Tag Archives: meta

Mid-Day Digest · February 19, 2026

“From The Patriot Post (patriotpost.us)”

THE FOUNDATION

“The virtues of men are of more consequence to society than their abilities; and for this reason, the heart should be cultivated with more assiduity than the head.” —Noah Webster (1788)

IN TODAY’S DIGEST

EXECUTIVE NEWS SUMMARY

The Editors

  • U.S. moves military toward Iran: A massive U.S. military buildup is underway in the Middle East with Iran in the crosshairs. The USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group had already moved into the region, but now the USS Gerald R. Ford, the largest warship ever constructed, has reached the Mediterranean and is moving toward Iran. Numerous Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers are in the region, along with Independence-class littoral combat ships and at least one nuclear submarine. Aircraft, including Stratotankers, AWACS, and F-22s, have been traversing Europe in that direction in such numbers that tracking software has started to fall behind. Trump administration officials have been strategically cagey about their plans for the buildup, but Iran has been encouraged to “make a deal” in the ongoing diplomatic talks. All necessary forces for a possible action will be in place by mid-March, a senior official said.
  • The Andrew formerly known as Prince arrested: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, brother of King Charles III, received a 66th birthday surprise — he was arrested. The ex-prince is further embroiled in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, as he is charged with forwarding confidential trade documents to Epstein. Andrew was taken into custody at his Sandringham Estate in eastern England early Thursday and faces possible life imprisonment for public office misconduct. He was reported to the police earlier this month following the release of the Epstein files. King Charles conveyed his “deepest concern” over the arrest but stated that the “law must take its course.” Prime Minister Keir Starmer said, “One of the core principles in our system is that everybody is equal under the law and nobody is above the law.” He’s happy to hold the white British royals accountable for misconduct but allow Muslim Pakistani rape gangs to roam free.
  • Bhattacharya to head CDC temporarily: National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya has been tapped by the Trump administration to act as the temporary head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention after former Acting Director Jim O’Niell’s exit. Bhattacharya gained prominence early in the COVID pandemic when he coauthored the Great Barrington Declaration, which criticized the government’s overly aggressive, pseudo-scientific response to the pandemic. Bhattacharya will remain NIH director as the Trump administration seeks a permanent CDC director, who must be confirmed by the Senate. Donald Trump’s first CDC director, Susan Monarez, served for only a month before resigning in opposition to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.‘s vaccine policy.
  • GOP sues to stop VA Dems’ gerrymandering: A group of Republicans filed a lawsuit against Virginia Democrats’ redistricting ballot referendum, seeking an emergency motion to stop the measure ahead of the March 6 early voting date. The lawsuit contends that Democrats have violated state law and used misleading language in pushing their blatantly partisan redistricting map that fails to represent Virginia’s near-even voter split. National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Richard Hudson observed, “Virginia Democrats are ignoring their own Constitution and trying to rig the system in their favor.”
  • CNN “documentary” will frame Kirk’s memorial as a radicalizing event: CNN’s Pamela Brown announced this week a documentary expected to air this weekend on how Charlie Kirk’s assassination became a “rallying call” for Christian nationalism. “Christian nationalism” is a deliberate effort to turn Christian citizenship into a slur that can be used against the Right. That, of course, gives away CNN’s game. This is not a hard-hitting documentary meant to highlight the grief the Christian Right felt over Kirk’s murder and how many are feeling led to live up to his example; it is a propaganda piece meant to turn its audience against the idea of Christian nationalism. A clip from the documentary shows Professor Matthew Taylor casting doubt on the persecution of Christians … while discussing Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
  • Mamdani shifts gears, restarts homeless encampment sweeps: During his campaign, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani blasted his predecessor, Eric Adams, for his policy of clearing out homeless encampments in the city. Upon taking office, Mamdani immediately suspended such sweeps, calling them inhumane. However, just over a month into the post, and following the death of at least 19 individuals due to cold exposure, Mamdani is changing his tune. On Wednesday, he announced that he is reauthorizing the sweeps, though he noted they would not be carried out by the police but by the city’s homeless services department. Coalition for the Homeless executive director David Giffen criticized the decision, arguing, “When a city worker shows up and throws out all your belongings, you’re not going to trust that person the next time they show up offering you a place to sleep inside.”
  • Trans Bill of Rights: Once upon a time, the 10 rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights were considered applicable to all Americans. Today, in an era when the Left is pushing “identity groups” rather than patriotism, that is no longer the case. That’s why House Democrats have introduced the “Trans Bill of Rights.” The bill itself is vague, aiming only to expand transgender access to public “services” and “accommodations.” Despite claiming to ask for “equal access,” what this bill truly wants to enshrine in law is the right of a perverted man in a dress to enter protected women’s spaces. Additionally, it would require institutions to play along with the transgender fetish and taxpayers to pay for gender reassignment surgeries. Under the Trump administration, this bill is expected to be dead in the water, but it establishes the playbook for the next Democrat administration.
  • NYU Langone and Baystate Health get rid of “gender-affirming care”: If you can’t appeal to their conscience, appeal to their wallets. That’s the motto behind the Trump administration’s policies that have now led to the termination of NYU Lagone and Baystate Health’s gender mutilation. Baystate, the largest healthcare system in western Massachusetts, and Lagone, a major Manhattan hospital, were not convinced by the Cass Review and subsequent banning of “gender-affirming” surgeries in the UK. Nor were they convinced by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and the American Medical Association’s statements that no “gender-affirming” care should be given to minors. But once the secretary of Health and Human Services announced that their Medicaid and Medicare funding would be cut off, they ended their evil practices posthaste.
  • High school trans wrestler accused of sexual assault drops out of girls state tourney: A male high school wrestler who identifies as a “transgender girl” and has been accused of sexually assaulting a female competitor during a match has withdrawn from the Washington State girls wrestling championship tournament. State authorities have yet to announce whether charges will be raised against this individual. A Washington Interscholastic Athletic Association spokesperson explained that the male athlete was “replaced by an alternate from the same WIAA District qualifying event.” The girl accusing him of sexual assault is not the alternate competitor.
  • Dispatches from Oakland: In Oakland, California, no one is above being targeted by the criminals — not even the mayor. A thief reportedly stole Mayor Barbara Lee’s car keys from her office and, two days later, returned to steal the car. The mayor’s abandoned black SUV was later discovered nearby in Vallejo, California. The Oakland Police Department has yet to locate the thief. Apparently, Oakland has the highest auto theft rate in the country, with 9,914 motor vehicle thefts in 2024, according to FBI data. Its overall crime rate was also four times the national average in 2024, likely due to the fact that the Oakland Police Department is suffering from a severe shortage of officers. Even the Soros-backed Oakland DA wasn’t exempt from brazen burglars who broke her SUV window to steal her laptop. Ironically, though, she claims she “doesn’t feel unsafe” living there.

Headlines

  • Judge rules that authorities can’t re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia (Townhall)
  • Trump “taking an interest” in social media bans for teens (NY Post)
  • Ex-South Korean President Yoon gets life sentence (Washington Times)
  • Thief breaks into Oakland mayor’s office, steals her car (Not the Bee)
  • Eight dead, one missing in Lake Tahoe avalanche tragedy (NY Post)

The Executive News Summary is compiled daily by Jordan Candler, Thomas Gallatin, Sterling Henry, and Sophie Starkova. For the archive, click here.

Comment | Share

FEATURED ANALYSIS

Zuckerberg Dodges and Weaves in Liability Case

Nate Jackson

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has previously testified before Congress about the addictive nature of social media and the effect it has on kids and teens. Yesterday, for the first time, the Facebook founder testified before a jury in a liability lawsuit in Los Angeles on the same subject.

Our Emmy Griffin explained the case last week:

One plaintiff, referred to as “KGM,” is a 20-year-old who believes that social media addiction led to her psychological issues, including depression, body dysmorphic disorder, and self-harm. She began using YouTube, owned by Google, at the tender age of six and had access to Instagram, owned by Meta, at age nine. …

The trial will specifically address whether or not the jury finds Meta and Google liable for the deterioration of KGM’s mental health due to the addictive nature of their platforms.

Griffin noted that proving liability for Meta and others may be a heavy lift for several reasons, including the frequently cited Section 230. That provision in the 1996 Communications Decency Act largely shields platforms from liability for user-generated content. However, those platforms have often behaved like publishers, “fact-checking” and censoring (primarily conservative) content in a tacit admission that social media changes behavior.

We know this all too well.

As for youth, The New York Times reports, “In internal documents that surfaced in some of the [other] lawsuits [facing the company], Mr. Zuckerberg and other Meta leaders repeatedly played down their platforms’ risks to young people, while rejecting employee pleas to bolster youth guardrails and hire additional staff.”

The Daily Wire adds, “Zuckerberg bolstered his argument by noting that less than 1% of Instagram’s revenue comes from teenagers, emphasizing the demographic has limited purchasing power and is therefore less attractive to advertisers. He argued that, from a business perspective, attracting teenagers is not ‘meaningful in the short term.’”

That may be, but if a product is meant to hook adults so they spend money, it will hook kids, too, if there are insufficient guardrails in place. Teen users also soon become adult users.

On Wednesday, Zuckerberg largely stuck to his talking points, steering clear of anything that might be taken as an acknowledgment of Instagram’s addictive “qualities.” Still, he was confronted with a 2015 memo, in which the Times says he “encouraged executives to prioritize increasing the time that teenagers spend on Meta’s apps.”

Much more recently — November 2023 — Instagram head Adam Mosseri sent a memo to employees, saying, “As you are building out your 2024 plans, I’m asking that the business teams stay laser focused on 1) teens, particularly in developed markets and 2) Threads, and in that order.”

Oh.

In this particular case, Meta’s lawyers are trying to prove that KGM had a turbulent home life and that social media, including Instagram, was a coping mechanism, not the cause of her mental health issues.

It seems relevant that, in his 2024 congressional testimony, Zuckerberg turned to several families and offered what appeared to be a spontaneous apology. He told parents he was “sorry for everything you have all been through.” Maybe that was all scripted, but likely not. In any case, it wasn’t exactly an admission of guilt.

Yesterday, Zuckerberg said Instagram made a conscious decision to prioritize utility over time spent on the platform. His “basic assumption,” he explained, is that “if something is valuable, people will use it more because it’s useful to them.”

The idea that Instagram or any other social media platform isn’t actively doing everything possible to keep people scrolling and staring is absurd on its face. They go out of business if people don’t stay on the platforms, and their own internal documents belie his claim.

Ultimately, however, this is a tough case. No one wants to be on the other side of grieving parents who have lost children to suicide. No one wants to admit responsibility for harm to children.

You can say that parents should take charge of how their children use things, but as the parent of teenagers, I can tell you that, unless you keep them under lock and key, they will find ways to do dumb stuff. Heck, I was a teenager once myself.

As a Gen Xer, I grew up without any of this stuff. I learned to type on a typewriter. I didn’t even send an email until I was in college, and I got my first cellphone when my wife was pregnant with our first child. In other words, my brain was fully developed (cough, cough — I swear) by the time social media was a gleam in Mark Zuckerberg’s eye.

For kids growing up in the last 20 years, however, separating fact from fiction or reality from make-believe is much harder because of social media. For example, there wouldn’t be a “transgender community” if it weren’t for Big Tech platforms.

Does that mean Meta and the rest are liable for every bad thing — or even just certain really bad things — that happens to a kid?

Some are looking to the Australian model of banning social media for kids. Some 86% of Americans want to hold platforms accountable for “predatory” social media addiction.

As for specific liability, this Los Angeles jury will go a long way to setting a precedent, one way or another.

Comment | Share

MORE ANALYSIS

Don’t Miss Alexander’s Column

Read Will the Gender Cult Implode?

If you’d like to receive Alexander’s Column by email every Wednesday, update your subscription here.

Reader Comments

Editor’s Note: Each week we receive hundreds of comments and correspondences — and we read every one of them. Click here for a few thought-provoking comments about specific articles. The views expressed therein don’t necessarily reflect those of The Patriot Post.

BEST OF RIGHT OPINION

For more of today’s columns, visit Right Opinion.

PODCAST

Latest PodcastPopCon #134: Rupert Lowe: “We Will Not Manage the West’s Decline”The West is in a moment of crisis, and British MP Rupert Lowe’s new political movement, Restore Britain, has, in the words of U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, “no interest in being polite and orderly caretakers of the West’s managed decline.”

BEST OF VIDEOS

SHORT CUTS

Race Bait

“What’s so interesting about the MAGA regime to me is they’re all white nationalists, even the brown-skinned ones, even the Latinos.” —podcaster Jennifer Welch

Shot/Chaser

Q: “I notice that when you urge people to action, you often include the word ‘peacefully.’ Is that to avoid another Jan. 6-type incident?” —CNN reporter

A: “With all due respect, it’s to avoid people like you guys saying that I’m anything but.” —right-wing activist Scott Presler

Democrat Infighting

“We did receive information suggesting that the federal government did not shut down this segment. … It is our understanding that either Mr. Colbert or CBS decided that they just didn’t want to air it. And this was because of a fear that the FCC may say something to him and that there may have been advice to just have me on.” —Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) suggesting that the Democrat establishment collaborated to support her Texas Senate primary opponent

For the Record

“CBS’s late night host wanted to deny a black woman equal time on television in the middle of an active election and with his super-Christian best friend, lied about it.” —Erick Erickson

“I, for one, am enjoying the Democrats throwing Jasmine Crockett under the bus.” —Amy Curtis

Re: the Epstein Files

“By releasing document after document, not only have victims been needlessly exposed without their consent, but we also risk applying guilt by association to anyone for the sole crime of simply being named in the files — a door that, once opened, cannot be closed.” —Ian Haworth

Climate Swindle

“Since the global warming crusade started some 30 years ago, the temperature of the planet has not been altered by one-tenth of a degree — as even the alarmists will admit. In other words, $16 trillion has been spent — a lot of people got very, very rich off the government largesse — but there is not a penny of measurable payoff.” —Stephen Moore

Belly Laugh of the Day

“We send billions of dollars to dead people and they get cashed — the checks get cashed. … We’re talking about all kinds of checks. … So I had to go pass a bill. … So far as I can tell, dead people can still vote, but they can’t cash checks because we’re not going to be sending them to them anymore.” —Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA)

Leading the Way

“Success for Turning Point wasn’t beating the NFL in ratings. It was proving that an alternative halftime show was viable and that Turning Point could pull it off. It succeeded on both fronts. … There’s a lesson here for conservatives. It’s not enough to rightly point out the many things wrong with our culture and society. Conservatives must create alternatives.” —Victor Joecks

And Last…

“The ideas that the left uses to discredit the West are uniquely Western ideas. The West came up with … equal rights, tolerance, of freedom from religious domination. These are all Western ideas that now the left hurls back against us and say, ‘You’re not perfect in them.’ No, we’re not, but no other civilization is as well.” —Heather Mac Donald

Comment | Share

TODAY’S MEME

Share

For more of today’s memes, visit the Memesters Union.

ON THIS DAY in 1945, the U.S. Marines launched the 36-day Battle of Iwo Jima with 70,000 men attacking 21,000 Japanese who were dug in and prepared to fight to the death. Only a couple of hundred Japanese soldiers surrendered, while 19,217 Americans were wounded and 6,871 were killed in action. The Medal of Honor was awarded to 22 Marines and five Sailors, 14 of them posthumously.

“From The Patriot Post (patriotpost.us)”

Trump Settles with Meta Platforms for $25 Million After Social Media Giant Suspended His Accounts in 2021 | The Gateway Pundit

President Trump and Mark Zuckerberg – Credit: Getty Images

President Donald Trump settled with Meta Platforms for $25 million after the social media giant suspended his accounts following the January 6, 2021, protests at the US Capitol.

$22 million from the settlement will go to President Trump’s presidential library. The rest will go to legal fees and to fellow plaintiffs who signed on to the case.

Meta did not admit to any wrongdoing in the settlement.

The Wall Street Journal reported that activity on the case after Mark Zuckerberg flew to Mar-a-Lago to dine with President Trump in November after his 2024 election victory.

Apparently, Trump brought up the lawsuit at the end of dinner with Zuckerberg in November. Then in January, Zuckerberg met with President Trump again for a full day of mediation at Mar-a-lago.

Facebook has been censoring conservative voices and the truth from reaching the masses for several years now.

Obviously, this is not the only censorship case Meta is involved in.

Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook eliminated up to 93% of traffic to top Pro-Trump websites following the 2016 election.

The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft testified to Congress on the oppressive Facebook policies back in 2018.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported in May 2022 that Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, along with Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, filed a lawsuit (Missouri v. Biden) against the Biden Administration, including Biden himself, Anthony Fauci, the Department of Homeland Security, and nearly a dozen federal agencies and Secretaries.

The suit alleges a massive coordinated effort by the Deep State to work with Big Tech to censor and manipulate Americans – from average citizens to news outlets – on issues including the Hunter Biden Laptop from Hell, 2020 Election Integrity, COVID-19 origin and extent skepticism, COVID-19 vaccine skepticism, among other issues.

In June 2022, The Gateway Pundit began assisting Missouri AG Schmitt’s team and providing critical evidence of Facebook and Twitter censorship of the Gateway Pundit on all of these issues. The Missouri-Louisiana case was heard before the Supreme Court in 2024. SCOTUS sent it back to the lower court and this case is still ongoing.

Now that President Trump has reentered the White House the censorship industrial complex is on notice. This settlement to President Trump this week by Meta is likely just the beginning. The tech giants and government agents censored and silenced conservatives and independent media in the US for years. Now justice will be served.

The post Trump Settles with Meta Platforms for $25 Million After Social Media Giant Suspended His Accounts in 2021 appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Meta Unbans Multiple Pro-Life Facebook Accounts | IFA

After promising to protect free speech moving forward, Meta unbanned several pro-life accounts. Is this a good sign for the future?

From The Daily WireMeta has restored several pro-life Facebook accounts just days after attorneys sent a letter demanding the social media giant do so in the wake of Meta’s recent promise to support free speech.

Do you want state prayer alerts?

The Facebook and Instagram accounts for pro-life news site LifeNews.com, LifeNews founder Steven Ertelt, and pro-life mom Abby Covington were restored this week after being suspended for months, according to a press release provided exclusively to The Daily Wire.

The move came just a week after their legal team at Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) sent a letter to Meta calling on the platform to reverse its decision to suspend the accounts. …

In May, Ertelt found his Facebook account had been permanently disabled after he posted a video showing a doctor performing a C-section. During the procedure, the unborn child can be seen grabbing the doctor’s finger.

“An unborn baby can’t be just a clump of cells when he or she is grabbing the doctor’s hand,” read the video’s caption.

Facebook permanently disabled Ertelt’s account and informed him the post failed to follow its Community Standards on “child sexual exploitation,” his attorneys said.

Because LifeNews used Ertelt’s Facebook account to create the LifeNews Instagram account, the group’s Instagram account is effectively permanently suspended as well. …

Covington, the Christian pro-life mother of three, had her Facebook account permanently suspended after she posted about her family’s adoption journey. In her post, she described her family’s Christian faith and encouraged expecting mothers to reach out if they were thinking about putting their baby up for adoption. …

Facebook then informed her that her account did not follow its Community Standards on “human exploitation,” her attorneys said. The platform disabled her Instagram account, as well as all of her Facebook accounts, including the one for her jewelry, skincare, and makeup business. …

The ADF attorneys accused Meta of violating its free speech standards, breaching its own terms of service, and failing to uphold its promises. They had requested the company respond to their request to reinstate the pro-life accounts by January 22.

“These situations provide a litmus test for whether Meta will live up to its public announcement or continue to censor and restrict the marketplace of ideas,” the legal team wrote.

Last week, Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg released a video announcing sweeping changes to his company’s content moderation policies, promising “more speech and fewer mistakes.” …

Share your prayers for the protection of free speech below.

(Excerpt from The Daily Wire. Photo Credit: Solen Feyissa on Unsplash)

Source: https://ifapray.org/blog/meta-unbans-multiple-pro-life-facebook-accounts/

Mid-Day Snapshot · January 13, 2025

 “From The Patriot Post (patriotpost.us)”.

THE FOUNDATION

“Is the relinquishment of the trial by jury and the liberty of the press necessary for your liberty? Will the abandonment of your most sacred rights tend to the security of your liberty? Liberty, the greatest of all earthly blessings — give us that precious jewel, and you may take every things else! Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel.” —Patrick Henry (1788)

IN TODAY’S DIGEST

EXECUTIVE NEWS SUMMARY

Douglas Andrews, Thomas Gallatin, & Jordan Candler

Politics

  • Biden says he could have won! Regarding Joe Biden’s latest BIG Lie that he could have defeated Trump had he not dropped out, CNN’s senior political data reporter Harry Enten notes: “Biden … claims that he could have beaten Donald Trump had he stayed in the race. So, this begs the question, could Biden have won the 2024 election had he [stayed] in the race?” He concludes: “Truthfully, I categorize his statement as flat-out bonkers. Biden was well behind Trump when he dropped out. Biden never led in all of 2024. And no incumbent president who was anywhere near as unpopular as Biden has ever won. The bottom line is this: Joe Biden was behind, he had always been behind and he most likely would have stayed behind.”
  • Jack Smith resigns: Jack Smith, the special prosecutor handpicked by Attorney General Merrick Garland to get Donald Trump over his objection to the 2020 election results and mishandling of classified documents, tendered his resignation on Friday. Smith failed in both cases to do what was the real intention behind the lawfare against Trump, which was to prevent him from winning the 2024 presidential election. Following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling granting presidents certain immunity from prosecution related to their duties as official acts, the legal underpinning of Smith’s lawfare crusade against Trump was effectively gutted. The legality of Smith’s own selection as special prosecutor came under fire from SCOTUS, which served to end his mishandled classified documents case against Trump and called into question any real possibility for success he might have in his January 6 case. Now, Smith is finally slinking away with his legacy as one who sought to bend the law in a failed effort to prevent a second Trump term.
  • Trump praises “commonsense” Fetterman after Mar-a-Lago meeting (National Review)
  • Dems raise wildfire money through Dem super PAC: Have you no sense of decency? That’s the question famously asked of Senator Joe McCarthy during his righteous anti-communist crusade in the early ‘50s, but we might today ask the same question of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who, as the New York Post reports, “sparked fierce outrage for soliciting donations to victims of the deadly Los Angeles wildfires via his super PAC, which pushed users to add their personal information to a Democratic fundraising site.” Newsom directed folks to a website, California Fire Facts, that his campaign committee had set up, ostensibly to fight misinformation. But the “DONATE TO CAL FIRE FOUNDATION” link on the site actually takes folks to an ActBlue fundraising page. Imagine that: promoting one’s political fortunes as a deadly catastrophe destroys the lives of countless of his constituents. As of today, at least 24 are dead, and preliminary estimates have damages somewhere around $150 billion. Newsom might well have no shame, but at least his hair still looks great.
  • LA officials issued countywide evacuation order — by mistake (Washington Free Beacon) | Satire: Newsom assures wildfire victims he is diverting millions of dollars to emergency DEI initiatives (Babylon Bee)

Security

  • Suspect arrested with “flamethrower” near LA fire is an illegal immigrant (NY Post)
  • Vance says those who “committed violence” on January 6 “obviously” shouldn’t be pardoned (The Hill)
  • Trump promises to release report on mystery drones after taking office (Daily Wire)
  • Supreme Court seems likely to uphold TikTok ban (Axios)
  • Austin denies woke military: Outgoing Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has presided over a prolonged and historic shortfall in military recruiting and a deadly serious decline in our nation’s force readiness, but, he says, don’t blame it on wokeness. In a legacy-protecting exit interview with the incurious friendlies at Bloomberg, Austin began with a scintillating circularity: “The United States of America has a military that reflects the United States of America — we are a diverse country, we will have a diverse military.” As for charges about the wokeness that’s plain for all to see, Austin says move along; nothing to see here. “Many of the people who make those comments,” he says, “may not really have a full understanding of what our troops are doing and how well they’re doing it.” In fact, he asserts, “You probably couldn’t get two people to provide the same definition of ‘woke’ because nobody really knows what that is.” We beg to differ. Everyone knows what wokeness is, whether it takes the form of race- and gender-based promotion policies or “Transgender Visibility and Awareness” seminars at our military academies.
  • Smuggler tunnel between Mexico and U.S. discovered: U.S. Border Patrol and Homeland Security Investigations agents recently discovered a tunnel constructed between Mexico and the U.S. in El Paso, Texas. The tunnel, which measured six feet high by four feet wide and included both electricity and a ventilation system, was located near a storm drain system by the border wall. Agents believed the tunnel had been built within the last year and was used in the trafficking of humans and drugs. Border Patrol spokesman Claudio Herrera called the discovery “historic.” HSI Special Agent in Charge Jason Stevens noted, “Transnational criminal organizations mistakenly think they can avoid detection by moving people and contraband underground.” He added, “This recent discovery is a significant blow to their operations as it highlights our capability to disrupt their sophisticated smuggling networks.”
  • Biden admin rushing to regulate AI ahead of Trump: The Biden administration is scrambling to set the U.S. agenda regarding Artificial Intelligence regulation before Donald Trump takes office. According to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, the target of AI regulation is not “ordinary commercial business in AI.” Instead, it is for the most advanced AI developers. Trump has pledged to undo Joe Biden’s executive orders related to AI regulation. Thus, the Biden administration is working to enact new AI rules that will be difficult for Trump to undo rapidly. Biden’s handlers hope to solidify rules protecting certain AI developers from competition. In other words, Biden’s picking winners and losers in the AI development industry on his way out the door, all under the guise of protecting national security. The AI restrictions will “go down as one of the most destructive to ever hit the U.S. technology industry,” contends Oracle Executive Vice President Ken Glueck. “To retroactively and surreptitiously issue a final rule of this magnitude without industry consultation and only days before the change in administration is highly consequential. For the first time, we are applying draconian new regulations to largely unregulated public, commercial cloud.”

Culture

  • No, people are not fleeing pro-life states: The Leftmedia touted a recent study purporting to show that single people were moving away from states that have enacted strong pro-life laws. The study claimed that the 13 states that have effectively banned abortion have collectively lost a total of 36,000 residents since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. To come to this conclusion, the study looked at U.S. Postal Service data regarding address changes. However, the application of change-of-address data is a problematic means of measuring population movement due to both privacy laws and the fact that not everyone who moves files a change-of-address form. Furthermore, the study begins its count of movers with the Dobbs decision, as if all pro-life laws went into effect immediately following the overturning of Roe when, in fact, in many cases, it was several months before pro-life laws took effect. Finally, the 16 states with the largest population growth in the U.S. Census already had pro-life laws on the books. In other words, the study does not actually back up the headline claim that pro-life laws are chasing people out of these states.
  • Former MP who downplayed UK rape gangs is arrested as a pedo: The latest punctuation mark on the UK’s societal ruin comes courtesy of a former Labour MP named Ivor Caplin, who Hot Air’s David Strom says “was a prominent critic of Elon Musk’s campaign to highlight the failure of British politicians to adequately investigate the so-called ‘grooming gang’ (really rape gang) scandal.” As it turns out, Caplin has good reason for being a foot-dragging critic of justice for these vile predators and their victims, some of them as young as 11. As Strom notes, “Just as you would expect, just days after appearing on GB News to take his shots at Musk, he was caught trying to meet up with a young boy to have sex.”
  • Satire: Notorious grooming gang votes to not investigate itself (Babylon Bee)
  • How a surgeon saved his cul-de-sac from the inferno: Los Angeles may well have been built to burn, but one courageous resident wasn’t inclined to give up his home — or the homes of his neighbors — without a fight. With the inferno consuming homes all around his Malibu cul-de-sac, 62-year-old Los Angeles brain surgeon Chester Griffiths, along with his son and a neighbor, sprung into action with fire hoses that he’d staged long ago. As PJ Media reports, “For five nights and four days, the men donned N95 masks and used spades and fire hoses to keep the fire from consuming their homes.” Softball-size embers were falling all around them, but they kept at it. As Griffiths said, “I’m a surgeon. You train and you prepare, and then when you’re in the thick of it, you rely on your training and your preparedness. Our exit strategy was paddle boards out into the ocean. … There was no time to be scared.” If that’s not the American Spirit, we don’t know what is.

For the Executive Summary archive, click here.

Comment | Share


Follow Thomas Gallatin and Jordan Candler on X/Twitter.

FEATURED ANALYSIS

DEI Dies at Meta

Nate Jackson

Significant changes are afoot at Meta, where the social media giant is preparing for Donald Trump’s second term. First, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and Threads announced last week that it will ditch the “fact-checkers.” Next, it announced the death of DEI. It’s almost too good to be true.

Indeed, we remain skeptical. Yes, we’re excited that Mark Zuckerberg announced the “fact-checker” breakup and numerous other changes in how political content is handled. Yet our Facebook page didn’t suddenly regain any of the traction that was taken from it beginning in June 2020. We certainly expect improvement will take time, but we haven’t seen the needle move at all yet. We’ll keep an eye on it, you can be sure.

However, removing diversity, equity, and inclusion from Meta’s company programs signals that Zuckerberg’s actionable promises might actually be implemented because DEI hires are the foot soldiers doing much of the damage.

“The legal and policy landscape surrounding diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in the United States is changing,” wrote Janelle Gale, Meta’s VP of human resources, in a memo to employees. “The Supreme Court of the United States has recently made decisions signaling a shift in how courts will approach DEI.”

We thought so, too, after the Court ruled in 2023 on Harvard’s race-based admissions policies, speculating that the decision could lead to corporations all over the country concluding that DEI would only get them in legal hot water. In the 18 months since that decision, a growing number of companies have, in fact, ditched DEI.

To be clear, the words “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion” are not the problem. The destructive results come from what leftists intend in redefining those words. They mean to elevate favored minorities, regardless of skill or merit, at the expense of white men. Christians are also on the “wrong side” of leftist calculations unless they bend the knee to left-wing sensibilities.

DEI policies are corrosive to the traditional American corporate goal of excellence. Doing the best work, providing the best service, or producing the best product all become secondary to race and sex considerations. Ask Los Angeles residents how that worked out in the city’s fire department.

Conservative activist Robby Starbuck has played an outsized role in exposing such policies in major corporations. He recently posted a list of companies that ended DEI policies after he brought them to light. None of those companies wanted to be either (A) the next Bud Light (well, except for Jaguar) or (B) a target for litigation after the Supreme Court’s ruling.

So, Meta’s decision is part of a welcome trend, but it will have a much greater impact than most of those other companies’ decisions. While it is excellent to see Ford or John Deere make the right call, Meta is the world’s biggest speech platform. More people worldwide get information from Facebook than buy trucks or tractors, meaning Meta’s DEI has an enormous impact on public opinion.

Meta isn’t the only Big Tech giant to do this, either, as Amazon likewise announced that it will scale back its DEI programs. Given Amazon’s size and dominance in the marketplace, that’s huge.

There is a red flag, however.

Gale’s memo implies that the blame is not with faulty policies but with how people interpret those policies. “The term ‘DEI’ has also become charged, in part because it is understood by some as a practice that suggests preferential treatment of some groups over others,” Gale said. The company will stop using the “diverse slate approach” in hiring and end representation goals, she said, because it “can create the impression that decisions are being made based on race or gender.” However, she insisted, “While this has never been our practice, we want to eliminate any impression of it.”

It’s just those darn critics.

Another flag: Though “we will no longer have a team focused on DEI,” Gale says, chief diversity officer “Maxine Williams is taking on a new role at Meta, focused on accessibility and engagement.” Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Remember this essential truth: When particular branding doesn’t lead to a public embrace of left-wing policies, leftists change the branding, not the policies.

I certainly hope that’s not the case at Meta, which is so critical to the future of free speech in these United States. There is reason for hope.

Zuckerberg joined podcaster Joe Rogan last week, and he indicated that he’s ready for these changes.

For one thing, he held no punches when describing the strong-arming the company felt coming from the White House. “They pushed us super hard to take down things that … honestly were true,” Zuckerberg said. “They basically pushed us and said, ‘You know, anything that says that vaccines might have side effects you basically need to take down.’” He added, “These people from the Biden administration would call up our team and scream at them and curse. It got to this point where we were like, ‘No, we’re not going to take down things that are true. That’s ridiculous.’” Furthermore, “All these different agencies and branches of government basically just started investigating, coming after our company. It was brutal. It was brutal.”

Meta’s CEO also seems to have grown more fond of President-elect Trump. “One of the things that I’m optimistic about with President Trump is I think he just wants America to win,” Zuckerberg said. “I do think that the American technology industry is a bright spot in the American economy,” he added. “I think it’s a strategic advantage for the United States that we have a lot of the strongest companies in the world and I think it should be part of the U.S.‘s strategy going forward to defend that.”

Maybe Zuckerberg is putting on a show for Rogan’s audience — and the incoming administration — or maybe he’s genuinely angry about the Biden administration’s interference in his business. Maybe he was a willing participant in left-wing censorship, or maybe he was bullied. Is he as dedicated to free speech as Elon Musk has proven to be, or is this an act?

We don’t yet know, but as I noted last week, these are measurable promises. We’ll know if Zuck is true to his word or not. One thing I do know is that welcoming free-speech converts will yield more converts than beating them over the head with past sins or admonitions for being too late.

Comment | Share

MORE ANALYSIS

BEST OF RIGHT OPINION

For more of today’s columns, visit Right Opinion.

BEST OF VIDEOS

SHORT CUTS

The Truth Comes Out

“They pushed us super hard to take down things that … honestly were true. Right? They basically pushed us and said, ‘You know, anything that says that vaccines might have side effects you basically need to take down.’” —Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg discussing Biden administration COVID policy

Demagogue

“Big Tech corporations are lining up to sponsor Donald Trump’s inauguration. You better believe these CEOs expect a return on their investment. Trump has promised tax breaks for his ‘rich as hell’ donors — while everyone else foots the bill.” —Senator Elizabeth Warren

The BIG Lie

“Republicans in Congress wanted to play politics with the border. We fought to fix it.” —Joe Biden

Delusions of Grandeur

“The economy I am leaving America is the best in the world, and stronger than ever for all Americans.” —Joe Biden

Non Compos Mentis

“I think I would’ve beaten Trump, could’ve beaten Trump. And I think that Kamala could’ve beaten Trump and would’ve beaten Trump.” —Joe Biden

Cleanup on Aisle 46

“I know you’re directly affected, so you fire away, no pun intended.” —Joe Biden calling on Kamala Harris for her assessment of the California fires

Hot Air

“Trump has been bought for $1 billion by Big Oil. Just a payoff to kill the IRA and the Green New Deal. We know what will happen. More fires, more climate disasters, more death. The LA fires are a preview of coming atrocities.” —Senator Ed Markey

Village Idiot

“I know all of us are worried about our friends in Los Angeles. … This climate crisis is brought to you by climate deniers and venal corporate greed. And you know, we’re in a period where these clowns are telling us that woke is a negative thing, and I would just like to say it’s time we wake the f*ck up” —Hollywood director Jim Jarmusch

Touché

“Spend less on hair gel.” —actor Mel Gibson, whose house burned last week, spitefully responding when asked if he had anything to say to Governor Gavin Newsom

Lawfare

“Today’s event was a despicable charade, and now that it is over, we will appeal this Hoax, which has no merit, and restore the trust of Americans in our once great System of Justice. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” —Donald Trump on the unconditional discharge in his hush-money case

“So Alvin Bragg, Matthew Colangelo, and the Manhattan DA’s office wasted almost two years of time and taxpayer resources … to get the right to briefly call Trump a ‘convicted felon’ before the sham sentence is [obviously] overturned on appeal. Exhibit A why NYC is a declining hellhole.” —Josh Hammer

“Trump will walk away from this trial and into the White House in less than two weeks, but the New York [legal] system will walk into infamy after this day.” —constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley

“As of today, President Trump will soon have the right to fire nuclear weapons but not a gun.” —Michael Knowles

Upright

“I think it’s very simple. Look, if you protested peacefully on January the 6th, and you’ve had Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice treat you like a gang member, you should be pardoned. If you committed violence on that day, obviously you shouldn’t be pardoned.” —JD Vance

Re: The Left

“Yeah, little girls are being raped en masse while authorities silence the victims… and the problem is [Elon Musk] for calling it out. How did we miss this? If only Musk can be silenced, the problem will go away. The solution was right in front of us all along.” —Andrew Klavan

“‘I support some women firemen — so long as they can pass the test. Women in combat, too. Why not? Yeah, I support same-sex ‘marriage.’ And if an adult man wants to wear a dress, that’s no business of mine. But transgenderism in school is crazy!‘ See the problem with this argument?” —Michael Knowles

“I have zero respect for all the Democrats coming out of the woodwork and condemning wokeness…after Trump won. Make no mistake: it’s great they’ve caught up with us. But are they actually red-pilled? Absolutely not. They’re just trying to rebrand before it’s too late.” —Ian Haworth

Belly Laugh of the Day

“Hopefully everyone is cool with me skipping the inauguration so I can go to the national title game.” —Ohio State University alumnus JD Vance

Comment | Share

MEMES & CARTOONS

Share

For more of today’s memes, visit the Memesters Union.

Share

For more of today’s cartoons, visit the Cartoons archive.

 “From The Patriot Post (patriotpost.us)”.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg moves away from fact-checkers | Denison Forum

Facebook censored the content when they detected that it is a false information. (Bangkok, Thailand - March 17, 2020) By wachiwit/stock.adobe.com Meta fact-checkers

“The fact-checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they’ve created.” That is how Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg described his company’s efforts to curtail the spread of misinformation for the better part of a decade. So, instead of an army of third-party Meta fact-checkers, Facebook, Instagram, and Threads will move to an X-style community notes form of moderation for most of their content.

Illegal activity, hate speech, pornography, and other clear violations of their content rules will still be taken down, but they are largely trying to move away from policing political and cultural views that are simply matters of free speech.

The news came as a welcome sign of sanity to many on the right, while those on the left tended to view it as a capitulation to the incoming Trump administration and harbinger of hate speech, conspiracy theories, and a host of other perceived ills. However, like most of the overly politicized trends in our culture today, the truth is probably somewhere in the middle.

Zuckerberg went on to acknowledge as much, noting that there will be a “tradeoff” where “we’re going to catch less bad stuff, but we’ll also reduce the number of innocent people’s posts and accounts that we accidentally take down.” He’s decided that tradeoff is worth it, and those close to him say it reflects “an evolved return to his political origins.”

While that sentiment may sound unlikely to those who have watched Facebook grow increasingly restrictive toward views that don’t align with the mainstream or political left, Zuckerberg’s reasons ultimately matter less than the new reality they will usher in. And, in a sign that Meta’s CEO is serious about these changes, that new reality will be guided by a host of new faces as well.

What are Meta’s motivations?

The most famous of those faces is likely UFC President and CEO Dana White, who joined the Board of Directors earlier this week. White is also a close ally to Trump, and introduced the President before his speech at last year’s Republican National Convention.

However, of those Zuckerberg has brought into the fold to guide this transition, Joel Kaplan—a longtime Republican lobbyist and President George W. Bush’s former chief of staff—is likely to play the most prominent role. Kaplan was named Chief of Global Affairs and replaced Nick Clegg, a former deputy prime minister from Britain who’d been in charge of Meta’s policy and regulatory stances since 2018.

In an interview with Fox earlier this week, Kaplan stated that the third-party fact-checkers Meta employed were “well-intentioned at the outset but there’s just been too much political bias in what they choose to fact-check and how.” He also noted that much of that change has occurred over the last four years, arguing that “We saw a lot of societal and political pressure, all in the direction of more content moderation, more censorship, and we’ve got a real opportunity.”

These moves have led many to claim that Meta is simply trying to curry favor with the incoming Trump administration. If that’s the case, it seems to be working. Following Kaplan’s interview, Trump said that Meta has “come a long way.”

Meta’s ability to be an ally rather than an enemy of the government will be essential going forward given that another of Zuckerberg’s stated goals is to combat the even greater levels of censorship found in Europe, Latin America, and China. And as Parker Jones and Micah Tomasella discussed on the inaugural episode of Culture Brief—Denison Forum’s newest podcast—large parts of the world could be primed to join that fight.

Ultimately, time will tell to what extent these changes are effective and how seriously Meta’s platforms are taking the notion of letting their users moderate one another rather than doing it for them. However, this news is yet another example of how the need for discernment has seldom been higher. And that represents an important opportunity for Christians today.

Opportunities we can’t afford to waste

The desire to go back to a time when you could trust what you saw on the news and when people believed their politicians were telling them the truth remains a common refrain among many. To be sure, there was (relatively) less division in our society when people were unable to anonymously yell at strangers from around the world.

However, much of the rise in consternation over the state of public discourse today is due to our ability to know how much of what is said is either incomplete or simply not true. That we’re more aware of the lies we’re told today doesn’t mean that people lied less in previous eras. The lies were simply harder to spot because the implicit trust in media, politicians, and other authority figures was higher.

While the current state of media and social discourse is certainly filled with its pitfalls and problems, it also gives us the ability to test what we’re told to see if it’s true to a level that, in many ways, really is unique to this point in human history. Doing so takes more work, but the potential rewards are much greater as well.

As Christians empowered by the Holy Spirit, we should be better positioned than most to practice such discernment. And just think of the difference it would make if we became known as a group of people others could trust and look to for guidance.

As people who worship the God who is Truth and are tasked with sharing a message that Paul warned would be considered “folly” by those who haven’t believed (1 Corinthians 1:18), discernment is among the most essential traits for us to master. Thankfully, each day presents us with endless opportunities to do just that; opportunities we can’t afford to waste.

So the next time you get ready to open Facebook, Instagram, X, or whatever social media platform you favor, start by asking God to help you discern the truth from the lies. And be sure to say that prayer again before liking, sharing, or otherwise engaging with the content you find.

The Holy Spirit is ready and waiting to help you do just that.

Will you let him?

The latest from Denison Forum:

Quote of the day:

“Truth will ultimately prevail where pains is taken to bring it to light.” — George Washington

The post Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg moves away from fact-checkers appeared first on Denison Forum.

Meta Backs Down from Censorship Program, Will Release Content Creators from ‘Facebook Jail’ | Christian Heritage News

Posted at CBN:Published January 7, 2025

The parent company of Facebook and Instagram has announced it’s putting an end to its program that restricted free speech and censored messages that its “fact checkers” didn’t agree with.

The Meta company is officially scrapping its third-party fact-checking program. Instead, it’ll be shifting to a Community Notes model similar to what Elon Musk has used on his social media platform X. That method of accountability allows users to weigh in on the veracity of posts.

Meta is admitting that its third-party fact-checkers had their own biases and too much content ended up being silenced. Critics have said that all the “fact-checking” just ended up becoming a pathway for censorship.

In a post titled “More Speech and Fewer Mistakes,” Meta’s Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan admitted, “…we are making too many mistakes, frustrating our users and too often getting in the way of the free expression we set out to enable. Too much harmless content gets censored, too many people find themselves wrongly locked up in ‘Facebook jail,’ and we are often too slow to respond when they do.”

Kaplan said the biases of its fact-checkers are a serious problem. “Over time we ended up with too much content being fact checked that people would understand to be legitimate political speech and debate,” he said.

And that censorship pressure didn’t just come from “independent fact-checkers.” As CBN News reported last year, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted that the Biden White House pressured Facebook and Instagram to censor stories it didn’t like.

Continue here…

https://www.christian-heritage-news.com/2025/01/meta-backs-down-from-censorship-program.html

10 Totally Based Changes Mark Zuckerberg Is Bringing To Facebook | Babylon Bee

As though scales fell from Mark Zuckerberg’s eyes, the tech magnate unveiled a set of changes that will be made to Facebook’s content restriction policies in the coming weeks.

The Babylon Bee obtained an advanced list of 10 of the improvements to promote freedom of expression:


  1. “Poking” will be brought back: This was once eliminated due to complaints from lame losers who did not consent to being poked.
  2. Sharing a minion meme will now be a bannable offense: The long national nightmare is finally over.
  3. It will now be impossible to unfriend Donald Trump: Just like in real life.
  4. It will now be permissible to share news stories about Hunter Biden’s laptop: Better late than never.
  5. The algorithm will occasionally show you posts that actually do interest you: Not all the time. But even doing it some of the time is a huge improvement.
  6. Only half of the recommended pages to follow will be Russian bots: The other half will be lizard people.
  7. Your crazy uncle’s posts about his UFO abduction are going to be visible again: Now this is good content.
  8. The loading screen will be the dancing baby gif: Not because it’s based or anything, but just because it’s fun.
  9. You will now be required to “like” the posts from your dad that show an upside-down picture with the caption “Meanwhile, in Australia”: It’s time for Facebook to bring families back together again.
  10. Any post promoting seed oils will result in automatic suspension: America is back, baby.

What other changes can Mark Zuckerberg implement to Make Facebook Great Again? Leave them in the comments below.


Thanks to clown world, it’s been a great year for comedy. Here are some of our top-performing sketches of 2024!

Check out our top videos!

https://babylonbee.com/news/10-facebook-changes-mark-zuckerberg-is-bringing-to-facebook/