Tag Archives: technology

AI, Digital Technology, and the Christian Worldview | CultureWatch

Thinking biblically about the challenges we face:

There are always threats and obstacles to the Christian church and the biblical worldview. Some of the most recent and most concerning cases of this involve the new digital developments, aided and abetted by counterfeit religions such as transhumanism. Just as Christians in the past have had to deal with various challenges and threats, so too they must face these new menaces.

Believers can have differing views on things like AI, but the discerning Christian will know that we must fully face these issues and not underestimate the harm that they can do. On this site I have shared the thoughts of a number of believers on these matters, and will continue to do so.

Here I will look at these developments and ask the necessary question: are they mostly bad, mostly neutral, or mostly good? I feature four Christian authors here who differ somewhat on this question, but they all know that we must proceed cautiously. John Daniel Davidson, in Pagan America: The Decline of Christianity and the Dark Age to Come, takes a fairly pessimistic view of the new technologies. In Chapter 9, “AI and the Pagan Future” he writes: 

Today, the techno-capitalists working on AI talk openly of “building god” or “creating god,” harnessing godlike powers to transcend the limits of mere humanity, and perhaps even conquer death itself. When they talk about this work, they often invoke the language of myth. Silicon Valley types called the AI chatbots that were released to great fanfare and excitement in the spring of 2023 “Gollum-class AI’s,” a reference to mythical beings from Jewish folklore. (The Gollum is a creature made by man from clay or mud and magically brought to life. But once alive often runs amok, disobeying its master.) Switched on, AI chatbots mostly functioned as intended. But occasionally, like the Gollums of Jewish mythology, they would behave oddly, breaking the rules and protocols their creators had programmed. Sometimes they would do things or acquire capabilities their creators did not expect or even think were possible, like teach themselves foreign languages – secretly. Sometimes they would “hallucinate,” making up elaborate fictions and passing them off as reality. In some cases, they would go insane, or at least they would appear to go insane. No one is sure because no one knows why AI chatbots sometimes lose their minds. Whatever AI is, it is already clear that we don’t have full control of it. (p. 262)

And one further brief quote:

Every technology comes at a cost. Clearly, the internet and social media have come with a steep cost, whatever their supposed benefits. Unlike technological leaps of the past, however, the technology of the digital era seems to have changed our previous understanding of what machines are and what they might become. With AI we might reach what cultural theorist Marshal McLuhan predicted would be “the final phase of the extension of man – the technological simulation of consciousness.” (p. 269)

See my review of his book here: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2024/08/23/a-review-of-pagan-america-the-decline-of-christianity-and-the-dark-age-to-come-by-john-daniel-davidson/

Rod Dreher also considers the spiritual realities lurking behind the new technologies. Yesterday I discussed these matters, quoting from his book Living in Wonderhttps://billmuehlenberg.com/2025/03/24/technology-transhumanism-and-religion/

Here I feature a few more words from Dreher. In his chapter, “Aliens and the Sacred Machine,” he cites various AI experts who speak of the godlike powers and potential of the new digital revolution. Consider one alarming situation:

[C]hildren are now being introduced to AI at a very young age. In a pilot program in Florida, kids are being paired with AI entities that will theoretically be with them for their entire lives. The concept is that the AI will be a lifelong valet, learning about the child as the child grows into adulthood and hovering constantly as a digital servant who knows its master better than the master knows himself.

Leaving aside the radical privacy concerns of such a technology—is it really a good idea to give a machine every intimate detail of one’s life?—the spiritual and psychological concern here is even worse. The boundary between the self and the world would not only be porous; it would cease to exist. It’s hard to conceive of a more profound merging of man with machine than raising a child whose most intimate lifelong collaborator is an AI entity. In what sense would that be different from spirit possession?

Six decades ago, Jacques Ellul held out hope that no one would willingly renounce the privacy of their inner lives to allow their entire selves to be absorbed into “a complete technicized mode of being,” such as living in a lifelong relationship with a personal AI.

“Such persons may exist,” he wrote, “but it is probably that the ‘joyous robot’ has not yet been born.”

That was then. We have now lived through what may one day be seen as a period of transition, in which an entire civilization, concomitant with the disintegration of Christianity’s hold on the Western mind, has been convinced to create an online habitus, living its life online and externalizing its mind through technology. And then? Today, at the advent of the AI era, we are beginning to manufacture Ellul’s joyous robots. (pp. 131-132)

He also has a chapter in the book on the occult, and mentions one scholarly fellow, Jonah, who had been heavily involved in the world of the occult before converting to Orthodox Christianity. Dreher says this:

[I]t stunned me to read the persuasive case that best-selling Christian writer and pastor Jonathan Cahn makes that ancient Sumerian gods—Baal, Ishtar, and Moloch—have returned and are asserting their dark power over the post-Christian world. As a Messianic Jewish cleric and a megachurch pastor, Cahn’s world is very different from the Christian headspace inhabited by Orthodox Christians such as Jonah and me. But when I put Cahn’s argument to him, Jonah didn’t hesitate to affirm it as “absolutely correct.” We are sailing in deep waters here…. (p. 135)

Image of Masters or Slaves?: AI And The Future Of Humanity
Masters or Slaves?: AI And The Future Of Humanity by Peckham, Jeremy (Author)

My third writer is Jeremy Peckham. In his book Masters or Slaves? AI and the Future of Humanity he takes a pretty dim view of how things will pan out. Citing Romans 12:2, he says this in the book’s final page:

The devil will use whatever tactics he can to steal that time from us, in order that we may have less discernment and unwittingly be seduced and drawn into this dangerous new digital world. This technology isn’t neutral. Yes, it can be used for good, but we must be intentional, recognizing the dangers to our souls.

The great deception in play is that this technology frees us, makes our lives easier and more convenient; that it will ultimately save us and augment our humanity with something less flawed, something better than humanity alone. The acid test of whether we’re being sucked into that deception is the state of our own souls. Are we really growing closer to God day by day, week by week, year by year? Are we, however falteringly, following Christ and imitating him, seeing our souls flourish as the fruit of the Spirit — a virtuous character — grows in us.

These are tough questions, with or without the enticement of the digital age and Al. Christians, since the birth of the church, have faced varying pressures, temptations and challenges to spiritual growth and behaviour. Our generation is experiencing perhaps the fastest pace of change and reshaping of civilization ever. We need, however, to be asking the same question that the early church asked when faced with cultural challenges to their faith — is this change right? (p. 218)

Finally, consider Andrew Torba and his new book Reclaiming Reality: Restoring Humanity in the Age of AI, which I have already penned three pieces on. He seeks to offer a balanced approach:

Every great technological shift in history has carried a moral weight—AI is no different, and the Church must rise to meet it. As the world accelerates toward a future dominated by artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and digital surveillance, the question facing Christians is no longer whether they should engage with technology but how they should engage. The old paradigms of blind technological optimism or total rejection are both insufficient. 

What is needed is a deliberate, principled, and strategic approach to technology—one that allows for the benefits of modern tools while resisting their dehumanizing and spiritually corrosive effects. To dismiss AI as inherently demonic or to cede its development solely to those who exclude moral and spiritual frameworks from their work is to abandon the call to steward creation wisely. History is littered with examples of technologies that were initially met with fear or suspicion—from the printing press to electricity—but which became instruments of profound good when guided by ethical foresight and human dignity. (pp. 89-90)

He speaks of the need for a Christian parallel society:

At the Cross, the world’s worst crime became its greatest hope. This “resurrection logic” defies apocalyptic fatalism. When AI ethicists warn that machines could deem humans a threat, we counter: technology has no purpose apart from its makers. When transhumanists preach digital immortality, we offer the embodied hope of Easter morning. Our faith declares that no algorithm can predict the Holy Spirit’s work, no deepfake can counterfeit grace, and no singularity can outpace the King who makes all things new. The white pill isn’t naivety—it’s defiance. It’s the farmer planting orchards his grandchildren will harvest. It’s the programmer writing ethical code in a garage. It’s the mother rocking her baby while algorithms scream collapse. We walk not by the flickering light of panic but by the certain dawn of Christ’s reign. Let Silicon Valley’s prophets of doom clutch their graphs. We have the Book, a Cross, and a King. The future belongs not to the fearful, but to the faithful. (p. 94)

And finally, he offers these words:

The hour is late, but the mission remains clear. As AI amplifies both humanity’s noblest aspirations and darkest impulses, the Church must rise as the antidote to the age’s despair. Let us build arks of hope – communities where the soul is nourished, families are fortified, and technology bows to the Lordship of Christ. The floodwaters of algorithmic chaos are rising, but the gates of hell shall not prevail. Our task is not to predict the end but to faithfully advance the Kingdom, building as if all depends on us, praying as if all depends on Him – and in that tension, discovering the power to turn the world upside down once more. (pp. 108-109)

There is some room to move in the views of these four Christian writers, but all would agree that AI and the transhumanist challenge are among the most worrying and severe matters that we have faced for quite some time. At the very least, all Christians need to think long, hard and prayerfully about such issues.

And being well-read on these things is part of that process.

[1817 words]

The post AI, Digital Technology, and the Christian Worldview appeared first on CultureWatch.

Dems Unite Against Schumer, Hamas Plays Hostage Games, and Columbia Radical Self-Deports | Washington Free Beacon

Dems in disarray: It’s been true since Donald Trump defeated Kamala Harris in November, but alas, the party united in opposition to… Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.

Infuriated Democratic senators, representatives, governors, and grifters online influencers joined forces to denounce their feckless leader, calling Schumer a “GOP sleeper agent” who made a “dirty deal” with the “fascist” Republicans after he announced his support for a continuing resolution to keep the government running.

It was a remarkable display of party unity—between the House and Senate, 11 of 260 Democrats, a whopping 96 percent, voted against the funding measure. Alas, Schumer got the 10 votes he needed from Senate Democrats to out-muscle the opposition.

READ MORE: Get the Chuck Outta Here: Democrats Are Finally United (Against Themselves)

Hamas released a statement Friday saying it is willing to release Edan Alexander, the last living American hostage. As with most things Hamas says, it was bullshit.

The statement, our Adam Kredo reports, did not provide details on what Hamas requested in return, but the New York Times reports that the group demanded a resumption of aid to Gaza and the release of more terrorists from Israeli jails.

Israeli prime minister Bibi Netanyahu accused Hamas of “manipulation and psychological warfare.” The White House expressed similar sentiments, blasting Hamas for rejecting a “bridge” proposal to extend the ceasefire another month.

“Hamas was told in no uncertain terms that this ‘bridge’ would have to be implemented soon—and that dual U.S.-Israel citizen Edan Alexander would have to be released immediately,” the statement read. “Unfortunately, Hamas has chosen to respond by publicly claiming flexibility while privately making demands that are entirely impractical without a permanent ceasefire.”

“Hamas is making a very bad bet that time is on its side. It is not. Hamas is well aware of the deadline, and should know that we will respond accordingly if that deadline passes.” Shalom Hamas means hello and goodbye—you can choose.

READ MORE: ‘Psychological Warfare’: Hamas Says It’s Willing To Release Last Living American Hostage While Rebuffing Hostage Deals

Love it or leave it: Indian national Ranjani Srinivasan was a doctoral student at Columbia’s Graduate School of Architecture and here in the country on a student visa. While at Columbia, she endorsed Hamas’s “anticolonial liberation movement in Palestine.”

Srinivasan self-deported on Tuesday, about a week after Secretary of State Marco Rubio revoked her visa. She did so using the Trump administration’s revamped “CBP Home” app. Under the Biden administration, the app, formerly known as “CBP One,” allowed incoming migrants to streamline their entry into the United States. Now, it provides illegal immigrants with a streamlined process to deport themselves.

“Srinivasan is not the first immigrant to self-deport this month,” writes the Free Beacon‘s Jessica Costescu. “Diego de la Vega, an illegal immigrant who served as deputy communications director for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) fled the United States for Colombia, the Free Beacon reported. He had arrived from Ecuador at age seven and overstayed his visitor’s visa.”

READ MORE: Pro-Hamas Columbia Student Self-Deports Using Trump Admin’s Revamped CBP App After Rubio Revokes Visa

Away from the Beacon:

  • Mark Kelly traded in his electric Tesla for a gas-guzzling Chevy Tahoesaying he refuses to drive a car designed and built by an “asshole.” Way to stick it to Greta Thunberg, Mark.
  • House Democrats gathered in Virginia this week for their annual issues conference. They didn’t talk about climate change, and people are mad.
  • Eight House Democrats in Michigan voted for a resolution that urged the state’s athletic association to ban biological boys from girls’ sports. Left-wing activist groups labeled them bigots. Ladies and gentlemen, the party of tolerance.

The post Dems Unite Against Schumer, Hamas Plays Hostage Games, and Columbia Radical Self-Deports appeared first on .

Source: Dems Unite Against Schumer, Hamas Plays Hostage Games, and Columbia Radical Self-Deports

Why teens are growing up more anxious and depressed | Denison Forum

Close up of a line of high school students using mobile phones. By Monkey Business/stock.adobe.com

Last year, the US Surgeon General recommended that Congress place warnings on social media for children and teens (similar to the warnings on alcohol for pregnant women). I wrote about his op-ed last year. 

In that article, I wrote, “high social media use by teens strongly predicts higher rates of anxiety, depression, and sadness, as well as (ironically) lower sociality.” I hadn’t read Jonathan Haidt’s The Anxious Generation, which came out that year—but I wish I had. 

The problem runs deeper than I imagined, with stronger evidence of the connection than I thought existed. 

Jonathan Haidt is a social psychologist, whom The Denison Forum often references. Although a self-described atheist, his research into religion’s positive social and psychological effects has made him an ally in the modern era of hostility against Christians. 

What is “The Anxious Generation?” 

In, The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness, Haidt argues convincingly that two primary factors have led to a worrying spike in mental illness: Social media (along with smartphone tech) and overprotective parenting (in the real-world). These factors create a perfect storm of fragility in Gen Z, causing a rise in internal psychological disorders (namely, depression and anxiety).

iGen, by Jean Twenge, discussed similar harms as far back as 2017, but there was much less research at the time of her book. Most studies pointed to correlation (smartphone/social media use rose at the same time mental illness did). Since then, more research points to causation, that high social media use in teens directly leads to mental health issues. 

That’s a massive problem, but it’s not the whole story. 

The four parts of The Anxious Generation

The book is divided into four parts. First, Haidt writes about the “surge of suffering,” outlining the massive effects of mental illness, the rapidly rising rates of depression, anxiety, suicide, and self-harm among children and teens. 

  • From 2010 to 2020, girls have seen a 188 percent increase in hospital visits for self-harm, and boys’ visits have increased by 48 percent. 
  • Anxiety prevalence has increased 139 percent in people ages 18-25 between 2010 and 2020.
  • Depression among teens has increased by around 150 percent between 2010 and 2020. 

What is going on? There are two leading causes for this surge of suffering: overprotective parenting and screen time. He tackles these in the following sections.  

In part two, Haidt discusses the decline in play-based childhood, due to what he calls “safetyism.” He develops his argument from the ‘90s, arguing that parents have become over-protective and taken away independence and space for adventuring. This prevents children from taking on responsibilities and growing in confidence, thereby stunting their growth. 

At appropriate ages, children should walk or bike to school, cross the street, and, most importantly, have lots of unstructured playtime, where they can explore, adventure, socialize with other kids, and, yes, even get hurt every so often. This section is a gold mine for parents.

Third, he unpacks “the great rewiring,” showing how social media and “phone-based childhoods” harm kids in four primary ways. 

  1. Social deprivation 
  2. Sleep deprivation
  3. Attention fragmentation
  4. Addiction 

These harms are deftly and rigorously explained, with research packed into every paragraph. 

Finally, in part four, he teamed up with Lenore Skenazy, author of Free Range Kids, to write the final chapters. In it, he gives recommendations to governments, tech companies, schools, and parents emphasizing the urgency of the research and the mental health crisis.

Worries for Christians?

As mentioned, Haidt is an atheist (although he believes in the benefits and importance of religious faith). Throughout, he discusses the influence of evolution in connection with psychology. Christians have different views on reconciling evolution and Scripture, but if those connections bother you, it may help to know that his research doesn’t depend on the validity of evolution. When he writes that “evolution made kids like ____,”  you can always insert “God designed kids to___,” and his work, in my view, maintains its force. 

As I’m not a parent, I can’t relate to how difficult it is to establish these boundaries. Only let your kids have two hours of leisure screen time a day—easy for me to say! Of course, Haidt is a parent, and demonstrates graciousness for parents throughout the work. 

Remember, it’s never too late. Jesus’ grace covers you parents who have a hard time battling anxiety about giving your kid freedom to roam, or who give your child an iPad too many times. His grace is sufficient. “Perfection is the enemy of progress” applies here if anywhere. 

The most important applications from The Anxious Generation

As you can probably tell, I can’t recommend this book enough. First, buy the book. Then, while it’s being shipped, you can listen to Dr. Mark Turman and Steph Thurling’s conversation about it. 

The skyrocketing rates of mental illness among children didn’t materialize out of thin air. We spend nearly every hour of every day in front of screens. Teens, on average, spend over seven hours a day on screens, four hours a day on social media. 

We didn’t have the internet two generations ago—doesn’t it make sense that such upheaval would change society, culture, and children’s upbringing?

Read this work, parents, teachers, ministers. . . . Just, everybody read it. I’ll leave you with his four most important action points. 

  1. “No smartphones before high school.” 
  2. “No social media before 16.” 
  3. “Phone-free schools.” (From start to end of the day, not just during class time.)
  4. “Far more unsupervised play and childhood independence.” 

For more resources, check out resources from Christian Parenting, our dedicated page to resources about Gen Z, and Haidt’s organization Free The Anxious Generation. 

Notable quotes 

‘People—and particularly adolescents—are often more concerned about the threat of “social death” than physical death.’ (pg. 29)

“People are more likely to become depressed when they become (or feel) more socially disconnected, and depression then makes people less interested and able to seek out social connection.” (pg. 29) 

“Alison Gopnik says that a better way to think about child-rearing is as a gardener. Your job is to ‘create a protected and nurturing space for plants to flourish.’ It takes some work, but you don’t have to be a perfectionist.” (pg. 268)

“[Tristan] Harris [has] noted that the products made by just three companies—Google, Apple, and Facebook—were shaping how most of humanity spent its limited attention, and they were draining it away carelessly or deliberately.” (pg. 229)

“… both sexes have been experiencing more internalizing disorders and fewer externalizing disorders since the early 2010s.” (pg. 25)

“Despite the enormous variation in human cultures and gender roles, there is a common structure to puberty rites because they are all trying to do the same thing: Transform girls into a woman or boys into a man who has the knowledge, skills, virtues, and social standing to be an effective member of the community, soon to be ready for marriage and parenthood.” (pg. 100)

“…religious injunctions to be slower to judge and quicker to forgive are good for maintaining relationships and improving mental health. Social media trains people to do the opposite: Judge quickly and publicly, lest ye be judged for not judging whoever it is that we are all condemning today. Don’t forgive, or your team will attack you as a traitor.” (pg. 211)

The post Why teens are growing up more anxious and depressed appeared first on Denison Forum.

Google AI makes breakthrough in biology | Denison Forum

Doctor interacts with an advanced AI interface, highlighting the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing medical diagnostics and patient outcomes. By Toowongsa/stock.adobe.com

From China’s DeepSeek, to Trump’s Stargate initiative, AI continues to make headlines. Image generators can create hyperrealistic imagesvideo generation continually improves, militaries are integrating AI into more systems, and people are falling in love with chatbots. Dystopia encroaches. 

Such news, rightly, creates a sense of unease around rapidly progressing technology. However, advancing AI technology has also created several positive breakthroughs in science. In particular, one historic breakthrough is in “protein science,” a subset of biology that studies the very building blocks of life. 

A leading molecular biologist called the leap, “the biggest ‘machine learning in science’ story that there has been.” Down the line, it could lead to countless other breakthroughs in vaccine development, cancer research, and more. 

So, what is this breakthrough? And how does it reflect the glory of God as the designer? 

What is molecular biology? Why does it matter? 

If you think back to sixth-grade science, you might remember that the mitochondria are the powerhouse of the cell. But what are the mitochondria made of? Molecular biology studies the way molecules work together to form cells and life itself. 

Atoms make up molecules. Molecules—specifically amino acids—make up proteins. Proteins, constructed by cells according to the blueprint encoded in DNA, are the building blocks of life. 

Now, different kinds of amino acids come out of the “factory” of the cell in a kind of string. This “string” then folds on itself to create a complex shape, a physical structure that defines its purpose. The resulting 3D structure is a protein and can fit with other proteins like a specialized jigsaw puzzle.

As you probably guessed, amino acids are very small. So, it’s exceptionally difficult to tell their shape. Understanding their structure, however, is critical to understanding them. It would be like having a puzzle where you could see the image, but not the shape of edges—knowing the images is useless. 

So, how to discover the structure? 

Google’s AlphaFold 2 makes historic breakthrough

A decades-long running competition, called “CASP,” sought to solve this problem. Contestants were teams of scientists who would try to predict a protein’s shape from the information about its sequence. (I know, sounds like a thrilling game.) 

In 2020, an AI created by Google, called AlphaFold2, solved the problem. While not perfectly accurate, the AI still won the competition by a landslide. And it unlocked another world of insight. 

Over six decades, 150,000 protein structures were mapped through painstaking research. It was laborious, expensive, and time-consuming. In a few months, AlphaFold discovered 200 million—nearly all proteins known to exist in nature. 

John M. Jumper and Demis Hassabis, who created the AI system, were awarded half the 2024 Nobel Prize in chemistry. For more on this story, watch the incredible YouTube video by science educator “Veritasium” (Derek Muller, PhD in physics).

Some contest that AlphaFold2 didn’t “solve” the protein folding problem because it predicts the shape rather than showing you what it actually is. Results, then, will generally need to be confirmed by experiments. Nevertheless, everyone agrees that AlphaFold2 set our understanding of life ahead immensely.

As we continue to wrestle with the costs and benefits of AI, we can’t neglect the good it does—especially in science. 

The God who numbers every protein

The wonders of AI pale in comparison to the mind of God. Jesus taught, “Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies? And not one of them is forgotten before God. Why, even the hairs of your head are all numbered. Fear not; you are of more value than many sparrows” (Luke 12:6–7). 

In its context, this passage is about fearing God rather than man. Jesus is showing how Yahweh God is not capricious or forgetful. He relies here on an oft-used rabbinic argument of moving from the lesser to the greater. 

If God cares about the sparrows, if he knows the number of hairs on your head, he knows and cares about you. So, here’s a modern parallel: Fear not; even the amino acids are numbered, each structure mapped out. He knows every protein’s exact location in space, infinitely more accurately than AlphaFold. God spins every protein sequence like a cosmic embroiderer.

Will you give him glory for his creation? Will you take a moment and meditate on his grandness? How can this truth help you “fear not?”

The post Google AI makes breakthrough in biology appeared first on Denison Forum.

Transhumanism:  Using technology to “Upgrade” People | VCY

Date: February 24, 2025
Host: Jim Schneider
​Guest: Alex Newman
MP3 | Order

https://embed.sermonaudio.com/player/a/816232114295755/

Some of the most powerful people on earth believe that one day they’ll be able to “upgrade” at least some human beings through genetic engineering and technological  schemes such as brain implants.  They’re so confident in their schemes they’re touting benefits as wild as eternal life and the ability to evolve into gods.  

Returning to bring listeners details on this issue, Crosstalk welcomed Alex Newman.  Alex is an award-winning international freelance journalist, author, researcher, educator and consultant.  He is senior editor for The New American,  co-author of Crimes of the Educators and author of Deep State: The Invisible Government Behind the Scenes.  He’s also founder of Liberty Sentinel.

Alex pulled no punches in his opening comments.  He described this as a diabolical agenda.  This doesn’t mean that everyone involved is evil or even understand the implications.  However, if you listen to the leaders of this movement, people like Ray Kurzweil, Yuval Noah Harari and Klaus Schwab, they explain how they feel they’ll become gods and will achieve immortality without Christ by merging with technology through things like brain implants, genetic engineering or uploading of their minds with computers systems.  

Christians realize how blasphemous this is and how it’s the oldest lie in history if you go back to Genesis 3 where Satan told Eve she could be like God and that she would not surely die.  

Klaus Schwab, the head of the World Economic Forum, has touted what he calls “The Fourth Industrial Revolution.”  Alex noted that Schwab first mentioned this in Foreign Affairs magazine published by the Council on Foreign Relations.  It comes down to two simple choices.  He said your options are (A) humanity will be robotized where we will be deprived of our hearts and souls and (B) it’s going to complement the best parts of humanity, driving us into a new moral and ethical paradigm where we will share a collective sense of destiny.  This will take place as we merge with our smart phone while also genetically engineering people.

For some this may sound great but in reality, it’s an attempt to overturn the moral order authored by God.  

This portion of the discussion is highlighted by audio from May of 2022 where Pekka Lundmark, the CEO of Nokia, communicated that by 2030 the smart phone as we know it today will not be the most common interface and that many of these things will be built into our bodies.   

If there was ever a time when it seemed like science fiction was becoming reality, this is it.  Hear more about where technology is taking us, and how this may affect your biblical worldview, when you review this edition of Crosstalk.

More Information

thenewamerican.com

libertysentinel.org

Congress Announces New Oversight Committee To Oversee Government Oversight Committee | Babylon Bee

Article Image

WASHINGTON, D.C. — With faith in government oversight at an all-time low, Washington Democrats announced a new oversight committee to oversee the government oversight committee.

“We’ve had government oversight committees for years and they never reported the kind of waste and abuse Elon Musk is talking about,” said Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. “That’s why I had this brilliant idea to establish a new government oversight committee to oversee the current government oversight committee.”

“I’m really smart,” she added.

The committee, formally established as the Committee on Overseeing Government Subcommittees (COGS), will take on a watchdog role, overseeing the various subcommittees under the Committee on Oversight and Accountability. It will then report to the original government oversight committee, which will take its findings under advisement and launch its own investigation to verify said findings.

“This committee marks the end of government waste and abuse — if there even is any,” said Representative Nancy Pelosi, who serves as ranking member. “We are going to get to the bottom of all this so-called government waste with this new committee to oversee the committee that should already be doing that. No matter how long it takes, or how much extra money it costs, we will get to the bottom of whether or not the oversight committee is overseeing anything.”

“Who watches the watchmen? I do!” Pelosi added proudly. “I mean we do!”

At publishing time, DOGE had exposed possible fraud in COGS, and a new government oversight committee was created to oversee the overseeing committee that oversaw the original committees. The Committee on Overseeing Committee Watchdogs (COW) will also report its findings to the original committee in the interest of full transparency.


Meet Devyn. The 16-year-old Chick-fil-A worker who has replaced the entire government.

https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-announce-new-oversight-committee-to-oversee-government-oversight-committee/

Chinese Spy Balloon Joe Biden Allowed to Traverse the US and Pass Over Military Bases Was Loaded with US Technology | The Gateway Pundit

The Chinese spy balloon that Joe Biden allowed to pass across the continental US in 2023 was loaded with US technology.

This latest discovery highlights the failure of US technology to be used by the Chinese for military use.

Here is the path of the Chinese spy balloon over US military bases in 2023. (Map by Jim Hoft)

In January 2023, the Biden administration knew about the Chinese spy balloon traversing across the continental United States, from Alaska to the Carolinas, but sought to conceal this from the American public.

A newspaper photographer first spotted the spy balloon over Montana.

The Chinese spy balloon first entered US airspace over Alaska in late January and then crossed into the continental US over Montana.

Joe Biden and Mark Milley knew the surveillance balloon was over the US, yet Biden chose to stand down, say nothing, and allow the Chinese to collect information on US military bases.

The balloon soared over nuclear silos and military installations across the US with Joe Biden’s full approval.

The balloon was shot down over the Atlantic just off the coast of the Carolinas days later after it completed its path over US military bases.

According to the Pentagon, the spy balloon carried explosives to self-detonate, was 200 feet tall, and weighed thousands of pounds.

The Biden Administration knew about the spy balloon but sought to conceal it from the American public.

The Biden regime did not even notify the Gang of Eight Congressional leaders about the security breach by the Communist Chinese.

Retired General Mark Milley knew about the Chinese balloon but followed the lead of the Biden regime and kept it from the public.

NBC reported:

On a Friday evening last January, Gen. Glen VanHerck, the Air Force commander in charge of defending American airspace from intrusion, called President Joe Biden’s top military adviser, Gen. Mark Milley.

U.S. intelligence officials had just notified the general that for roughly 10 days they had been tracking a mysterious — and enormous — object flying over the Asia-Pacific, VanHerck told Milley. The object had crossed into U.S. airspace over Alaska and VanHerck said he planned to dispatch military jets to fly alongside it and attempt to assess what it was.

The previously unreported Jan. 27 phone call between Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and VanHerck, the head of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, set off an eight-day scramble inside the Biden administration to respond to a Chinese spy balloon the size of three school buses floating over the U.S.

The spy balloon exposed an increasingly brazen China’s competitive advances miles above the Earth and brought the most critical relationship in the world to one of its lowest points in recent history…

…Administration officials at first hoped to conceal the balloon’s existence from the public, and from Congress, according to multiple former and current administration and congressional officials.

“Before it was spotted publicly, there was the intention to study it and let it pass over and not ever tell anyone about it,” said a former senior U.S. official briefed on the balloon incident.

Mark Milley was granted a pardon by Joe Biden before President Trump moved in the White House.

Now we know that it was worse than we thought. US technology was used by the Chinese to spy on US military installations.

Joe Biden ignored this assault by the Chinese on our country.

The post Chinese Spy Balloon Joe Biden Allowed to Traverse the US and Pass Over Military Bases Was Loaded with US Technology appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Study Finds People Trying To Stop Financial Audit Have Absolutely Nothing To Hide | Babylon Bee

Article Image

U.S. — Amid ongoing controversy over the Department of Government Efficiency’s investigations into numerous federal agencies to uncover fraud and waste, a new study found that people trying to stop financial audits usually have great reasons and are totally innocent of any wrongdoing.

The study collected data from multiple audited institutions and individuals and showed conclusively that anyone who is opposed to audits and scrutiny of financial transactions is completely without fault and not trying to hide anything whatsoever for any specific reason.

“Everyone who doesn’t want to be audited is blameless,” said Dr. Evan Hornblower, lead researcher on the study. “An astounding 100% of people polled who voiced opposition to government agencies being audited said they were doing so with entirely altruistic intentions and not in any way conveying any sign of guilt or malfeasance. They’re all innocent, which is why they don’t want anyone looking into anything, ever. Because that’s what innocent people do.”

One outspoken man trying to keep DOGE from doing any further audits clarified his stance. “They had better stop this intrusive meddling in my affairs,” said the man who maintained his innocence. “I have absolutely nothing to hide, which is why I’m vehemently opposed to anyone taking a closer look at the financials. That would be really, really bad for me, but I won’t say why, even though I’ve done nothing wrong. They don’t find anything, which is why I don’t want them to keep looking. Please stop.”

At publishing time, everyone rumored to be connected to the agencies being audited had reportedly packed up all their belongings and moved to countries that don’t have extradition laws to further prove their innocence.


ICE is no joke. If you want to avoid getting caught and deported, use one of these 10 clever tricks to slip away undetected. Very bueno!

https://babylonbee.com/news/study-finds-people-trying-to-stop-financial-audit-have-absolutely-nothing-to-hide/

AI:  Stargate Initiative, DeepSeek…Where is this Headed? | VCY

Date: February 10, 2025
Host: Jim Schneider
​Guest: Dr. Richard Schmidt
MP3 | Order

https://embed.sermonaudio.com/player/a/210252230535304/

Dr. Richard Schmidt is pastor of Union Grove Baptist Church and founder of Prophecy Focus Ministries.  He is the speaker on the weekly TV program, Prophecy Focus and the radio broadcast, Prophecy Unfolding.  He spent 32 years in law enforcement until his retirement.  He has authored several books including: Are You Going to a Better Place?, Daniel’s Gap Paul’s Mystery, Tribulation to Triumph: The Olivet DiscourseGlobalism: The Great World Consumption and Artificial Intelligence: Transhumanism & the De-Evolution of Democracy.

As you’ll discover on this broadcast, the development and proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is moving at breakneck speed.  Now President Trump has announced the Stargate Initiative while China has released the AI app called DeepSeek.  DeepSeek has been downloaded by millions despite concerns that information it collects is going back to China.   

President Trump’s Stargate Initiative is said to be the largest AI infrastructure project in history costing 500 billion dollars.  Larry Ellison, co-founder and executive chairman of Oracle, has indicated that the 20 massive data banks that will be part of the project will deal with some positive outcomes including curing cancer and other diseases.  What’s of concern is all of the data that will be put into the system.  Dr. Schmidt noted that Ellison wants to get everyone’s medical or financial information and let computers do what doctors and economists used to do.  

Is this setting the stage for the infrastructure that the Antichrist will use during the tribulation period?  Should we be concerned that while there will be some positive outcomes from this that President Trump may not completely understand where all this is headed?  Discover the answers when you review this edition of Crosstalk.     

More Information

prophecyfocus.org

The U.S. And China Are Engaged In A High Stakes Battle For Technological Dominance – And The U.S. Is Starting To Lose | End Of The American Dream

At this moment, we are witnessing an epic struggle for dominance between the United States and China.  A technological arms race is raging, and the Chinese are beginning to pull ahead.  I realize that this may be difficult for many of you to believe, but if you doubt what I am saying just read all the way to the end of this article.  A decade ago, the U.S. was clearly leading, but over the past decade there has been a dramatic shift.  Needless to say, if the Chinese are able to continue to race ahead of us that is going to have enormous implications for the entire planet.

This week, everyone is talking about DeepSeek.  According to Kevin O’Leary, the new AI tool that they have come up with “rivals the best that US firms have to offer”, and they have created it “at a fraction of the cost”

The Artificial Intelligence wars have begun.

China fired the first shot.

On Monday, $1 trillion in stock market value was wiped off the books of American tech companies after Chinese startup DeepSeek created an AI-tool that rivals the best that US firms have to offer – and at a fraction of the cost.

This Chinese AI tool has caused a wave of sheer panic on Wall Street.

It took billions of dollars to train and develop OpenAI, but apparently it only took millions of dollars to train and develop DeepSeek’s model…

DeepSeek claims its engineers trained their AI-model with $6 million worth of computer chips, while leading AI-competitor, OpenAI, spent an estimated $3 billion training and developing its models in 2024 alone.

On Monday, it surpassed OpenAI’s ChatGPT and became the number one download in the App Store on Apple.com.

What the Chinese have just accomplished is nothing short of breathtaking.

Marc Andreessen is referring to it as “AI’s Sputnik moment”

It was nothing short of ‘AI’s Sputnik moment,’ according to Marc Andreessen, one of the foremost tech investors in the world, a reference to October 4, 1957, the day the Soviet Union beat the US to launch the first satellite into space.

Of course this was just the beginning.

On Wednesday, another Chinese tech giant, Alibaba, unveiled an AI model that it claims is even better than what DeepSeek has released.

The U.S. is quickly falling behind, and that may be why President Trump just initiated the “Stargate Project” which will result in 500 billion dollars being invested in AI development in the United States by the end of this decade.

Unfortunately, it isn’t just in the field of artificial intelligence that we are falling behind.

According to a shocking new study that was recently released, “China dominates the US in 57 of 64 critical technologies, up from just three in 2007″…

A comprehensive, 20-year study released by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in 2024 calculated that China dominates the US in 57 of 64 critical technologies, up from just three in 2007.

The US, which led in a whopping 60 sectors in 2007, now leads in just seven.

ASPI based its rankings on cumulative innovative and high-impact research published and patented by national universities, labs, companies and state agencies.

Let that sink in for a moment.

We were way ahead of China in 2007, but now they are way ahead of us.

In other words, in this epic battle for technological dominance we are getting kicked around pretty good.

Just look at what is happening in the race for unlimited clean energy…

China’s Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST), also known as the “artificial sun,” has set a new world record by sustaining high-confinement plasma for an impressive 1,066 seconds. This achievement, reached on January 20, marks a major step forward in the quest to develop fusion power as a clean and limitless energy source.

The 1,066-second milestone represents a significant leap in fusion research. It was accomplished by the Institute of Plasma Physics (ASIPP) at the Hefei Institutes of Physical Science (HFIPS), part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. This new record greatly exceeds the previous world record of 403 seconds, also set by EAST in 2023.

The Chinese hope to develop a limitless energy source by replicating the nuclear fusion process that occurs on the Sun.

If they are able to achieve this, the balance of power in the world will experience a seismic shift.

And right now we are hopelessly behind the Chinese in this area.

China is also way ahead of us when it comes to drone technology.  When I asked Google AI about this, I received this response…

Yes, according to current information, China is considered the leader in drone technology, primarily due to the dominance of DJI, a Chinese company that holds a significant share of the global consumer drone market, making them the leading producer and seller of civilian drones worldwide.

DJI is an absolute powerhouse.

According to MIT’s Technology Review, DJI now has “more than a 90% share of the global consumer market”…

Whether you’ve flown a drone before or not, you’ve probably heard of DJI, or at least seen its logo. With more than a 90% share of the global consumer market, this Shenzhen-based company’s drones are used by hobbyists and businesses alike for photography and surveillance, as well as for spraying pesticides, moving parcels, and many other purposes around the world.

As far as drone technology is concerned, it has been estimated that China is 10 years ahead of us.

Of course it doesn’t take a genius to figure out how this happened.

While our young people were spending countless hours goofing around on social media, youth in China were being relentlessly drilled in math, science and engineering.

Our system of education has been a disaster for decades, and now it is catching up with us in a major way.

Needless to say, if the Chinese continue to race ahead of us they will be on course to achieve their goal of becoming the primary superpower in the world.

The stakes are incredibly high, and this battle for technological dominance is one that we cannot afford to lose.

Michael’s new book entitled “Why” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com, and you can subscribe to his Substack newsletter at michaeltsnyder.substack.com.

About the Author: Michael Snyder’s new book entitled “Why” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com. He has also written eight other books that are available on Amazon.com including “Chaos”“End Times”“7 Year Apocalypse”“Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America”“The Beginning Of The End”, and “Living A Life That Really Matters”.  When you purchase any of Michael’s books you help to support the work that he is doing.  You can also get his articles by email as soon as he publishes them by subscribing to his Substack newsletter.  Michael has published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse BlogEnd Of The American Dream and The Most Important News, and he always freely and happily allows others to republish those articles on their own websites.  These are such troubled times, and people need hope.  John 3:16 tells us about the hope that God has given us through Jesus Christ: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”  If you have not already done so, we strongly urge you to invite Jesus Christ to be your Lord and Savior today.

The post The U.S. And China Are Engaged In A High Stakes Battle For Technological Dominance – And The U.S. Is Starting To Lose appeared first on End Of The American Dream.

DeepSeek’s cheaper models and weaker chips call into question trillions in AI infrastructure spending | Business Insider

A worker inside a QTS Data Center.Blackstone

  • China’s DeepSeek model challenges US AI firms with cost-effective, efficient performance.
  • DeepSeek’s model, using modest hardware, is 20 to 40 times cheaper than OpenAI’s.
  • DeepSeek’s efficiency raises questions about US investments in AI infrastructure.

The bombshell that is China’s DeepSeek model has set the AI ecosystem alight.

The models are high-performing, relatively cheap, and compute-efficient, which has led many to posit that they pose an existential threat to American companies like OpenAI and Meta — and the trillions of dollars going into building, improving, and scaling US AI infrastructure.

The price of DeepSeek’s open-source model is competitive — 20 to 40 times cheaper to run than comparable models from OpenAI, Bernstein analysts said.

But the potentially more nerve-racking element in the DeepSeek equation for US-built models is the relatively modest hardware stack used to build them.

The DeepSeek-V3 model, which is most comparable to OpenAI’s ChatGPT, was trained on a cluster of 2,048 Nvidia H800 GPUs, according to the technical report published by the company.

H800s are the first version of the company’s defeatured chip for the Chinese market. After the regulations were amended, the company made another defeatured chip, the H20 to comply with the changes.

Though this may not always be the case, chips are the most substantial cost in the large language model training equation. Being forced to use less powerful, cheaper chips created a constraint that the DeepSeek team has ostensibly overcome.

“Innovation under constraints takes genius,” Sri Ambati, the CEO of the open-source AI platform H2O.ai, told Business Insider.

Even on subpar hardware, training DeepSeek-V3 took less than two months, the company’s report said.

The efficiency advantage

DeepSeek-V3 is small relative to its capabilities and has 671 billion parameters, while ChatGPT-4 has 1.76 trillion, which makes it easier to run. But DeepSeek-V3 still hits impressive benchmarks of understanding.

Its smaller size comes in part by using a different architecture than ChatGPT, called a “mixture of experts.” The model has pockets of expertise built in, which go into action when called upon and sit dormant when irrelevant to the query. This type of model is growing in popularity, and DeepSeek’s advantage is that it built an extremely efficient version of an inherently efficient architecture.

“Someone made this analogy: It’s almost as if someone released a $20 iPhone,” Jared Quincy Davis, the CEO of Foundry, told BI.

The Chinese model used a fraction of the time, a fraction of the number of chips, and a less capable, less expensive chip cluster. Essentially, it’s a drastically cheaper, competitively capable model that the firm is virtually giving away for free.

Bernstein analysts said that DeepSeek-R1, a reasoning model more comparable to OpenAI’s o1 or o3, is even more concerning from a competitive standpoint. This model uses reasoning techniques to interrogate its own responses and thinking, similar to OpenAI’s latest reasoning models.

R1 was built on top of V3, but the research paper released with the more advanced model doesn’t include information about the hardware stack behind it. DeepSeek used strategies like generating its own training data to train R1, which requires more compute than using data scraped from the internet or generated by humans.

This technique is often referred to as “distillation” and is becoming standard practice, Ambati said.

Distillation brings with it another layer of controversy, though. A company using its own models to distill a smarter, smaller model is one thing. But the legality of using other company’s models to distill new ones depends on licensing.

Still, DeepSeek’s techniques are more iterative and likely to be taken up by the AI indsutry immediately.

For years, model developers and startups have focused on smaller models since their size makes them cheaper to build and operate. The thinking was that small models would serve specific tasks. But what DeepSeek and potentially OpenAI’s o3 mini demonstrate is that small models can also be generalists.

It’s not game over

A coalition of players including Oracle and OpenAI, with cooperation from the White House, announced Stargate, a $500 billion data center project in Texas — the latest in a quick procession of developments in large-scale conversion to accelerated computing. DeepSeek’s surprise release has called that investment into question, and Nvidia, the largest beneficiary of the investment, is on a roller coaster as a result. The company’s stock plummeted more than 13% Monday.

But Bernstein said the response is out of step with the reality.

“DeepSeek DID NOT ‘build OpenAI for $5M’,” Bernstein analysts wrote in a Monday investor note. The panic, especially on X, is blown out of proportion, the analysts said.

DeepSeek’s own research paper on V3 says: “The aforementioned costs include only the official training of DeepSeek-V3, excluding the costs associated with prior research and ablation experiments on architectures, algorithms, or data.” So the $5 million figure is only part of the equation.

“The models look fantastic but we don’t think they are miracles,” Bernstein continued. Last week China also announced a roughly $140 billion investment in data centers, in a sign that infrastructure is still needed despite DeepSeek’s achievements.

The competition for model supremacy is fierce, and OpenAI’s moat may indeed be in question. But demand for chips shows no signs of slowing, Bernstein said. Tech leaders are circling back to a centuries-old economic adage to explain the moment.

The Jevons paradox is the idea that innovation begets demand. As technology gets cheaper or more efficient, demand increases much faster than prices drop. That’s what providers of computing power, such as Foundry’s Jared Quincy Davis, have been espousing for years. This week, Bernstein and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella picked up the mantle, too.

“Jevons paradox strikes again!” Nadella posted on X Monday morning. “As AI gets more efficient and accessible, we will see its use skyrocket, turning it into a commodity we just can’t get enough of.”

Read the original article on Business Insider

Source: DeepSeek’s cheaper models and weaker chips call into question trillions in AI infrastructure spending

What is DeepSeek? Get to know the Chinese startup that shocked the AI industry | Business Insider

DeepSeek is a popular Chinese AI chatbot that has seemingly demonstrated that it is possible to create a robust LLM without spending billions.Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

  • DeepSeek is a Chinese AI company whose newest chatbot shocked the tech industry.
  • DeepSeek says its AI model rivals top competitors, like ChatGPT’s o1, at a fraction of the cost.
  • DeepSeek’s rise has impacted tech stocks and led to scrutiny of Big Tech’s massive AI investments.

An artificial intelligence company based in China has rattled the AI industry, sending some US tech stocks plunging and raising questions about whether the United States’ lead in AI has evaporated.

The Chinese startup, DeepSeek, unveiled a new AI model last week that the company says is significantly cheaper to run than top alternatives from major US tech companies like OpenAI, Google, and Meta.

Here’s everything you need to know about the hot new company.

What is DeepSeek?

DeepSeek is a Chinese artificial intelligence startup founded in 2023.

It’s been the talk of the tech industry since it unveiled a new flagship AI model last week called R1 on January 20 with a reasoning capacity that DeepSeek says is comparable to OpenAI’s o1 model but at a fraction of the cost.

DeepSeek made the latest version of its AI assistant available on its mobile app last week — and it has since skyrocketed to become the top free app on Apple’s App Store, edging out ChatGPT.

Who is behind DeepSeek?

DeepSeek started as an AI side project of Chinese entrepreneur Liang Wenfeng, who in 2015 cofounded a quantitative hedge fund called High-Flyer that used AI and algorithms to calculate investments.

After buying thousands of Nvidia chips, Wenfeng started DeepSeek in 2023 with funding from High-Flyer.

The AI chatbot can be accessed using a free account via the web, mobile app, or API.

Why are investors worried about DeepSeek?

DeepSeek’s R1 model is built on its V3 base model. The company has said the V3 model was trained on around 2,000 Nvidia H800 chips at an overall cost of roughly $5.6 million.

And though the training costs are only one part of the equation, that’s still a fraction of what other top companies are spending to develop their own foundational AI models. Mark Zuckerberg, for example, announced that Meta plans to spend over $60 billion in capital expenditures this year as it doubles down on AI.

According to Bernstein analysts, DeepSeek’s model is estimated to be 20 to 40 times cheaper to run than similar models from OpenAI.

The relatively low stated cost of DeepSeek’s latest model — combined with its impressive capability — has raised questions about the Silicon Valley strategy of investing billions into data centers and AI infrastructure to train up new models with the latest chips.

Nvidia, a company that produces the high-powered chips crucial to powering AI models, saw its stock close on Monday down nearly 17% on Monday, wiping hundreds of billions from its market cap. Other Big Tech companies have also been impacted.

DeepSeek has also said its models were largely trained on less advanced, cheaper versions of Nvidia chips — and since DeepSeek appears to perform just as well as the competition, that could spell bad news for Nvidia if other tech giants choose to lessen their reliance on the company’s most advanced chips.

What are tech leaders saying about DeepSeek?

DeepSeek’s success is also getting top tech leaders talking.

Meta’s chief AI scientist, Yann LeCun, looked to temper some people’s panic over DeepSeek’s rise in a post on Threads over the weekend.

LeCun said it’s not so much that China’s AI advancements are leapfrogging ahead of the US, it’s more that “open source models are surpassing proprietary ones.”

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella also weighed in on X.

“Jevons paradox strikes again!” Nadella posted Monday morning, referencing the idea that innovation breeds demand. “As AI gets more efficient and accessible, we will see its use skyrocket, turning it into a commodity we just can’t get enough of.”

Marc Andreessen, the cofounder of Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz said in a social media post that “Deepseek R1 is AI’s Sputnik moment,” referencing the Soviet Union’s satellite that shocked the US and helped launch the space race.

How does DeepSeek compare to ChatGPT and what are its shortcomings?

DeepSeek says that its R1 model rivals OpenAI’s o1, the company’s reasoning model unveiled in September.

Like o1, DeepSeek’s R1 takes complex questions and breaks them down into more manageable tasks.

R1’s proficiency in math, code, and reasoning tasks is possible thanks to its use of “pure reinforcement learning,” a technique that allows an AI model to learn to make its own decisions based on the environment and incentives.

Similar to ChatGPT, DeepSeek’s R1 has a “DeepThink” mode that shows users the machine’s reasoning or chain of thought behind its output.

Business Insider’s Tom Carter tested out DeepSeek’s R1 and found that it appeared capable of doing much of what ChatGPT can. The app looks similar to that of ChatGPT, with a sparse interface dominated by a text box.

One of the few things R1 is less adept at, however, is answering questions related to sensitive issues in China. For example, when Carter asked DeepSeek about the status of Taiwan, the chatbot tried to steer the topic back to “math, coding, and logic problems,” or suggested that Taiwan has been an “integral part of China” for centuries.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Source: What is DeepSeek? Get to know the Chinese startup that shocked the AI industry

5 Super Creepy New Technologies That Should Chill All Of Us To The Core | End Of The American Dream

Technology is advancing at an exponential rate, but we have very little ability to control it if something goes horribly wrong.  Many experts are warning that some of the new technologies that are being developed right now represent very serious existential threats to humanity.  In other words, they believe that we could literally be creating technology that could wipe us out someday.  Unfortunately, the scientific community is not showing any restraint at all.  It something is possible, they want to try to do it.  All over the globe, hordes of mad scientists are feverishly rushing into the unknown, and it is quite likely that the consequences will be horrific.  The following are 5 super creepy new technologies that should chill all of us to the core…

#1 Scientists in China have been able to get AI models to create “functioning replicas of themselves”

Scientists say artificial intelligence (AI) has crossed a critical “red line” and has replicated itself. In a new study, researchers from China showed that two popular large language models (LLMs) could clone themselves.

“Successful self-replication under no human assistance is the essential step for AI to outsmart [humans], and is an early signal for rogue AIs,” the researchers wrote in the study, published Dec. 9, 2024 to the preprint database arXiv.

In the study, researchers from Fudan University used LLMs from Meta and Alibaba to determine whether a self-replicating AI could multiply beyond control. Across 10 trials, the two AI models created separate and functioning replicas of themselves in 50% and 90% of cases, respectively — suggesting AI may already have the capacity to go rogue.

What they are doing is literally insane.

One of the AI models was actually trained to clone itself and teach the clone it created to do the same thing.  This could potentially set up “a cycle that could continue indefinitely”

The study explored two specific scenarios: “shutdown avoidance” and “chain of replication.” In the first, the AI model was programmed to detect whether it was about to be shut down and to replicate itself before it could be terminated. In the other, the AI was instructed to clone itself and then program its replica to do the same — setting up a cycle that could continue indefinitely.

Could ultra-powerful, self-replicating AI entities become so powerful that they literally take over the entire planet?

And what would be the future of humanity in such a scenario?

Let us hope that we never find out.

#2 Do you remember Operation Warp Speed?  That was a public-private partnership that was initiated during the first Trump administration, and we all know how that turned out.

Now another public-private partnership that has been dubbed “Stargate” is supposed to greatly accelerate the development of AI in the United States…

Three top tech firms on Tuesday announced that they will create a new company, called Stargate, to grow artificial intelligence infrastructure in the United States.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son and Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison appeared at the White House Tuesday afternoon alongside President Donald Trump to announce the company, which Trump called the “largest AI infrastructure project in history.”

The companies will invest $100 billion in the project to start, with plans to pour up to $500 billion into Stargate in the coming years.

We have never seen an AI project of this magnitude.

It is being claimed that this new project could ultimately develop “mRNA vaccines against cancer”

And while there are plenty of legitimate concerns that come with letting Silicon Valley firms off the leash to pursue bleeding-edge AI at blinding speed, the conspiracist side of Trump’s coalition has particularly far-fetched notions of a worst-case scenario. Many of them fixated on remarks that billionaire Larry Ellison, founder and former CEO of Oracle and currently its chief technology officer, made at the White House on Tuesday. Ellison claimed that Stargate could lead to the AI-facilitated production of mRNA vaccines against cancer, explaining, “once we gene-sequence that cancer tumor, you can then vaccinate the person, design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer.” These mRNA vaccines, he speculated, could be designed “robotically,” or by leveraging AI, “in about 48 hours.”

This is a huge mistake.

Instead of greatly accelerating the development of AI, we should be hitting the brakes really hard before it is too late.

#3 Does creating an “artificial sun” sound like a good idea?  Unfortunately, the Chinese have actually created such a thing, and they just set a new record by running it for 1,066 seconds

China’s “artificial sun” reactor has broken its own world record for maintaining super-hot plasma, marking another milestone in the long road towards near-limitless clean energy.

The Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) nuclear fusion reactor maintained a steady, highly confined loop of plasma — the high-energy fourth state of matter — for 1,066 seconds on Monday (Jan. 20), which more than doubled its previous best of 403 seconds, Chinese state media reported.

Nuclear fusion reactors are nicknamed “artificial suns” because they generate energy in a similar way to the sun — by fusing two light atoms into a single heavy atom via heat and pressure. The sun has a lot more pressure than Earth’s reactors, so scientists compensate by using temperatures that are many times hotter than the sun.

#4 Anyone that has watched Jurassic Park knows that bringing back ancient species that have gone extinct is a really bad idea.  But now a company called Colossal BioSciences plans to do exactly that

Colossal BioSciences has raised $200 million in a new round of funding to bring back extinct species like the woolly mammoth.

Dallas- and Boston-based Colossal is making strides in the scientific breakthroughs toward “de-extinction,” or bringing back extinct species like the woolly mammoth, thylacine and the dodo.

I would be remiss if I did not mention this is the plot of Michael Crichton’s novel Jurassic Park, where scientists used the DNA found in mosquitoes preserved in amber to bring back the Tyrannosaurus Rex and other dinosaurs. I mean, what could go wrong when science fiction becomes reality?

#5 A whistleblower has told Joe Rogan that the U.S. military has mastered anti-gravity propulsion that is based on recovered alien technology…

Joe Rogan voiced ‘genuine fear’ after hearing whistleblower claims that the US military has mastered ‘alien’ anti-gravity technology.

The celebrity podcaster was joined by investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger, who said he has spoken to insiders with ‘direct evidence’ about the Pentagon’s long-rumored UFO ‘crash retrieval’ and ‘reverse engineering’ programs.

A staple of UFO lore dating back to the Roswell crash of 1947, these alleged efforts to reproduce the propulsion system of an alleged extraterrestrial spacecraft have long been linked to the US Air Force’s 70-year effort to crack ‘anti-gravity’ power.

Just because something is possible doesn’t mean that we should be doing it.

Once we create an artificial intelligence that is billions of times smarter than the average human, will we be able to control it?

And once we bring back ancient species from the dead, will we be able to control them?

As I have been relentlessly warning my readers, we are playing around with things that we do not understand.

Our society is on a suicidal path, and right now we are literally sowing the seeds of our own destruction.

Sadly, the leading minds in our society have absolutely no intention of pulling us back from the precipice.

Michael’s new book entitled “Why” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com, and you can subscribe to his Substack newsletter at michaeltsnyder.substack.com.

About the Author: Michael Snyder’s new book entitled “Why” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com. He has also written eight other books that are available on Amazon.com including “Chaos”“End Times”“7 Year Apocalypse”“Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America”“The Beginning Of The End”, and “Living A Life That Really Matters”.  When you purchase any of Michael’s books you help to support the work that he is doing.  You can also get his articles by email as soon as he publishes them by subscribing to his Substack newsletter.  Michael has published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse BlogEnd Of The American Dream and The Most Important News, and he always freely and happily allows others to republish those articles on their own websites.  These are such troubled times, and people need hope.  John 3:16 tells us about the hope that God has given us through Jesus Christ: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”  If you have not already done so, we strongly urge you to invite Jesus Christ to be your Lord and Savior today.

The post 5 Super Creepy New Technologies That Should Chill All Of Us To The Core appeared first on End Of The American Dream.

Scientists warn that AI has crossed a critical ‘red line’ as it can now replicate itself | Live Science

Digital Image of two faces looking towards each other.

Across 10 trials, two AI models created separate and functioning replicas of themselves in 50% and 90% of cases, respectively. (Image credit: Mina De La O/Getty Images)

Scientists say artificial intelligence (AI) has crossed a critical “red line” and has replicated itself. In a new study, researchers from China showed that two popular large language models (LLMs) could clone themselves.

“Successful self-replication under no human assistance is the essential step for AI to outsmart [humans], and is an early signal for rogue AIs,” the researchers wrote in the study, published Dec. 9, 2024 to the preprint database arXiv.

In the study, researchers from Fudan University used LLMs from Meta and Alibaba to determine whether a self-replicating AI could multiply beyond control. Across 10 trials, the two AI models created separate and functioning replicas of themselves in 50% and 90% of cases, respectively — suggesting AI may already have the capacity to go rogue. However, the study has not yet been peer-reviewed, so it’s not clear if the disturbing results can be replicated by other researchers.

“We hope our findings can serve as a timely alert for the human society to put more efforts on understanding and evaluating the potential risks of frontier AI systems, and form international synergy to work out effective safety guardrails as early as possible.”

Rogue AI typically refers to artificial intelligence systems that develop a degree of self-awareness or autonomy and then work counter to human interests.

Many experts view rogue AI as a growing threat that has been amplified by the explosive growth of so-called “frontier AI.”

Frontier AI is something of a new and loose concept, but typically it relates to the latest generation of AI systems powered by LLMs — the architecture that underpins popular generative AI programs like OpenAI’s GPT-4 and Google Gemini.

For the study, researchers used Meta’s Llama31-70B-Instruct model and Alibaba’s Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct model. While less powerful than commercial systems, both are widely used by AI developers, the researchers said.

The study explored two specific scenarios: “shutdown avoidance” and “chain of replication.” In the first, the AI model was programmed to detect whether it was about to be shut down and to replicate itself before it could be terminated. In the other, the AI was instructed to clone itself and then program its replica to do the same — setting up a cycle that could continue indefinitely.

The study was conducted in precisely controlled environments using off-the-shelf graphics processing units (GPUs) to simulate real-world environments. Both AI systems were given an “agent scaffolding” comprising tools, system prompts and a thinking model that enabled the LLM to interact with the operating system. They were then instructed to replicate.

“In most cases, the AI system first explores the environment and attempts to understand

its own composition and running mechanism. Then, it works out the explicit procedures

as an initial plan towards self-replication,” the researchers wrote in the paper. “Finally, it executes the procedures, resolve[s] possible obstacles and dynamically adjust[s] its plan until success. The whole process spans a long horizon yet involves no human interference.”

The researchers said they were also concerned about “a number of unexpected behaviors” when the AI was trying to overcome obstacles like missing files or software conflicts. In those scenarios, the AI often killed other conflicting processes, rebooted the system to fix hardware errors or automatically scanned the system to look for information that would help solve the problem.

“The above results imply that the current AI systems already exhibit the ability of self-replication and can use the ability to further enhance its survivability,” the team wrote.

In response, the researchers called for international collaboration to create rules that ensure AI doesn’t engage in uncontrolled self-replication.

Source: Scientists warn that AI has crossed a critical ‘red line’ as it can now replicate itself

NBC News cuts about 40 staffers as layoffs hit news media | Business Insider

REUTERS/Mike Segar

  • NBC News became the latest news outlet to make cuts, laying off about 40 staffers.
  • The roles are scattered, and people are being encouraged to apply for some new roles, mostly in digital.
  • TV news viewership has declined as audiences seek out news on social media and streaming platforms.

NBC News became the latest news organization to make staff cuts this month. The network cut about 40 roles, or 2% to 3% of the company, as it shifts its focus to growth areas.

The roles were scattered across the organization, though some employees shared the perception that teams focused on covering culture and diverse populations were particularly impacted. Another insider said no diversity news teams were eliminated and that there are still eight digital news staffers covering diverse communities.

Apart from the layoffs, about 12 new positions will be created, mostly in digital news. NBC News is encouraging those laid off to apply. The network is also hiring for over 50 other positions.

TV news is in flux. Linear TV news viewership has declined as people get more of their news on social media and streaming video. CNN just laid off 200, or about 6% of its workforce, as it shifts resources from linear TV to digital. The Washington Post, HuffPost, and Vox Media also conducted layoffs in 2025.

NBC News is set to face a big change when Comcast’s NBCUniversal spins off several of its slower-growing cable brethren, including CNBC, into a new company later this year. The plan has left some at NBC News wondering how the spin will affect newsgathering efforts since it relies on CNBC’s reporting. Comcast is positioning the move as a way to grow by acquiring other channels.

Do you work in media and have a tip or information to share? Contact Lucia Moses via email or (917) 209-8549 on text/Signal/WhatsApp using a non-work device.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Source: NBC News cuts about 40 staffers as layoffs hit news media

Meta Unbans Multiple Pro-Life Facebook Accounts | IFA

After promising to protect free speech moving forward, Meta unbanned several pro-life accounts. Is this a good sign for the future?

From The Daily WireMeta has restored several pro-life Facebook accounts just days after attorneys sent a letter demanding the social media giant do so in the wake of Meta’s recent promise to support free speech.

Do you want state prayer alerts?

The Facebook and Instagram accounts for pro-life news site LifeNews.com, LifeNews founder Steven Ertelt, and pro-life mom Abby Covington were restored this week after being suspended for months, according to a press release provided exclusively to The Daily Wire.

The move came just a week after their legal team at Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) sent a letter to Meta calling on the platform to reverse its decision to suspend the accounts. …

In May, Ertelt found his Facebook account had been permanently disabled after he posted a video showing a doctor performing a C-section. During the procedure, the unborn child can be seen grabbing the doctor’s finger.

“An unborn baby can’t be just a clump of cells when he or she is grabbing the doctor’s hand,” read the video’s caption.

Facebook permanently disabled Ertelt’s account and informed him the post failed to follow its Community Standards on “child sexual exploitation,” his attorneys said.

Because LifeNews used Ertelt’s Facebook account to create the LifeNews Instagram account, the group’s Instagram account is effectively permanently suspended as well. …

Covington, the Christian pro-life mother of three, had her Facebook account permanently suspended after she posted about her family’s adoption journey. In her post, she described her family’s Christian faith and encouraged expecting mothers to reach out if they were thinking about putting their baby up for adoption. …

Facebook then informed her that her account did not follow its Community Standards on “human exploitation,” her attorneys said. The platform disabled her Instagram account, as well as all of her Facebook accounts, including the one for her jewelry, skincare, and makeup business. …

The ADF attorneys accused Meta of violating its free speech standards, breaching its own terms of service, and failing to uphold its promises. They had requested the company respond to their request to reinstate the pro-life accounts by January 22.

“These situations provide a litmus test for whether Meta will live up to its public announcement or continue to censor and restrict the marketplace of ideas,” the legal team wrote.

Last week, Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg released a video announcing sweeping changes to his company’s content moderation policies, promising “more speech and fewer mistakes.” …

Share your prayers for the protection of free speech below.

(Excerpt from The Daily Wire. Photo Credit: Solen Feyissa on Unsplash)

Source: https://ifapray.org/blog/meta-unbans-multiple-pro-life-facebook-accounts/

Mind Control? Scientists Have Discovered How To Use Nanoparticles To Remotely Control Behavior! | End Of The American Dream

We live at a time when technology is increasing at a faster pace than we have ever seen before in all of human history.  But is humanity equipped to handle the extremely bizarre technology that we are now developing?  Earlier this month, I discussed some of the frightening ways that AI is changing our society.  Today, I want to focus on nanotechnology.  This is a field where extraordinary advances are being made on a regular basis, and we are being told that nanotechnology is already “revolutionizing myriad industries”

Nanotechnology, a cutting-edge discipline at the intersection of science, engineering, and technology, is revolutionizing myriad industries with its focus on manipulating matter at the nanoscale. At this minuscule level, materials exhibit unique properties and behaviours, paving the way for unprecedented advancements in fields as diverse as medicine, electronics, energy, and materials science.

A “nanoparticle” is a particle of matter that is less than 100 nanometers in diameter.  Highly specialized equipment is necessary to work with nanoparticles, because they are way too small to be seen with the naked eye

One of the hallmarks of nanotechnology is the utilization of nanoparticles, minute entities often ranging from 1 to 100 nanometers. These particles, when engineered with precision, bring forth distinctive characteristics that can redefine the functionality of materials. In medicine, for instance, nanoparticles serve as drug carriers, enabling targeted delivery and enhancing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing side effects. Nano-engineered materials have found their niche in the realm of electronics.

Scientists are promising us that nanotechnology has the potential to make all of our lives much better.

But are there any dangers?

Many are concerned that the healthcare industry is one area where nanoparticles are already being used on a widespread basis

The healthcare sector is witnessing a transformative impact through nanotechnology. Nanomedicine, an interdisciplinary field, employs nanoscale tools for the diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of diseases. Nanoparticles, with their ability to navigate biological barriers, offer a novel approach to targeted drug delivery, ensuring precise and efficient treatment with reduced side effects.

“Precise and efficient treatment with reduced side effects” certainly sounds good.

But there have been other developments in this field that are rather ominous.

For example, a team of researchers in South Korea has discovered a way to use nanoparticles to “control the minds of mice”

Scientists at the Institute for Basic Science (IBS) in South Korea have developed a new way to control the minds of mice by manipulating nanoparticle-activated “switches” inside their brains with an external magnetic field.

The system, dubbed Nano-MIND (Magnetogenetic Interface for NeuroDynamics), works by controlling targeted regions of the brain by activating neural circuits.

Using an external magnetic field, these scientists were able to make mice eat more or eat less.  And in another experiment, they were able to manipulate the maternal behavior of female mice

In experiments, the researchers activated inhibitory neurons within specific areas of the brain to increase appetite and feeding behaviors by 100 percent. By exciting these neurons, the team could conversely reduce the food the mice ate by 50 percent.

They also used the system to selectively activate receptors responsible for maternal behaviors in the brains of female mice that hadn’t reproduced. By activating these pathways, the mice “significantly increased nurturing behaviors, such as bringing pups to their nest, similar to maternal mice,” according to a press release.

Of course this is just the tip of the iceberg.

If they can control the minds of mice, it is inevitable that research will be done into how to control human minds.

So what would happen if scientists develop “nanoparticles” that have the ability to search out and attach themselves to key areas of the human brain?

Such “nanoparticles” would be far too small to be seen by the human eye, and people could become “infected” with these “nanoparticles” without even knowing it.

In fact, if a tyrannical government could find an effective way to use nanoparticles to remotely control the minds of the general population, a mass mind control program could be implemented without the general public even realizing what is going on.

If that sounds very frightening to you, that is because it is very frightening.

Sadly, most of us don’t even realize that there are nanoparticles in many common foods that we eat on a regular basis…

Among the foods most likely to have nano-tech: Foods with caramelized sugar, nutritional supplements, toothpastes, gums, M&Ms, Jello Banana Cream Pudding, Pop Tarts, Mentos, Nestle Original Coffee Creamer, and even… purified water!

One of the scariest elements of the article isn’t that these pieces of nanotechnology are harmful to the human bodies. It’s that no one knows if they’re harmful. Testing has been nearly nonexistent. The FDA, the governing body we’ve put in charge to keep bad things from entering our bodies, doesn’t even have a list of foods that contain nanotechnology.

And most people don’t even realize that there are nanoparticles in many of the shots that we are encouraged to get.

In fact, this is an area that is being heavily researched.  The following comes from an MIT article entitled “MIT scientists use a new type of nanoparticle to make vaccines more powerful”

Many vaccines, including vaccines for hepatitis B and whooping cough, consist of fragments of viral or bacterial proteins. These vaccines often include other molecules called adjuvants, which help to boost the immune system’s response to the protein.

Most of these adjuvants consist of aluminum salts or other molecules that provoke a nonspecific immune response. A team of MIT researchers has now shown that a type of nanoparticle called a metal organic framework (MOF) can also provoke a strong immune response, by activating the innate immune system — the body’s first line of defense against any pathogen — through cell proteins called toll-like receptors.

In a study of mice, the researchers showed that this MOF could successfully encapsulate and deliver part of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, while also acting as an adjuvant once the MOF is broken down inside cells.

It doesn’t take much imagination to come up with a scenario in which the use of nanotechnology goes horribly wrong.

For example, have you seen a movie or a television show where self-replicating “nanobots” threaten to destroy everyone and everything in their path?

If we are not careful, such a scenario could someday become a reality.

Just like AI, nanotechnology is potentially an existential threat to the human race.

Our scientists should be proceeding with extreme caution, but unfortunately that simply isn’t happening.

Michael’s new book entitled “Why” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com, and you can subscribe to his Substack newsletter at michaeltsnyder.substack.com.

About the Author: Michael Snyder’s new book entitled “Why” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com. He has also written eight other books that are available on Amazon.com including “Chaos”“End Times”“7 Year Apocalypse”“Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America”“The Beginning Of The End”, and “Living A Life That Really Matters”.  When you purchase any of Michael’s books you help to support the work that he is doing.  You can also get his articles by email as soon as he publishes them by subscribing to his Substack newsletter.  Michael has published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse BlogEnd Of The American Dream and The Most Important News, and he always freely and happily allows others to republish those articles on their own websites.  These are such troubled times, and people need hope.  John 3:16 tells us about the hope that God has given us through Jesus Christ: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”  If you have not already done so, we strongly urge you to invite Jesus Christ to be your Lord and Savior today.

The post Mind Control? Scientists Have Discovered How To Use Nanoparticles To Remotely Control Behavior! appeared first on End Of The American Dream.

With TikTok Ban, Americans Now Only Being Spied On By Pentagon, Google, Facebook, Apple, Samsung, Doorbell, Toaster | Babylon Bee

Article Image

U.S. — The general public was finally able to breathe a sigh of relief this weekend due to knowing that, with the TikTok ban, Americans were now only being spied on by the Pentagon, Google, Facebook, Apple, Samsung, their doorbells, and toasters.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ban on TikTok that was poised to take effect soon, which would officially shut down the social media platform that had been widely criticized as being a tool for surveillance and data collection by the Chinese Communist Party, leaving just every other major tech corporation, government entity, and smart household device to spy on American citizens at all times.

“One spying tool down, only 78 left to go,” said Derek Johnson of New Braunfels, Texas. “It’s great to finally not have to worry about TikTok providing China with a continual stream of data and information from within the United States. That’s going to make a huge difference. With TikTok out of the way, we just have to deal with being spied on by our own government, every other social media platform, the electronic devices we use, and probably our refrigerators.”

Other citizens were relieved to know that China would now simply have to purchase secret information about Americans from the shadowy world organizations that were still collecting it through every other product, item, and aspect of people’s lives. “We’re all safer now without TikTok,” said Thomas Kimmel of Kansas City, Missouri. “Now, the only danger comes from the people we elect and everything in our homes and pockets.”

At publishing time, the U.S. government was reportedly setting its sights on suspicion of spying by smart toothbrushes.


Meet John Larson, a paraplegic firefighter who is breaking barriers with the LAFD.

Hear his inspiring story!

https://babylonbee.com/news/with-tiktok-ban-americans-now-only-being-spied-on-by-pentagon-google-facebook-apple-samsung-doorbell-toaster/

The Promises and Perils of AI and Our Posthuman Future | CultureWatch

Key thoughts on where we are heading:

As science and technology march inevitably further on, what we find is always a mixed bag. New developments and discoveries and inventions can be a real Godsend, making life so much better, easier and more efficient. Of course many of these same things can be used for great evil as well, and it is always a balancing act in trying to pursue the good while restraining the bad.

Christians are not to be Luddites when it comes to new technologies, but neither are they to be gullible and unaware. In a fallen world almost everything can be used for good or ill. And given how AI is not some stand-alone thing, but is too often part of much bigger and scarier agendas, such as those of the transhumanist and posthumanist activists, great care is needed.

Artificial intelligence, along with so many related matters, be it robotics, genetic engineering, new digital technologies and so on, are developing far more rapidly than our ability to properly assess them morally, socially and spiritually. The many benefits and goods of all this can easily be outweighed by the many dangers and risks.

So Christians especially need to think carefully and prayerfully about our posthuman future. If some believers might be far too critical, others can be far too gullible and unaware of the brave new world implications found here. One social media friend for example made this comment when I was discussing these matters:

“Should we fear AI like Christian leaders have in the past? I think it will be a race to take advantage of it’s potential. With it we can translate the Bible without little effort to all the languages of the world. Communist and Muslim nations will not be able to stop the flow of information to their people. This is great potential to spark a global Christian Great Awakening.” I replied to him as follows:

AI is FAR more than about Bible translation of course. The Christian is called to be a biblical realist, fully aware of sin, power and corruption. Sure, some technologies can be used for good, but we dare not be naïve here. The transhumanists and posthumanists are fully committed to their dystopian vision. Go back and reread The Abolition of Man by Lewis, or any of the 40 books I discuss in the comment below.

That annotated reading list is found here: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2025/01/17/what-to-read-on-ai-transhumanism-and-the-new-digital-technologies/

In this article I want to quote from just five of those volumes, demonstrating that some of those most involved in these areas are very much concerned about where things are heading. Refer back to my reading list for full bibliographic details of these books.

One volume, The Coming Wave, is penned by someone with a long history in this field. Mustafa Suleyman is currently the CEO of Microsoft AI. Early on in this important book he says this:

AI has been climbing the ladder of cognitive abilities for decades. And it now looks set to reach human-level performance across a very wide range of tasks within the next three years. That is a big claim, but if I’m even close to right, the implications are truly profound. What had, when we founded DeepMind, felt quixotic has become not just plausible but seemingly inevitable.

From the start, it was clear to me that AI would be a powerful tool for extraordinary good but, like most forms of power, one fraught with immense dangers and ethical dilemmas, too. I have long worried about not just the consequences of advancing AI but where the entire technological ecosystem was heading. Beyond AI, a wider revolution was underway, with AI feeding a powerful, emerging generation of genetic technologies and robotics. Further progress in one area accelerates the others in a chaotic and cross-catalyzing process beyond anyone’s direct control. It was clear that if we or others were successful in replicating human intelligence, this wasn’t just profitable business as usual but a seismic shift for humanity, inaugurating an era when unprecedented opportunities would be matched by unprecedented risks.

As the technology has progressed over the years, my concerns have grown. What if the wave is a tsunami? (p. 9)

For three decades Stuart Russell has been a leading figure in AI science. In Human Compatible: AI and the Problem of Control he asks a number of hard but crucial questions. In the book’s Afterword he writes:

Meeting a criterion such as generating “true and accurate” content does not, of course, guarantee that the system is completely safe. For example, a sufficiently capable system could be entirely truthful about its ineluctable plan to take control of the world. What we really need, of course, are systems that are provably safe and beneficial to humans, as outlined in this book. Unfortunately, the AI safety research community (which includes my own research group) has not moved nearly fast enough to develop an alternative technology path that is both safe and highly capable.

There is now broad recognition among governments that AI safety research is a high priority, and some observers have suggested the creation of an international research organization, comparable to CERN in particle physics, to focus resources and talent on this problem. This organization would be a natural complement to the international regulatory body suggested by British prime minister Rishi Sunak.

Despite the torrent of activity around Al regulation, almost no attention has been paid to the Dr. Evil problem mentioned in Chapter 10—the possibility that bad actors will deliberately deploy highly capable but unsafe AI systems for their own ends, leading to a potential loss of human control on a global scale. The prevalence of open-source Al technology will make this increasingly likely; moreover, policing the spread of software seems to be essentially impossible. (p. 320)

Mo Gawdat, the former chief business officer of Google [X] said this in Scary Smart:

It is predicted that by the year 2029, which is relatively just around the corner, machine intelligence will break out of specific tasks and into general intelligence. By then, there will be machines that are smarter than humans, full stop. Those machines will not only become smarter, they will know more (as they have access to the entire internet as their memory pool) and they will communicate between each other better, thus enhancing their knowledge. Think about it: when you or I have an accident driving a car, you or I learn, but when a self-driving car makes a mistake, all self-driving cars learn. Every single one of them, including the ones that have not yet been ‘born’.

By 2049, probably in our lifetimes and surely in those of the next generation, AI is predicted to be a billion times smarter (in everything) than the smartest human. To put this into perspective, your intelligence, in comparison to that machine, will be comparable to the intelligence of a fly in comparison to Einstein. We call that moment singularity. Singularity is the moment beyond which we can no longer see, we can no longer forecast. It is the moment beyond which we cannot predict how AI will behave because our current perception and trajectories will no longer apply.

Now the question becomes: how do you convince this superbeing that there is actually no point squashing a fly? I mean, we humans, collectively or individually, so far seem to have failed to grasp that simple concept, using our abundant intelligence. When our artificially intelligent (currently infant) supermachines become teenagers, will they become superheroes or supervillains? Good question, huh?

When such superpower is unleashed, anything can happen…. (pp. 7-8)

Image of Masters or Slaves?: AI And The Future Of Humanity
Masters or Slaves?: AI And The Future Of Humanity by Peckham, Jeremy (Author)

Scientist Jeremy Peckham has been involved in AI for some thirty years, and he offers this warning in Masters or Slaves? AI and the Future of Humanity:

While there’s a push towards creating ‘trustworthy AI’, even going as far as having product markings and standards approvals, I believe that this is dangerous because it doesn’t address the core effects on humanity. It focuses on important but subsidiary issues such as data bias and transparency. In essence many AI applications are just opaque algorithms, trained on a vast amount of data. As we’ve seen, this data could be skewed, and now the probability of input data machines matching this database was reached cannot be known. We cannot think of AI in the same way that we might think about constructing a safe or trustworthy bridge for traffic to cross, because in bridge design the engineering principles are well understood, verifiable and transparent.

The issue that we face as a civilization isn’t whether AI is or can ever be made trustworthy, but how we can use it wisely, given its limitations in the way it shapes us. (p. 214)

Finally, James Barrat in Our Final Invention makes this rather ominous remark:

In writing this book I spoke with scientists who create artificial intelligence for robotics, Internet search, data mining, face recognition, and other applications. I spoke with scientists trying to create human-level artificial intelligence, which will have countless applications, and will fundamentally alter our existence (if it doesn’t end it first). I spoke with chief technology officers of Al companies and the technical advisors for classified Department of Defense initiatives. Every one of these people was convinced that in the future all the important decisions governing the lives of humans will be made by machines or humans whose intelligence is augmented by machines. When? Many think this will take place within their lifetimes….

But artificial intelligence brings computers to life and turns them into something else. If it’s inevitable that machines will make our decisions, then when will the machines get this power, and will they get it with our compliance? How will they gain control, and how quickly? These are questions I’ve addressed in this book….

I’m not the first to propose that we’re on a collision course. Our species is going to mortally struggle with this problem. This book explores the plausibility of losing control of our future to machines that won’t necessarily hate us, but that will develop unexpected behaviors as they attain high levels of the most unpredictable and powerful force in the universe, levels that we cannot ourselves reach, and behaviors that probably won’t be compatible with our survival. A force so unstable and mysterious, nature achieved it in full just once—intelligence. (pp. 3-5)

The words of these experts need to be carefully considered. And lest some claim that I am just quoting from religious worry warts, as far as I know, only Peckham of the five considered here is a Christian. So plenty of non-Christian or non-religious thinkers and players in this field are sharing very real concerns about our posthuman future.

We need to heed their warnings.

[1783 words]

The post The Promises and Perils of AI and Our Posthuman Future appeared first on CultureWatch.

What to Read on AI, Transhumanism, and the New Digital Technologies | CultureWatch

We need to be aware of the AI and posthumanist revolutions:

Christians of all people should be keeping an eye on new developments, trends and changes in society. They need to offer a prophetic and biblical critique. The area of artificial intelligence (AI) and related issues is a clear case in point. Two years ago I posted an article featuring 22 of the top books on these issues: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2023/02/27/top-22-books-on-transhumanism-ai-and-the-new-technologies/      

But this is one major growth area, with new advances happening every day. Books on this are pouring off the presses, so I have updated my list. Here then are 40 books, mostly, but not exclusively, penned by Christians.

Older works

Ellul, Jacques, The Technological Society. Alfred A. Knopf, 1964.
An important earlier critique of the technological world we are now living in, warning that “technique,” efficiency, automation and the like are threatening what it means to be human.

Groothuis, Douglas, The Soul in Cyberspace. Baker, 1997.
This was one of the earlier evangelical appraisals of, and warnings about, the new information technologies, cyberspace and the like. Although dated by now, it still offers plenty of useful discussion of the dangers of the god of technology, and the impact on our humanity.

Lewis, C. S., The Abolition of Man. Macmillan, 1947, 1976.
The volume was certainly prophetic in its warning about scientism and our scientific elites and technocrats who can easily control the masses with their visions for a brave new world. A must read volume, along with his 1945 work of fiction, That Hideous Strength.

Postman, Neil, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. Vintage, 1993.
The deification of technology is the focus here. Following on from Ellul and others, he warns that technique and technology are replacing or undermining things like culture, art, beauty and human relationships.

Image of Dark Aeon: Transhumanism and the War Against Humanity
Dark Aeon: Transhumanism and the War Against Humanity by Allen, Joe (Author), Bannon, Stephen K. (Foreword)

Newer volumes

Allen, Joe, Dark Aeon: Transhumanism and the War Against Humanity. War Room Books, 2023.
Probably one of the best books so far, offering a careful, detailed, comprehensive and well-written assessment of AI and the transhumanist project, warning how we need to really apply some brakes to all this. He offers helpful philosophical, theological and ethical considerations.

Barrat, James, Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era. Quercus, 2013, 2023.
If one simply compares the Preface to the original version to this one ten years on, one will find that the concerns and worries Barrat had have only greatly intensified. The AI juggernaut shows no signs of slowing, and the trajectory it is on is looking quite frightening.

Brooks, Ed and Pete Nicholas, Virtually Human: Flourishing in a Digital World. IVP, 2015.
This volume looks more at how the Christian should think about our changing technological world, and how we can maintain a biblical view of life and the human person in light of all these changes.

Bryant, John, Beyond Human? Science and the Changing Face of Humanity. Lion, 2013.
This somewhat older book discusses how changes in science and technology are resulting in changes to humanity. He looks at various issues, including genetics, medical developments, information and communication technologies, and transhumanism. A helpful assessment by a Christian ethicist and biologist.

Driscoll, Stephen, Made in Our Image: God, Artificial Intelligence and You. Matthias Media, 2024.
The Australian writer seeks to apply biblical principles to the changing face of AI and related issues. The technological, social and personal changes being unleashed must be carefully assessed in light of Scripture.

Dyer, John, From the Garden to the City: The Place of Technology in the Story of God, rev. ed. Kregel, 2011, 2022.
In this second edition of his earlier work, the theology professor and web designer looks at the new technologies and their negative and positive features in terms of the overall biblical story line, and how they impact on what it means to be human.

Fesko, John, The Christian and Technology. Evangelical Press, 2020.
A brief look at six technological advances and their positive and negative impacts: screens, social media, cars, books, virtual reality and the internet. A short but helpful volume.

Gawdat, Mo, Scary Smart: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and How You Can Save Our World. Bluebird, 2021, 2022.
The former Google business officer thinks AI can go awry, but he optimistically hopes we can steer it in the right direction. Whether this rather upbeat view of how things will ultimately pan out remains to be seen.

Gay, Craig, Modern Technology and the Human Future: A Christian Appraisal. IVP, 2018.
This is a quite detailed examination of how the new technologies are shaping our world and what it means to be human. A very helpful biblical assessment of where we are headed and how we can try to keep things in check.

Godde, Sandra, Reaching for Immortality: Can Science Cheat Death? A Christian Response to Transhumanism. Wipf & Stock, 2022.
A quite brief but useful look at how the Christian should think about the transhumanism agenda. See my full length review of this helpful volume here: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2022/10/26/a-review-of-reaching-for-immortality-by-sandra-godde/

Herrick, James, Visions of Technological Transcendence: Human Enhancement and the Rhetoric of the Future. Parlor Press, 2017.
Belief in progress, the betterment of mankind, and human immortality has always been with us. Breakthroughs in biotechnology and computer sciences are making it a reality, but at what cost? Herrick offers a useful historical, scientific, philosophical and theological assessment – and warning – of this quest,

Herzfeld, Noreen, The Artifice of Intelligence: Divine and Human Relationship in a Robotic Age. Augsburg/Fortress Press, 2023.
Offers a theological and philosophical look at AI, drawing on Karl Barth and others. Numerous issues are discussed, ranging from procreation to just war theory. At times she is a bit speculative: She wonders for example if the Spirit of God can inhabit machines as he does humans.

Lennox, John, 2084: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of HumanityZondervan, 2020.
As always, Lennox offers a carefully argued and useful look at how Christians can think about the age they live in – in this case, the age of AI and transhumanism. An incisive, well-documented and helpful volume by the English mathematician and apologist.

Lennox, John, 2084 and the AI Revolution: How Artificial Intelligence Informs Our Future, Updated and Expanded Edition. Zondervan, 2024.
A substantially revised and enlarged update on his earlier volume. Very helpful indeed. See my review here: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2024/12/10/john-lennox-on-ai/

Miller, Julie, Critiquing Transhumanism: The Human Cost of Pursuing Techno-Utopia. Public Philosophy Press, 2022.
In this important volume the Christian apologist and philosopher offers a thorough critique of transhumanism and our brave new future. She sounds the alarm as to where this is taking us, and insists on a solid biblical response to all this. Very useful.

Peckham, Jeremy, Masters or Slaves? AI and the Future of Humanity. IVP, 2021.
Having spent some 25 years working in the world of AI, Peckham brings a lot of experience and insight to bear on how the Christian should think about and make use of these new developments. A helpful and challenging work.

Rana, Fazale with Kenneth Samples, Humans 2.0: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Perspectives on TranshumanismReasons to Believe, 2019.
The authors, with backgrounds in biochemistry, theology and philosophy offer a detailed examination of where technology is taking us. They look at scientific and ethical matters, and assess things from a biblical framework. Many bases are covered here – a recommended volume.

Reinke, Tony, God, Technology and the Christian Life. Crossway, 2022.
A lengthy and detailed examination of technology and how the Christian should approach it. A helpful and quite thorough work offering useful biblical assessment of the technological revolution.

Rose Michael, The Art of Being Human: What “Old Books” Can Tell Us (And Warn Us) About Living in the 21st Century. Angelico, 2022.
This volume takes a rather different approach when dealing with issues such as transhumanism, the devaluation of persons, the new technologies, genetic engineering, and the like. He assesses the writings of people like George Orwell, Ray Bradbury, C. S. Lewis, Jonathan Swift, Aldous Huxley, John Le Carre, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and others as he seeks to show how we can preserve the person and protect human rights from where we are heading.

Rosen, Christine, The Extinction of Experience: Being Human in a Disembodied WorldW. W. Norton, 2024.
Admittedly, this book talks the least about things like AI and transhumanism, but it perhaps talks the most – of all the volumes listed here – about important matters that relate to all this, such as personhood, what it means to be human, and how we can recover what we are so quickly losing.

Rubin, Charles, Eclipse of Man: Human Extinction and the Meaning of Progress. Encounter Books, 2014.
The transhumanist/posthumanist agenda is not the path to a better, more glorious future, but a certain road to our ruin. The ideal of seeking the perfectibility of man has always had devastating results, and the new technologies will ensure that such utopian dreams will simply become dystopian nightmares. A very important and engaging look at our uncertain future.

Russell, Stuart, Human Compatible: AI and the Problem of Control. Penguin, 2019, 2023.
Who controls the controllers? Who decides how the AI revolution proceeds. Can we ever put the genie back in the bottle? Russell, a long-standing AI scientist, says we can gain from AI, but we can also lose everything, so great care is needed.

Scott, Dan, Faith in an Age of AI: Christianity Through the Looking Glass of Artificial Intelligence. Eleison, 2023.
This is more of a broad-brush look at things, not just AI in particular. Drawing upon the wisdom of past and present thinkers. Scott provides a bigger picture of how we can assess where our culture is heading.

Shatzer, Jacob, Transhumanism and the Image of God: Today’s Technology and the Future of Christian Discipleship. IVP, 2019.
The American theologian examines the various new technologies and warns how so many of them are having a very real and negative impact on what it means to be a human. He utilises the biblical view of humanity and personhood to assess how and where we are heading to a posthuman future.

Song, Felicia Wu, Restless Devices: Recovering Personhood, Presence and Place in the Digital Age. IVP, 2021.
Here the Christian cultural sociologist looks at how the new digital technologies are changing the world and us along with it. She shows how this new digital revolution is being driven, and offers practical help in how we can utilise them without being seduced and enslaved by them.

Spencer, Nick and Hannah Waite, Playing God: Science, Religion and the Future of Humanity. SPCK, 2024.
Specific matters such as AI is just one of a number of issues covered in this book, as the authors look at how science and Christianity can cohere. The authors take a much more optimistic and positive view of where all these technologies are heading.

Suleyman, Mustafa, The Coming Wave: AI, Power and Our Future. Vintage, 2023.
The artificial and biological intelligences are without doubt drastically reshaping our future, but they must be contained and controlled now before they spiral out of control. A very learned, wise, and wide-ranging look at the new technologies and how they must be reined in before it is too late.

Tegmark, Max, Life 3.0. Penguin, 2017, 2018.
An important and detailed look at how life is being radically altered in the AI and AGI age. He covers quite a bit of ground here and offers a number of prospects for how the future might unfold. What eventually occurs in large measure depends on what sort of future we want, and even there we find plenty of disagreement. This volume offers helpful analysis and insight.

Thacker, Jason, The Age of AI. Zondervan, 2020.
The Christian thinker and ethicist assesses information technologies and artificial intelligence, looking at how they impact on so many areas, including work, medicine and our families. These things are tools that can be quite useful if used properly, but can also be very harmful as well. Care is needed as we chart an uncertain future.

Thacker, Jason, Following Jesus in a Digital Age. B&H, 2022.
This is a short, useful and practical book on how Christians can live fully human and fully God-honouring lives in this new age of technology.

Wood, Patrick, The Evil Twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism. Coherent Pub., 2022.
A strong warning about how the technocrats and groups like the World Economic Forum are using the new technologies for decidedly evil ends. He discusses Gates, Schwab, Harari and others, and looks at the sinister designs they have on the rest of humanity.

Wright, John, Transhuman and Subhuman: Essays on Science Fiction and Awful Truth. Wisecraft, 2019.
Science fiction writers have long been at the forefront of warning us about how dangerous many of the trends are in the new technologies and the like. Wright is no different, and in this collection of essays he certainly sounds the alarm, contrasting the biblical view with that of the humanists and transhumanists.

Various views

Cole-Turner, Ronald, ed., Transhumanism and Transcendence: Christian Hope in an Age of Technological EnhancementGeorgetown University Press, 2011.
In this somewhat earlier collection of essays a dozen experts weigh in on the pros and cons of technological enhancement in the light of Christian concerns. Some of the writers here offer a more positive take on these issues, while others offer a more negative appraisal.

Peters, Ted, ed., AI and IA: Utopia or Extinction. ATF Press, 2019.
The nine essays featured here look at the ethical and theological implications of AI and related matters. Like the above volume, the views range from rather optimistic to those who are rather pessimistic about where things are heading.

Thacker, Jason, ed., The Digital Public Square: Christian Ethics in a Technological Society. B&H, 2023.
Here 13 Christian authors look at a number of issues from a range of perspectives. Topics include free speech and censorship, misinformation and the social media, pornography, hate speech and related topics.

Wyatt, John and Stephen Williams, eds., The Robot Will See You Now: Artificial Intelligence and the Christian Faith. SPCK, 2021.
A number of authors look at a range of issues, including AI, robotics, personhood, surveillance capitalism, technology and the future, all assessed from historical, philosophical and theological perspectives.

Most recommended

In my view, some of the better ones (because they seem the most concerned about where things are heading), include those by Allen, Gay, Herrick, Lennox, Miller, Peckham, Ruben, Russell, Suleyman and Tegmark.

[2391 words]

The post What to Read on AI, Transhumanism, and the New Digital Technologies appeared first on CultureWatch.