to go into court, while criminals swagger out its revolving doors.”

“Politics is the art of making your selfish desires seem like a national interest.”

“The old adage about giving a man a fish versus teaching him how to fish has been updated by a reader: Give a man a fish and he will ask for tartar sauce and French fries! Moreover, some politician who wants his vote will declare all these things to be among his ‘basic rights’.”

“What is called an educated person is often someone who has had a dangerously superficial exposure to a wide spectrum of subjects.”

“Government bailouts are like potato chips: You can’t stop with just one.”

“If the battle for civilization comes down to the wimps versus the barbarians, the barbarians are going to win.”

“When you want to help people, you tell them the truth. When you want to help yourself, you tell them what they want to hear.”

“Thanksgiving may be our most old-fashioned holiday. Gratitude itself seems out of date at a time when so many people feel ‘entitled’ to whatever they get—and indignant that they didn’t get more.”

“‘Funding’ is one of the big phony words of our times — used by people too squeamish to say ‘money’ but not too proud to take it, usually from the taxpayers.”

“Envy plus rhetoric equals ‘social justice’.”

“Historians of the future will have a hard time figuring out how so many organized groups of strident jackasses succeeded in leading us around by the nose and morally intimidating the majority into silence.”

“No matter how disastrously some policy has turned out, anyone who criticizes it can expect to hear: ‘But what would you replace it with?’ When you put out a fire, what do you replace it with?”

“No matter how much people on the left talk about compassion, they have no compassion for the taxpayers.”

“Some ideas so plausible that they can fail nine times in a row and still be believed the tenth time. Other ideas sound so implausible that they can succeed nine times in a row and still not be believed the tenth time. Government controls in the economy are among the first kinds of ideas and the operations of the free market are among the second kind.”

“Much of what are called ‘social problems’ consists of the fact that intellectuals have theories that do not fit the real world. From this they conclude that it is the real world which is wrong and needs changing.”

“Egalitarians create the most dangerous inequality of all— inequality of power. Allowing politicians to determine what other human beings will be allowed to earn is one of the most reckless gambles imaginable.”

“We seem to be getting closer and closer to a situation where nobody is responsible for what they did but we are all responsible for what somebody else did.”

“I am so old I can remember when other people’s achievements were considered to be an inspiration, rather than a grievance.”

“A careful definition of words would destroy half the agenda of the political left and scrutinizing evidence would destroy the other half.”

“If people had been as mealy-mouthed in centuries past as they are today, Ivan the Terrible might have been called Ivan the Inappropriate.”

Image of The Thomas Sowell Reader
The Thomas Sowell Reader by Sowell, Thomas (Author)

And a few more quotes, this time from Ever Wonder Why? And Other Controversial Essays (Hoover Institution Press, 2006) which also has a chapter titled “Random Thoughts”:

“It is a little much when people come to this country preaching hatred against others and demanding tolerance for themselves.”

“Those who want to take our money and gain power over us have discovered the magic formula: Get us envious or angry at others and we will surrender, in installments, not only our money but our freedom. The most successful dictators of the 20th century—Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Mao—all used this formula and now class warfare politicians here are doing the same.”

“The scariest thing about politics today is not any particular policy or leaders, but the utter gullibility with which the public accepts notions for which there is not a speck of evidence, such as the benefits of ‘diversity,’ the dangers of ‘overpopulation,’ and innumerable other fashionable dogmas.”

“It is amazing that people who think we cannot afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, and medications somehow think that we can afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, medications and a government bureaucracy to administer ‘universal health care’.”

“Much of what is promoted as ‘critical thinking’ in our public schools is in fact uncritical negativism towards the history and institutions of America and an uncritical praise of the cultures of foreign countries and domestic minorities.”

“It is self-destructive for any society to create a situation where a baby who is born into the world today automatically has pre-existing grievances against another baby born at the same time, because of what their ancestors did centuries ago. It is hard enough to solve our own problems, without trying to solve our ancestors’ problems.”

“What ‘multiculturalism’ boils down to is that you can praise any culture in the world except Western culture—and you cannot blame any culture in the world except Western culture.”

And lastly, a few bonus quotes:

“Since this is an era when many people are concerned about ‘fairness’ and ‘social justice,’ what is your ‘fair share’ of what someone else has worked for?”

“It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.”

“The first lesson of economics is scarcity: there is never enough of anything to fully satisfy all those who want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics.”

“Mystical references to ‘society’ and its programs to ‘help’ may warm the hearts of the gullible but what it really means is putting more power in the hands of bureaucrats.”

“Rhetoric is no substitute for reality.”

“If politicians stopped meddling with things they don’t understand, there would be a more drastic reduction in the size of government than anyone in either party advocates.”

“When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination.”

[1342 words]

The post More Gems from Thomas Sowell appeared first on CultureWatch.

Source: More Gems from Thomas Sowell

Kamala’s Audiobook Lets You Pick Which Kamala Accent You Want To Hear For Each Chapter | Babylon Bee

Image for article: Kamala's Audiobook Lets You Pick Which Kamala Accent You Want To Hear For Each Chapter

U.S. — The new memoir by the former vice president will include a revolutionary new feature, as publishers announced that Kamala Harris’s audiobook lets you pick which accent you want to hear for each chapter.

The innovative new format for the audiobook version of 107 Days will allow listeners to choose from among a wide range of accents used by the former vice president over the years, including “Black,” “Very Black,” “Hispanic,” “Vaguely Indian,” “Southern,” “Jamaican,” and “Klingon.”

“This audiobook provides a fully customizable Kamala experience,” said Simon & Schuster President and CEO Jonathan Karp. “Vice President Harris has such a unique way of altering her accent to fit her audience, and we wanted to be able to bring that same variable speech spectrum to the people who listen to the audiobook version of her memoir. Which Kamala do you want to hear for the chapter about her debate against Donald Trump? You get to decide.”

One listener who received an advance copy of the audiobook said that the accent option added a whole new level of realism. “You can change the way she talks from one chapter to the next, just like in real life,” the review said. “One chapter you can have her sounding like she’s from the ‘hood, and the next chapter she sounds like a white suburban housewife. It’s a lot of fun. There’s even a Chinese option, which was unexpected, but you know she’s got it up her sleeve for when she talks to a crowd of Chinamen.”

At publishing time, Simon & Schuster announced that expansions of the 107 Days audiobook would be made available to account for whatever new accents Harris unveils in the future.


Tony asks questions about everything in his life. Is he a crazy conspiracy theorist?

https://babylonbee.com/news/kamalas-audiobook-lets-you-pick-which-kamala-accent-you-want-to-hear-for-each-chapter/

Iryna Zarutska Never Needed to Have Died Like This | CultureWatch

Evil, crime, justice and the left:

A society that coddles criminals, winks at crime, and ignores the victims, is a society that cannot long last. Labor in Australia and the Dems in America have a lot to answer for in this regard. In North Carolina Iryna would still be alive today if the politicians and courts and the magistrates and the judges and the police had been doing their jobs properly. But too many were NOT.

This was a fully preventable crime had the powers that be actually done their jobs. The weak-on-crime mindset of the left is the cause of so many of these horrific murders, rapes, assaults and kidnappings. These folks have so much blood on their hands. Simply consider the role of the Democratic Mayor of Charlotte Vi Lyles in all this.

After the savage attack she put out a statement expressing her concern about the lack of government services available to the murderer: “I want to be clear that I am not villainizing those who struggle with their mental health or those who are unhoused. The unhoused are more often victims of crimes and not the perpetrators. … We, as a community, must do better for those members of our community who need help and have no place to go.”

Good grief – not a word about this poor girl. It really is amazing how she turns a vicious murderer into the victim here. This is the Democrat mindset in action: Let’s make every excuse in the book for the perpetrators of crime, and remain tight-lipped about the victims.

Thankfully many have been speaking out about all this insanity. Gad Saad tweeted this: “A society that burns neighbourhoods and calls for the defunding of the police for the guy on the left [George Floyd] and largely ignores the public butchering of the woman on the right is one that is drowning in the infinity pool of Suicidal Empathy.”

And a few more tweets. Elon Musk was quite right to say this: “Let’s change the law. Between now and then, name and shame the DAs and judges who enable murder, rape and robbery. But especially shame those who funded the campaigns of the DAs and judges. That will make the biggest difference.”

Allie Beth Stuckey posted this: “America failed this girl. We protect criminals. We glorify degenerates. We have no will to restrain evil, no courage to punish wickedness. We sacrifice the weak on the altar of social justice and pat our backs in the process. The cowards on this train who did nothing to help her are representative of what our society has become. I’m so sad for her and sad for all of us.:

And Xaviaer DuRousseau tweeted: “So let me get this straight…  A bartender can go to prison for serving drinks to a drunk person if they drive and murder someone … but judges aren’t accountable after letting a 14 TIME REPEAT OFFENDER murder a young woman?”

Said Charlie Kirk: “Right now, millions of people are finding out you can become a magistrate judge in many states WITHOUT being a licensed lawyer — Teresa Stokes [of Charlotte] never passed the bar exam — fully empowered to let repeat criminal offenders roam the streets to murder innocents.”

Another Kirk post: “Telling how so many pastors were mad that George Floyd overdosed but don’t care a white woman was brutally murdered by a 14 count repeat offender.”

Trump Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said this:

Many of the journalists in this room spilled PLENTY of ink trying to SMEAR Daniel Penny for defending a subway car from a deranged lunatic in New York City, but none of those same reporters lift a finger to write stories about an actual murderer. Here are the facts that many outlets have SHAMELESSLY and intentionally failed to report until President Trump drew attention to it. This beautiful innocent 23-year-old young woman was a Ukrainian refugee, who had recently fled her country for a chance at a safer life in a promising new beginning here in the United States of America. But tragically, a public transportation system in a major American city was more dangerous than the active war zone she left.

And President Trump put out this statement:

I have seen the horrific video of a beautiful, young Ukrainian refugee, who came to America to escape the vicious War in Ukraine, and was innocently riding the Metro in Charlotte, North Carolina, where she was brutally ambushed by a mentally deranged lunatic. The perpetrator was a well known career criminal, who had been previously arrested and released on CASHLESS BAIL in January, a total of 14 TIMES. What the hell was he doing riding the train, and walking the streets? Criminals like this need to be LOCKED UP. The blood of this innocent woman can literally be seen dripping from the killer’s knife, and now her blood is on the hands of the Democrats who refuse to put bad people in jail, including Former Disgraced Governor and “Wannabe Senator” Roy Cooper. North Carolina, and every State, needs LAW AND ORDER, and only Republicans will deliver it! Additionally, where is the outrage from the Mainstream Media on this horrible tragedy?

We must not forget

One Christian on the social media said we should not post pics of the attack on Iryna. I disagree. If I had a daughter horrifically murdered while simply coming home from work on a train, I would want the whole world to know about this evil – especially since Iryna had NO second chance, while this thug had 14 chances. We are sick to death of the leftist justice system that coddles criminals and ignores the victims. If highlighting such acts of evil results in less of these attacks taking place, then that would be one good outcome of sounding the alarm.

This believer had said we do not honour her by showing these pics. I disagree even more. We dishonour her by turning a blind eye to what happened to her. Pretending these terrible crimes are not happening will not make them go away. They will only get worse and we will have more of them.

We honour her by standing up for her, championing her, speaking up for her, and doing all we can to ensure that fewer such attacks take place in the future. We honour her by insisting that our leaders and lawmakers start seriously addressing the runaway crime problems in so many American cities.

We honour her when we demand that justice prevails. Scripture speaks so much about the importance of justice. Just a few of many relevant passages come to mind here:

Psalm 28:3-5 Do not drag me off with the wicked,
    with the workers of evil,
who speak peace with their neighbors
    while evil is in their hearts.
Give to them according to their work
    and according to the evil of their deeds;
give to them according to the work of their hands;
    render them their due reward.
Because they do not regard the works of the Lord
    or the work of his hands,
he will tear them down and build them up no more.

Proverbs 18:5 It is not good to be partial to the wicked
    or to deprive the righteous of justice.”

Proverbs 19:28 A worthless witness mocks at justice,
    and the mouth of the wicked devours iniquity.

Ecclesiastes 8:11 Because the sentence against an evil deed is not executed speedily, the heart of the children of man is fully set to do evil.

Amos 5:24 But let justice roll down like waters,
    and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.

Iryna did not find such justice. Please keep the family of Iryna in your prayers. The US government had offered to fly her body back home to Ukraine but her parents said no. They said this: “She loved America. We’re going to bury her here.”

We need to see many fewer acts of senseless crime like this. A no-crime community might be impossible to achieve, but a low-crime one is possible. If we stop siding with criminals and making cheap excuses for crime, and start doing what we are meant to do as communities – protecting the innocent and keeping people safe – we can see a lot less such demonic attacks as poor Iryna had to go through.

[1384 words]

The post Iryna Zarutska Never Needed to Have Died Like This appeared first on CultureWatch.

Migration, Multiculturalism, Mayhem and Murder | CultureWatch

There are other stories like that of Iryna Zarutska:

I happen to live in what can only be called the murder capital of Australia, if not much of the West. Melbourne has become a bloody crimescape wherein roving gangs of teen punks armed with machetes (often Sudanese) are terrorising the entire city.

Most recently we had two children slaughtered by these gangs – a 12 and a 15 year old. The fools who run this state are doing nothing about this crime spree that is overtaking us like a tsunami. Instead, they waste zillions of taxpayer dollars on useless and expensive “machete bins” found outside of police stations. As if any lowlife crim is going to waltz up to a well-lit cop shop with surveillance cameras and dispose of his weapons of choice.

Allan and Co are useless wonders who care nothing about the safety and protection of Victorians, but care everything about mutli culti madness and protecting migrant gang members. And the story is always the same: a gross crime is committed, an arrest is made, and they are easily bailed out in a matter of hours. Repeat and repeat and repeat. But our eggheads and ‘experts’ claim we cannot turn these teens into career criminals. Hey, wakey, wakey: the already ARE career criminals!

This madness is happening all over the West. Consider just two recent news items from Sweden, another multicultural hellhole. Check out this video in which Muslim migrants take videos of innocent Swedish girls being brutally attacked and assaulted: https://www.threads.com/@roxanne.ruggles.9/post/DOWYllwCVl6/muslim-migrants-brutally-hit-a-local-girl-in-sweden-and-film-it-for-fun-sweden-h

And one recent study found that Sweden has the highest per capita rape rate in Europe. It notes that a majority of 2000-2020 rape convictions were by people of immigrant origin (who are a quarter of the population). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08862605241311611

Iryna Zarutska

Things are just as bad in America – especially in its Democratic-controlled states and cities. President Trump is doing all that he can to make American cities safer, but the demonised Dems are fighting this tooth and nail. That tells you all you need to know about this psychopathic party. The most recent horror case comes out of Charlotte, North Carolina.

Iryna was a young gal from Ukraine who fled her war-torn nation to find a better life in America. But the US has plenty of warzones as well with repeat offenders who commit crime after crime after crime running free and running wild. They delight in doing what they do best; mayhem and murder. So a crim with 14 prior police arrests decided he would stab to death this poor young woman while on a train heading home after work.

London-based columnist Lauren Smith wrote this about the offender:

Then there was the fact that Brown was known to the authorities—that dreaded phrase we see come up time and again in cases like these. Brown, who is currently homeless, has spent most of his life in and out of prison, having appeared in court no fewer than 14 times. He previously served a five-year sentence for armed robbery, and was arrested again for assaulting his sister, just months after being released in 2020. He also has a history of mental-health issues and was diagnosed with schizophrenia. Earlier this year, he was charged with abusing the 911 emergency number, when he called to complain that he had “man-made” material inside his body, which he believed was controlling his movements. 

Why was this man, who had consistently proved to be a danger to himself and others, allowed to walk the streets freely? I am reminded of a similar case here in the UK, also involving a dangerous, severely mentally ill man who the authorities failed to properly treat and restrain. In 2023, Valdo Calocane randomly began attacking passersby in central Nottingham, killing three people—two 19-year-old students, Grace O’Malley-Kumar and Barnaby Webber, and 65-year-old school caretaker Ian Coates. Like Brown, Calocane was known to the authorities and was diagnosed with schizophrenia. He was supposed to be in the care of the NHS, but kept refusing treatment, because he was afraid of needles. Nobody involved seemed all that concerned with ensuring that Calocane actually received the antipsychotic medication he needed. The cost of this carelessness and apathy was three people’s lives. 

In another, eerily similar case from Germany last month, 16-year-old Liana K.—also a refugee from Ukraine—was killed when she was randomly pushed in front of a moving train. The suspect is believed to be a failed Iraqi asylum seeker, who was supposed to have been deported years ago. Once again, the suspect was also suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. Like Zarutska, Liana and her family had fled to Germany, believing they would be safe there. Instead, the authorities’ failure to enforce the law resulted in a 16-year-old’s death. 

This is apparently how we deal with criminals and the violently mentally ill in the West now—by ignoring them and hoping the problem will solve itself. In many ways, this is an over-correction for the asylums of the 20th century, where the disturbed and vulnerable were locked away and treated with little compassion or understanding. Today, the cultural memory of barbaric practices like force-feeding, electro-shock therapy, and lobotomies seems to prevent Western societies from taking any steps at all to detain and treat the mentally unwell.

But she is a white victim, and he is a Black attacker. So the mainstream media is not interested in covering this story – it does not suit their narrative. Smith closes her piece with these words:

The reason for this silence on the Left should be fairly obvious. As Mary Harrington points out in UnHerd, “there is simply no obvious way to make [Zarutska’s] murder intelligible within American race politics in a way that does not serve Right-wing narratives.” No wonder progressives would rather pretend this never happened—it goes against their fundamental belief that certain sections of the population are perpetual victims and therefore can never do any wrong. By the logic of identity politics, Brown should be near the very top of the victim hierarchy. He is black, homeless and mentally ill. There is no room in the identitarian worldview for him to be anything other than a victim—of white supremacy, of capitalism, of police brutality, of systemic racism in the justice system, or whatever else it might be. The idea that someone like him might savagely attack and kill another person without provocation is beyond comprehension. It doesn’t fit the narrative. 

As much as the Left would like to believe otherwise, ignoring crime does not make it go away. Letting severely mentally ill people with multiple criminal convictions roam the streets is not the kind or caring option for anyone. It is especially reckless to make excuses or set low expectations for violent criminals because they come from ‘victim’ groups—whatever that means. Far too often, lives could have been saved if only the authorities had fulfilled their duty to uphold public safety. Real compassion starts with protecting the innocent.

Or as Ken Blackwell said in part about this horrific story:

Here is the most chilling part of all: the silence.
Where are the headlines? Where is the outrage?
The same media that saturated the airwaves with endless coverage of George Floyd and Daniel Penny has not written a word about Iryna Zarutska.
Not the New York Times. Not CNN. Not the Washington Post. Not NPR. Not USA Today. Not ABC. Not MSNBC. Not PBS.
They decided her life was not worth telling.
Why? Because she does not fit their story.
If Iryna had been Black and her killer White, the coverage would be endless. It would be on every television channel and splashed across every front page. Protestors would be marching in the streets. Politicians would be rushing to the microphones to offer speeches.
Instead, because she was White, her story does not serve the approved narrative. And so the media chooses to erase her.
That is not just bias.
That is deliberate.
It is coordinated.
It is evil.
Iryna came here believing America was different from the country she fled. She thought she had found safety. Instead she was butchered on a train by a repeat offender who should never have been free. And the institutions that claim to care about justice and equality have looked away.
Her death is not just the result of one man’s knife. It is the result of a system that values ideology over safety. It is the result of prosecutors who keep letting violent criminals out. It is the result of a media machine that decides which lives count and which lives can be erased.
Iryna Zarutska deserved better. She deserved safety. She deserved protection. She deserved to be remembered.
Do not let them bury her memory.
Say her name.
Tell her story.
Demand justice.
Remember Iryna Zarutska.

And of course it needs to be said that many of these murderous thugs roaming our streets are NOT mentally ill. They are simply evil, and they need to be locked up for a very long time – or deported. But our lax criminal justice system in the West, full of leftist judges and magistrates who tend to care more for criminals’ rights than victims’ rights will ensure that getting tough on crime will continue to be resisted.

All the more reason for Trump to keep going after Democrat crime zones like Chicago, LA and elsewhere and keep standing up for ordinary law-abiding citizens. And all the more reason to consider cloning the President and send them to England, Europe and here down under.

[1585 words]

The post Migration, Multiculturalism, Mayhem and Murder appeared first on CultureWatch.

‘War on white people’: Young woman ‘butchered’ on U.S. train by black man, national media hammered for their silence | WND

Iryna Zarutska and her accused killer Decarlos Brown, Jr.

Outrage is exploding online as new video reveals graphic details of a black man who had been arrested at least 14 times allegedly slaughtering a white woman who had fled Ukraine for a peaceful life in America on a train in Charlotte, North Carolina.

On Friday, the Charlotte Area Transit System released surveillance video of Aug. 22, the night 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska was slain after she left her job working at a pizzeria.

“She ran from war in Ukraine. She came here for safety. And America FAILED her,” wrote online journalist Benny Johnson.

“23-year-old Iryna Zarutska was butchered on a Charlotte light rail, her throat cut open by a violent repeat offender who had been arrested 14 times and was STILL free.

Iryna Zarutska unaware that she is about to be stabbed on a light rail train in Charlotte, North Carolina, on Friday, Aug. 22, 2025 (Video screenshot)
Iryna Zarutska unaware that she is about to be stabbed on a light rail train in Charlotte, North Carolina, on Friday, Aug. 22, 2025

“This wasn’t random. This was preventable. There is a war on White people. Her blood is on the hands of a system that lets violent criminals roam while innocent people pay the price.

“If Iryna were Black and her killer White, the media would be rioting nonstop. But because she’s White, they stay silent. This is evil. And it’s deliberate.”

 

The surveillance footage shows Zarutska boarding the train in her work uniform at 9:46 p.m., and once seated, looking at her phone, completely oblivious of the danger behind her.

 

The New York Post reports:

Just four minutes later, 34-year-old Decarlos Brown Jr. allegedly whips out a folding knife and lunges forward, stabbing her three times, at least once in the neck, police said.

The chilling video then appears to show Brown then walking through the rail car, stripping off his sweatshirt and waiting by the doors – as passengers began to notice blood dripping from him.

Zarutska, who grabbed her neck as blood spilled onto the train floor, collapsed in her seat and was pronounced dead on the light rail, investigators said.

Surveillance video shows Decarlos Brown Jr., sitting behind Iryna Zarutska on a train in North Carolina, before allegedly pulling a knife and stabbing her.

 

Police said Brown got off at the next stop, where a folding knife was later recovered near the platform. He was treated at a hospital for a cut on his hand before being taken into custody on a murder charge.

It took six minutes for police to respond, according to Spectrum News, which noted transit security guards were on the train, but in the car ahead of Zarutska’s when she was attacked.

Brown – who has multiple arrests dating back to 2011 – was charged with first-degree murder, according to CMPD. His record includes larceny, robbery with a dangerous weapon and communicating threats, according to court records obtained by the Post.

 

GoFundMe page started by Zarutska’s family indicates the victim, known by the nickname of Ira, “had recently arrived in the United States, seeking safety from the war and hoping for a new beginning. Tragically, her life was cut short far too soon.”

More than $50,000 has been collected to date.

Iryna Zarutska (X)
Iryna Zarutska

Reaction online to the case has been fierce.

“I’m sick of seeing this,” said Lilly Gaddis, host of the “The Lilly Show” on X and Rumble. “It’s everywhere. This story is shocking just because of the brutality of it alone. If we had a little bit more racial consciousness and we realized, ‘Hmm, maybe don’t put yourself anywhere in the vicinity of a black person.’ Better yet, why don’t black people have their own spaces?”

 

“This was not front-page news. No one care because she’s white. … People like this need to be made an example of. Law enforcement needs to do their job, and these people need to be sequestered in safe areas away from the rest of us.

Is there a war on white people in America?

Yes
No
I’m not sure

“Because it’s not fair that the rest off us who built this country, who pay for this country and go to work every day, it’s not fair that we have to live under this sort of tyranny.”

Iryna Zarutska giving a peace sign in front of s waterfall (X)
Iryna Zarutska giving a peace sign in front of a waterfall

Ada Lluch said: “Remember what happened when the police arrested a drug addict convicted felon and he died of an overdose, George Floyd? Why is the mainstream media and leftists acting like the murder of Iryna Zarutska does not matter? Is it because she is white? Or because the killer is black?”

 

Some, including Elon Musk and End Wokeness are pointing out the lack of national news coverage of the horror.

 

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk slammed the national media as well, saying: “Dear CNN, WaPo, NYT, ABC, NBC etc etc. If you want to know why your ratings are in the tank and no one likes you, look no further than the brutal murder of Iryna Zarutska who moved to US to escape war in Ukraine, a story you refuse to tell. Sadly she couldn’t survive the Democrats’ criminal justice system.

“Yet you wouldn’t shut up or stop villainizing Daniel Penny, a hero, who probably stopped a murder just like her’s. Why? Because he was a straight white American male and the perp was black. Shame on you. Genuinely.”

 

This case is reminiscent of a July racial beatdown of several white people in Cincinnati by a black mob, with the president pro tem of the city council indicating she was “grateful” for the vicious pummeling of white citizens and that “they begged” to be attacked.

Is the news we hear every day actually broadcasting messages from God? The answer is an absolute yes! Find out how!

Follow Joe on X @JoeKovacsNews

‘Nothing short of cruel’: Watch whites viciously pummeled by blacks in graphic attack ignored by national media

 

‘They begged for that beat down!’ Top Cincinnati official allegedly ‘grateful’ after black mob pummels whites

 

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@wndnewscenter.org.

Source: ‘War on white people’: Young woman ‘butchered’ on U.S. train by black man, national media hammered for their silence

Top 10 Quotes From Kamala’s New Book | Babylon Bee

Former Vice President Kamala Harris has written a new book about her brief presidential campaign called 107 Days, and The Babylon Bee has obtained an advance copy.

The book won’t be released until next month, but here are some of the most fascinating quotes:


  1. “A prologue is like an introduction. So, here’s my introduction. And this is my book. A book written by me. I am me. The writer of the book.”
  2. “My publisher said this book should be 100,000 words, which is very, very, very, very […] very, very, very many words.”
  3. “This is a chapter. And in this chapter, there will be several pages. Each page contains many words. And the words are the meaning of the chapter.”
  4. “I was accused of covering up Joe Biden’s severe dementia. This is false. During his entire term, he always seemed just as sharp and intelligent as I was.”
  5. “Of all the great political minds throughout history, the genius whose philosophy I admire most has to be Megan Thee Stallion.”
  6. “A Moscow Mule is three parts ginger beer, one part lime juice, and the rest is vodka. If you don’t taste the vodka, you’re doing it wrong.”
  7. “That was the day that I found out I’ve been pronouncing my first name wrong this whole time.”
  8. “It is my fervent hope and wish that my story can prove an inspiration for young black girls across this country whose dream it is to attain wealth, fame, and status through no achievement of their own. It can be done, girls!”
  9. “Am I right? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!”
  10. “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past. I wrote this.”

107 Days will be available on September 23. With quotes like the ones listed above, can you resist getting a copy of your own?


The Washington Commanders aren’t the only sports team in Trump’s crosshairs.

https://babylonbee.com/news/top-10-quotes-from-kamalas-new-book/

FOX News Reporter Peter Doocy is Having WAY Too Much Fun With the Karine Jean-Pierre Story (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

Peter Doocy covers the White House for FOX News, so he has been dealing directly with former press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre for years.

Now that KJP has supposedly left the Democrat party and is releasing a new book about her time at the White House, Doocy is having an absolute blast with the story, recounting interactions and sharing details.

He made an appearance on FOX & Friends yesterday morning and had a laugh with the hosts.

Transcript via TV News Now on Twitter/X:

PETER DOOCY on Karine Jean Pierre’s new book: “You know, it’s like I had a dream, and I opened up the first page of her book about the ‘broken White House’ and the first sentence says, ‘Peter Doocy told me, and I didn’t listen to him’.”

“The thing about this book is that she, towards the end, after Biden dropped out, would say that legitimate questions were misinformation. And I told her once: you can’t just call something that you don’t like misinformation.”

“So I don’t know how she is going to square being the public face of saying things that we now know were not true about the president and about policies.”

“I don’t know how she’s now gonna come out and say, ‘you know what, just because I swore on camera that things were okay, actually here’s what was really going on,”

Here’s the clip:

Then last night, he also made some comments on the Jesse Watters show. Watters asked him if he feels vindicated. Watch:

Doocy was always very patient with KJP. You can’t blame him for having a good time with this story.

The post FOX News Reporter Peter Doocy is Having WAY Too Much Fun With the Karine Jean-Pierre Story (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

How NPR’s CEO Katherine Maher responded to accusations of bias | WINTERY KNIGHT

The Trump administration has a difficult task ahead of them. The country is over $36 trillion in debt. The interest on the debt is not up to about 13% of the budget. If government spending is not cut, that will increase by about half a percent per year. Eventually, it will take up so much of the budget, that government won’t be able to keep its promises for social programs.

First, for those who would rather watch than read, check out this clip of Matt Walsh:

If you cannot watch, then here’s an editorial by famous law professor Jonathan Turley that was published in the far-left The Hill:

In one of the most cringeworthy appearances in Congress, Katherine Maher imploded in a House hearing on the public funding of the liberal radio outlet.

By the end of her series of contradictions and admissions, Maher had made the definitive case for ending public funding for NPR and state-subsidized media.

And here are the details:

She was the personification of advocacy journalism, even declaring that the First Amendment is the “number one challenge” that makes it “tricky” to censor or “modify” content as she would like.

Maher has supported “deplatforming” anyone she deems to be “facsists” and even suggested that she might support “punching Nazis.” She also declared that “our reverence for the truth might be a distraction [in] getting things done.”

A former NPR editor published an article about bias at NPR: “NPR’s Washington headquarters has 87 registered Democrats among its editors and zero Republicans.”

It’s amazing how secular leftists change their views when they are about to lose access to taxpayer handouts:

When asked about her past public statements that Trump is a “deranged, racist sociopath,” she said that she would not post such views today. She similarly brushed off her statements that America is “addicted to White supremacy” and denounced the use of the words “boy and girl” as “erasing language” for non-binary people.

When asked about her past assertion that the U.S. was founded on “black plunder and white democracy,” Maher said she no longer believed what she had said. She also wrote that “America is addicted to white supremacy”

When asked about her support for the book “The Case for Reparations,” Maher denied any memory of ever having read the book. She was then read back her own public statements about how she took a day to read the book in a virtue-signaling post.

She then denied calling for reparations, but was read back her own declaration: “Yes, the North, yes all of us, yes America. Yes, our original collective sin and unpaid debt. Yes, reparations. Yes, on this day.”

Suddenly, the thought of losing access to taxpayer money made Katherine Maher forget everything that her company – NPR – had ever done or said:

The one moment of clarity came when Maher was asked about NPR’s refusal to cover the Hunter Biden laptop story. When first disclosed, with evidence of millions in alleged influence-peddling by the Biden family, NPR’s then-managing editor Terence Samuels made a strident and even mocking statement: “We don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don’t want to waste the listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions.”

Now Maher wants Congress to know that “NPR acknowledges we were mistaken in failing to cover the Hunter Biden laptop story more aggressively and sooner.”

All it took was the threat of a complete cutoff of federal funding.

It must be so confusing for her to be confronted with her own words and her own choices. I can imagine that she must be thinking something similar to Hillary Clinton, when she was confronted with evidence of her crimes: “what difference at this point does it make?” No apology. No taking responsibility. No accepting accountability. Just lie, evade, dodge, deflect, shift blame, project.

Listen. All of this government spending is going to have to be paid by your children, and your children’s children. For Democrats – the party of slavery – this is not a problem. Democrats LOVE spending money now, and making other people pay for it later. Democrats LOVE the idea of forcing others to pay their bills.  They believe in unlimited money, unlimited youth, unlimited beauty. They don’t understand scarcity. They just want to have a good time now.

Now that the grown-ups are back in charge, we need to cut the spending while we still can. Let these welfare queens fend for themselves. Let them face the consequences of their actions.

How Can Murder and True Crime Point Others to Jesus? with Jimmy and J. Warner Wallace | Cross Examined

Why are so many people fascinated with evil stories of murder, and true crime? And more importantly, can we use that fascination to point them to Jesus? Christianity is the only worldview that answers the problem of evil adequately, and now there’s a new graphic novel that tackles this big question in a way that’s both artistic and compelling!

This week, Frank sits down with cold-case detective and bestselling author, J. Warner Wallace, along with his son and co-author, Jimmy Wallace, to discuss their new book, ‘Case Files: Murder and Meaning‘. As a father-son duo with deep roots in law enforcement, they’re using their real-life experiences to craft a crime story that sneaks apologetics into an action-packed graphic novel. Tune in as they address questions like:

  • Why do so many police officers become cynical, and what does that reveal about human nature?
  • How did their experience in law enforcement help Jim and Jimmy to write this story?
  • What makes ‘Case Files’ different from other apologetics books?
  • How can storytelling help people wrestle with questions about morality and justice?
  • What are some of the biggest misconceptions that the public has about police and detective work?
  • How did the George Floyd and BLM riots radically shift the police world?
  • What are some of the common internal and psychological struggles of police officers?
  • How did Jim overcome his season of identity crisis once he retired?

Be sure to pre-order your copy of ‘Case Files: Murder and Meaning‘ and then head to Jim’s website to grab some exclusive bonus resources! If you know anyone who loves crime stories, comics, or big questions about life, this book might just be the tool that sparks some amazing faith conversations!

If you enjoyed this podcast episode PLEASE HELP US SPREAD THE TRUTH OF CHRISTIANITY BY SUPPORTING OUR MINISTRY HERE. 100% of your donation goes to ministry, 0% to buildings!

Resources mentioned during the episode:

Jim’s website: ColdCaseChristianity.com

J. Warner Wallace & Jimmy’s New Book: CaseFilesGraphicNovel.com

The Truth in True Crime: https://a.co/d/0fE9crT

Cold-Case Christianity: https://a.co/d/dABS4uA

Person of Interest: https://a.co/d/69NoUEw

The post How Can Murder and True Crime Point Others to Jesus? with Jimmy and J. Warner Wallace appeared first on Cross Examined.

https://crossexamined.org/how-can-murder-and-true-crime-point-others-to-jesus-with-jimmy-and-j-warner-wallace/

“Transparency Is Coming… They Don’t Want Anyone to Know Who Was on Epstein’s Island, Who was a Pedo, and Who Is Probably Still Sitting in DC” – Alina Habba on Upcoming Epstein Island Documents Release (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

Bill Clinton gets a shoulder rub from one of Epstein’s girls on African tour.

Alina Habba, the Counselor to President Trump went on FXO and Friends this past week and warned the left what is coming out soon: “Transparency is coming… Now they are going to panic because they don’t want anyone to know who was on Epstein’s island, who was a pedo, and who is probably still sitting in DC.”

Alina Habba was asked about the bombshell Epstein documents that Pam Bondi is vowing to release.

What she had to say will send shivers down the spines of the leftist perverts.

Alina Habba: Transparency. Transparency is coming. We had a lot of defiance, I think, is the word you were looking for from the radical left, and that’s because they would have rather us kept quiet. They didn’t want to expose the funding that they were getting through NGOs, through USAID. Now they’re going panic because they don’t want anybody to know who was on Epstein’s Island, who was a pedo, and who is probably still sitting in DC. The reality of the situation is this. There will be accountability, and America deserves it. We needed to know what the drones are. We needed to know that we were okay. We need to know about Epstein’s Island. We want to know about JFK. The days of American government hiding from American people are over. We need transparency. We have done that, and we will continue to do so. I’m excited for Pam and now Cash to get in there and clean up our mess.

Via FOX and Friends Weekend and The Storm Has Arrived.

The post “Transparency Is Coming… They Don’t Want Anyone to Know Who Was on Epstein’s Island, Who was a Pedo, and Who Is Probably Still Sitting in DC” – Alina Habba on Upcoming Epstein Island Documents Release (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

C.S. Lewis and the “Romantic Heresy” | Key Life

Among the most well-known books in English in the twentieth century, first published as a single text in 1952, Mere Christianity began as a series of radio talks between 1942 and 1945. Yet this renowned work displays precisely the sort of emotive rhetoric that leads some to ponder Lewis’s method.

Notice the opening line of his opening talk: “Every one has heard people quarrelling” (C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity [New York: HarperOne, 2000], 1). Lewis begins in a rather strange place for a series of lectures on “Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe.” The chapter, titled “The Law of Human Nature,” resonates with readers because Lewis begins precisely with that which some of Lewis’s contemporaries would rather he exclude, namely, individual human experience. Instead of identifying a philosophical principle of the good or the true, Lewis starts with the familiar occurrence of arguing with another person. Not only has everyone heard others engaged in such verbal bouts, but everyone also has participated in just such brawls. “It’s my turn, not yours!” “You wouldn’t like it if I broke your favorite mug!” “Didn’t we agree to clean this up together?”

Lewis’s purpose in drawing his readers’ attention to such language is to demonstrate the existence of a law that is shared by all people, in all places, at all times. Lewis’s moral canon works precisely because it is not only known by all intellectually but also felt by all personally. His examples thereby serve as reminders of a connection between what we sometimes call the subjective and objective. Note well: Lewis does not begin with the affirmation of a knowledge taught only in the Scriptures and available to a few but with an appeal to a universal experience of individual morality (whatever exceptions might be found in the population as a whole).

Notice, too, that Lewis makes clear that the law of human nature is not the same as something so unswerving and unalterable as the law of gravitation (Lewis, Mere Christianity, 20). This is neither a fact of nature—such that humans must always and necessarily behave in a particular manner—nor some inventive fancy. Human nature is the result of neither intellection nor appetite. The law of right and wrong results from some third aspect that dictates human behavior: “a moral law, which they did not make, and cannot quite forget even when they try” (Lewis, Mere Christianity, 23).

Lewis later identifies this sense of the moral law as conscience. For Lewis, the notion implies both a consciousness of something within human nature and a someone “inside ourselves as an influence or a command trying to get us to behave in a certain way” (Lewis, Mere Christianity, 24). Here, at the crossroads of a law we feel compelled to meet and a mind behind that law we know we ought to obey, Lewis grounds his case for the personal God described by Christianity.

The question I wish to ask is why Lewis begins his case for Christianity with an appeal to personal experience. And I think an additional question that might be posed is why his defense of Christianity was so successful among his listeners and readers. The answer to these questions, I suspect, lies in several different but related movements within modern thought—movements that I think Lewis was more aware of than some scholars admit.

Listen or Watch our interview with Jeffrey Barbeau by clicking here!

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

Adapted from The Last Romantic by Jeffrey W. Barbeau. ©2025 Jeffrey W. Barbeau. Used by permission of InterVarsity Press. http://www.ivpress.com.  

The post C.S. Lewis and the “Romantic Heresy” appeared first on Key Life.

JANUARY 26 | The Sin Revealer

SCRIPTURE READING: Hebrews 4:12–16
KEY VERSE: Psalm 77:12

       I will also meditate on all Your work,
       And talk of Your deeds.

Oscar Wilde’s classic novel The Picture of Dorian Gray is a chilling exploration of what happens when a person refuses to deal with the sin inside his heart.
In this fantasy tale, the handsome character Dorian commissions a portrait of himself that will capture his good looks. He is so captivated by this picture that he makes a wish—he wants to stay young forever and let the picture “grow old” in his place.
Dorian gets his wish and then uses his youth and attractiveness to fulfill his desires. His motives are self-seeking, vain, and greedy in everything he does. As the years pass, Dorian periodically checks the picture in his back room.
Not only is his face growing old; it becomes gnarled and vicious. Dorian is so ashamed that he covers the picture and refuses to let anyone look at it. The picture has become a horrifying portrait of his soul!
Even though Oscar Wilde did not profess to be a Christian, he understood the effects of sin run rampant. Dorian’s picture was his sin revealer, even as God’s Word is the instrument of conviction in your life.
When you meditate on Scripture and feel the tug of His Word on your heart, pay attention. God is urging you to confess your sin and experience the renewing power of forgiveness in Christ.

Reveal my sins, O Lord, so I can deal with them. Show me what is really in my heart.

Stanley, C. F. (2000). Into His presence (p. 27). Thomas Nelson Publishers.

When Culture Hates You with Natasha Crain | Cross Examined

Has the recent political shift softened the growing animosity toward Christians, or is hostility here to stay? The election may be over, but Christians can’t afford to let our guards down just yet. While America might be moving toward cultural sanity, the battle for truth, justice, morality, and reason is far from over!

This week, our good friend, Unshaken Conference speaker, and author, Natasha Crain, joins Frank to discuss her timely new book, ‘When Culture Hates You: Persevering for the Common Good as Christians in a Hostile Public Square. Together, they’ll explore how Christians can respond to persecution, speak truth boldly, and navigate cultural backlash and opposition with grace, courage, and humility, tackling questions like:

  • Why do Christians need to speak truth in culture and link it to the Bible?
  • What’s the ‘new vibe shift’ that’s taken place since the inauguration?
  • Was the leftist female bishop justified in her public scrutiny of President Trump?
  • What are the four main tenets of secularism?
  • Are all Christians guilty of being Christian Nationalists?
  • What’s the difference between social justice and biblical justice?
  • How can Christians help true victims fight for biblical justice?
  • How do you respond if someone calls you a hateful bigot?

Do you feel hated as a Christian? Get used to it, but don’t give up! In this podcast episode, Frank and Natasha will offer encouragement for believers who experience persecution on any level, as well as provide practical tips on how to be salt and light in the midst of so much chaos. Be sure to order a copy of Natasha’s book, ‘When Culture Hates You‘, and don’t miss the upcoming midweek podcast episode where Frank and Natasha will continue their conversation by discussing a topic that’s TOO EXTREME for radio!

If you enjoyed this podcast episode PLEASE HELP US SPREAD THE TRUTH OF CHRISTIANITY BY SUPPORTING OUR MINISTRY HERE. 100% of your donation goes to ministry, 0% to buildings!

Resources mentioned during the episode:

NATASHA’S WEBSITE: NatashaCrain.com

ORDER NATASHA’S BOOK: When Culture Hates You

BLOG POST: What the Inauguration (and Vibe Shift) Means for Christians

BOOK: Faithfully Different by Natasha Crain

UNSHAKEN CONFERENCE 2025: UnshakenConference.com

The post When Culture Hates You with Natasha Crain appeared first on Cross Examined.

https://crossexamined.org/when-culture-hates-you-with-natasha-crain/

Let’s Go With God | Pastor Jack Hibbs

January 18, 2025

When Jesus walked this earth, there was nothing He did, said, or thought that was not in tandem with His Heavenly Father. As a result, His mission was accomplished and His ministry impacted the entire world. Likewise, as we seek to live the Christian life, we must do so with complete dependence on the Lord. Let’s go with God!

Love4567 Share Share

Recent Real Life TV

Real Life TV

January 18, 2025

Let’s Go With God

When Jesus walked this earth, there was nothing He did, said, or thought that was not in tandem with His…

Audrey Aguirre

Love4567

Real Life TV

January 11, 2025

Judge Everything Against The Bible

If you want to avoid being led astray in a world that is more deceptive than it has ever been,…

Audrey Aguirre

Love4570

Real Life TV

January 4, 2025

Do You Know God?

God wants you to know Him as much more than just an acquaintance or an ally. He wants you to…

Audrey Aguirre

Love4535

The post Let’s Go With God first appeared on Pastor Jack Hibbs.

Scopes Monkey Trial Then and Now | Juicy Ecumenism

Supposedly the 1925 Scopes Monkey Trial in Dayton, Tennessee, over whether evolution could be taught in public schools, embarrassed Christian “fundamentalists” out of public life until the 1970s. The reality is more complex.

Keeping the Faith: God, Democracy, and the Trial That Riveted a Nation by Brenda Wineapple tells the story of the trial but does not reflect deeply about its long-term impact on religious public witness. Instead, she focuses on the supposed similarities of the trial and its era to today, amid debates over populism, Christian nationalism, and race.

The trial was chiefly about the large personalities of perennial presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan, who joined the prosecution, and famed trial lawyer Clarence Darrow, who joined the defense. In 1960, the trial was dramatized in the film “Inherit the Wind,” with Spencer Tracey portraying Darrow, Fredric March as Bryan, and Gene Kelly as cynical Baltimore reporter H.L. Mencken, who despised backcountry America. Of course, the film is not historically accurate. Defendant John Scopes was never jailed. The jail was never attacked by an angry mob. Scopes was not romantically involved with the daughter of the town’s fundamentalist “spiritual leader.” That fiery preacher, whose denomination is never cited, is sinisterly portrayed consigning a drowned unbaptized boy to hell in his funeral sermon, an odd teaching for any Protestant preacher, fundamentalist or not. The film portrays the town’s religious people as dangerously reactionary.

In reality, Dayton during the controversy was friendly and civil. It virtually invited national notoriety by staging the controversial trial to invite publicity and commerce. The American Civil Liberties Union publicly advertised for a schoolteacher to defy the law to precipitate a test trial, which the ACLU hoped would eventually overturn the Tennessee law as unconstitutional. John Scopes amiably agreed to cooperate as a defendant, although it’s unclear whether he ever taught evolution in the classroom. He persuaded students to testify against him. There was never any question that he would be found guilty, with hopes placed on higher court appeals.

Bryan eagerly volunteered to help the prosecution. He was a vociferous critic of Darwinian evolution as dehumanizing and immoral, a threat against the weak and vulnerable. He was the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate in 1896, 1900 and 1908. Secretary of State under Woodrow Wilson, and he strove to be a political kingmaker at the 1912, 1920 and 1924 Democratic Party conventions. At the 1924 convention, he successfully denounced a resolution condemning the Ku Klux Klan. Although a self-styled friend of the commoner, he was not a friend to black people, whom he thought should passively accept subordination in a white-led society. Bryan rejoiced at the 1919 enactment of Prohibition. And like many others, he saw post World War I America, despite Prohibition, as morally degenerating, with divorce increasing, rising religious liberalism and secularism, permissive sexuality, debauched entertainment, and America losing its definitive Protestant character.

Both Bryan and Darrow were political progressives. Darrow had supported two of Bryan’s three presidential campaigns. Both ultimately opposed eugenics as a threat to society’s most vulnerable. Both strove, selectively, to defend society’s outcasts. Both wanted activist government enacting greater justice. But Bryan was an ardent Presbyterian who wanted a society and public life centered on the Bible. Never ordained, he was a popular lay preacher and speaker on the Chautauqua circuit. He was a polished and charming if not sophisticated exponent of American populist folk religion. In the film “Inherit the Wind,” rapturous crowds in Dayton repeatedly great Bryan with the hymn “Give Me That Old Time Religion.” 

Darrow was an outspoken religious agnostic who defended unsavory murderers, enjoying publicity and money, but also sincerely defended unpopular political dissidents and racial minorities. He often spoke cynically but was suspected of being a secret idealist. He feared political and religious conformity. Some in the ACLU resented and feared his role in the trial, which they did not want to be clash over religion. But Darrow and Bryan ensured it would be exactly that. And the national media, including newsreels filmed in the courtroom, portrayed it so. It was a battle over God and the Bible.

“Inherit the Wind” portrays the town’s fiery preacher leading a histrionic evening outdoor revival full of threats and thunder that horrified even Bryan and the preacher’s daughter. In reality, Dayton was dominated by more subdued Methodists and Baptists. The trial judge was a devout Methodist who carried a Bible into the courtroom. Amid soaring Summer heat, the trial was eventually moved outdoors, adding to its theatricality.

As the book recalls, Darrow with reporters and others one evening during the trial attended a “holy roller” revival outside town. It was perhaps Pentecostal. The worshippers were anti-Darwin but mostly focused on repentance and salvation with great passion. Darrow and the reporters watched mostly in reverential silence, with Darrow admitting their sincerity and their need for faith amid poverty. He offered respect to them that he could not give to Bryan, whom he deemed self-serving.

Refused permission to call scholarly witnesses about evolution, Darrow surprised everyone by summoning Bryan to the witness stand to query him about the Bible. Appalling the rest of the defense team, Bryan readily acceded, his ego unable to resist. Although a lifelong teacher of the Bible, Bryan was no scholar or deep thinker. He superficially responded to Darrow’s efforts to discredit the Bible with bromides and quips. It was a fiasco for Bryan’s reputation. Darrow won in the court of public opinion even as Scopes was found guilty and sentenced to a $100 fine, later overturned on a technicality. The Tennessee law was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court forty years later.

Bryan died in Dayton, only five days after the trial, after attending church, age 65. As a populist exponent of progressive politics and religious conservatism, he left no successor, which may partly explain why public “fundamentalism” receded as a political force. Prohibition was revoked in 1933. As the book notes, Bryan in 1923 was defeated as a candidate for Presbyterian Church Moderator. The New York Times reported in its front-page story that his “controversy” over evolution factored in his defeat. A nominating speech hailed his “uncompromising position for civic righteousness.”  His successful opponent was hailed for not bringing politics into the church.

Wineapple, the author, tries to parallel Bryan with today’s “Christian nationalists.” And perhaps there is overlap but only to the extent that religion of all stripes has always infused American public life. The author stresses that southern segregationists opposed teaching evolution while also admitting that black Christians largely agreed. The Scopes Monkey Trial was about two opposing forms of progressivism. Both claimed to defend the vulnerable. Bryan and Darrow in the end were too absolutist to find common ground.

The post Scopes Monkey Trial Then and Now appeared first on Juicy Ecumenism.

Flashback: The Great Paul Harvey Shares Annual Christmas Story: ‘The Man and the Birds’ | The Gateway Pundit

Paul Harvey being awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President George W. Bush/Wikicommons photo by Shealah Craighead.

Paul Harvey was one of the great radio personalities of 20th century America. Paul was a Christian man. He was a staunch American patriot and Godly man.

In 2005, Harvey was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the United States’ most prestigious civilian award, by President George W. Bush.

Bush said of Harvey’s career. “He first went on the air in 1933, and he’s been heard nationwide for 54 years. Americans like the sound of his voice…over the decades we have come to recognize in that voice some of the finest qualities of our country: patriotism, the good humor, the kindness, and common sense of Americans.”

His popular “Rest of the Story” segment was broadcast into millions of American homes and businesses.

Paul Harvey was also a devout Christian who was deeply concerned that the United States was abandoning God and morality at her own peril.

Every year, starting in 1965, Harvey shared a story at Christmas, ‘The Man and the Birds.’

Listen to his moving story below:

The post Flashback: The Great Paul Harvey Shares Annual Christmas Story: ‘The Man and the Birds’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Narnia Remains | The Log College

by Samuel James

On Nov. 22, 1963, all of America and much of the world were thinking about only one thing: the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Kennedy’s shocking death absorbed global consciousness for perfectly understandable reasons. Yet that same day, nearly 4,700 miles away from Dallas, C.S. Lewis also passed away in his Oxford home. Lewis was not an obscure figure by any reasonable standard, for he was a world-renowned fantasy author and had been on the cover of Time magazine in 1947. Yet in the days that followed, Kennedy’s murder, with all the upending of the American presidency and tumultuous cultural landscape it portended, eclipsed Lewis’s passing. But sixty years later, Lewis still speaks.

But it seems that history has rendered a different verdict. Lewis and Kennedy represent two very different but oddly connected interpretations of the modern age. Kennedy’s humanistic, hedonistic idealism—the Camelot of lunar ascent and social justice and sexual liberation—epitomized the 1960s, indeed creating much of American social and political culture in its image. On the other side, Narnia—the kingdom of mere Christianity, of “true myth” and virtue and a world one cannot just “see through”—cut an archaic figure in a modern world that was allegedly leaving religion behind.

Is there any doubt which of these two legacies looks stronger, more prophetic, more likely to meet the needs of the moment right now?

Kennedy’s liberal Catholicism became a cultural touchstone, a metaphor for an emerging American synthesis of faith and self-determining autonomy. This was the eager expectation of everyone from the “modernist” theologians—who stripped Christianity of its metaphysics—to the commercial advocates of abortion and birth control. These drew strict borders around a now-demythologized religion.

What’s more, Kennedy symbolized the sexual revolution in all its debonair vice. His well-documented escapades seemed right in step with the mood of the 1960s. This era was proof, it seemed, that modern people could throw off the repressive demands of Christian morality and invent a newer, more sophisticated, more “compassionate” society. 

Lewis’s entire life seemed to point in the completely opposite direction. The man who was a settled atheist by his 20s would later observe that modernist theology is something only lifelong Christians could invent, since “when unbelievers come in all, they come in a good deal further.” And indeed, Lewis came in much further. He did not see the point in worshiping a god who would merely command, “Follow thy heart.” “Christianity, if true, is of utmost importance,” he would write. “If it is false, it is of no importance. The one thing it cannot be is moderately important.”

Precisely because Lewis knew that the claims of Christianity were all-encompassing, he recognized that no civilization that abandoned it could function. This was not because Lewis desired some kind of baptized Anglo-Saxon ethnonationalist state (born in Belfast, Lewis never forgot the high cost of religious intolerance), but because modern man’s alternatives were quite literally inhumane. Lewis saw from afar, with striking prescience, that humans had no choice but to retreat from personhood if they wanted to escape the implications of Christian revelation. In The Abolition of Man, Lewis would declare that “Man’s conquest of Nature,”—that is, the quest to overcome first principles and natural law—“turns out, in the moment of its consummation, to be Nature’s conquest of Man.” Eighty years from its original publication in 1943, The Abolition of Man still speaks.

“Man conquered by nature” could well be the headline summary of the post-1960s West. How did Lewis see this? Part of the answer is that Lewis was deeply rooted in the past. His scholarly magnum opus, English Literature in the Sixteenth Century, took Lewis deep into the thought patterns and values of older generations. It was Lewis’s habit of “breaking bread with the dead” (as W.H. Auden put it) that laid bare the pretentiousness of the contemporary consensus. How else could Lewis warn of “chronological snobbery,” or observe in The Screwtape Letters that “jargon, not argument,” is the way Satan keeps people away from Christ?

By the mid 1960s, American society was determined to divorce its past. Five months before Lewis and Kennedy died, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that public schools could no longer require prayer or Bible recitation. It was a confident decision (8 to 1), the kind that made sense in a world of dazzling social progress like the Apollo program and the birth control pill. Yet the view from our own day reveals that Lewis was right and Camelot was wrong. We are more, not less, like the ones who have become before. Postmodern sensibilities and contemporary technology have not revealed more happiness to us; instead, we are left trying to figure out the meaning of words like “man,” “woman,” and “friend.”

Camelot came to a violent end. But Narnia remains. 

It is a remarkable providence that John F. Kennedy and C.S. Lewis died on the same day. It is likewise remarkable that while Kennedy obtained the most powerful office in the world, it is the professor, the letter writer, and the storyteller Lewis whose prophetic voice rings out most audibly and most wisely from the grave. Political power does not a wise man make. This will be something worth remembering 60 years from now.

A version of this essay was published in 2023 at World Magazine. 

November 20 | A Purpose for Pain

Scripture reading: Ephesians 3:14–21

Key verse: Psalm 71:20

You, who have shown me great and severe troubles,

Shall revive me again,

And bring me up again from the depths of the earth.

The book A Prisoner and Yet Free details the time Corrie ten Boom spent in the concentration camps of World War Two. She described solitary confinement:

A solitary cell awaited me. I was pushed inside and the door closed after me. I was alone. Everything was empty and gray. In the other cell there had been at least the colors of my cell mates’ dresses. Here there was nothing, only an emptiness, a cold gray void …

I threw myself down on the mattress, pulled the filthy cover over me, and shut my eyes. The storm howled, and every now and then a gust of wind shook the door so violently it seemed as if someone were beating against it from the outside … “Oh, please, not this loneliness. Oh Savior, take away this anxiety, this desolation … Take me into your arms and comfort me,” I prayed. And peace stole into my heart. The weird noises still surrounded me, but I fell quietly asleep.

The deepest possible adversity was Corrie’s. “It was dark in my cell,” she wrote, “but I talked with my Savior. Never before had fellowship with Him been so close. It was a joy I hoped would continue unchanged. I was a prisoner, and yet … how free!”

Because of Corrie’s life, thousands have come to know Jesus as their personal Savior. Let Him take the painfulness of your life and make it a shining light of hope to someone today.

Dear heavenly Father, please take the painfulness of my life and use it for Your purposes—reaching out through me to a lost and hurting world.1


1  Stanley, C. F. (2000). Into His presence (p. 339). Thomas Nelson Publishers.

The Choice, Is It Yours? | Pastor Jack Hibbs

November 16, 2024

The Lord puts a choice before us: life or death. Which direction will you move toward? In this episode of Real Life TV, Pastor Jack opens chapter 10 of Romans to take a closer look at the choices we make in life.

Love4287 Share Share

Recent Real Life TV

Real Life TV

November 16, 2024

The Choice, Is It Yours?

The Lord puts a choice before us: life or death. Which direction will you move toward? In this episode of…

Audrey Aguirre

Love4287

Real Life TV

November 9, 2024

Battle Scars Of Suffering

The battle scars of suffering are nothing to hide. They are marks of honor for the Christian. Suffering is a…

Audrey Aguirre

Love4289

Real Life TV

November 2, 2024

The Battlefield Of Life

The Christian life is a battlefield! Are you ready for battle? The Bible declares that we are more than conquerors…

Audrey Aguirre

Love4291

The post The Choice, Is It Yours? first appeared on Pastor Jack Hibbs.

Ladies, Please Check The Mail As Your Handmaid’s Tale Outfit Should Be Arriving Today | Babylon Bee

Article Image

Ladies of the United States, this is a friendly reminder to please check your mailbox as your mandatory Handmaid’s Tale outfit should be arriving today.

As you may know, women must wear the outfit every day starting the moment Trump is sworn in, and the government is taking precautions to ensure every woman has an outfit that fits. Just like from 2016 to 2020, women are once again property and may only serve as baby-making factories. The outfit is a necessary reminder of women losing all of their rights when Trump again returns to power.

Yes, Trump has won, and the dark days are near. Please, be sure you wear your outfit to school events, the grocery store, church (Unitarian, of course), your next doctor’s appointment, and to get the mail when you are retrieving backup Handmaid’s Tale outfits. If you see a gun, remember to bow to it, as it now has more rights than you. It’s not a legal requirement per se, but it is a nice sign of respect.

Thanks for your understanding.


BIG NEWS: We made a movie, and you can watch the trailer NOW:

Click here to find out how you can watch the movie when it releases on October 11

https://babylonbee.com/news/ladies-please-check-the-mail-as-your-handmaids-tale-outfit-should-be-arriving-today/