There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true. —Soren Kierkegaard. "…truth is true even if nobody believes it, and falsehood is false even if everybody believes it. That is why truth does not yield to opinion, fashion, numbers, office, or sincerity–it is simply true and that is the end of it" – Os Guinness, Time for Truth, pg.39. “He that takes truth for his guide, and duty for his end, may safely trust to God’s providence to lead him aright.” – Blaise Pascal. "There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily" – George Washington letter to Edmund Randolph — 1795. We live in a “post-truth” world. According to the dictionary, “post-truth” means, “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.” Simply put, we now live in a culture that seems to value experience and emotion more than truth. Truth will never go away no matter how hard one might wish. Going beyond the MSM idealogical opinion/bias and their low information tabloid reality show news with a distractional superficial focus on entertainment, sensationalism, emotionalism and activist reporting – this blogs goal is to, in some small way, put a plug in the broken dam of truth and save as many as possible from the consequences—temporal and eternal. "The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it." – George Orwell “There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” ― Soren Kierkegaard
Photo Illustration by Pavlo Gonchar/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
For years, conservatives, independent doctors, and outlets like The Gateway Pundit were smeared as “conspiracy theorists” for warning that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines carried real risks, especially for young men. Big Tech censored. Corporate media mocked. “Fake-checkers” silenced dissent.
Now, five years too late, Stanford University researchers, funded by the National Institutes of Health, have finally published a study confirming what we’ve been saying all along: mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can trigger myocarditis through a specific, identifiable biological mechanism.
In a study published December 10 in Science Translational Medicine, scientists from Stanford Medicine detail how mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can cause inflammatory heart damage in some recipients, particularly young men and adolescent males.
The research identifies a two-step immune cascade triggered by the vaccines:
Macrophages, first-responder immune cells, are activated by the mRNA shots and release high levels of a cytokine called CXCL10.
This, in turn, stimulates T cells to release IFN-gamma, another inflammatory cytokine.
Together, these two immune signals ignite inflammation that directly injures heart muscle cells, elevates cardiac troponin levels (a clinical marker of heart damage), and leads to myocarditis.
Stanford now confirms:
Myocarditis can occur within 1–3 days of vaccination
Elevated cardiac troponin levels confirm real heart muscle injury
Risk increases after the second dose
Incidence peaks in males under 30
According to the study:
About 1 in 140,000 develop myocarditis after the first dose
About 1 in 32,000 after the second dose
Among young males, the rate rises to 1 in 16,750
Stanford researchers didn’t stop at data analysis. They:
Vaccinated young male mice and observed elevated troponin levels
Found macrophage and neutrophil infiltration into heart tissue
Replicated the damage using human cardiac spheroids—lab-grown heart-like tissue that beats rhythmically
When exposed to vaccine-stimulated immune signals, the cardiac tissue showed:
Reduced beating strength
Impaired heart function
Elevated markers of cellular stress
Blocking CXCL10 and IFN-gamma dramatically reduced the damage — proving causation, not coincidence.
Despite the findings, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute Director Dr. Joseph Wu still dutifully recited the official talking points, insisting the vaccines were “extremely safe” and did a “tremendous job” mitigating COVID.
“Without these vaccines, more people would have gotten sick, more people would have had severe effects and more people would have died,” he said.
But even Wu conceded:
Severe cases can lead to hospitalization
Some require ICU care
Deaths, while rare, do occur
Those are facts that were aggressively downplayed, if not outright denied, while millions were coerced into vaccination under threat of job loss, school exclusion, or social ostracization.
Wu’s team identified genistein, a soy-derived compound with estrogen-like anti-inflammatory properties, as a potential protective agent.
Pre-treating cells and animals with genistein significantly reduced vaccine-induced cardiac damage.
Wu and his colleagues conducted a series of experiments closely paralleling those described above, pre-treating cells, cardiac spheres and mice (the latter by oral administration of large quantities) with genistein. Doing this prevented much of the deleterious effects of mRNA vaccines or the CXCL10/IFN-gamma combo to heart cells and tissue.
The genistein Wu and his associates used was purer and more concentrated than the dietary supplement found in health food stores.
“It’s reasonable to believe that the mRNA-vaccine-induced inflammatory response may extend to other organs,” Wu said. “We and others have seen some evidence of this in lung, liver and kidney. It’s possible that genistein may also reverse these changes.”
Elevated inflammatory cytokine signaling could be a class effect of mRNA vaccines. Notably, IFN-gamma signaling is a fundamental defense mechanism against foreign DNA and RNA molecules, including viral nucleic acids, Wu said.
“Your body needs these cytokines to ward off viruses. It’s essential to immune response but can become toxic in large amounts,” he said. IFN-gamma secreted in large amounts, however lofty its purpose, can trigger myocarditis-like symptoms and degradation of structural heart muscle proteins.
That risk probably extends beyond mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines.
“Other vaccines can cause myocarditis and inflammatory problems, but the symptoms tend to be more diffuse,” Wu said. “Plus, mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines’ risks have received intense public scrutiny and media coverage. If you get chest pains from a COVID vaccine you go to the hospital to get checked out, and if the serum troponin is positive, then you get diagnosed with myocarditis. If you get achy muscles or joints from a flu vaccine, you just blow it off.”
Pfizer is back in the spotlight, rolling out trial results that claim its new mRNA influenza vaccine outperforms the standard flu shot. The headlines trumpet “better efficacy,” as if we’ve all forgotten the last three years. But FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary says it’s a non-starter, “The trial showed zero benefit” for seniors.” Approval denied.
Pfizer rolled out a press release highlighting very carefully framed numbers. They say this new shot reduced flu cases more than the conventional vaccine. What they don’t discuss with the same enthusiasm is that they’re using the exact same COVID-19 mRNA platform that triggered adverse-event warnings that are still being debated today. Who would believe a word they say? Not the new FDA.
We learned a lot during COVID, and most of it didn’t come from official talking points. Pfizer’s own early submissions showed declining protection within months and a spike in myocarditis and pericarditis—especially in young males. People who never had cardiac issues before suddenly found themselves navigating symptoms they didn’t expect. Even the FDA eventually added warnings to the label. And yet here we are again, being told that the same mRNA delivery system has now produced a superior flu shot.
They want you to focus on the percentage improvements, not the risks. They want you to forget that “safe and effective” turned into “waning efficacy and unforeseen complications.” They want you to act like none of it happened. But facts are stubborn things, and memories—especially painful ones—tend to stick.
Pfizer insists side effects from this new flu shot are “consistent” with its prior mRNA vaccines. That alone should set off alarms. Consistent with what? The platform associated with heart inflammation, blood clots, miscarriages, infertility? The protection that collapses over time? The trial data that treated serious adverse events as unfortunate footnotes?
Americans aren’t anti-science. They’re anti-being-sold-something-twice. After COVID, who in their right mind takes Pfizer’s self-reported success at face value?
If the company wants credibility, it should lead with long-term safety data, transparent adverse-event reporting, and real-world durability. What we’re getting instead is selective storytelling wrapped in marketing optimism, hoping you don’t notice the fine print repeating itself. Hats off to the FDA for not buying it this time. This is exactly how these drug companies bamboozle people into really bad health decisions with irreputable side effects.
We all need discernment. You don’t have to be a scientist to apply common sense. If a company’s last blockbuster vaccine came with unresolved questions, diminishing returns, and documented risks, then any product built on that same blueprint deserves serious scrutiny.
The moral here is simple: don’t let déjà vu turn into deception.
Ephesians 5:6 first says, “Let no one deceive you with empty words.”
Pfizer may believe the public has a short memory, but a whole lot of people are living with reminders that say otherwise.
Demand honesty. Demand full data. Demand accountability from corporations that expect blind trust after earning the opposite because being fooled again is, say it with me…Stupidocrisy.
President Donald Trump has signed a presidential memorandum ordering a sweeping review of the U.S. childhood immunization schedule.
The directive, issued late Friday night, mandates that top health officials evaluate vaccine guidelines against those of peer developed nations, with a view to align American policy with the “best available science and common sense.”
In his announcement, Trump decried the current U.S. schedule as a national outlier, with “far more than is necessary” required for healthy children.
“Today, the CDC Vaccine Committee made a very good decision to END their Hepatitis B Vaccine Recommendation for babies, the vast majority of whom are at NO RISK of Hepatitis B, a disease that is mostly transmitted sexually, or through dirty needles.
The American Childhood Vaccine Schedule long required 72 “jabs,” for perfectly healthy babies, far more than any other Country in the World, and far more than is necessary.
In fact, it is ridiculous! Many parents and scientists have been questioning the efficacy of this “schedule,” as have I!
That is why I have just signed a Presidential Memorandum directing the Department of Health and Human Services to “FAST TRACK” a comprehensive evaluation of Vaccine Schedules from other Countries around the World, and better align the U.S. Vaccine Schedule, so it is finally rooted in the Gold Standard of Science and COMMON SENSE!
I am fully confident Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and the CDC, will get this done, quickly and correctly, for our Nation’s Children. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAHA!”
According to the memo, the number of vaccines recommended for all children in 2025 stands at 18 diseases, including COVID-19, a total unmatched by comparable countries.
“Peer, developed countries recommend fewer childhood vaccinations — Denmark recommends vaccinations for just 10 diseases with serious morbidity or mortality risks; Japan recommends vaccinations for 14 diseases; and Germany recommends vaccinations for 15 diseases.
Other current United States childhood vaccine recommendations also depart from policies in the majority of developed countries. Study is warranted to ensure that Americans are receiving the best, scientifically-supported medical advice in the world.
I hereby direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to review best practices from peer, developed countries for core childhood vaccination recommendations — vaccines recommended for all children — and the scientific evidence that informs those best practices, and, if they determine that those best practices are superior to current domestic recommendations, update the United States core childhood vaccine schedule to align with such scientific evidence and best practices from peer, developed countries while preserving access to vaccines currently available to Americans.”
The move comes on the heels of a decision by a newly re-constituted vaccine advisory panel to rescind universal newborn vaccination for Hepatitis B.
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices approved a measure removing the universal hepatitis B vaccination guideline for infants under two months old.
Today, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted in favor of removing the universal hepatitis B vaccine recommendation for infants under 2 months old. pic.twitter.com/xWGH4EQ7go
According to Nicolas Hulscher, Epidemiologist and Administrator at the McCullough Foundation, “‘If adults won’t go for the shots, then give them to babies.’ This was the real reason behind the pharma-captured ACIP adding the Hepatitis B shot to the newborn schedule — as revealed by The New York Times in 1991. Big Pharma targets the babies when consenting adults refuse.”
“If adults won’t go for the shots, then give them to babies.”
This was the real reason behind the pharma-captured ACIP adding the Hepatitis B shot to the newborn schedule — as revealed by The New York Times in 1991.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will present data linking COVID-19 vaccines to the deaths of dozens of children.
According to several media reports, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) will meet Thursday and Friday to review and recommend several vaccines, including this fall’s updated Covid shots.
The FDA is basing its claim on data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a public database run jointly by the FDA and CDC.
The reports come after FDA Commissioner Marty Makary told CNN last week that the agency is investigating reports of healthy children dying after receiving Covid vaccines.
“We’ve been looking into the VAERS database of self-reports that there have been children that have died from the Covid vaccine,” Makary said.
“We’re going to release a report in the coming few weeks and we’re going to let people know. We’re doing an intense investigation.”
In France, the Covid shot is only recommended for people over age 80 and high-risk. In the UK, it's age 75 and high-risk.
Beware of medical elites claiming absolute consensus when in fact the U.S. has been an international outlier. pic.twitter.com/04FAo8SsED
Meanwhile, Department for Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon told The Washington Post that any recommendations will be backed by “gold standard” scientific research.
“FDA and CDC staff routinely analyze VAERS and other safety monitoring data, and those reviews are being shared publicly through the established ACIP process,” he said.
“Any recommendations on updated COVID-19 vaccines will be based on gold standard science and deliberated transparently at ACIP next week.”
The Gateway Pundit led the way in reporting on the adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccines, which Democratic politicians tried to force on millions of people against their will.
While millions of law-abiding adults were threatened with or ended up losing their livelihoods over their refusal to take the jabs, many leftists wanted to go even further by forcing them on healthy children.
Many countries including the United Kingdom have since banned children under the age of five from taking the jab because of the risk of adverse side effects.
However, it took until May this year for the Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to follow suit in the U.S. by ending all COVID vaccination recommendations for otherwise healthy children, teenagers and pregnant women.
Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet is president and CEO of Truth for Health Foundation. Since February 2020, she has been part of the team of frontline physicians treating COVID early at home. With Dr. Peter McCullough, she is a co-author/editor of the Guide to COVID Early Treatment: Options to Stay Out of Hospital and Save Your Life. She is a past director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. She received her M.D. degree and internship in Internal Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School and completed special training at Johns Hopkins. She spoke as an independent physician, not as a spokesperson for any healthcare system, pharmaceutical company, insurance plan or political party. She is a patient advocate.
Discussion began by looking at President Trump who was demanding answers from the pharmaceutical companies related to the COVID shots. He indicated that the CDC is being ripped apart over the question of the shots and he wants an answer as to whether the drug companies can justify the success of the various COVID drugs because there are those who disagree.
Elizabeth referred to a Trump post on Truth Social from Labor Day where he claimed he was given secret data by the pharmaceutical companies showing benefits. Such data was not released to the public.
She believes President Trump was “horribly deceived by the deep state players,” all who had been involved in the planning of “Operation Warp Speed” before we had ever heard of COVID and before President Trump was in office. In other words, the president was not the architect of this operation. She believes Anthony Fauci indicated that in 2017. Also, in 2017 at Davos, there was a PowerPoint presented by Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab that outlined the plan for pharma profits from the new, experimental vaccines based upon mRNA technology.
Elizabeth believes that President Trump knew all along that he was being deceived yet was not in a position to take on the deep state, the vaccine cartel and the other nefarious players that had been crafting this plan.
Other items talked about include R.F.K Jr. and his contentious hearing on the health of the nation, the firing of the CDC director, direct-to-consumer ads for medications, the flu vaccine and more.
This article originally appeared on vigilantfox.com and was republished with permission.
In 2016, Dr. Marcus Zervos agreed to the unthinkable: test the vaccinated against the unvaccinated.
Convinced it would prove vaccines safe, he vowed to publish the results no matter what.
Those results never saw the light of day—until now.
Here’s what the buried study revealed.
Meet Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health in Detroit. He’s as pro-vaccine as they come.
In 2016, he crossed paths with health freedom journalist Del Bigtree, who urged him to take on something public health had avoided for decades: a study comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
Dr. Zervos agreed to run the study, determined to prove Bigtree and other vaccine skeptics wrong. At the time, he vowed, “Whatever the results, they get published.”
In early 2020, Bigtree and team received a copy of the study. It was a retrospective vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparison, examining the long-term health outcomes of 18,468 subjects.
Its title was “Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study.”
Here’s what the results revealed:
Vaccinated children were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis than the unvaccinated.
They also had a sixfold increase in acute and chronic ear infections.
Speech disorders were 4.47 times higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated.
Meanwhile, the unvaccinated cohort showed zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.
“This is devastating.”
Attorney Aaron Siri of ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) notes that this study should have been “rushed to publication on an emergency basis.”
But that didn’t happen.
Why? Because publishing this would have ruined Zervos’ career.
As Siri testified at a Senate vaccine hearing on Tuesday, the overall findings showed that “after 10 years, 17% of unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while 57% of vaccinated children had at least one.”
That’s a more than threefold increase in the risk of chronic health conditions among the vaccinated.
Why? Because publishing this would have ruined Zervos’ career.
As Siri testified at a Senate vaccine hearing on Tuesday, the findings showed that “after 10 years, 17% of unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while 57% of vaccinated children had at least one.”
“The only real problem with this study,” Siri stated, “is that its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe. Had it found vaccinated children were healthier, it no doubt would have been published immediately. But because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.”
Huge credit goes to Del Bigtree, The Highwire, Attorney Aaron Siri, and others for 1) convincing Dr. Zervos to conduct this study and 2) bringing it to light.
The full documentary, titled An Inconvenient Study, is slated for release on October 3.
Attorney Aaron Siri testifies before the U.S. Senate, exposing a buried study showing vaccinated children face skyrocketing chronic illness compared to their unvaccinated peers.
Attorney Aaron Siri, managing partner at Siri & Glimstad LLP, dropped a nuclear truth bomb on the vaccine establishment, exposing how the government, medical elites, and Big Pharma buried damning data proving vaccinated children face far higher rates of chronic illness than their unvaccinated peers.
Siri testified that none of the clinical trials relied upon to license routine childhood vaccines on the CDC’s schedule ever proved the products safe before licensure due to glaring design flaws.
Worse, post-licensure monitoring is riddled with manipulation and “a priori” assumptions that vaccines are inherently safe, effectively corrupting the entire scientific process.
According to Siri, a team of respected researchers at Henry Ford Health in Detroit, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, Division Head of Infectious Disease, undertook a massive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated birth cohort study involving 18,468 children enrolled between 2000 and 2016.
The results were devastating to the vaccine establishment:
Vaccinated children were 3.03 times more likely to develop allergic diseases.
4.29 times more likely to develop asthma.
5.53 times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental disorders — including speech disorders and developmental delays.
5.96 times more likely to develop autoimmune diseases.
Not a single case of ADHD, learning disability, or tics was found among the unvaccinated, while hundreds of cases existed among the vaccinated cohort
By age 10, only 43% of vaccinated children remained free of chronic disease — compared to 83% of unvaccinated children
Despite the study being well-designed and internally validated, the researchers refused to publish it, fearing career destruction. Dr. Lois Lamerato admitted she “did not want to make doctors uncomfortable,” while Dr. Zervos feared losing his job.
Siri blasted this blatant cover-up, warning that if the results had shown vaccines improving health outcomes, the study would have been published immediately. Instead, because the findings threatened the pharmaceutical-government alliance, the study was buried, leaving parents in the dark.
Siri: The following is from a table in the study titled, “Incidence of Chronic Health Conditions Stratified by Vaccine Exposure Status” and reflects the number of instances (denoted as “N”) and the rate (denoted as “Incidence per 1,000,000 pt-yrs”) of a given medical condition for each group. The rate is critical because there were more children in the exposed (16,511 children) than the unexposed group (1,957 children).
Also, note that some of the unvaccinated children have some of the listed chronic health conditions and hence, other environmental insults, aside from vaccines, can certainly cause these conditions.
Finally, note that for many of the conditions, there were many cases in the vaccinated group but none in the unvaccinated group.
When that happened, an “[i]ncident rate ratios could not be calculated … since all cases occurred in the group exposed to vaccination and no cases occurred in the unexposed group.”
The reason it cannot be calculated is because division breaks down when one value is zero. For example, while there were 262 cases of ADHD in the vaccinated group, there were zero in the unvaccinated group. Hence, an IRR could not be calculated for this condition.
As you can see from this table, for many conditions, the incidence and rate among the vaccinated is far greater than among the unvaccinated. For many others, no rate could be calculated because, as discussed above, there wasn’t a single instance of that condition among the unvaccinated.
Democrat Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) tried to pull a cheap stunt to discredit Siri, sneering at his lack of a medical degree.
The exchange backfired spectacularly, causing the audience to erupt in applause at Siri’s response.
Sen. Blumenthal: “We’ve been talking about medical issues. You’re not a medical doctor, are you?”
Aaron Siri: “No, sir.”
Blumenthal: “You’re not an immunologist or biologist or any—”
Aaron Siri: “Or vaccinologist… No. But I depose them regularly, including the world’s leading ones with regards to the vaccines. I have to make my claims based on actual evidence. When I go to court with regards to vaccines, I don’t get to rely on titles.”
Blumenthal: “Okay… But you’re not a doctor.”
Aaron Siri: “No. Actually, I prefer not to be a doctor because I prefer to rely on the evidence, not slogans like we’ve been hearing.”
Blumenthal: “Okay.”
WATCH:
Sen. Blumenthal burnt by the hot molten lava 🔥
Sen. Blumenthal tries to discredit Aaron Siri, but @AaronSiriSG absolutely nails him:
"No [I'm not a Doctor] but I depose them regularly, including the worlds leading ones with regards to the vaccines and I have to make my claims… pic.twitter.com/C58qlA1fSm
The FDA announced the removal of the Emergency Use Authorization of the COVID vaccine. The FDA and Pfizer knew of serious safety signals before the Emergency Use Authorization.
Pfizer’s own early safety review, the “5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of BNT162b2” dated February 2021, catalogued more than 42,000 adverse event reports with nearly 160,000 individual events in just the first three months.
Pfizer concluded that none of these “were consequential enough” to hold back approval. The FDA went along with it. Now, with independent science repeatedly confirming risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and waning effectiveness, there is action.
The slogan “safe and effective” became the government’s mantra, repeated endlessly while concerns were dismissed as fringe. Yet large-scale studies now show otherwise.
The Lancet published evidence of elevated myocarditis risk in young men. Nature Communications confirmed that even the dosing interval influenced heart inflammation outcomes.
Multiple NEJM and JAMA reports documented that protection against infection dropped below 20% after just six months.
This is not a profile of safety or effectiveness; it is a failed medical product. To continue marketing it under false pretenses while evidence piles up is a dereliction of duty by both regulators and pharmaceutical executives who cashed in at the expense of public health.
Worse yet, Pfizer and federal agencies had the data in hand. Their confidential February 2021 report detailed tens of thousands of adverse events across multiple organ systems. Yet they waved it away as inconsequential.
Independent researchers, re-analyzing the same trial data, later found a 3.7-fold increase in cardiovascular deaths among the vaccinated compared to placebo. Other peer-reviewed papers have confirmed pregnancy complications, menstrual irregularities, and disproportionate cardiac risks in young males.
These are not side effects “rare enough to ignore.” They are red-flag signals that should have stopped the rollout in its tracks. Instead, Americans became unwitting subjects in a massive, uncontrolled experiment. Even those who earnestly researched before getting the shot were acting off of severely flawed information.
With former skeptics now leading efforts to phase out the vaccine, the writing is on the wall. But why just a partial ban? Every additional day this is allowed means more people exposed to risks that government officials and corporate leaders knew about from the start.
The Pfizer website to this day downplays the side effects of its COVID shot and says that health concerns are rare.
Paul’s warning in Galatians 6:7 comes to mind: “Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap.”
We have reaped disastrous results from the sowing of deceptive seeds. It’s time to reap honesty, not deception; transparency, not concealment.
While the FDA move is in the right direction, the COVID vaccine should be banned sooner rather than later. Anything less just prolongs the, say it with me…Stupidocrisy.
Sources
5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of BNT162b2. (Feb 2021) PDF
(DCNF)—Republican Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin stumped CNN host Kasie Hunt on Thursday after she defended vaccines for children and he asked if she knew the difference between the number of vaccines given to children in 1980 compared to 2025.
During a Senate Finance Committee hearing the same day, Democrats tore into Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. because he questioned certain vaccines for children. Some called for his resignation. While discussing the hearing on “The Arena,” Hunt asked Mullin if he believes more children could get sick if they don’t follow the recommended vaccine regimen, adding that his state requires six different vaccines for kids to attend school.
Mullin responded by asking Hunt if she knew how many vaccines are administered to children “all the way through before they go to school, college.” Hunt said that Kennedy’s “answer would be about 76,” before adding that the HHS estimate is somewhat obscured.
“And what was it in 1980?” Mullin asked.
“Sir, I, this is, I don’t know, because I didn’t vaccinate kids in 1980!” Hunt said. “I’m doing it now, so I know the vaccine’s coming out.”
During the 1980s, children were recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to receive an estimated eight to 10 doses covering about six to seven diseases before entering school. However, under the current 2025 CDC schedule, children are expected to receive over 30 doses to cover more than 16 diseases.
“And I would just like to clarify that 76 is misleading,” Hunt said. “It is used by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., but it counts up the number of times there are, say, three courses for MMR, right? You need three shots over the years to get vaccinated for MMR. So when you count them all up, it’s 76. But it’s misleading because the number of diseases that you’re vaccinating against is closer to 20.”
“OK, well, let’s just use, is it being effective?” Mullin asked. “Because … if we’re looking at 76 percent of the population now has chronic illness, one out of every 10 kids today have autism. What is it? Are we healthier as a nation or are we not?”
Hunt continued to press the Republican senator, asking why the issue had resurfaced. Mullin responded that while it’s unclear if vaccines are the root cause of autism, Kennedy is simply questioning the science.
Hunt then asked Mullin if he’s willing to “risk kids dying of measles,” prompting him to say that Republicans are not “anti-vaccination for measles.”
“More kids have died of measles in this country this year than, you know, in decades,” Hunt said.
“Well, if you want to get into that, we can talk about the openness of the southern border and what caused that. Because you had an inflation [of] over 20 million people that came over illegally underneath the Biden administration that wasn’t vaccinated,” Mullin said. “We’re not talking about measles outbreaks from kids that were born and raised here inside the United States. We’re talking about ones that were brought over here illegally. And you can make that connection. No one can argue that.”
During his hearing, Kennedy outlined the CDC’s “disastrous” failures regarding their “nonsensical policies” during the COVID-19 shutdown, which included the closure of small businesses, schools shutting down for nearly two years and masking policies, even for children.
The CDC has faced major public backlash over its recommendations and handling of COVID-19, particularly regarding vaccines. In 2022, the agency presented a pre-print study to its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) warning of COVID-19 risks to children, though the data was widely considered misleading. Despite the flawed study, the ACIP voted to recommend the COVID-19 vaccine for children aged six months through four years.
(Featured Image Media Credit: Screenshot/CNN/”The Arena with Kasie Hunt”)
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
For years, Americans were told their only hope was to roll up their sleeves for Pfizer, Moderna, and the rest of the vaccine cartel.
Trillions of dollars flowed into their coffers while dissenting doctors were silenced, families were divided, and countless workers lost their jobs under vaccine mandates.
However, a peer-reviewed study out of Germany now shows that a cheap, decades-old nasal spray, azelastine, may do what the so-called ‘miracle’ experimental COVID jabs never accomplished: stop infection.
According to new findings published in JAMA Internal Medicine this week, all it may have taken to block infections was a $10 bottle of over-the-counter nasal spray used for seasonal allergies.
Researchers at Saarland University Hospital in Germany ran a phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on 450 healthy adults between March 2023 and July 2024.
Participants were randomly divided into two groups:
227 volunteers received azelastine nasal spray (a common antihistamine used for allergies) three times a day.
223 volunteers got a placebo spray.
All participants were tested for COVID twice per week for nearly two months.
The difference was undeniable:
Infections in the placebo group: 15 out of 223 people (6.7%) caught COVID.
Infections in the azelastine group: Only 5 out of 227 people (2.2%) got infected.
That’s a 67% reduction in risk of infection. The odds ratio came out to 0.31 (95% CI, 0.11–0.87; P = .02), meaning the nasal spray cut the likelihood of catching COVID by more than two-thirds, statistically significant.
Not only were fewer people infected, but those who did get sick had longer protection before infection (31 days on average versus 19 days in the placebo group) and shorter illness duration when measured by rapid tests (3.4 days vs 5.1 days).
The spray didn’t just block COVID. It also:
Cut symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections from 6.3% (placebo) down to 1.8%.
Reduced rhinovirus (common cold) infections from 6.3% to 1.8%.
Slashed the overall number of PCR-confirmed infections (COVID + other respiratory viruses) from 22% in placebo to 9.3% with azelastine.
Compare that to the COVID shots: expensive, rushed, mandated, and now known to have diminishing efficacy against new variants and side effects. The vaccines were pitched as our salvation but couldn’t stop infection or transmission.
Yet a cheap generic nasal spray, already FDA-approved for allergies, outperformed them in a head-to-head prevention trial.
And it comes with minimal side effects. Most complaints were mild: bitter taste, nosebleeds, or tiredness. No serious adverse events were linked to the spray
The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) has obtained new documents through a Department of Defense (DoD) request for proposal revealing the U.S. military’s funding of a controversial self-spreading vaccine program known as DARPA INTERCEPT.
The documents reveal, say ICAN, that the animal trials were a success and that the next step of development is to inject terminally-ill humans next.
ICAN reports that Autonomous Therapeutics, a biotech company, has already published results showing successful tests of its self-spreading vaccines in monkeys. Their stated goal is to build “synthetic immune systems.”
FOIA Revelations on “Tiny Trojan Horses”
Last year, ICAN drew public attention to U.S. government studies on self-spreading vaccines. Now, ICAN attorneys have uncovered fresh details showing that DARPA’s INTERCEPT program funded the development of ‘therapeutic interfering particles’ (TIPs). These are engineered viruses designed to act as “tiny Trojan horses” that carry genetic material from person to person.
The FOIA records show that the INTERCEPT program planned not only to create these spreading particles, but also to build computer models to predict how TIPs could move from a single cell to an entire population.
Documents reveal a 2016 DoD request for proposal calling for a “biological system for replicating ‘human-like conditions’” to study the evolutionary dynamics of mutating pathogens and diseases. This contract was awarded to Autonomous Therapeutics, co-founded by Ariel and Leor Weinberger.
Leor Weinberger has published research testing TIPs engineered for HIV on rhesus monkeys. He is now pursuing plans to inject TIPs into terminally ill HIV patients. ICAN warns that such genetic payloads could integrate permanently into patients’ DNA and could possibly spread beyond the intended clinical trial population.
ICAN says it is taking legal action to ensure these technologies are never deployed without consent. The organization has sued the federal government over grants and contracts to Autonomous Therapeutics and has filed a FOIA request for all INTERCEPT program reports.
ICAN is urging public awareness and continued scrutiny of what it calls “deeply concerning” research. The group warns that the line between medical treatment and uncontrolled biological release is being dangerously blurred.
Self-spreading vaccines have been discussed for many years. The first published scientific proposals for self-disseminating vaccines appeared in veterinary medicine journals in the 1980s. The original idea was to control wildlife diseases by releasing a transmissible virus that had been engineered to carry immunity to a specific pathogen.
Around the mid-2010s, U.S. and European defense research agencies began funding modeling studies on self-spreading vaccines for human pathogens. DARPA’s INTERCEPT program, launched circa 2016, represents one of the more well-known U.S. military efforts in this area.
The controversy around ‘self spreading’ vaccines comes from the fact that once released into a population, they cannot be controlled as to where the vaccine goes, who it reaches, or how it behaves. This goes against long-established public health principles that medical interventions require informed consent and dose control.
As well, an added layer of concern is the continued development of mRNA vaccines, which have the potential affect to change the DNA of those who are repeatedly exposed to the vaccine. If exposure is repeated over many transmissions, this could lead to permanent genetic changes in human cells. Mutations could also, easily, create a different effect than originally intended and cause permanent genetic damage to a population.
The Informed Consent Action Network is a nonprofit organization based in Austin, Texas that positions itself as a legal watchdog and transparency advocate in the realm of biomedical research. ICAN’s mission is using legal action and FOIA requests to uncover and challenge controversial government programs.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the Trump administration has formally updated the safety labeling on all mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to reflect what many Americans have been warning about for years: a disturbingly high risk of myocarditis—particularly in young men—and the possibility of long-term, irreversible heart damage.
The revised warnings apply to both Pfizer’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax vaccines and follow months of mounting pressure over transparency and accountability regarding the true risks of these experimental injections.
The update stems from new studies and data showing persistent cardiac abnormalities months after vaccination—especially among males aged 12 to 24.
During a presentation of the new FDA safety data on Tuesday, Dr. Vinay Prasad, Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, walked the public through the harrowing evidence behind the label change.
Prasad detailed how FDA data reveals a myocarditis rate of 27 per million in young men—a figure that experts say is significantly underreported due to passive surveillance methods and political suppression of adverse event reports.
More troubling, Dr. Prasad cited late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac MRIs as proof of sustained, potentially irreversible myocardial injury. According to Prasad, in one FDA-funded study, 60% of patients who suffered post-vaccine myocarditis still showed signs of LGE five months later.
WATCH:
🚨 Dr. Vinay Prasad announces an updated FDA safety label for mRNA COVID vaccines “based on persistent and concerning cardiac MR findings” pic.twitter.com/tRqFeIsuk5
After denying and downplaying the risks for years, the FDA is now requiring both Pfizer and Moderna to update their Prescribing Information, Adverse Reactions sections, and Fact Sheets for patients and caregivers.
FDA has required and approved updates to the Prescribing Information for Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) manufactured by Pfizer Inc. and Spikevax (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) manufactured ModernaTX, Inc. to include new safety information about the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
Specifically, FDA has required each manufacturer to update the warning about the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis to include information about
the estimated unadjusted incidence of myocarditis and/or pericarditis following administration of the 2023-2024 Formula of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and
the results of a study that collected information on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cardiac MRI) in people who developed myocarditis after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.
FDA also required each manufacturer to describe the new safety information in the Adverse Reactions section of the Prescribing Information and in the Information for Recipients and Caregivers.
The Fact Sheets for Healthcare Providers and for Recipients and Caregivers for Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19, which are authorized for emergency use in individuals 6 months through 11 years of age, have also been updated to include the new safety information in alignment with the Comirnaty and Spikevax Prescribing Information and Information for Recipients and Caregivers.
You can watch the full 15-minute presentation below:
Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet is president and CEO of Truth for Health Foundation. Since February 2020, she has been part of the team of frontline physicians treating COVID early at home. With Dr. Peter McCullough, she is a co-author/editor of the Guide to COVID Early Treatment: Options to Stay Out of Hospital and Save Your Life. She’s a past director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. She received her M.D. degree and internship in Internal Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School and completed special training at Johns Hopkins. She spoke on this Crosstalk as an independent physician, not as a spokesperson for any healthcare system, pharmaceutical company, insurance plans or political party. She is a patient advocate.
Jim noted that today Senator Ron Johnson held a hearing and released 2,400 pages of records detailing the failure of federal health agencies, under the Biden administration, to properly warn the public about the risk of myocarditis-related heart inflammation conditions following the mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations. Dr. Vliet responded by indicating how unconscionable it was that our taxpayer dollars were going to federal agencies that were lying to us and allowing people to die as a result of their push of this experimental, gene-therapy shot.
This is the first salvo in a program that looks at other troubling news coming forth concerning the COVID-19 shots. For example, Dr. Vliet commented on the following:
A peer reviewed study in Pediatric Rheumatology indicates that children and adolescents who received at least one COVID-19 shot had a 23% higher risk of developing autoimmune disease compared to unvaccinated children.
Scientists at Johns Hopkins University confirm that COVID vaccines are reducing human population by lowering birth rates.
A senior medical advisor at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, who is also a world-renowned virologist, is warning that the mRNA vaccines are a dangerous experiment as he raises alarms about the presence of the cancer-causing SV-40 enhancer in the injections. He contends that the SV-40 enhancer is amplifying genes that can turn the bodies of those vaccinated into tumor factories.
A rise in white fibrous clots being seen by embalmers in deceased individuals. What’s this all about?
The House Judiciary Committee, led by Republicans, has accused Pfizer of engaging in a massive scandal related to the COVID-19 vaccine trial data, alleging that the company deliberately delayed results to influence the 2020 presidential election.
Get caught up on the latest concerning the COVID vaccines with Jim and Dr. Vliet, and hear what listeners had to say as well, on this edition of Crosstalk.
This article originally appeared on vigilantfox.com and was republished with permission.
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden left Tucker Carlson visibly shaken after dropping a chilling COVID-19 vaccine statistic that’s impacting millions of children right now.
Before her appearance on Carlson’s show, Dr. Bowden, a Texas-based ENT specialist, rose to prominence in the medical freedom movement by speaking out against vaccine mandates and advocating for early treatment options like ivermectin.
She gained national attention after she was suspended by Houston Methodist Hospital for challenging the prevailing COVID narrative.
Despite the backlash, Bowden has remained committed to the Hippocratic Oath, successfully treating an impressive total of over 6,000 COVID patients without a single death.
Before Tucker became visibly disturbed, Dr. Bowden pointed to data from the CDC’s VAERS system, explaining that over 38,000 deaths have been reported following the rollout of the so-called COVID-19 vaccines.
She said that under normal circumstances, such numbers would’ve prompted the FDA to pull the shots.
Instead, they pushed forward, adding the COVID vaccine to the routine childhood schedule, with the expectation that babies receive three doses by just nine months of age.
She added that the shots are still under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for children under 12—not fully FDA approved—and yet they remain on the official vaccine schedule.
Tucker was horrified when Dr. Bowden mentioned a disturbing fact: “According to the CDC, 9 million American children have gotten the latest version of these COVID shots,” she said.
Clearly caught off guard, Carlson asked, “Actually?”
“Yes,” Bowden confirmed.
“Still?” he pressed.
“Yes. Yes. 9 million [kids]—12% [of US children have been injected].”
Tucker, in disbelief, asked, “Wait, this is going on right now?”
“Yes,” Bowden replied.
“I think we voted against this,” Tucker said.
“Yeah,” Bowden confirmed.
“Correct?” Tucker stressed.
“I don’t know,” Dr. Bowden answered.
“You’re very diplomatic, but I’m just stunned to learn that that’s happening right now,” Tucker exclaimed.
“Could this be shut down?” he asked.
“It should have been shut down a long time ago,” Dr. Bowden answered. “And you know, what’s the—”
Tucker interrupted: “9 million babies have had COVID shots?”
“Yeah. Well, children. Minors,” Dr. Bowden clarified.
Tucker’s reaction at the end says it all:
WATCH – Dr. Mary Talley Bowden STUNS Tucker Carlson
— McCullough Foundation (@McCulloughFund) April 2, 2025
The conversation took another dark turn when Carlson asked about the potential long-term consequences of these shots, to which Dr. Bowden pointed to a disturbing trend.
“I don’t see a ton of cancer in my practice,” she said, “but I do have friends at MD Anderson, and they said they’ve never seen anything like it. The young people coming in with very advanced tumors, I think that’s what we have to be worried about now.”
She explained that getting updated cancer data is difficult, but the anecdotal reports are piling up. “It’s hard to get up-to-date cancer numbers, but I’m hearing all sorts of things. There are probably people who have access to that data, but publicly, it’s hard [to get access].”
"I don't see a ton of cancer in my practice, but I do have friends at MD Anderson, and they said they've never seen anything like it. The young people coming in with very advanced tumors, I think that's what we have to be worried about now."
This raises a profound question we must now consider as a society: What have we done?
In our rush to vaccinate every man, woman, and child, have we compromised the long-term health of a population that never needed these shots in the first place?
What data was ignored? If so, who made decisions to ignore that data, and will they ever answer for the consequences? It’s time for a serious conversation about accountability.
Five years after the greatest crime in American history, the only people who’ve been punished are the ones who told the truth about Covid. Dr. Mary Talley Bowden is one of them.
0:00 Dr. Mary Talley Bowden Was Right All Along 6:19 The Origin of the Government’s Propaganda… pic.twitter.com/5ITW3HsrA3
One of these grenades was DNA contamination in the mRNAs — a topic that has thus far failed to penetrate the mainstream awareness bubble.
While independent scientists and media have been publishing news of excessive synthetic DNA contamination being detected in the mRNA shots since Boston-based genomics scientist Kevin McKernan first discovered it in early 2023, legacy media has ignored the issue, except for occasional articles brushing aside scientific findings as ‘anti-vax conspiracy theories.’
Most people who took the mRNA shots still have no idea that the vaccines contain plasmid DNA contamination and, in the case of the Pfizer vaccine, that the product they took is not even the same as the one that was tested in the landmark Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT).
Now, millions of listeners worldwide have been introduced to the topic.
The undisputed king of podcasting, Rogan has an audience of a whopping 14.5 million listeners on Spotify, 19.6 million subscribers on YouTube, 19.7 million followers on Instagram and 15.2 million on X.
The Dr Humphries episode had over a million views on YouTube on its first day. So when Dr Humphries told Rogan, “You’re one of the cracks in the matrix here, quite frankly,” she was not wrong.
Dr Suzanne Humphries on the Joe Rogan Experience, episode #2294
Bait and Switch
During a wide-ranging discussion covering everything from polio, to vaccine propaganda, to SV40, to vaccines and autism, to the multitude of risks of the Covid shots, Rogan asked Dr Humphries about the ‘bait and switch’, whereby Pfizer tested one vaccine product in its RCT, then changed its production process for the mass vaccine rollout.
Rogan: “All the things you said about the Covid vaccine I’m sure are correct and true, but isn’t it also different to the one they used in the test?”
Dr Humphries: “Yes. The vaccine that was produced for the general public, at least when it comes to Pfizer, they used magnetic beads for purification which was totally different to what they did for the one they gave to us.
“And they produced it using… they didn’t use plasmids and they didn’t use all these different components that were given to us.
“There were two aspects of the test vaccine that were very different — it was the production, and how they purified it.”
This is exactly right.
As highlighted by Dr Josh Guetzkow and Professor Retsef Levi in a rapid response in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) in July 2022, Pfizer used one method (Process 1) to manufacture its RCT vaccine, but switched to a different method (Process 2) to scale-up production for the mass rollout.
As Dr Guetzkow has since explained, when dealing with highly complex biological medical products, “the process is the product.”
Almost all of the 43,448 participants in Pfizer’s RCT received the Process 1 vaccine, while only 252 participants in the trial received the Process 2 vaccine, meaning that the vaccine doses administered to billions of people around the world were never tested at scale before being approved for use. No further safety data on the Process 2 product was ever provided to regulators.
“The differences include changes to the DNA template used to transcribe the RNA and the purification phase, as well as the manufacturing process of the lipid nanoparticles,” wrote Dr Guetzkow and Prof Levi.
Process 1 used In Vitro Transcription of synthetic DNA to make the spike-producing mRNA and a ‘clean,’ high-quality filtration process, as described by Dr Humphries.
Process 2, however, involves growing DNA plasmids in E. coli bacteria, from which the vaccine mRNA is then produced. The filtration is done with an enzyme that chops the leftover plasmids into tiny pieces, which are then supposed to be filtered out.
It is this manufacturing process, used by both Pfizer and Moderna, that has resulted in DNA contamination at levels far above the regulatory limit being found in an increasing number of mRNA vaccine vials around the world, including in an FDA lab, and most recently reported for vials from Ireland and from Slovakia (the full formal write up for both studies has yet to be released).
Verifications of mRNA vaccine DNA contamination to the end of 2024. Source.
In the Pfizer vaccine (but not Moderna), a genetic sequence called the SV40 enhancer-promoter has been detected, also there as a result of the switch to Process 2. This gene therapy sequence is known for its ability to drag material into the nucleus of cells, something that Covid vaccine components are not supposed to be able to do.
The potential implications of the DNA contamination arising from Process 2 are risks of genomic instability, cancers, immune system disruption, and adverse hereditary effects, warn leading scientists, doctors and academics.
Dr Humphries went on to add that the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) encasing the DNA contamination effectively deliver this material straight into recipient cells, contrary to the promise that it would “never get past the deltoid and will be disintegrated in there.” [Note: Dr Humphries used the term lipopolysaccharide at first to refer to E. coli endotoxin resulting from Process 2, but I believe, based on the context, when she moved on to describing materials shuttling into cells, she muddled the terms and actually meant LNPs.]
Revelations
During the episode, Kevin McKernan (Anandamide) also got a mention for his discovery of the SV40 enhancer-promoter sequence in the Pfizer vaccine, which the pharma giant did not disclose to drug regulators during the approvals process.
Regulators have since confirmed that the Pfizer vaccine does indeed contain the SV40 sequence, but maintain that it is non-functional, despite admissions made in internal emails between staff of Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) that it can, in fact, “promote nuclear transport of DNA,” which could give rise to genomic integration (which can in turn give rise to cancer).
Hopefully, the prospect of millions of Rogan’s followers hearing about DNA contamination in the mRNAs and that the Process 2 vaccine wasn’t even tested before being given to them will afford the opportunity for sober reflection and future informed consent.
The intent is not to scare the bejesus out of people, but to provide them with the information that they have a right to know. As McKernan likes to say, the stress hormone cortisol is not good for your health either.
The ‘crack in the matrix’ on this issue is welcome after long-held media silence on DNA contamination in the mRNAs and its implications for those who have taken (or are still taking) them.
Discussing the media blackout on a swathe of vaccine-safety concerns, Dr Humphries raised a 1984 publication by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the federal register relating to standards for polio vaccines, which states that:
“… any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives.”
Indeed, the idea that suppression of “well-founded” doubts about vaccine safety in the interest of maintaining public confidence in public health programs appears to be the prevailing sentiment among regulators and their media henchmen to this day (with the exception of a handful of limited hangouts).
Interested readers can find out more about efforts to raise awareness of the DNA contamination in Covid mRNA vaccines in this recent press release sent to over 2,000 media contacts across the US, Europe, the UK, and Australia calling attention to a citizen petition filed with the FDA to revoke the mRNAs.
Note: I have not fact-checked every claim made by Dr Humphries over the course of the two-and-a-half-hour interview. On the topics I am well-versed in, I found her to be broadly accurate.
Barbara Loe Fisher is president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), a non-profit charity she co-founded with parents of DPT vaccine injured children in 1982. NVIC is a national, grassroots movement and public information campaign to institute vaccine safety reforms and informed consent protections in the public health system. She has researched, analyzed and publicly articulated the major issues involving the science, policy, law, ethics and politics of vaccination to become one of the world’s leading non-medical, consumer advocacy experts on the subject.
It’s been said that we had eradicated measles by the year 2000, yet to listen to the legacy media, you’d think that was never the case as now measles is making headlines all over America. For example, Barbara began by noting the over 300 cases of measles that were reported in 15 states on March 13th, the majority of which were in Texas. There were two deaths, one confirmed as a school age unvaccinated child in Texas and one adult in New Mexico, the latter of which is still under investigation. We’re told that 95% of the cases are children or adults that aren’t vaccinated or have an unknown vaccination status.
What’s critical to this discussion involves a major report Barbara did in 2019 when measles outbreaks were being reported in the New York City area. This report deals with the history of measles and measles vaccines in America. It’s called: The Science and Politics of Eradicating Measles.
The report goes back in time to show that during the 1960’s, the two doctors that were responsible for coordinating smallpox eradication campaigns described measles as, “…a self limiting infection of short duration, moderate severity and low fatality that has maintained a remarkably stable, biological balance over the centuries.”
So why the dire warnings today concerning measles when so many from generations past got measles yet it was never a leading cause of death in America? Barbara helps answer that question on this broadcast that also takes a look at vaccines and autism, there’s discussion on the latest concerning the bird flu and mRNA technology, the influenza vaccine, vaccine news out of Iowa, comments from listeners and more.
A combat veteran and federal whistleblower continues to advocate for veterans harmed by former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s tyrannical enforcement of the 2021 COVID-19 shot mandate.
In a recent article for The Gateway Pundit, Sonny Fleeman described how a “fraudulent” standard operating procedure note within the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxic (PACT) Act denies vaccines and medications from being considered under the Toxic Exposure Risk Activity (TERA) provision of the act. The PACT Act provides compensation for veterans exposed to toxic substances like burn pits and hazardous chemicals.
Considering the number of adverse side effects he revealed through VA claims, Fleeman is greatly concerned about the VA’s decision to knowingly downplay what the data confirms as it relates to the COVID-19 shot in service members and veterans.
As a result of his efforts to expose the truth, several people have contacted the author of Fleeman’s previous article to inquire whether the VA Secretary has the authority to change the TERA standard operating procedure to allow the harm caused by the once-mandated COVID-19 shot to be included under the PACT Act without congressional action.
The Gateway Pundit reached out to Fleeman to find the answer. Emphasizing that the views and opinions expressed in this article are solely his own and do not reflect the official policies, positions, or views of the VA, the United States Government, or any organization or employer, current or former, with which he is or has been affiliated, the combat vet whistleblower simply replied, “yes.”
He explained, “The VA Secretary does have the legal authority to recognize COVID-19 vaccines as a toxic exposure risk activity, TERA, through a policy change—without the need for congressional approval.”
“Under 38 U.S.C. § 1710(e)(4)(C),” Fleeman pointed out that “a toxic exposure risk activity is defined as either an event recorded in an exposure tracking system or any exposure that the Secretary determines qualifies as ‘reasonably prudent’ to protect veterans’ health.” For Fleeman, “It is reasonably prudent for the VA Secretary to remove this policy because the COVID-19 injections were a mandated exposure, making them an occupational risk by definition.”
“Since this law gives the Secretary full discretion,” he argued, “they could designate COVID-19 vaccines as a toxic exposure risk if they determine it is necessary for veteran health protection.”
The VA already concedes TERA for environmental and chemical exposures based on potential health risks, not just proven harm. Given the documented toxic mechanisms of lipid nanoparticles, spike protein, and DNA contamination, Fleeman said, it is both rational and necessary to recognize these injections under TERA. “Denying this designation is an arbitrary policy choice, not a scientific or legal one,” he asserted.
“At a minimum, veterans who were required to take these shots deserve the same opportunity for medical review and benefits consideration as those exposed to other toxic substances.” The exclusion of vaccines and medications from being considered toxic exposures is nothing more than “fraudulent,” Fleeman argued.
“It’s a procedural directive, not statutory law, meaning the Secretary has the authority to modify or remove it at any time,” Fleeman shared. “If the standard operating procedure were revised,” he said, “vaccine administration could then be examined under 38 CFR § 3.303(a), which requires that exposure claims align with the places, types, and circumstances of a veteran’s service.”
A simple revision would require the VA to recognize COVID-19 injections as a toxic exposure risk activity under the existing framework, forcing claims processors to consider them as a potential cause of service-connected disabilities—even in cases where they were not explicitly claimed, he explained.
“Thus,” according to Fleeman, “the only barrier preventing COVID-19 pseudo vaccines from being classified as a toxic exposure risk activity is the VA’s own policy, which the Secretary has full authority to change,” he said.
The question remains: Will VA Secretary Doug Collins acknowledge the need to recognize COVID-19 injections as a toxic exposure risk activity?
Historical records estimate that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima in 1945 killed at least 140,000 people. This catastrophic event changed the way the world viewed war and its consequences.
During the Covid-19 pandemic, physical bombs were not dropped, but the death toll from the vaccines has far surpassed that of Hiroshima, the city that bore the brunt of widespread nuclear devastation.
Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, an epidemiologist for the McCullough Foundation, made the association between nuclear bombs and Covid-19 vaccines for one simple reason–“the substantial data linking them to a catastrophic number of deaths.”
Hulscher has cited many research studies and databases which document the evidence that the Covid-19 injections have caused significant death and injuries worldwide. The list can be found here.
The Evidence is Overwhelming
He stresses, “There’s already enough evidence, there is now thousands upon thousands of peer reviewed manuscripts indexed in the National Library of Medicine that demonstrate harms from these injections. There are three facets that have been fulfilled and these include, number one excess mortality. There are 12 studies now and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) that demonstrate these injections do in fact increase your risk of death, reduce life expectancy, and contribute to excess mortality among populations worldwide. We also have DNA contamination– this is confirmed worldwide across multiple manufacturers, multiple batches, and all these researchers use different methods, so it strengthens these findings even more. And then we have this negative efficacy–the vaccines don’t work, they increase your risk of infection. Clearly these shots have been demonstrated to be dangerous, ineffective and they need to be removed off the market.”
Hulscher writes, “COVID-19 vaccine death acknowledgment by federal agencies may mirror the same path as finally declaring smoking harmful in 1964 after years of claiming cigarettes to be healthy.”
Even though clear safety signals have been seen in the VAERS system, as well as the CDC’S V-Safe data, these agencies continue to hide the truth from the public. Just recently, after two years of FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests and lawsuits from ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network), the FDA finally released data that reveals “a long list of adverse events that far surpassed FDA’s standard alert threshold.”
World’s Largest Covid-19 Vaccine Safety Study Shows Safety Signals
In early 2024, the largest Covid-19 vaccine safety study ever conducted was published in the journal Vaccine. Results confirmed that Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA injections and AstraZeneca’s adenoviral vector shots, are not safe. The study, involving up to 99 million vaccinated people, was led by researchers from the Global Covid Vaccine Safety Project based out of New Zealand and received funding from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Scientists in the study “calculated post-vaccination rates of neurological, cardiovascular and other outcomes occurring up to 42 days after the shots and compared them to background rates before the pandemic.” Data was collected and analyzed from Covid vaccinations given December 2020 through August 2023 across ten sites in Denmark, France, Canada, Argentina, Australia, Finland, Scotland and New Zealand.
Children’s Health Defense reported, “Myocarditis and pericarditis risks were significantly elevated after both mRNA vaccines and were seen across the first three doses. The highest risks were after the second Moderna vaccine dose—a 6.1 times increase in risk — and for pericarditis after the third dose of AstraZeneca—a 6.91 times increased risk…acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, or swelling in the brain, was 3.78 times more likely after the first Moderna dose. Researchers found a 2.49 times higher-than-expected occurrence of Guillain-Barré syndrome following the initial dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine. Cases of CVST (cerebral venous sinus thrombosis), which can lead to strokes, increased by 3.23 times after the first AstraZeneca dose.”
Though the results showed clear safety signals, it stands to reason that all possible adverse events could not have been documented because the cut-off date of 42 days post-injection is “unrealistic for all of the adverse events considered, especially cardiac conditions which appear primarily after physical exertion.”
Safety Signals are a Big Deal
Researchers in the study, funded by the CDC and HHS, maintain that adverse events are rare and pose a small risk, but cardiologist and epidemiologist Peter McCullough states, “As an epidemiologist, I can tell you these are not ‘small’ risks with COVID-19 vaccination. Adverse events were diluted over all age groups and were truncated at 42 days. For large populations, relative risks of 1.2 or greater are important, greater than 2 or 3 are frankly alarming.” McCollough added that under-reporting of adverse events to safety databases must be taken into consideration as well. Oftentimes, doctors, nurses, or people who are injured, fail to fill out a report in the databases that monitor vaccines.
McCullough stresses that the study’s data “fully support” the global withdrawal of all Covid 19 vaccines and boosters. He says, “They are not safe for human use.”
It should be noted that this particular study did not analyze or report on deaths following COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, data from the United States Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) was not included, which documented some of the worst Covid-19 outcomes.
Let the Evidence Speak
The evidence of harm from Covid-19 vaccines cannot be ignored. Public hearings in Washington D.C. have taken place, hosted by Senator Ron Johnson, that clearly document safety issues and devastating injuries. Doctors and whistleblowers continue sharing their stories, hoping that Covid-19 vaccines will no longer be offered, and that the CDC and FDA will be held accountable.
The Brownstone Institute posted an article on January 7, 2025 titled The Trump Administration Must Bring Moderna to Heel, which reported that Moderna withheld vital safety information about adverse events experienced during its trials. One such example included a preschool-aged child who died of “cardio-respiratory arrest” after receiving Moderna’s Covid mRNA vaccine during its clinical trials. “The death of the child only became known because of an obscure European report released last year, which revealed Moderna has known about the death for over two years while it continues to advertise Covid shots to children as young as six months old.”
It’s clear that the Covid-19 vaccines have caused worldwide devastation. There must be a global moratorium on these injections. Many organizations, physicians, and health freedom groups have been working tirelessly to make this a reality.
Accountability Must Happen
Intercessors, we must keep praying that the CDC, the FDA and other health agencies/authorities around the world are made accountable for the deaths and injuries the Covid vaccines have caused. We must also pray that further attempts at creating mRNA vaccines, such as the novel mRNA Bird Flu vaccines, would be halted in their tracks.
Lord Jesus, you are aware of every injury and death that the Covid-19 vaccines have caused. We cry out for justice for those who have been harmed. Please have mercy and help us win this difficult battle.
How are you praying about the mountain of evidence showing injuries and deaths from the Covid vaccines?
Angela Rodriguez is an author, blogger and former teacher who studies the historical and biblical connections between Israel and the United States. You can visit her blogs at 67owls.com and 100trumpets.com. She is also the author of Psalm 91: Under the Wings of Jesus and Hallelujah’sGreatRide. Photo Credit: Elen Sher on Unsplash.
President Trump’s “Stargate” project has come under fire, as many right-wingers are wary of its connection to mRNA vaccines. Should we be worried, or is this fear being blown out of proportion?
From Newsweek. A number of Donald Trump supporters and vaccine skeptics have criticized the president after he talked up multibillion-dollar artificial intelligence infrastructure project, which, it was suggested, could help develop vaccines for cancer. …
When it comes to vaccines, Trump has appeared to find himself between a rock and a hard place. He has faced frequent backlash from his own supporters for expressing support for the COVID-19 vaccine, especially when he praised the Operation Warp Speed initiative he launched during the pandemic, which accelerated vaccine development. …
What To Know
Trump announced a joint venture between OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank, which will be called Stargate, during a press conference on Tuesday. The project, which could cost up to $500 billion, was described by Trump as the “largest AI infrastructure project in history.” …
Stargate will start building data centers and the electricity generation needed for AI development in Texas, according to the White House.
Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison highlighted the potential medical benefits of the investment, stating that AI could be used to detect cancers and customize mRNA vaccines to treat them within 48 hours. …
The AI project has faced backlash from some Trump supporters and vaccine skeptics on social media.
In December 2021, Trump was booed by a section of the crowd after revealing he had received a COVID-19 booster shot while on stage at a speaking event with former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly. …
… Some have been skeptical about mRNA vaccines, which were used for COVID-19 …
What People Are Saying
Trump supporter @sovereignbrah posted on X, formerly Twitter: “Donald Trump will lose his base if he supports more mRNA vaccines. Mark my words.” …
Right-wing political commentator Evan Kilgore posted on X: “The ‘mRNA cancer vaccines’ discussed at Donald Trump’s first press conference tonight were a BIG turn off for a lot of Right-Wingers. The Trump Administration must learn that his base largely DESPISES him for Operation Warp Speed and how heavily experimental vaccines were pushed.” …
What do YOU think of Stargate? Share your thoughts and prayers below.
A recent interview on the Tucker Carlson show, which highlighted the use of aborted fetuses in vaccine research, is going viral. Clips from the interview, featuring medical freedom attorney Aaron Siri, have been circulating through social media, sparking conversations and debate over the unethical practices of researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and government agencies.
“In every single dose of an MMR (Measles Mumps Rubella) shot, there are literally millions of pieces from the cultured cell line of an aborted fetus. In every single injection,” Siri said. “Now, again, that might sound crazy, but I could literally pull up right now the CDC’s own ingredient list for the MMR vaccine.”
How are Aborted Fetal Cells Obtained?
Upon hearing this information, a visibly disturbed Tucker Carlson prompted Siri to elaborate on the process used to procure the cells from the fetuses. Siri explained that all viruses must be grown in cells. The ingredients listed as MRC-5 and WI-38 are cultured cell lines obtained from aborted fetuses. He stresses, however, that in order for a viable vaccine to be developed, the tissues (cells) must be “alive.” He added that those procuring the samples from the aborted babies must “immediately act to make sure the tissues don’t die.”
Stanley Plotkin: The “Godfather of Vaccines”
Siri went on to share information that further shocked Carlson where he described the research of one of the world’s most prominent vaccine experts, Dr. Stanley Plotkin. In 1988, Plotkin developed the standard textbook for vaccines titled Plotkin’s Vaccines. Bill Gates has called his book the “bible for vaccinologists.” Plotkin, who is an atheist, has been quoted as saying that he hopes his book is “more accurate than the Bible.” Plotkin has been a consultant for pharmaceutical companies for decades, offering advice on how to make their products.
In the past, Sirideposed Dr. Plotkin in court, where he testified about how the tissues of aborted fetuses are obtained. The apathetic Plotkin revealed under oath that one of the vaccine studies he presided over included over 70 healthy fetuses, aged three months and older. Body parts of these babies, including the lung, skin, pituitary gland, kidneys, spleen and heart were cut into pieces and then viruses were cultured on them to determine which medium could produce a viable vaccine. At one point, Plotkin snickered when asked if the tongues of the fetuses were used in the experimental study. To this question he responded, “I don’t recall, but probably yes.”
Siri continued, reminding Dr. Plotkin that that was just one experimental study where aborted fetuses were used for research. He asked if more babies were used in other studies. Without emotion, Plotkin stated, “I don’t remember the exact number, but quite a few.”
Siri probed further, inquiring “Are you aware that one of the objections to vaccination by the plaintiff in this case is the inclusion of aborted fetal tissue in the development of vaccines and the fact that it’s part of the ingredients in vaccines?”
Plotkin responded, “I’m aware of those objections.”
Siri fired back, “Do you take issue with religious beliefs?”
Plotkin answered, “Yes.”
Siri reminded Plotkin that he’d been quoted as saying that “Vaccination is always under attack by religious zealots who believe that the will of God includes death and disease.” Without batting an eye, Plotkin declared that he still stood by thar statement.
Experimental Testing on Orphans and the Mentally Disabled
Plotkin’s admissions under oath were sobering. At one point he acknowledged the use of experimental vaccines on orphans and the mentally disabled for testing purposes. Additionally, he testified that he made the following statement in a letter to the editor of ethics on human experimentation: “The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society, or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form, but not in social potential. It may be objected that this question implies a Nazi philosophy, but I do not think that it’s difficult to distinguish non-functioning persons from members of ethnic, racial, economic or other groups.” Plotkin also stated he had used babies of mothers in prison to study experimental vaccines, as well as individuals who were under some form of colonial rule.
Siri explains in his interview with Carlson that when it comes to the development of vaccines, “A lot of times they like to say they only involved a few babies, way back when. So, I have a whole series in these depositions showing it’s not a few babies way back when. It was a lot of babies and it’s still ongoing. And this industry has only grown.” Both Siri and Carlson agree that babies have been sacrificed for health, as the pharma industry profits from abortions and fetal tissue.
Do Not Ignore the Facts
Dr. Theresa Deisher is the president and founder of Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, a 501 (c)3 non-profit organization “with a mission to end human trafficking and exploitation for the purposes of biomedical research and commercial products.” With over 30 years of pharmaceutical research and leadership experience, she is well-educated on how human fetal tissue is used. In the past, she has appeared on shows like The High Wire, speaking about the inhumane way that fetuses are procured and utilized for scientific research.
Dr. Deisher reveals, “What you have are procurement companies, who are working side by side literally with the abortionist, typically right in the building. What happens with the heart is that it will actually go into this contracture, and once that happens, you can’t get good data from it. So, the tissue really becomes useless. It has to be flushed. It has to be put into a preservative that stops the heart within two minutes. The baby has to be born alive, or they’re not going to be able to get the heart and get it rushed and get it in the blocked solution so they can preserve it for processing.”
She adds that when a baby’s heart is cut out, he/she is not given any anesthetic. “I would never do this to a mouse or a rat. I would not be surprised that we might get some hard numbers not in the so distant future that abortions are delayed later and later so that the scientists and the procurement companies can get better late-term tissue.”
Which Vaccines Use Aborted Fetal Cells/Tissue?
Deisher’s website lists the vaccines which utilize aborted fetal materials (human diploid cells). They include the MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella), Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Poliomyelitis (DTaP/TdP), Varicella (Chickenpox), Shingles, Hepatitis A & B, Rabies, and some Coronavirus vaccines. These vaccines contain “human fetal DNA fragments and cellular debris, and in quite high levels.”
On Deisher’s website, it states, “The United States government has known about the dangers of human DNA from aborted fetal cell-lines since at least 2005. They set guidelines which are supposed to keep the DNA at a specific limit, which they hypothesize will not cause cancer. There is no monitoring of vaccines by our government agencies to ensure those limits are adhered to. Vaccines (MMR, Varicella, and Hepatitis A) sent for independent analysis have consistently shown levels of human fetal DNA that are far beyond the ‘established safety limits.’”
Dr. Deisher continues to sound the alarm about using aborted fetuses in medical research. In 2019 she wrote an open letter describing the potential harms to children. She warns, “We absolutely know that the levels of DNA in these vaccines get into our children’s bloodstream at levels that are above sometimes 100-fold higher than levels of fetal DNA that has been demonstrated to massively activate the immune response, causing a general cytokine release and cytokines are toxins. And we are giving children 10 to 100-fold higher concentrations…The pharmaceutical companies have never measured cytokine release and they’ve never measured that acute auto-immune response.”
In 2023, Dr. Jim Meehan also discussed the use of aborted fetal cells in vaccines on The High Wire, stressing that many vaccines contain residual components of human DNA. He adds that even the names of the cell lines, which are denoted as letters and numbers, dehumanize the children who were sacrificed to “become the endless production substrate” for certain vaccines.
How Many Aborted Fetal Cell Lines Exist?
Other fetal cell lines are utilized for vaccines besides the MRC-5 and WI-38. The HEK293 cell line is derived from human embryonic kidney cells, while the PER.C6 line is procured from human embryonic retinal cells. IFA reported on the brutal origins of the HEK293 cell line and its link to the Covid vaccine back in 2021.
In 2015 a new cell line was created for use in vaccines known as WALVAX 2. It was taken from the lung tissue of a “3-month gestation female who was selected from among 9 aborted babies.” Specific guidelines were followed to “mimic WI-38 and MRC-5 in selecting the aborted babies, ranging from 2-4 months gestation.” Scientists described how they “induced labor using a ‘water bag’ abortion to shorten the delivery time and prevent the death of the fetus to ensure live intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.”
As Intercessors, How Do We Respond?
The issue of aborted fetal cell lines in vaccines is of utmost importance. As intercessors, we cannot just sweep this information under the rug. During the COVID pandemic, people became more aware of vaccines and their ingredients. As light continues to be shed, this provides intercessors with an opportunity for deep prayer.
First and foremost, we should pray that God has mercy upon our nation for this grievous sin against innocent babies. Ask the Lord to specifically direct our response both individually and as the Body of Christ.
Secondly, we must pray for the people (lawyers, scientists, doctors, journalists, pastors, parents, etc.) who are informing the public about the use of aborted fetal tissue (cells) in medical research and products such as vaccines. Pray they would not be hindered, censored or canceled, as they bring this information to light. Also, pray for their protection as they do battle against a fierce enemy that wants the truth hidden.
Third, pray that the public would have ears to hear, instead of turning a blind eye to what’s happening in the pharmaceutical industry. Instead of putting faith in vaccines, pray that people would turn to Jesus Christ, the Great Healer, to protect them from sickness and disease.
Fourth, pray that the funding for medical research utilizing aborted fetal cells/tissue would run dry and that scientists/doctors involved in this research would repent and cease from engaging in this type of work.
Fifth and most importantly, ask Jesus to restore our medical system so that the products and treatments on the market are safe, ethical and pleasing to God.
Lord Jesus, our hearts are grieved about the way innocent babies have been used in the pharmaceutical/medical industry. Even though this information is hard to hear, continue opening our eyes so we can make informed decisions about vaccines and protect our children and ourselves, from harm.
For more information about aborted fetal cells, you can read Abortion, the Human Fetal Cell Industry and Vaccines White Paper by Tanya Foster M.A. by clicking on this link.
IFA also has a Special Report titled The Mystery Behind the Covid Vaccine.
How are you praying about the use of aborted fetal cells/tissues in vaccines and other medical research? Share your prayers below.
Angela Rodriguez is an author, blogger and former teacher who studies the historical and biblical connections between Israel and the United States. You can visit her blogs at 67owls.com and 100trumpets.com. She is also the author of Psalm 91: Under the Wings of Jesus and Hallelujah’sGreatRide. Photo Credit: Elen Sher on Unsplash.
Truth2Freedom's Blog 