Tag Archives: surveillance

Our Surveillance Culture and the Erosion of Freedom and Privacy | CultureWatch

New developments are putting us all at risk:

We live in an age in which the surveillance state is greatly expanding, while personal freedoms and privacy are greatly decreasing. And I am speaking here about the West and not some totalitarian state. Things have moved rapidly in this regard over recent years, and the trends look set to continue.

There are various responses one can have to the increasing war on our personal privacy and security. Below I will look at one wrong reaction to this. But first a bit more on the problem and its seriousness. We must face the reality that more and more of our lives are being put under surveillance of different forms, and more and more of what we do – and even say – is now being recorded, stored and assessed.

The cashless society is one obvious case in point. Every transaction we make is being recorded and tabulated somewhere, be it just on a bank statement, or by corporate giants, or by the new big tech companies. And calls of digital IDs and the like simply offer more of the same: all our moves and activities are being tracked by big government or big business.

We already know how modern technology is tracing our every move and recalling our every online activity. With the ever-growing world of AI in general, and things like Siri and Alexa in particular, we now are being monitored and surveilled 24/7.

Many have experienced being on the social media, and finding an ad pop up out of nowhere which specifically has to do with some product or service you were just talking about or looking into. Just the other day I shared this on the social media:

“Now this is scary: I just had a shower then clipped my nails. Hopping back on to FB, one of the first things I see is an ad for nail clippers! What – does FB now have drones in my shower? Do clipper companies have secret cameras installed in my bathroom? Spook city!”

Others asked me if I was speaking while doing this, or had my phone nearby. I said ‘nope’ to each. I was outside while doing the clipping! However, my dog was with me, so perhaps she is the one who snitched on me! Humour aside, you know what I am talking about.

And of course some folks do not mind this much at all. After all, in so many ways it is all about convenience. To swipe a plastic card when paying for something or swipe a mobile phone to do the same is very quick and easy – and convenient. In a busy world we all like convenience.

Moreover, some aspects of surveillance seem necessary in the fight against crime and criminals. There can be a place for security cameras and the like, and basic forms of identification. Not all such things are necessarily wrong in themselves.

But is all this coming with a price? Obviously our privacy is eroding fast. Obviously who we are, what we like, what we buy, what products we prefer, what services we make use of, and where we go is now all being tracked and recorded, with all this information being stored somewhere.

During the covid days I penned plenty of pieces on this, discussing the erosion of freedom and privacy that we all endured. Consider just one article: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2023/04/17/covid-tyranny-and-ccp-fascism-compare-the-pair/

Also, I have already written about things like a digital ID: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2024/09/24/big-brother-and-digital-id/

And the dangers of a cashless society: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2024/04/09/say-no-to-a-cashless-society/

And the tyranny of social credit systems: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2023/03/31/the-surveillance-state-tiktok-and-the-ccp/

‘But I am doing nothing wrong, so I don’t have to worry about this’

This is a common response being made by many. Some folks think they are breaking no laws and doing nothing amiss, so why should they worry if businesses and governments and others know more and more about them and what they do?  But they are missing the point, and this is risky thinking for various reasons.

We have already been warned, not just in dystopian novels like Brave New World and 1984 just how dangerous and diabolical such worlds can be, but we have real-life examples right now, certainly in places like Communist China with its social credit system. So even if all this seems OK for now, we are dreaming if we think it will stay that way.

And we already know it is not safe right now. The covid wars should have taught us all that. Our every move was being monitored and tracked. Our medical history especially had to be known and directed to where the state wanted it to be. No vax for example meant no visits to most shops, businesses, hospitals, schools and the like. The important medical ethics of bodily autonomy and no compulsion in medical treatment and the like were quickly trashed.

Even if you think you are some fine, upstanding citizen that would never run afoul of the law and the state, you are still dreaming. Just as the state determined that an unvaxed person or an unmasked person walking alone on a beach was a threat that had to be harshly dealt with a few years ago, tomorrow they might decide that things like reading the Bible or praying are threats to society.

Indeed, we did see churches closed big time a few years ago, all in the ‘public interest.’ If the state can decree that the public worship of the living God is verboten, it can decree anything. And when that happens, it will be too late. We can all be turned into criminals overnight if the all-powerful state decides that we need to be re-educated and reformed into ‘acceptable citizens’ that it prefers.

We are already seeing a plethora of ‘hate crimes’ and ‘thought crimes’. The state increasingly decides what is good speak and bad speak, good thought and bad thought. Radical activist agendas like the trans revolution are being forced down our throats, and those who do not fully comply are being punished by the state.

The new bill passed in Australia, the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2004, is another example of this invasion of our privacy, done in theory to protect children. Also referred to as the ‘Digital Duty of Care’ Billone concerned writer concluded an article on the chilling effects of this law with these words:

Finally, the platform is also forced to provide activist research organisations with access to their commercial data in real-time (s28M(1)) and to cough up any document the Commissioner requests within 14 days (194A(2)). Couldn’t imagine this access being used for political purposes. This legislation is perfectly aimed at shutting down free speech platforms like X, and the Government can quite easily make the obligations practicably impossible to comply with. Please let people know that the Misinformation Bill has a new name — The Digital Duty of Care Bill. https://dailydeclaration.org.au/2024/12/06/misinformation-bill-returns/

So not just individuals who are considered to be a danger to the state, but various platforms and organisations where free discussion occurs can also be targeted and penalised, if not shut down altogether. Anyone concerned about freedom and the importance of basic privacy should resist all these moves.

As mentioned, we all like efficiency and convenience, but there are always costs involved with this, be it with the cashless society, or with the state entering into every aspect of our lives. It does not matter how ‘good’ or law-abiding you may think you are as a citizen today.

Tomorrow the state can decide that you are a lawbreaker and a threat to the system. All these now technologies, policies and laws will simply make it so much easier for the state to keep its eyes on you, and negatively deal with you if it thinks you are getting out of line.

The bottom line is this: we ALL should be concerned about the growth of big government, big tech, and big business as they increasingly work together to erode our basic freedoms, and to radically whittle away at our own privacy. Thinking that you are a good person so are exempt from all this and have nothing to fear is naive and reckless. We are all at risk.

[1362 words]

The post Our Surveillance Culture and the Erosion of Freedom and Privacy appeared first on CultureWatch.

The Surveillance State has Arrived… And It’s Being Implemented by Our Cities and Towns | The Gateway Pundit

Guest post by Leo Hohmann – republished with permission.

Surveillance cameras – Wikicommons image

Cities across the United States are installing hidden surviellance cameras that track everyone, everywhere, and nobody, not even Donald Trump, is talking about this. What are the Top 10 most surveilled cities in the U.S.? We’ve got the list!

My old colleagues at World Net Daily have an interesting story up today about the city of Norfolk, Virginia. City officials have transformed Norfolk into a virtual lock-down surveillance society with more than 172 high-resolution, internet-connected cameras monitoring practically all human movement.

Of course Norfolk is not terribly unique in this regard and we have a full report below, including a Top 10 list of most surveilled American cities.

Multitudes of cities of all sizes across the U.S. are jumping on the technocracy bandwagon and setting up hidden surveillance cameras on every corner. They’re on light poles, bridges and overpasses, stoplights, buildings, you name it. Some are equipped with speakers so they can also listen in on what’s being said.

They claim it’s for our “safety.”

What makes Norfolk unique is a group of citizens is fighting back. They’ve filed a lawsuit against the city, which is something that needs to happen in every city that implements this technology.

A lawsuit has been filed that accuses elected officials in Norfolk, Virginia, of using a network of 170 cameras to impose a warrantless surveillance scheme on residents and visitors.

The Institute for Justice has filed the suit on behalf of several plaintiffs, charging that the actions violate Fourth Amendment rights protecting U.S. citizens against unwarranted searches and seizures.

The system allows police “to monitor the comings and goings of all drivers in the city,” the legal team said.

Lee Schmidt, one of the plaintiffs, said, “I don’t like the government following my every movement and treating me like a criminal suspect, when they have no reason to believe I’ve done anything wrong.”

Another plaintiff, Crystal Arrington, stated, “My work requires me to drive around Norfolk very often, and it’s incredibly disturbing to know the city can track my every move during that time.”

The Institute for Justice explained that in 2023, Norfolk police partnered with a private company called Flock Safety Inc. to install 172 automatic license-plate reading cameras all across town.

The locations were chosen to provide a so-called “curtain of technology,” which would allow police to watch anyone drive anywhere without knowing they’re being watched.

The Institute noted:

“Unlike traditional traffic cameras, which capture an image only when they sense speeding or someone running a red light, Flock’s cameras capture images of every car driving by, which it retains for at least 30 days. Artificial intelligence then uses those images to create a ‘Vehicle Fingerprint’ that enables any Flock subscriber to both track where that vehicle has gone and identify what other vehicles it has been seen nearby.”

Institute for Justice lawyer Michael Soyfer stated:

“Norfolk has created a dragnet that allows the government to monitor everyone’s day-to-day movements without a warrant or probable cause. This type of mass surveillance is a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment.”

Making the violation worse, the Institute noted, is that since Flock “pools its data in a centralized database, police across the entire country can access over 1 billion monthly datapoints. That means not just tracking drivers within a particular jurisdiction, but potentially across the entire nation.”

“Following someone’s every move can tell you some incredibly intimate details about them, such as where they work, who they associate with, whether or not they’re religious, what hobbies they have, and any medical conditions they may have,” said IJ lawyer Robert Frommer. “This type of intrusive, ongoing monitoring of someone’s life is not just creepy, it’s unconstitutional.”

The scheme gives police the ability to spy on people without any judicial oversight.

Imagine walking into court to challenge a ticket when the only evidence is from a machine powered by artificial intelligence. We already know that AI allows for deep fake videos. Think of the potential for abuse here.

The really sick part of this story is that the Agenda 2030 surveillance state is being implemented at the local level. And many cities are able to pay for the digital enslavement of their residents with federal dollars as the incentive. Why aren’t more Republican political figures talking about this?

Some abuses have already been documented, the Institute said, noting just a couple of examples:

  • In Kansas, the Institute reports that officials were caught using Flock to stalk their exes, including one police chief who used Flock 228 times over four months to track his ex-girlfriend and her new boyfriend’s vehicles.
  • In California, several police departments violated California law by sharing data from their license-plate reader database with other departments across the country. And as is the case with other databases, these can be susceptible to hacking, which can reveal private data.

Comparitech looked at a variety of camera types that have become ubiquitous in U.S. cities of all sizes.

  • Fixed CCTV cameras.
  • Cameras accessed through real-time crime centers.
  • Private cameras within the police force’s network.
  • Cameras on public transport facilities.
  • Traffic cameras.
  • Streetlight cameras.

Not to mention, FedEx and Amazon are also spying on you each time they make a delivery to your home.

Tech writer Kim Komando reports in an October 22, 2022 article that the study even looked at police departments that access people’s private Ring doorbell data.

She writes: “Did you know that police can access your Ring footage without your permission? Tap or click here to stop law enforcement from asking you for any videos. While at it, you’ll want to disable Amazon’s shared wireless network, known as Sidewalk. Here’s how to opt out of Sidewalk on your Amazon devices.”

Using Census.gov data, this is what the Comparitech study showed:

  • 44.2 million people are being monitored by 270,000 cameras.
  • Atlanta was the most surveilled city, with a ratio of 48.93 cameras per 1,000 people.
  • Chicago had the highest number of cameras at 32,000.
  • 28 of the police departments have access to Ring doorbell technology and have submitted a total of 728 requests for access to footage in the third quarter of 2020.

The top 10 most surveilled cities in the US as of October 2022

Based on the number of cameras per 1,000 people, these are the 10 most surveilled cities in the U.S.:

  1. Atlanta, Georgia – 24,800 cameras for 506,811 people = 48.93 cameras per 1,000 people.
  2. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania – 28,064 cameras for 1,584,064 people = 17.72 cameras per 1,000 people.
  3. Denver, Colorado – 12,273 cameras for 727,211 people = 16.88 cameras per 1,000 people.
  4. Washington, District of Columbia – 11,441 cameras for 705,749 people = 16.21 cameras per 1,000 people.
  5. San Francisco, California – 14,266 cameras for 881,549 people = 16.18 cameras per 1,000 people.
  6. Las Vegas, Nevada – 10,208 cameras for 651,319 people = 15.67 cameras per 1,000 people.
  7. Detroit, Michigan – 8,836 cameras for 670,031 people = 13.19 cameras per 1,000 people.
  8. Chicago, Illinois – 32,000 cameras for 2,693,976 people = 11.88 cameras per 1,000 people.
  9. Portland, Oregon – 6,411 cameras for 654,741 people = 9.79 cameras per 1,000 people.
  10. Fresno, California – 4,706 cameras for 531,576 people = 8.85 cameras per 1,000 people.

2024 is almost over and LeoHohmann.com needs your help if Leo is going to be able to bring you another year of independent news and analysis. This site is totally independent and ad free, meaning nothing is owed to any corporate or government entity. I depend only on my readers to support the reporting and critical analysis you find on this site. If you appreciate these updates and wish to support my work, you may send a donation of any size c/o Leo Hohmann, PO Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or donate via credit card here. Thank you.

The post The Surveillance State has Arrived… And It’s Being Implemented by Our Cities and Towns appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.