Daily Archives: December 4, 2020

December 4th The D. L. Moody Year Book

And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.—Revelation 22:17.

HOW many men fold their arms and say: “If I am one of the elect, I will be saved, and if I am not, I won’t. No use bothering about it.”

I have an idea that the Lord Jesus saw how men were going to stumble over this doctrine of election, so after He had been thirty or forty years in heaven He came down and spoke to John. One Lord’s day in Patmos, He said to him:

“Write these things to the churches.”

John kept on writing. His pen flew very fast. And then the Lord, when it was nearly finished, said,

“John, before you close the book, put in one more invitation. ‘The Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst, come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.’ ”[1]

 

[1] Moody, D. L. (1900). The D. L. Moody Year Book: A Living Daily Message from the Words of D. L. Moody. (E. M. Fitt, Ed.) (pp. 215–216). East Northfield, MA: The Bookstore.

December 4 Life-Changing Moments With God

Where can wisdom be found?

Father God, if I lack wisdom, I ask You, who gives liberally and without reproach, and it will be given to me. But I will ask in faith, with no doubting. I trust in You, Lord, with all my heart, and lean not on my own understanding; in all my ways I acknowledge You, and You shall direct my paths. You alone are wise. I will not be wise in my own eyes.

Jeremiah feared and said, “Ah, Lord God! Behold, I cannot speak, for I am a youth.” But You, Lord, said to him: “Do not say, ‘I am a youth,’ for you shall go to all to whom I send you, and whatever I command you, you shall speak. Do not be afraid of their faces, for I am with you to deliver you.”

Whatever I ask You, Father, in Jesus’ name You will give me. Until now I have asked nothing in His name. Ask, and I will receive, that my joy may be full. And whatever things I ask in prayer, believing, I will receive.

Genuine wisdom can be found only in You, dear Lord, so teach me to turn to You for wisdom and to trust without doubt or fear.

Job 28:12; James 1:5–6; Proverbs 3:5–6; 1 Timothy 1:17; Proverbs 3:7; Jeremiah 1:6–8; John 16:23–24; Matthew 21:22[1]

 

[1] Jeremiah, D. (2007). Life-Changing Moments With God (p. 363). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

December 4, 2020 Evening Verse Of The Day

Trust in God (56:3–4)

3–4 Difficult as life is, the psalmist has learned to “trust” in the Lord. Fear is there, but he expresses it positively. He neither feeds his fear nor stares at his problems but looks to his Redeemer, who will deliver him. The variation of “I am afraid”/“I will not be afraid” and “I [will] trust” conveys his confidence in the Lord (cf. v. 11; 37:5). He knows the absolute distinction between God and people: people are only “flesh” (bāśār, GK 1414; NIV, “mortal man,” v. 4; cf. 38:3; 78:39; Ge 6:3; Isa 40:6–7; Jer 17:5), but the Lord is God. His promise (“word,” v. 4) is secure and will come true (cf. Isa 40:8). The psalmist, putting his fear aside, praises the promises of the Lord. After all, trusting in the Lord requires a prior commitment to the revelation of God in his Word (see Reflections, p. 220, The Word of God).[1]


3–4 Verse 3 begins with I am afraid, a typical response to the situation described above. The phrase is emphatic in the MT, but is directly followed with I will trust you. The one praying expresses his fear, but that fear is immediately countered with his trust in God. Verse 4 is repeated at v. 10 with slight variations, forming an inclusio of trust for the body of the prayer. This confession ends with the prayer’s first rhetorical question, and it stands in direct opposition to the situation in vv. 1–2; in contrast to being surrounded by enemies, the one praying now asks What can flesh do to me? The question ends this section and serves to draw the audience into the situation and wonder “what indeed can flesh do?”[2]


Refrain: Trust in God (vv. 3–4)

When I am afraid, I will trust in you. In God, whose word I praise, in God I trust; I will not be afraid. What can mortal man do to me? (vv. 3–4). Striking alliteration draws attention to the confident assertion in verse 3. The statement opens with the Hebrew word ‘day’ (yôm) used adverbially to indicate ‘when’. It is followed by four consecutive words starting with the letter alef (represented by ʾ in transliteration); yôm ʾîrâ ʾanî êlekâ ʾevtach: ‘When I fear, in you I trust.’ There is no doubt that David knows fear, but he claims that trust in God robs it of terror. He is afraid, yet not afraid! At the time when he fears, he will trust in God, and at the moment of speaking he is confidently placing his reliance on God’s word of promise. Other psalms contain similar references to God’s word (cf. 107:20; 130:5), without indication of how that word came to the psalmists. It is possible that a ‘word’ such as Eli spoke to Hannah could be in mind (1 Sam. 1:17). Verse 4 ends with a challenge to mortal man (Hebrew, bâsâr, ‘flesh’). Human power is nothing compared to God’s might, as King Hezekiah said to his officers when Jerusalem was faced with an attack by King Sennacherib of Assyria (2 Chron. 32:8).[3]


56:3 When I am afraid, I put my trust in you. Trust is the antidote for fear. Verse 4b clarifies this: “In God I trust and am not afraid.”

56:4 In God, whose word I praise … What can mere mortals do to me? Verses 4 and 10–11 comprise a refrain, almost verbally identical. Verse 10b, however, repeats 10a but inserts “Lord” for God, thus identifying God by his covenant name. It is most likely the intention of the psalmist and not an editorial change imposed on the Elohistic Psalter (compare with Psalm 55:22). The final question is a rhetorical one with the implied answer “Nothing.” Verse 11b is virtually synonymous with 4b, with ’adam (“humankind,” rather than basar, “flesh,” as here) as the word for “man.”[4]


3–4. Reader, do remark how suited this case is to every exercised soul. It corresponds to the case of the Redeemer, and to his church upon all occasions.[5]


Ver. 3.—What time I am afraid, I will trust in thee; literally, the day when I am afraid. When the day comes that I feel fear stealing over me, by an act of will I (even I, weak as I am) will put my trust in thee (comp. Pss. 7:1; 11:1; 18:2, etc.).

Ver. 4.—In God I will praise his word; rather, through God; i.e. “with God’s help, by his grace,” I am ready to praise whatever sentence he pronounces, whatever flat goes forth from him. In God I have put my trust (so again, ver. 11). This is at once the refrain and the key-note of the psalm. In all dangers, in all troubles, whatever happens, whatever seems to be impending, the psalmist will never relinquish his trust in the Almighty. I will not fear what flesh can do unto me. This is the true martyr spirit. Compare our Lord’s words, “Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both body and soul in hell” (Matt. 10:28).[6]

3. In the day that I was afraid, &c. In the Hebrew, the words run in the future tense, but they must be resolved into the præterite. He acknowledges his weakness, in so far as he was sensible of fear, but denies having yielded to it. Dangers might distress him, but could not induce him to surrender his hope. He makes no pretensions to that lofty heroism which contemns danger, and yet while he allows that he felt fear, he declares his fixed resolution to persist in a confident expectation of the divine favour. The true proof of faith consists in this, that when we feel the solicitations of natural fear, we can resist them, and prevent them from obtaining an undue ascendancy. Fear and hope may seem opposite and incompatible affections, yet it is proved by observation, that the latter never comes into full sway unless there exists some measure of the former. In a tranquil state of the mind, there is no scope for the exercise of hope. At such times it lies dormant, and its power is only displayed to advantage when we see it elevating the soul under dejection, calming its agitations, or soothing its distractions. This was the manner in which it manifested itself in David, who feared, and yet trusted, was sensible of the greatness of his danger, and yet quieted his mind with the confident hope of the divine deliverance.

4. In God I will praise his word. Here he grows more courageous in the exercise of hope, as generally happens with the people of God. They find it difficult at first to reach this exercise. It is only after a severe struggle that they rise to it, but the effort being once made, they emerge from their fears into the fulness of confidence, and are prepared to grapple with the most formidable enemies. To praise, is here synonymous with glorying or boasting. He was now in possession of a triumphant confidence, and rejoiced in the certainty of hope. The ground of his joy is said to be the divine word; and this implies, that however much he might seem to be forsaken and abandoned by God, he satisfied himself by reflecting on the truthfulness of his promises. He would glory in God notwithstanding, and although there should be no outward appearance of help, or it should even be sensibly withdrawn, he would rest contented with the simple security of his word. The declaration is one that deserves our notice. How prone are we to fret and to murmur when it has not pleased God immediately to grant us our requests! Our discontent may not be openly expressed, but it is inwardly felt, when we are left in this manner to depend upon his naked promises. It was no small attainment in David, that he could thus proceed to praise the Lord, in the midst of dangers, and with no other ground of support but the word of God. The sentiment contained in the latter clause of the verse might seem at first glance to merit little consideration. What more obvious than that God is able to protect us from the hand of men, that his power to defend is immensely greater than their power to injure? This may be true, but we all know too well how much of that perverse unbelief there is in our hearts, which leads us to rate the ability of God below that of the creature. It was no small proof, therefore, of the faith of David, that he could despise the threatenings of his enemies. And it would be well if all the saints of God were impressed with such a sense of his superiority to their adversaries as would lead them to show a similar contempt of danger. When assailed by these, it should never escape their recollection, that the contest is in reality between their enemies and God, and that it were blasphemous in this case to doubt the issue. The great object which these have in view is to shake our faith in the promised help of the Lord; and we are chargeable with limiting his power, unless we realize him standing at our right hand, able with one movement of his finger, or one breath of his mouth, to dissipate their hosts, and confound their infatuated machinations. Shall we place him on a level with mortal man, and measure his probable success by the numbers which are set against him? “But how,” may it be asked, “are we to account for this sudden change in the exercise of David? A moment before, he was expressing his dread of destruction, and now he bids defiance to the collected strength of his enemies.” I reply, that there is nothing in his words which insinuate that he was absolutely raised above the influence of fear, and every sense of the dangers by which he was encompassed. They imply no more than that he triumphed over his apprehensions, through that confident hope of salvation with which he was armed. Men he terms in this verse flesh, to impress the more upon his mind the madness of their folly in attempting a contest so infinitely above their strength.[7]


3. The Hebrew expression here for ‘When’ is ‘(In) the day (when)’, much as in verse 9. Cf. the old translation ‘What time I am afraid’—which brings a certain vividness to the phrase. Faith is seen here as a deliberate act, in defiance of one’s emotional state. The first line might too easily have run, ‘When I am at peace …’.

4. This striking verse becomes a refrain, enlarged and repeated in verses 10 and 11, and quoted in 118:6 and Hebrews 13:6. It adds to the delineation of faith already given in verse 3, by showing where faith rests, i.e. in God, and where it finds its content, i.e. in his word (a point which will be made twice over in verse 10). The further phrase, without a fear, is better in its more literal form: ‘I will not be afraid’ (rv), since it matches and answers verse 3a, as the outcome of the act of trust. The last line, with its sturdy reasoning, shows how much the proportions of the scene have changed since verses 1 and 2, where enemies were looming up around their victim. Now, over against God, they are seen as frail flesh (cf. Isa. 31:3). They can still do much to hurt God’s servant, as the next verses (especially verse 8) will confirm; but nothing to defeat him. Cf. the context of suffering and thanksgiving in which Hebrews 13:6 quotes these words.[8]


56:3–4. What can mere mortals do to me?

In spite of his fear, the poet puts his trust in God, and that leads him from fear to confidence. While his enemies might be dangerous, he knows that they are no match for God, and he expresses this belief by the rhetorical question: What can mere mortals do to me? (see v. 11).[9]


Ver. 3, 4. What time I am afraid, I will trust in Thee.Fear and faith:

It is not given to many men to add new words to the vocabulary of religious emotion. But so far as an examination of the Old Testament avails, I find that David was the first that ever employed the word that is here translated, “I will trust,” with a religious meaning. And it is a favourite word of his. I find it occurs constantly in his psalms; twice as often, or nearly so, in the psalms attributed to David as in all the rest of the psalter put together; and it is in itself a most significant and poetic word. But, first of all, I ask you to notice how beautifully there comes out here the occasion of trust. “What time I am afraid, I will put my trust in Thee.” This psalm is one of those belonging to the Sauline persecution. If we adopt the allocation in the superscription, it was written at one of the very lowest points of his fortunes. And there seem to be one or two of its phrases which acquire new force, if we regard the psalm as drawn forth by the perils of his wandering, hunted life. For instance—“Thou tellest my wanderings,” is no mere expression of the feelings with which he regarded the changes of this earthly pilgrimage, but is the confidence of the fugitive that in the doublings and windings of his flight God’s eye marked him. “What time I am afraid,” I will trust. That is no trust which is only fair weather trust, nor the product of outward circumstances, but of his own fixed resolves. I will put my trust in Thee. True faith, by a mighty effort of the will, fixes its gaze on the Divine helper, and there finds it possible and wise to lose its fears. Then, still further, these words, or rather one portion of them, give us a bright light and a beautiful thought as to the essence and inmost centre of this faith or trust. Scholars tell us that the word here translated “trust” signifies literally to cling to or hold fast anything, expressing thus both the notion of a good tight grip and of intimate union. Now, is not that metaphor vivid and full of teaching as well as of impulse? “I will trust in Thee.” “And he exhorted them all that with purpose of heart they should cleave unto the Lord.” We may follow out the metaphor of the word in varied illustrations. For instance, here is a strong prop, and here is the trailing, lithe feebleness of the vine. Gather up the leaves that are creeping all along the ground, and coil them around that support, and up they go straight towards the heavens. Here is a limpet in some pond or other, left by the tide, and it has relaxed its grasp a little. Touch it with your finger and it grips fast to the rock, and you will want a hammer before you can dislodge it. Or, take that story in the Acts of the Apostles, about the lame man healed by Peter and John. All his life long he had been lame, and when at last healing comes, one can fancy with what a tight grasp “the lame man held Peter and John.” That is faith, cleaving to Christ, twining round Him with all the tendrils of our heart, as the vine does round its pole; holding to Him by His hand, as a tottering man does by the strong hand that upholds. And then one word more. These two clauses that I have put together give us not only the occasion of faith in fear, and the essence of faith in this clinging, but they also give us very beautifully the victory of faith. You see with what poetic art—if we may use such words about the breathings of such a soul—he repeats the two main words of the former verse in the latter, only in inverted order—“What time I am afraid, I will trust in Thee.” He is possessed by the lower emotion, and resolves to escape from its sway into the light and liberty of faith. And then the next words still keep up the contrast of faith and fear, only that now he is possessed by the more blessed mood, and determines that he will not fall back into the bondage and darkness of the baser. “In God I have put my trust; I will not fear.” He has confidence, and in the strength of that he resolves that he will not yield to fear. There are plenty of reasons for dread in the dark possibilities and not less dark certainties of life. Disasters, losses, partings, disappointments, sicknesses, death, may any of them come at any moment, and some of them will certainly come sooner or later. Temptations lurk around us like serpents in the grass, they beset us in open ferocity like lions in our path. Is it not wise to fear unless our faith has hold of that great promise, “Thou shalt tread upon the lion and adder; there shall no evil befall thee”? (A. Maclaren, D.D.)

On public prayer in connection with natural national calamities:

There are two classes of calamities in connection with which men have felt themselves in all ages moved to public confession and supplication; those which come to them from the hand of Providence through the order of the system of Nature around them, and those which have their origin wholly or chiefly in the follies, vices and sins of mankind. But the two stand by no means on the same ground with regard to the question of national humiliation and prayer. In the case of calamities which a nation has brought upon itself by its follies and crimes, there can be no question of the duty of humiliation and prayer. But when we are asked to join in an act of national humiliation on account of a scanty harvest, we seem to be standing on quite different ground. Chastisement which seems to fall on us from the skies brings suffering, but with it much that modifies it, and which may make us see, if we have but the open eye, that it is blessing in disguise. If we were asked to recognize in a late and scanty harvest a signal part of the Divine chastisement, I should feel little disposed to respond. And this not on the ground of doubts about the power of prayer in its legitimate sphere; but rather from a deepening sense of the reality and grandeur of this power of prayer. We are only just emerging from Jewish levels of thought and belief in the Christian Church. Through all the Christian ages we have been prone to return on the tracks of Judaism, and to conceive of God, in His ways in the providential government of the world, as the ruler, after all, of a little realm, at the centre of which are the interests of our little lives.

  1. The principle on which we are less ready than of old to rush to confession under natural national calamities of an ordinary type, is a just and noble one, and is a sign of vital progress in our theological conceptions, and our view of our relation to the world and to God.
  2. This progress in the Christian thought of our times runs parallel to the progress in our conceptions of the true nature and the subject-matter of prayer, which is the fruit of growing knowledge and experience in the individual believing soul. As experience widens and deepens prayer becomes, or ought to become, less a cry of pain, and more an act of communion; intercourse with the Father in heaven, whereby His strength, His serenity, His hope flow into and abide in our hearts I should think but little of a Christian experience in which there is not a constant lifting up into the higher regions the subject-matter of prayer.
  3. I by no means say, that even in an advanced state of Christian intelligence, there may not be natural national calamities, under which it would be wise and right for a nation to humble itself in confession and supplication before God. We must not regard our prayer as a sure means of securing the removal of such calamities. Always, behind the prayer, if it is to be worth anything, is the thought, “It is the Lord, let Him do what seemeth to Him good.” There is in man, deep down in his nature, a sense, not only that the relation between his nature and the world around him, and the God who rules it, have become jangled and out of tune, but also that the responsibility for the discord lies at his door. Everywhere, in all countries, in all ages, at the bottom of man’s deepest thoughts is the sense of sin. It is natural for men to rush to humble confession and importunate supplication when they think that the hand of God is upon them in judgment; and it is good and right for them at such seasons to approach Him, if they will but remember that the message of the Gospel is that God is reconciled in Christ to His children, that all His dealings with them, His sharpest and sternest discipline, are moved and ruled by the hand of that love which gave the well-beloved Son to Gethsemane and Calvary, that men might know its measure. (J. Baldwin Brown, B.A.)

Faith conquering fear:

Our nature is strangely compounded. Trembling and trust often co-exist in us. It was so in David, whose heart is laid bare to us in these psalms. Now, fearfulness, although it has some ill effects which are sure to appear unless it is kept under the control of faith, nevertheless it has its own appointed good results in the formation of Christian character. Some have no fear, they are utterly unconcerned as to God and His claims. They need that the alarm bell of fear should be rung in their hearts. And many Christians need more of it: their flippant talk about sacred things; their indifference as to the condition of the ungodly: their heedlessness of walk would cease and give place to a holy fear. Fear, then, is not to be indiscriminately condemned. But it is when fear paralyzes trust that it becomes a sin, and as such is condemned.

  1. Occasions of undue fear are—
  2. The Christian worker’s sense of responsibility.
  3. Experiences of affliction.
  4. Constitutional nervous disorder.
  5. Anxiety as to the future.
  6. Its disadvantages: it hinders all success and misrepresents God.

III. Its cure. Get more light and exercise more trust. (Alfred Rowland, B.A.)

Fear and trust:

“What time I am afraid.” Alas! those times are many. Let me speak of three causes of fear and unrest, and the trust which should remove them.

  1. Fear for the morrow. There is the fear which arises from a contemplation of possible exigencies and contingencies in the future of our life’s temporal economy. Where one can sing—

“… I do not ask to see

The distant scene: one step enough for me,”

a hundred are bowed down with anxiety, worry, care, and the restlessness of doubt. I am perfectly sure that underneath the placid face and the serene smile that sits on many a brow there is much fear and alarm as to the future. What is the remedy for this? What is there that will give a man peace? My answer is—Trust! Trust in God, His wisdom, His love, His Fatherly care, His plans and His purposes! If there is one phase of the teachings of the Bible that has been more attested by human experience than another, it is the assurance that trust in God is the secret of strength, serenity, and peace. He is behind all events, and before all contingencies. He is above the cloud and below the waters. Say, then, O ye timid ones, ye sorrowing ones, ye foreboding ones, ye anxious ones, “What time I am afraid, I will trust in Thee.”

  1. Another great cause of fear is the fact of death. God has so constituted us that the very elements of life stand in battle array against the elements that produce death. It is natural, and in perfect harmony with God’s purpose in us, that we should cling to life; and by so much as we cling to life, by that much do we fear death. And perhaps the two feelings in regard to death that most contribute to this fear are the loneliness and uncertainty that inevitably belongs to it. “I shall die alone,” said the great Pascal. Nothing is so distressing to the human spirit as solitude, and when solitude is overhung with darkness it is then full of awfulness. And it is the awfulness that comes from the solitude and darkness of death that makes us shrink from it. What is the panacea for this fear? Trust in God—God’s presence, God’s sustaining hand. If there be a Providence watching over us in life, is it not reasonable to suppose that some provision for our need in the hour and conflict of death is made for us? that His providence will open the gate of death for us and guide us through? that His care for us will be as manifest then as now? Does a mother watch over her child all day—fondle it, nestle it in her bosom, teach it, protect it, uphold it—and then leave it alone when the darkness conies?

III. Fear in regard of the destinies of the future life. They ask, Where will my destiny be? Shall I be numbered with the blest, or rejected with the lost? Momentous questions! Tremendous thoughts! I cannot wonder that they make men anxious. The wonder is that, living as we do on the threshold of eternity, we are not more concerned. Whither, at such times of foreboding, shall we flee for succour? To God, the Father of our spirits. Every soul that turns to Him with the cry, “Father, I have sinned”; every heart that yearns for His forgiveness, shall have refuge and peace on earth, shall have a welcome home in heaven (W. J. Hocking, B.A.)

The saints’ great resource in times of fear:

  1. There are many times and circumstances calculated to awaken our fears.
  2. Our state of sin should awaken great fear in our hearts.
  3. Well may we fear when conscience convicts and condemns.
  4. In times of temptation we ought to fear.
  5. A backsliding state may well make us afraid.
  6. To be in affliction and nigh to death in a state of impenitence, is a state which should excite the greatest fears.
  7. There is an adequate resource under every kind and degree of fear.
  8. God has revealed the doctrine of His providence as an antidote to all those fears which relate to this life.
  9. He has revealed the doctrine of His grace as an antidote to all these fears which result from sin and guilt.
  10. He has revealed the doctrine of immortal glory and blessedness to remove the fear of death and our anxiety concerning another world.

III. There is a great blessedness in knowing this resource before our fears come.

  1. In some cases the knowledge of this Divine resource has delivered the mind from all fear.—Fear concerning the body or the soul—life or death, the grave or eternity (Job 13:15; Prov. 28:1).
  2. Where it does not do this, it may prevent the worse effects of fear. Two ships in a storm, the one with a good anchor and anchorage, and the ether without either, meet that storm under widely different circumstances (2 Cor. 7:10).
  3. Sometimes in the most fearful circumstances it enables us not only in patience to possess our souls, but to glorify God.
  4. The greatest of all fears will seize upon those who know not this only true antidote to fear.
  5. The absence of that salutary fear, which leads to provision against danger, proves the extremity of that danger in which we are involved.
  6. That fear which is accompanied with utter despair must be the portion of those who have not found the true refuge.
  7. They will realize infinitely more than they ever feared in the very deepest seasons of their despair in this life. For it is very certain no man ever formed a sufficiently awful idea of the worm that dieth not, and of eternity. Let all these considerations induce sinners to prize that refuge of mercy and grace which the Gospel presents, and let us be allowed to turn them all into an occasion for urging upon them the immediate and indispensable necessity of trust in God. (Evangelist.)

Ver. 4. In God will I praise His word.The moral impulse imparted to individuals and communities by the study of the Bible:

My object is not merely to demonstrate the inspiration of the Bible, but to win you to the study of it. It may possibly be alleged by many persons, especially of the more busy classes of society, that they have no time for the attention to the Bible which is recommended.

  1. The plea is dangerous as well as monstrous and criminal. If a son or a friend were to aver that he had become too busy, that he was too much engaged, for days and weeks and months together, to read an epistle from a distant land, dictated by parental love or by friendship, to what conclusion should we come as to the nature of the pretence or the character of the mind that could dictate it? Could we, even in this ordinary case, admit for an instant the validity of the excuse, or suppose that any business of life could be so urgent?
  2. The plea is untrue. A few verses, snatched from the hurry of life (if life must indeed be so hurried) may suffice. In a few minutes you may read enough to furnish materials for reflection and inquiry. You may walk or work—and think. And we claim such study for the Bible because—
  3. The influence which it exerts is distinctly moral. It deals with man as a moral being, responsible for his actions, and to be influenced by motives.
  4. And this impulse which it communicates is holy. Notwithstanding passages in it which infidels have urged have an unholy tendency, the overwhelming effect of the book is towards holiness. Not so other sacred books—the Koran, and the like.

III. And this impulse is mighty.

  1. Progressive.
  2. But simply instrumental. The truth contained in the sacred volume exerts an influence analogous, both in its force and its secrecy, to that of some of the most wonder-working agencies of nature. It resembles the unseen presence of magnetism or electricity, which move as by a touch the elements and masses around us—disposing them to order or clothing them with beauty; or it is like the vegetative power, that in the darkness and concealment of the earth and the clods of the valley impels the seed to shoot and rise and spread fertility upon the smiling surface. In the secret recesses of the soul, and in the dark and hidden depths of a heart, no human eye can penetrate and no human philosophy unravel—it subdues and sanctifies, works repentance and humiliation, and the settled purposes of a renewed mind, till on the surface appears the penitential tear, the bended knee, the contrite sigh, the believing and imploring reception of Christ, the moral and spiritual renewal of character, the outward, fearless, and heaven-sealing profession of a true religion; and every right-minded observer attests the truth of the Divine declaration, “Behold I make all things new.” (F. A. Cox, D.D.)[10]

What time I am afraid, I will trust in thee.

In God I will praise his word, in God I have put my trust; I will not fear what flesh can do unto me.

What time I am afraid.” David was no braggart, he does not claim never to be afraid, and he was no brutish Stoic free from fear because of the lack of tenderness. David’s intelligence deprived him of the stupid heedlessness of ignorance, he saw the imminence of his peril, and was afraid. We are men, and therefore liable to overthrow; we are feeble, and therefore unable to prevent it; we are sinful men, and therefore deserving it, and for all these reasons we are afraid. But the condition of the Psalmist’s mind was complex—he feared, but that fear did not fill the whole area of his mind, for he adds, “I will trust in thee.” It is possible, then, for fear and faith to occupy the mind at the same moment. We are strange beings, and our experience in the divine life is stranger still. We are often in a twilight, where light and darkness are both present, and it is bard to tell which predominates. It is a blessed fear which drives us to trust. Unregenerate fear drives from God, gracious fear drives to him. If I fear man I have only to trust God, and I have the best antidote. To trust when there is no cause for fear, is but the name of faith, but to be reliant upon God when occasions for alarm are abundant and pressing, is the conquering faith of God’s elect. Though the verse is in the form of a resolve, it became a fact in David’s life, let us make it so in ours. Whether the fear arise from without or within, from past, present, or future, from temporals, or spirituals, from men or devils, let us maintain faith, and we shall soon recover courage.

  1. In God I will praise his word.” Faith brings forth praise. He who can trust will soon sing. God’s promise, when fulfilled, is a noble subject for praise, and even before fulfilment it should be the theme of song. It is in or through God that we are able to praise. We praise as well as pray in the Spirit. Or we may read it—in extolling the Lord one of the main points for thanksgiving is his revealed will in the Scriptures, and the fidelity with which he keeps his word of promise. “In God I have put my trust.” Altogether and alone should we stay ourselves on God. What was a gracious resolve in the former verse, is here asserted as already done. “I will not fear what flesh can do unto me.” Faith exercised, fear is banished, and holy triumph ensues, so that the soul asks, “What can flesh do unto me?” What indeed? He can do me no real injury; all his malice shall be overruled for my good. Man is flesh, flesh is grass—Lord, in thy name I defy its utmost wrath. There were two verses of complaint, and here are two of confidence; it is well to weigh out a sufficient quantity of the sweet to counteract the sour.[11]

[1] VanGemeren, W. A. (2008). Psalms. In T. Longman III & D. E. Garland (Eds.), The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Psalms (Revised Edition) (Vol. 5, p. 458). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

[2] deClaissé-Walford, N., & Tanner, B. (2014). Book Two of the Psalter: Psalms 42–72. In E. J. Young, R. K. Harrison, & R. L. Hubbard Jr. (Eds.), The Book of Psalms (p. 483). Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

[3] Harman, A. (2011). Psalms: A Mentor Commentary (Vol. 1–2, pp. 428–429). Ross-shire, Great Britain: Mentor.

[4] Bullock, C. H. (2015). Psalms 1–72. (M. L. Strauss & J. H. Walton, Eds.) (Vol. 1, p. 427). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

[5] Hawker, R. (2013). Poor Man’s Old Testament Commentary: Job–Psalms (Vol. 4, p. 337). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.

[6] Spence-Jones, H. D. M. (Ed.). (1909). Psalms (Vol. 2, pp. 1–2). London; New York: Funk & Wagnalls Company.

[7] Calvin, J., & Anderson, J. (2010). Commentary on the Book of Psalms (Vol. 2, pp. 349–351). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.

[8] Kidner, D. (1973). Psalms 1–72: an introduction and commentary (Vol. 15, p. 221). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

[9] Longman, T., III. (2014). Psalms: An Introduction and Commentary. (D. G. Firth, Ed.) (Vol. 15–16, p. 230). Nottingham, England: Inter-Varsity Press.

[10] Exell, J. S. (1909). The Biblical Illustrator: The Psalms (Vol. 3, pp. 102–105). New York; Chicago; Toronto; London; Edinburgh: Fleming H. Revell Company; Francis Griffiths.

[11] Spurgeon, C. H. (n.d.). The treasury of David: Psalms 27-57 (Vol. 2, p. 465). London; Edinburgh; New York: Marshall Brothers.

Would a Loving God Send People to Hell? (Video) — Cold Case Christianity

Why wouldn’t God make sure everyone can spend eternity with Him? How can a loving God completely reject people for all eternity? In this video from J. Warner’s “Quick Shots: Fast Answers to Hard Questions” series on RightNow Media, J. Warner answers this common question related to the claims of Christianity.

To see more training videos with J. Warner Wallace, visit the YouTube playlist.

Would a Loving God Send People to Hell? (Video) — Cold Case Christianity

December—4 The Poor Man’s Evening Portion

Wherefore glorify ye the Lord in the fires, even the name of the Lord God of Israel in the isles of the sea.—Isaiah 24:15.

My soul! hast thou ever considered, in how many ways, and by what a variety of means, every poor sinner called by grace is furnished with ability to glorify God in Christ? It is blessed to see this, and doubly blessed to be employed in such a service. The poor sinner not only glorifies Jesus, actively, when he is praising him, but passively also, when his wants and necessities afford occasion for Jesus to be glorified in giving out of his fulness to his relief! And how is the Lord glorified in the fires? Evidently, when in the furnace of affliction, or in the fire of temptation, the poor exercised soul glorifies in his infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon him! when he can, and when he doth receive all, and take all, and feel happy under all, from the consciousness that the Lord’s hand is in it, and the Lord’s blessing will be upon it. “I was dumb,” said one of old, “and opened not my mouth, for it was thy doing.” And another ancient sufferer cried out, “Why should a living man complain, a man for the punishment of his sins?” Oh! it is most blessed to see a child of God, thus engaged for God, when matters are most dark and discouraging! It is easy, comparatively speaking, for a man to praise and give glory to the Lord, when all things around him are gay and smiling; but when songs are heard from the fires, and when the soul feels its own wretchedness, and cries out under it, “My leanness, my leanness!” and is looking to a God in Christ, here is a frame of mind suited to the divine glory. My soul! see that all thy glory be centered in Jesus, and on God in Jesus, as the name of the Lord God of Israel. And oh! for grace to give him both the praises and the glory in whom “all the seed of Israel shall be justified, and shall glory.”[1]

 

[1] Hawker, R. (1845). The Poor Man’s Evening Portion (A New Edition, pp. 336–337). Philadelphia: Thomas Wardle.

December 4- Petra, the Book of Life, and the 75 Day Gap — VCY America

December 4

Daniel 11:36-12:13
1 John 4:1-21
Psalm 123:1-4
Proverbs 29:2-4 

Daniel 11:36 – Between yesterday and today, we just leapfrogged the entire Church Age. Yesterday’s reading described events from 2,000 years ago. Today’s reading describes events in the soon future. From John Walvoord:

Beginning with verse 36, a sharp break in the prophecy may be observed, introduced by the expression the time of the end in verse 35. 

https://walvoord.com/article/252

Daniel 11:40 – From Jimmy DeYoung:

Verse 40 in our reading reveals how the alignment of Arab and Islamic nations, led by Russia, will begin to make their way into Israel to destroy the Jewish state. Almost in concert, the two nations, Egypt and Syria, will come “against him”, verse 40. Remember the “him” is the Antichrist.

Why would the text say that Syria and Egypt are going to attack the Antichrist? The answer is that before both Arab nations move against Israel, the Antichrist will have “confirmed” a peace agreement between Israel and her enemies, Daniel 9:27. So, to attack Israel is like attacking the Antichrist who has just guaranteed Israel’s peace.

http://devotional.prophecytoday.com/search/label/Daniel

Daniel 11:41 – Chuck Missler is one of many who note the connection between “Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon” (present day Jordan) with Petra, the desert fortress.

Author’s Photo of Petra

Daniel 12:1 – “time of trouble” is also known as the Great Tribulation.

Daniel 12:2 – We read about the special book that Moses talked about (Exodus 32:32-33, Deuteronomy 9:14), and Paul wrote about (Philippians 4:3), that John saw (Revelation 3:5, Revelation 21:27). Is your name written there?

https://youtu.be/XT53VOUG71s?t=148

Daniel 12:8-9 – Daniel could interpret dreams, could counsel Nebuchadnezzar, but he couldn’t understand God’s prophetic timetable. The promise was that at the “time of the end” the words would be unsealed. 

There’s a fascinating history of eschatology (study of the last things) at ChristInProphecy.org but the key point is that eschatology is relatively new in theological studies, especially because of its interconnection with Zionism. 

In 1878, “one of the first [statements of faith] to explicitly proclaim faith in the premillennial return of Jesus Christ to earth” was written at the Niagara Bible Conference.

Since Julian the Apostate’s attempt in 363 to rebuild the Temple that was stopped by “fearful balls of fire,” there had been little movement to return Jews to Eretz Israel until Lord Shaftesbury’s Memorandum calling for “the restoration of the Jews to Palestine” in 1841. The Zionist Congress itself didn’t commit itself to Palestine until 1905 (for fun, read a fictional travel guide to “New Judea, East Africa” – an alternative timeline history), and in 1940 FDR considered moving the Jews to Alaska.

Daniel 12:12 – Apparently there is a 75 day transitional period between the Tribulation and the New Jerusalem (Walvoord).

1 John 4:3 – Speaking of antichrist, denial of the humanity of Jesus is a sign of a false teacher. 

1 John 4:4 – Greater is He that is in me, than he that is in the world!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UjU7tJhPh4

1 John 4:9 – Notice the similarity between this verse and John 3:16

1 John 4:16 – You’ve heard that “God is love” and that is found only in 1 John 4. But also remember that the reverse is not true, Love is not God. 

1 John 4:19 – Thank God He loved us first!

Psalm 123:2 – Notice the Psalmist identifies himself as a servant of the Master, the LORD Our God!

Proverbs 29:2 – Yes that means you have to vote for good candidates!

December 4- Petra, the Book of Life, and the 75 Day Gap — VCY America

December 4 Learning From Pain

Before I was afflicted I went astray: but now have I kept thy word.
(Psalms 119:67)

Never think that God will ignore small acts of disobedience. Discipline always comes! Achan kept only a tiny portion of the treasures of Jericho, but everybody paid the price. (See Joshua 7:1.) The Israelites lost their confidence with God, and they lost their respect in the eyes of the world. One person’s disobedience can create pain and judgment for so many. One person out of the will of God can cause many problems for everybody else around them. When you get the wrong people out of your life, the wrong things will stop happening!

If you are walking in contradiction to God’s laws, expect painful experiences on the road ahead. Pain is corrective! Your affliction can turn out for your good if you are willing to learn from it.

Pain forces you to look to God for answers. Pain also forces you to lean on Him instead of other people. Pain forces you to learn where you went astray. Pain forces you to long for His presence and His healing touch. And pain forces you to listen for God’s instructions and to be sensitive to the changes He wants to bring in your life.

 

Turn your pain into profit; let God take your losses and turn them into lessons that will make you better and stronger in the days ahead.[1]

 

[1] Gass, B. (1998). A Fresh Word For Today : 365 Insights For Daily Living (p. 338). Alachua, FL: Bridge-Logos Publishers.

Weekly Watchman for 12/04/2020

Steve Wohlberg: Approaching Armageddon, Bible Prophecy

What on earth is going on? The world around us is changing quickly; we find ourselves wondering what will be next. What does the Bible say about the unique time we’re living in? As the world seems to be getting crazier by the moment, we are actually in a season of wonderful expectation for the Kingdom of God!

Daily podcast, relevant articles on issues pertaining to Christians and more can be found on Stand Up For The Truth.

Read more


Bruce Baker: Perspective on Life’s Tests, No Fear of Death

We discuss the need for Christians to keep an eternal perspective in a world getting more dark and a country filled with corruption. Also, at what point do believers refuse to obey governing authorities? More:

Daily podcast, relevant articles on issues pertaining to Christians and more can be found on Stand Up For The Truth.

Read more


Dan Fisher: Patriot Pastors, Romans 13 & The ‘Rona’

Many of America’s spiritual leaders have been shackling believers with a flawed interpretation of Romans 13:1-5 – especially as to how it applies to citizens living in a republic like ours. Consequently, Christian people who would normally stand against tyranny, believe that they owe slavish, unlimited submission to their government.

So, the American church stands by doing little to stop the wickedness that is allowed to flourish all around them. Is this what God intends?

Daily podcast, relevant articles on issues pertaining to Christians and more can be found on Stand Up For The Truth.

Read more


Dr. Duke Pesta: Hijacked Education, Cancel Culture, a Biden Presidency

We discuss the current state of education in America and why Christian parents should be alarmed and moved to action. Plus, Duke Pesta shares his concerns about the policies a Joe Biden, Kamala Harris presidency would bring.

Daily podcast, relevant articles on issues pertaining to Christians and more can be found on Stand Up For The Truth.

Read more

Covid 19 Vaccines: Paving The Way For The Surveillance State

 • Ron Paul Liberty Report

Like so many other “crises” that preceded it, the Covid-19 “pandemic” has provided fertile territory for the authoritarians who seize any opportunity to destroy freedom and liberty under the false claim of “keeping us safe.” The PATRIOT Act passed after 9/11 was supposed to do the same thing: keep us safe by targeting the terrorists who wanted to kill us. But as we learned from Ed Snowden shortly afterward, it was a lie. The PATRIOT Act was designed to view us as the enemy, to be spied on, tracked, and harassed. The Covid “crisis” and coming vaccine will be the same. Will Americans resist? Also today, more Covid Hypocrites – from Austin to California. And an LA County mayor claims anyone without a mask is a “domestic terrorist.”

Can Employers Fire Any Employees That Choose Not To Take The COVID Vaccine? | ZeroHedge News

Authored by Michael Snyder via TheMostImportantNews.com,

A COVID vaccine is not even available yet, but the mainstream media is already full of stories about whether or not it is legal for employers to fire employees that refuse to take it.  To me, this is not even a debate that we should be having.  It would be fundamentally anti-American and morally reprehensible for any employer to fire someone for choosing not to get vaccinated.  Unfortunately, the mainstream media does not see things that way, and they are interviewing lots of legal experts that are assuring employers that it is perfectly legal to fire people that don’t want to get vaccinated.

For example, the following comes from a CNBC article

“In general, yes, employers are able to mandate the vaccine when it becomes available with, of course, a bunch of caveats,” says employment lawyer Lindsay Ryan, listing possible exemptions for those with specific medical conditions and those with sincerely held religious convictions.

If religious convictions really did protect employees, that would be great.

From my perspective, any employee that refuses to get vaccinated based on a sincerely held religious conviction should definitely be shielded from being fired under federal law.

Unfortunately, the CNBC article goes on to explain why federal law is probably not going to protect any person of faith from mandatory vaccination requirements…

Ryan emphasizes that state laws regulating what constitutes reasonable accommodations for religious groups vary significantly, but that “under federal law, employers don’t have to grant a religious accommodation if doing so would result in more than a de minimis cost to the operation of the business.”

De minimis” is Latin for “of minimum importance” and is used in law to refer to a total so small that it is not even recognized. Given how significantly the pandemic has impacted businesses, Ryan says “this is a pretty low standard.” Meaning, many employers will likely have legal ground to require vaccination.

In other words, under federal law there is hardly any protection at all for workers that wish to refuse the COVID vaccine.

Other major news outlets have been publishing similar stories.  This excerpt comes from a piece that was published by Reuters

Gostin and five other health law experts said private companies in the United States have broad liberties to set health and safety standards, which would allow them to mandate vaccinations as a condition of employment with some exceptions.

It is almost as if there is a coordinated effort to make employers across the country aware that they can issue such mandates.

A little over a decade ago, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration ruled that employers could make vaccines mandatory during the swing flu pandemic, but of course that crisis faded rather rapidly and so very few employers actually went in that direction.

But now it appears that COVID-19 is going to be with us for quite a while, and some employers have already decided that they are going to make vaccination mandatory for all employees

Just a few months into the coronavirus pandemic, Holly Smith had already made up her mind. She was not going to reopen her restaurant to diners until there was a vaccine. She just didn’t think it was safe. When she shared the decision with her staff, they asked: Would the vaccine be mandatory?

Yes, she said. It would be.

“I’m not going to open until I can indeed be sure that everyone on my staff is vaccinated,” says Smith, chef and owner of Cafe Juanita in Kirkland, Wash. “The immediate people on the team — you’ve got to take care of them. If you don’t take care of them, they cannot help you take care of business.”

If some of her employees do not want to take the vaccine, they will be hitting the bricks.

And as I have detailed repeatedly in recent weeks, it is not easy to find another job in this economy.

The good news is that most employers will likely be hesitant to mandate vaccines because of the potential of pushback from their employees.  According to a recent Gallup survey, 42 percent of all Americans do not plan to get a COVID-19 vaccine…

Americans’ willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19 rebounded a bit in October, as seen in Gallup polling conducted before Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna made promising announcements about the likely effectiveness of their coronavirus vaccines. Fifty-eight percent of Americans in the latest poll say they would get a COVID-19 vaccine, up from a low of 50% in September.

It is estimated that there are 328 million people living in the United States right now, and 42 percent of 328 million is 137 million.

If those 137 million people stand up for their God-given rights, we almost certainly will not see widespread vaccine mandates.

But will they?

We shall see.

In the months ahead, there is going to be so much public pressure to get vaccinated, and the CDC plans to aggressively promote their vaccination campaign.

They even plan to distribute “buttons or stickers” so that people that have been injected can advertise that fact to others…

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is planning to offer health care providers a template they can use to print buttons or stickers that would advertise a person’s vaccination status. The idea is that the button would be handed out to patients after they receive their vaccination shots.

The effort is part of a “toolkit” that the CDC plans to provide healthcare systems to “educate and promote vaccination,” a CDC spokesperson told ABC News.

In addition, within the past few days Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Joe Biden have all committed to being vaccinated publicly

President-elect Joe Biden said he would publicly take a vaccine when it’s available to encourage the public to get vaccinated, joining three former presidents who recently pledged to do the same.

Biden said he’d “be happy” to join former Presidents Barack Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton in getting the vaccine in public to prove it is safe.

That would seem to be quite a public relations coup for the pharmaceutical companies, but if any of them has any sort of an adverse reaction to the vaccine it will rapidly transform into a public relations nightmare.

Of course the truth is that nobody really knows what the long-term side effects of taking COVID vaccines will be for the population as a whole.

As I have discussed previously, this entirely new class of mRNA vaccines has never been tried before, and those that line up first to get a COVID vaccine will be the guinea pigs.

Source: Can Employers Fire Any Employees That Choose Not To Take The COVID Vaccine?

Gabbard: Religious Institutions Facing Stricter COVID Restrictions Reflects ‘Antagonistic’ View Towards Faith of ‘Many’ in Gov’t

On Thursday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Fox News @ Night,” Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) praised the Supreme Court’s rulings striking down coronavirus restrictions on religious institutions and stated that religious institutions being treated worse than other institutions demonstrates

Source: Gabbard: Religious Institutions Facing Stricter COVID Restrictions Reflects ‘Antagonistic’ View Towards Faith of ‘Many’ in Gov’t

Mid-Day Snapshot · Dec. 4, 2020

THE FOUNDATION

“A wise and frugal government … shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.” —Thomas Jefferson (1801)

Comment | Share

IN TODAY’S DIGEST

FEATURED ANALYSIS

The Post-Election Jobs Freeze

Nate Jackson

The good news is that the U.S. economy added 245,000 jobs in November, while the headline unemployment rate dropped a notch to 6.7%. The fuller measure of unemployment sits at 12%. The bad news is this represents a significant slowdown in job growth after the gangbusters reports following the reopening of the economy, and November’s report falls far short of predictions. All the ground we lost in March and April has not yet been made up — we’ve recovered only 12.3 million of the 22 million jobs lost.

The primary factor behind the slowdown is still COVID restrictions. Many states, counties, and cities are still imposing varying degrees of lockdown. Governors Gavin Newsom (California), Gretchen Whitmer (Michigan), and Andrew Cuomo (New York) have been legendary for their tyrannical regulations (not to mention gross hypocrisy), and such lockdowns in huge states make recovering jobs that much more difficult. Restaurants, for example, are often relegated to outdoor dining only and that’s not exactly a welcoming feature as temperatures plummet. (Where’s global warming when you need it?) Hence, fewer jobs are coming back. In fact, the areas of food service and retail actually lost jobs in November.

The elephant in the room, of course, is the presidential election. The November jobs report isn’t the first one since the election, but it is the first to include data from after it. Given the presumption that Joe Biden will take office in January, businesses began planning accordingly. Biden has already named much of his economic stagnation team, which bodes ill for the two recoveries President Donald Trump helped to fuel, even if the second remains incomplete.

Moreover, Biden and his team are likely to push for a major hike in the federal minimum wage — to $15 an hour. That sounds really great and “long overdue” as one leftist economist put it. But try telling the restauranteur who can only seat at 25% capacity outside that he has to pay his workers twice as much for a quarter of the work. The real world doesn’t work the way leftist pinheads with cushy jobs in think tanks seem to assume it does.

Between the way Democrat politicians have exploited the pandemic to wreck the economy and the Biden administration’s plans to kneecap business owners with tax and wage hikes and to tie them up with regulatory red tape, the American economy may be in for a tough winter. Biden’s “dark winter” comment might be right after all, if for different reasons.

Comment | Share

GOP Senate Is Trump’s to Win or Lose

Thomas Gallatin

For those who don’t know, there are a pair of runoff elections in Georgia on January 5 that will determine which party controls the U.S. Senate. And irrespective of how things work out in the presidential election, the fact of the matter is that, for freedom-loving Americans and for the preservation of the American Republic as we know it, Republicans Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue need to secure at least one of the two seats.

In light of this reality, the open mud-slinging that has erupted between President Donald Trump and Republicans in Georgia is, to put it mildly, quite disturbing. While Trump should express his legitimate concerns over potential election fraud, his hammering of Republicans like Governor Brian Kemp does little to build consensus among party faithful in support of the president’s efforts to investigate election fraud, nor does it energize Georgia Republican voters to turn out for the runoff.

Epitomizing the madness of this political fratricide are the statements from Trump-backing attorneys Lin Wood and Sidney Powell, who, in attempting to make their case of massive election fraud, have literally called on Trump supporters in Georgia to boycott the Senate runoff. Thankfully, Donald Trump Jr. called out the insanity of this suggestion, stating, “I’m seeing a lot of talk from people that are supposed to be on our side telling GOP voters not to go out & vote for [Kelly Loeffler] and [David Perdue] Senate. That is NONSENSE. IGNORE those people. We need ALL of our people coming out to vote for Kelly & David.”

To be clear, Trump has endorsed both Loeffler and Perdue and will be stumping for them in Georgia today. Yet the question many Republicans are asking is whether Trump will stay focused on campaigning for Loeffler and Perdue or devolve into rancor over the Democrats’ efforts to steal the election while accusing Georgia Republicans of not doing enough to stop it. Ginning up anger over the Democrats’ efforts to rig the election is fine so long as he also pushes hard for voters to get out and prevent the Democrats from moving forward with their radical agenda. Attacking fellow Republicans only hurts that message.

Trump’s recent statement regarding Georgia’s secretary of state serves as just one example of why Republicans are so nervous. Trump wrote, “Georgia Secretary of State, a so-called Republican (RINO), won’t let the people checking the ballots see the signatures for fraud. Why? Without this the whole process is very unfair and close to meaningless. Everyone knows that we won the state. Where is @BrianKempGA?” How does saying “the whole process is very unfair and close to meaningless” encourage conservatives to vote in the runoff?

In any case, likely in an effort to generate a little team spirit, Governor Kemp has (once again) called for Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to conduct a signature audit of mailed ballots.

It behooves Trump to do his best to ensure the GOP holds onto the Senate, especially if he has his eyes on 2024. As The Wall Street Journal editorial board writes, “Mr. Trump is already sounding like he wants to run again in 2024, and his stolen-election claims sound like an opening bid for campaign donations. At least for now he can say, with justification, that he helped the GOP gain seats in the House and avoid a rout in the Senate. But that narrative changes for the worse if the GOP loses in Georgia after Mr. Trump divided his own party to serve his personal political interest. He needs a GOP Senate nearly as much as Mr. McConnell does.”

Comment | Share

Bracing for Biden’s Educational Failure

Douglas Andrews

If you saw our tribute from Mark Alexander earlier this week, you already know that the great Walter Williams has passed away.

Professor Williams, whom Alexander called “a fine gentlemen, an Army veteran, an American Patriot, and scholar of the first order,” was, of course, also a teacher. And given the damage that a Biden administration would do to the educational advances that conservatives have made during the Trump years, we thought it worth contrasting these two educational worldviews.

As The Wall Street Journal’s Madeleine Ngo reports, “Joe Biden has vowed to bring sweeping changes to education and to reverse some of the civil rights-related moves made under President Trump. The current education secretary, Betsy DeVos, sought to bolster school-choice programs, proposed cuts to public-school funding and called for swift school reopenings during the coronavirus pandemic. Mr. Biden, meanwhile, has said he wants to expand resources for public schools and has pledged to appoint a teacher to head the Education Department.”

Regarding those rotten public schools and the civil rights-based, freedom-driven concept of school choice, Department of Education spokesperson Angela Morabito said, “There is no one less powerful and more marginalized than the student trapped in a failing, government-assigned school with no way out.”

Former Obama Education Secretary Arne Duncan, though, says those policies are going to “fundamentally change.”

Biden himself has pledged to reinstitute the Obama administration’s rules on “transgender” students and bathroom choice as well as its awful “guilty until proven innocent” Title IX sexual-assault directive. And he’s likely to do the same with racist Obama-era guidelines that encouraged the use of race in college admissions and that directed schools to count by race when punishing students for misbehavior.

Biden also said, tellingly, during a presidential victory speech earlier this month, “For American educators, this is a great day for you all. You’re going to have one of your own in the White House, and Jill’s going to make a great first lady.” Notice how he addressed American educators and not American parents. Which cohort do you think has a greater stake in the education of our nation’s children?

In addition, Biden has called for “more stringent guardrails for charter schools,” which is euphemism soup for slashed funding and more onerous regulations.

Professor Williams had always been more than a bit dubious of leftist do-gooders like Duncan and Biden, especially as it pertained to inner-city blacks. “I think that the Democrats have been very successful in portraying themselves as the caring people,” he said, “when, if you look at the effects of the Democratic Party on black people, I think it’s horrible, it’s horrendous. For example, if you ask the question, ‘In what cities do blacks live under the worst conditions — in terms of crime, rotten education, poor services?’ — these are the very cities that have been run for decades by Democrats.”

Why do we have a sense that the Good Professor had a lot more street cred here than Arne Duncan and his ilk?

Professor Williams’s second-to-last column, which we posted Wednesday, is titled, sadly but fittingly, “Black Education Tragedy Is New.” In it, he discussed the often-ignored truth that black educational underachievement hasn’t always been as disastrous as it is in today’s inner cities.

“Should we blame this education tragedy on racial discrimination or claim that it is a legacy of slavery?” he asked. “Dr. Thomas Sowell’s research in ‘Education: Assumptions Versus History’ documents academic excellence at Baltimore’s Frederick Douglass High School and others. This academic excellence occurred during the late 1800s to mid-1900s, an era when blacks were much poorer than today and faced gross racial discrimination.”

He didn’t believe that this awful disparity is preordained. “You can bet the rent money,” he said, “that white liberals and high-income blacks would not begin to accept the kind of education for their children that most blacks receive.” Williams pointed to a rise in violence and a drop in respect as root causes: “First- and second-graders telling teachers to ‘Shut the f— up’ and calling teachers ‘b—h,’” as he put it.

“Years ago,” he concludes, “much of the behavior of young people that we see today would have never been tolerated. … Today, unfortunately, we have replaced practices that worked with practices that sound good and caring. And we are witnessing the results.”

Biden’s “solution”? More of the same, but with gusto because the teachers unions will have “one of their own” in the White House. And if black parents don’t like it, well, he might say “you ain’t black.”

Comment | Share

Biden’s ‘Wilting’ and ‘Diminished’ Foreign Policy Team

Nate Jackson

We’ve noted more than once that Joe Biden’s foreign policy will not only be very different from Donald Trump’s but will undo much of Trump’s stellar success. You’ve also heard it said that personnel is policy. So here’s a look at the personnel Biden wants to bring (back) to the swamp.

“We have no time to lose when it comes to our national security and foreign policy,” Biden said when discussing the Obama retreads populating his foreign policy team. “I need a team ready on Day One to help me reclaim America’s seat at the head of the table, rally the world to meet the biggest challenges we face, and advance our security, prosperity, and values.”

Well, as former Defense Secretary Robert Gates said of Biden, he’s been “wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades.” So it’s unlikely he’ll pick the right people for his team.

Not all the players have been announced, and we’re a long way from January 20 in any case. But let’s start with the State Department, where Biden has tapped Tony Blinken to replace Mike Pompeo.

Blinken served as deputy national security adviser and deputy secretary of state in the Obama administration and is a lefty from Barack Obama’s Lead From Behind™ School of Diplomacy. Blinken embraced the Iran nuclear deal. He pushed for more American troops in Syria and backed Obama’s disastrous misadventure in Libya. He’s a Russia-collusion hoaxer. Like Biden, he has unexplained ties to China. Yet as with so many creatures of the Left who are wrong on virtually every issue, Blinken is failing upward to the serve as one of the president’s most prominent Cabinet officials.

Jake Sullivan is Biden’s choice for national security advisor. He was Biden’s NSA during the last administration, and before that he was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff. He too was a fanboy of the Iran nuclear deal — in fact, he was said to be “instrumental in shaping” that deal. On Clinton’s bogus Steele dossier, Sullivan was a true believer: “I believe that [the Steele dossier] is perfectly appropriate and responsible if we get wind or people associated with the campaign get wind that there may be real questions about the connections between Donald Trump, his organization, and Russia that that be explored fully. At this point, we’re finding out more and more that’s deeply troubling.”

Indeed we are.

For Homeland Security, Biden is looking to Alejandro Mayorkas. Senator Tom Cotton warns: “Alejandro Mayorkas was found by Barack Obama’s Inspector General to be guilty of selling Green Cards to Chinese nationals on behalf of rich, democratic donors.” But we can trust him to run Homeland Security.

As for the United Nations, the ambassadorship will go to Linda Thomas-Greenfield. She’s more concerned with social justice and putting America in its place (which is down a few pegs) than she is in advancing our interests internationally. As she herself wrote, “The contours of a new agenda for diplomatic reform have to flow from a sensible reinvention of the United States’ role in the world. … U.S. diplomacy has to accept [this] country’s diminished, but still pivotal, role in global affairs. It has to apply greater restraint and discipline; it must develop a greater awareness of the United States’ position and more humility about the wilting power of the American example.”

“Diminished.” “Wilting.” If that doesn’t describe Biden’s foreign policy (or pretty much anything else), we don’t know what does.

Speaking of diminished and wilting, however, Biden has tapped John Kerry to serve as his climate czar, a position that does not need Senate confirmation but will be part of his national security team. Lumping climate with national security gives you an idea of leftist priorities.

On a final note, given that China is our number one national security threat, the most alarming thing about Biden’s team — and Biden himself — is the rampant and deep ties to China and the people at every level, all the way up to the “Big Guy” himself.

Comment | Share

Dems’ Pandemic of COVID Hypocrites

Thomas Gallatin

The surest sign that an elected official is more motivated by power than principle is when they blatantly flout the very rules they impose on others. It’s the classic authoritarian attitude of “rules for thee but not for me.” And Democrat officials across the country have been demonstrating this hypocritical authoritarian attitude in spades ever since the coronavirus pandemic hit.

California Governor Gavin Newsom just issued a new stay-at-home order (that the LA County sheriff, among others, will not enforce). We’ll see how well Newsom does in following his own rules this time. Remember, just before Thanksgiving, Newsom was observed dining mask-less at the ritzy Napa Valley establishment The French Laundry, celebrating a birthday party just hours after he had released more COVID guidelines on mask-wearing and restricting social gatherings to three households or fewer. At least Newsom offered an apology after being caught, which is more than can be said of most other Dem officials busted breaking their own rules. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi blamed the salon owner after she was caught violating local shutdown rules.

Back to The French Laundry. On the very next night after Newsom was caught, San Francisco Mayor London Breed, who has cultivated a public reputation as a stickler for COVID rules, was seen dining at the establishment sans mask and not social distancing. Her spokesman defended her actions by saying that she had not technically broken state rules. However, she certainly broke the rules she’s imposed on San Francisco, banning any dining at such establishments.

Moving down the California coast to Los Angeles, we find that County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl, a Democrat, provides yet another blatant flouting of rules after she was caught dining at an outdoor restaurant immediately after issuing a directive banning outdoor dining. Her excuse? Well, she had to get in one last meal at her favorite dining establishment prior to her edict going into effect. But isn’t it serious? Why, yes. She insisted when announcing the new rule, “This is a serious health emergency and we must take it seriously. The servers are not protected from us, and they’re not protected from their other tables that they’re serving at that particular time, plus all the hours in which they’re working.” Evidently, Kuehl believed the virus would be transmissible only after her edict went into effect.

Before leaving the Golden State, let’s not ignore Senator Dianne Feinstein’s failure to practice what she preaches, as she has regularly been spotted speaking to colleagues on Capitol Hill without her mask, even as she decrees, “Wearing masks in public should be mandatory. Period.”

Then there’s the case of Denver Democrat Mayor Michael Hancock, who hopped on a private jet to fly down to Mississippi to spend Thanksgiving with his daughter. No big deal — it was a private flight — right? Just pay no attention to the fact that, just 30 minutes prior to his flight, he sent out the following message: “With the continued rise in cases, I’m urging you to refrain from travel this Thanksgiving holiday. For my family that means cancelling our traditional gathering of our extended family.”

But even in deep-red states, Democrat elected officials’ hypocrisy abounds. In Texas, Austin Mayor Steve Adler in November admonished city residents via a video message in which he lectured, “Stay home if you can. This is not the time to relax. We are going to be looking really closely. … We may have to close things down if we are not careful.” Except Adler wasn’t in Austin when he delivered that appeal. He wasn’t even in the Lone Star State. Nor was he in the U.S. Adler was, in fact, down in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, where he had gone to vacation with his family after having just attended his daughter’s wedding in Austin.

Moving east to the Bayou State, Democrat Governor John Bel Edwards wrote just before Thanksgiving, “Always wear your mask if you are around people not part of your immediate household.” Except for him. He was photographed at a Baton Rouge Country Club mingling with other diners — without a mask.

On the East Coast, in the City of Brotherly Love, restauranteurs aren’t getting much love from Mayor Jim Kenny, whose policies have shut down restaurants in Philadelphia. But Kenny, whose appetite for fine cuisine must be satiated, saw no problem in traveling over the border into Maryland to dine at an establishment on the Chesapeake Bay. His jaunt provoked the ire of Philadelphia chef Marc Vetri, who wrote on social media, “Glad you’re enjoying indoor dining with no social distancing or mask wearing in Maryland tonight while restaurants here in Philly close, suffer and fight for every nickel just to survive. I guess all your press briefings and your narrative of unsafe indoor dining don’t apply to you. Thank you for clearing it all up for us tonight.”

Either these hypocrites don’t believe the virus is dangerous, or they don’t give a rip about potentially spreading COVID to their constituents. And the result of this hypocrisy will be more people ignoring their warnings. As National Review’s Jim Geraghty observes, “If another bunch of fat-cat politicians try to decree that no one should get together for Christmas, and that everyone should stay out of restaurants and church and so on, the reaction from much of the public will be a metaphorical middle finger, and that reaction will be entirely deserved. Elected officials didn’t start this pandemic with a ton of trust and respect for their authority, and the worst among them have destroyed what was left in the past few weeks.”

Ever wonder why conservatives have never been big on Big Government?

Comment | Share

More Evidence of ChiCom Pandemic Malfeasance

Mark Alexander

Ahead of the critical release of the Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed vaccines, there was more evidence this week of what we already know: Red China concealed information about the CV19 pandemic, and that concealment significantly increased the spread of the virus worldwide.

According to global health expert Yanzhong Huang, the latest leaked Wuhan files from the Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control add to what is already known about the ChiCom suppression of information regarding the onset of the virus.

Huang notes: “It was clear they did make mistakes — and not just mistakes that happen when you’re dealing with a novel virus — also bureaucratic and politically motivated errors in how they handled it. These had global consequences. You can never guarantee 100% transparency. It’s not just about any intentional cover-up, you are also constrained with by technology and other issues with a novel virus. But even if they had been 100% transparent, that would not stop the Trump administration downplaying the seriousness of it. It would probably not have stopped this developing into a pandemic.”

Andrew Mertha, director of the China Studies Program at Johns Hopkins University, concluded: “China had an image to protect internationally, and lower-ranking officials had a clear incentive to under-report — or to show their superiors that they were under-reporting — to outside eyes.” He added that the under-reporting of deaths “appeared to be a deception, for unsurprising reasons.”

Meanwhile, in the deadly wake of the ChiComs’ willful and grossly negligent cover-up of the China Virus, the Demos’ Leftmedia cover-up of Joe Biden’s nefarious ChiCom influence-peddling scheme remains in blackout status.

Comment | Share

The Systemic Decline of the American Family

Brian Mark Weber

The 2020 election may bring new leadership to the White House in January, but the problems plaguing cities and towns across America remain unchanged.

Like a scene out of a dystopian novel, youth gangs roam the streets toppling statues, breaking windows, and attacking innocent bystanders. Theirs is a world turned upside down by a revolution devoid of morals or principles.

Yet while millions of Americans watch in horror at the unraveling of our social fabric, we tend to avoid the hard questions. It’s not that we don’t care, but maybe we’re fearful that decades of broken families really have contributed to our current state of affairs.

As Stanley Kurtz writes at National Review, “Because the family has been seen since approximately forever as society’s foundation, it makes sense from the traditional point of view that family decline would have pervasive social effects. Yet no one dares discuss it.”

We don’t discuss it because our culture has been changed in part by the unending onslaught of TV shows, movies, music, and books that mock traditional families, celebrate single-parent households, encourage a life of decadence, and reward selfish pursuits.

Across the board, we’ve failed to defend our way of life in the face of a multi-pronged attack that’s ripping apart the ideals and institutions we long believed in. These days, we’re fearful of speaking out and defending what we’ve always held so dear.

But defending a way of life is only possible if we believe in that way of life. Having been taught by our popular culture to think Western and Christian values are oppressive and destructive, too many young people want to tear down the entire system.

Increasingly, the breakdown of the American family seems to be the culprit, and Mary Eberstadt of the Faith and Reason Institute believes the loss of fathers, faith, and patriotism are to blame. As Eberstadt notes, “Some people, mainly on the left, think there’s nothing to see here. They’re wrong. The vast majority of incarcerated juveniles have grown up in fatherless homes. Teen and other mass murderers almost invariably have filial rupture in their biographies. Absent fathers predict higher rates of truancy, psychiatric problems, criminality, promiscuity, drug use, rape, domestic violence, and other less-than-optimal outcomes. Here’s another pertinent, albeit socially radioactive fact: Fatherlessness leads to a search for father substitutes. And some of these daddy placeholders turn out to be toxic.”

Eberstadt also points out that many of the extreme ideologues pushing critical race theory on the Left, and white nationalism on the Right, are products of fatherless homes. She notes that the lack of a father, or the presence of a dysfunctional father, also leads to a lack of faith in God, increased anger toward social and political systems, and sexual promiscuity.

Kurtz agrees, adding, “The ever-growing number of Americans who pursue education post-high school, and the ever-lengthening number of years during which they do so, is now driving the delay of marriage and, with it, family decline.”

It’s an interesting take on a complex issue, and collectively we’ve certainly created the perception among young people that college is the best path toward a good life. But there has to be more to the decline of families than sending kids off to college. After all, thousands of American soldiers spent years in Europe fighting world wars, but they came home ready and able to embrace marriage, family, and God.

In the end, it’s hard to deny that millions of fatherless children have been lost. It may be too late to save them, but we have the power in our hands and in our hearts to make sure the next generation enjoys the benefits of a home centered on the values that have served us so well for so long: God, family, and country.

Comment | Share

Cashing in on the Diversity Racket

Douglas Andrews

With apologies to female Patriots everywhere, there’s a hilarious scene in the movie “As Good as It Gets” in which Jack Nicholson, who plays a well-known novelist, is approached by a star-struck young female reader. “How do you write women so well?” she gushingly asks.

Distracted, impatient, and in no mood for banter, Nicholson replies, “I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability.” Then he gets on the elevator and off he goes.

Why do we share this sexist clip? Because it perfectly captures our thoughts on the “diversity consulting” industry. There’s no reason to it, nor any accountability. And yet it’s thriving, raking in millions of our hard-earned taxpayer dollars, thanks to the Diversicrats and their outsized influence in all levels of government.

Take the Mid-Atlantic Equity Consortium, for example. It’s a social justice nonprofit — or an “equity consulting firm” for those who’d rather call a guy who pumps gas a “petroleum transfer technician” — that’s funded entirely by our taxpayer dollars. As The Washington Free Beacon’s Chrissy Clark and Joe Schoffstall report, the consortium “conducts ‘anti-racist audits’ for corporations and schools, often in partnership with far-left groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center. The consortium was recently awarded a lucrative contract by Maryland’s largest school district and works with educators across 15 states.”

P.T. Barnum might never have said “There’s a sucker born every minute,” but if he did, he was no doubt thinking about the sort of chump who’d pay good money to be told he’s a racist. Thank you, sir. May I have another?

Would that these racial-grievance grifters were limited to bilking the government. At least then we’d know where our tax dollars were being wasted. But, as Clark and Schoffstall write, “Equity firms have profited greatly from the burgeoning anti-racist movement in academia. The MAEC was awarded a $454,680 contract with the Montgomery County Public School district to conduct an ‘anti-racist audit’ of the school’s policies; in nearby Loudoun County, a similar consulting firm raked in $422,500 in two years. Prominent diversity consultants, such as White Fragility author Robin DiAngelo, make nearly $13,000 for a speaking gig on college campuses.”

It pains us to say it, but regular readers of The Patriot Post know all about Racist Robin, a white woman who’s somehow overcome her pallor to become one of the nation’s most successful race hustlers. Our Thomas Gallatin covered her lucrative two-hour shakedown of the University of Kentucky back in July, writing, “DiAngelo promoted her latest ‘woke’ work, the obtusely titled White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism.” As Gallatin dryly noted, “No one ever told DiAngelo that racism has been one of the most widely and repeatedly discussed issues in this nation since the civil-rights era of the 1960s.”

All isn’t lost, however. City Journal’s Christopher Rufo, for one, doesn’t believe that taxpayers should be funding the indoctrination of government employees via “divisive pseudosciences” such as critical race theory, and President Donald Trump seems to agree.

In September, the president issued a lengthy and detailed executive order banning federal contractors from teaching “this malign ideology [that] is now migrating from the fringes of American society and threatens to infect core institutions of our country.”

Executive orders are, of course, orders rather than laws, so a future administration could simply undo Trump’s anti-anti-racist EO. But at least we’d get a good sense of how that future administration believes our hard-earned tax dollars should be spent.

Comment | Share

The Plight of Nigeria

Michael Swartz

It often seems that the trouble popping up in far-off places eventually comes home to roost. Few Americans devote much thought to Nigeria — aside from an occasional joke about its all-too-frequent email scams — but after a kidnapping that involved a rescue from SEAL Team 6, that African nation is attracting a little bit of our international spotlight.

While that abduction involved an American living in the next-door nation of Niger who was then brought across the border, the concern about his safety arose because of the increasing frequency of kidnappers selling their captives. As The Military Times reports, “Concern grew quickly after the kidnapping that an opportunity to rescue [hostage Philip Nathan] Walton could become much more dangerous if he was taken by or sold to a group of Islamist militants aligned with either al-Qaida or ISIS and American special operations commanders felt they needed to act swiftly before that could occur, said one counterterrorism official briefed on the hostage recovery operations.”

Walton was one of the lucky ones. As our Louis DeBroux pointed out back in June, more than 50,000 Africans have been murdered in Nigeria over the last decade. Most of these victims were Christians who died at the hands of Islamic-associated groups, Boko Haram being the most infamous. (DeBroux also notes the still-unsolved 2014 kidnapping of 276 schoolgirls by the group that the Obama administration addressed with a social media hashtag.) Last week, that same group was blamed for a one-day massacre of 110 farmers around the city of Mauduguri in northeast Nigeria, the area where Boko Haram is most prevalent.

Even more chilling was the kidnapping and murder of Michael Nnadi, an 18-year-old seminary student who was abducted with three other students last January. The reason why Michael was executed but not one of the other three? “He did not allow me any peace,” said his Muslim captor. “He just kept preaching to me his gospel. … I did not like the confidence he displayed [in his faith], and I decided to send him to an early grave.” In other words, he was killed for being a devout Christian.

Unfortunately, the prevailing attitude in Nigeria seems to be either a shrug of the shoulders or hollow lip service. “Some in the government of Nigeria, which notoriously lacks the rule of law, have been complicit in the attacks,” observes The Heritage Foundation’s Patrick Tyrrell. “Data on cellphones inadvertently left behind by the killers identified owners of the phones as government insiders. Police are also complicit, according to reports. Some police stations haven’t responded to brutal anti-Christian violence even when loud gunfire and screams are clearly audible from less than a mile away.”

The fact that our government felt compelled to call in SEAL Team 6 seems to be a vote of no confidence in the Nigerian government.

It’s no secret that we’ve been doing battle in some form with radical Islam for most of the last 40 years, ever since the Iranian Revolution and the accompanying hostage crisis of the Carter administration. But while we’ve focused on the hot spots of Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, and Afghanistan — much of which was derided as “blood for oil” by the Left — the age-old battle between Christians and Muslims occurs in many other places as well. Nigeria’s situation, where Christians tend to dominate in the southern half of the nation while Muslims prevail in the north, has put the lie to the Left’s phony “coexist” mantra. Nigeria is becoming a war zone, and the more well-armed Islamists are the aggressors.

Despite its successes in other areas of diplomacy, the Trump administration made little progress in dealing with the issues in Nigeria. Unfortunately, the Obama-era retreads who are poised to populate a Biden administration have an even worse track record of success. Thus, it’s not out of the question that Nigeria’s problems could become ours before too long.

At Nnadi’s funeral, Bishop Matthew Hassan Kukah bemoaned the fate of his brethren: “Our nation is like a ship stranded on the high seas, rudderless and with broken navigational aids. … Nigeria is on the crossroads, and its future stands precariously in a balance.”

Nigeria’s plight serves as a reminder that the Long War we’ve been fighting exists on many fronts, and at a moment’s notice we may become involved once again.

Comment | Share

NEWS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Jordan Candler

Election Debrief

  • Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to hear Trump campaign legal challenge (National Review)
  • Ousted House Democrats warn party against moving too far left (Washington Examiner)

Government & Politics

  • Joe Biden names Brian Deese, an Obama-era henchman, as top economic ecofascist aide (NPR)
  • Biden set to push job-killing minimum wage hikes (Washington Examiner)
  • Maxine Waters’ campaign paid her daughter $240,000 over 2019-20 election cycle (Fox News)

Apparently, this is the Democrat modus operandi. Ilhan Omar has paid her husband’s firm millions.

  • Senate (very) narrowly confirms Christopher Waller to serve on Fed’s board (AP)
  • Supreme Court backs California ministry on “draconian and unconscionable” COVID rules (National Review)
  • DNI John Ratcliffe says they can’t declassify all of Russiagate’s secrets (Washington Examiner)

Leftmedia

Health

  • Biden to call for 100 days of masks after inauguration (Fox News)

Memo to Biden: Most Americans already wear a mask and have been for a good chunk of 2020.

  • Governor Gavin “French Laundry” Newsom introduces new stay-at-home order (NBC News) | LA County deputies won’t enforce Newsom’s diktat (Fox News)

“Theater of the Absurd” Headline Award

  • One in every 800 North Dakota residents is now dead from COVID (Daily Mail)

Behold, the textbook definition of manufacturing bombastic news.

Genes of Steel

  • 102-year-old New Yorker who also lived through the 1918 flu pandemic and is a cancer survivor beats COVID twice (Disrn)

National Security

  • More than 1,000 visiting researchers affiliated with the Chinese military fled the U.S. this summer (The Washington Post)
  • U.S. imposes severe travel restrictions on Chinese Communist Party members (NPR)

“The restrictions target holders of business (B-1) and tourist (B-2) visas, reducing the travel documents’ maximum validity to one month, down from the current maximum of 10 years. … The Chinese Communist Party has more than 90 million members, effectively making the State Department visa action the Trump administration’s most sweeping and direct attack on the party.”

Business & Economy

  • DOJ sues Facebook for discriminating against American workers (National Review)
  • Data shows Americans couldn’t resist Thanksgiving travel (AP)
  • OPEC and allies agree to gradually increase production (CNBC)

Annals of the “Social Justice” Caliphate

  • Chicago sees massive spike in police-targeted shootings (Free Beacon)
  • Oppressed LGBT minority actor Ellen Page transitions to evil white male (Not the Bee)
  • Ever wondered what your Privilege/Marginalization score was? There’s a worksheet for that! (Not the Bee)

Double Standards

  • San Francisco to bar tobacco smoking in condos and apartments — but marijuana will remain legal (Disrn)
  • AOC roasted for selling “Tax the Rich” sweatshirts for $58 (The Washington Times)

Based on AOC’s ideology, shouldn’t this shirt be free? In any case, Jim Treacher makes a great point: “AOC is never going to make a shirt for jerks like me, because nobody ever became powerful by leaving people alone.” But hey, the price could be worse. At least it’s nowhere near the $10,000 it costs for a can of “Tax the Rich” caviar.

Stranger Than Fiction

  • Politician named after Adolf Hitler wins election in Namibia (Daily Mail)

On a Lighter Note…

  • Department of Transportation cracks down on type of emotional support animal allowed on planes (Disrn)

As the article states, “The new rule will put an end to what had become a widely-abused loophole allowing passengers to bring a wide array of different creatures aboard, including peacocks, pigs, and snakes.” Allow comedian John Crist to demonstrate.

  • This poor Amazon driver got chased off by hens (Not the Bee)
  • Jurassic gator devours hunters’ ducks before they can retrieve them (Not the Bee)
  • This video will make you never want to drive over a bridge again (Not the Bee)
  • Twenty-five pups that won the “Grumpy Dog Photo Challenge” paws down (InspireMore)

Closing Arguments

  • Policy: Rx for America’s dysfunctional health insurance system (Manhattan Institute)
  • Policy: Fiscal federalism during the COVID pandemic (AEI)
  • Humor: Gretchen Whitmer casts spell on Michigan so it’s always winter and never Christmas (The Babylon Bee)

For more of today’s editors’ choice headlines, visit Headline Report.

The Patriot Post is a certified ad-free news service, unlike third-party commercial news sites linked on this page, which may also require a paid subscription.

Comment | Share

VIDEOS

How the Media Stole the Election — A plethora of votes would have gone against Biden had voters simply been informed.

Obama Speaks Out Against ‘Defund the Police’ — Or does he?

Humor: Guy Who Loves Christmas Inflatables — “One is one too many and one more is never enough.”

BEST OF RIGHT OPINION

 

 

For more of today’s columns, visit Right Opinion.

SHORT CUTS

Insight: “The only proper purpose of a government is to protect man’s rights, which means: to protect him from physical violence. A proper government is only a policeman, acting as an agent of man’s self-defense, and, as such, may only resort to force only against those who start the use of force.” —Ayn Rand (1905-1982)

For the record: “Policies should never entice students into greater debt, nor should they put taxpayer dollars at greater risk. There are too many politicians today who support policy that does both. We’ve heard shrill calls to cancel, to forgive, to make it all free. Any innocuous label out there can’t obfuscate what it really is: wrong. The campaign for free college is a matter of total government control. Make no mistake: It is a socialist takeover of higher education.” —Education Secretary Betsy DeVos

Upright: “Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are totally destructive. Every Georgia conservative who cares about America MUST vote in the runoff. Their ‘don’t vote’ strategy will cripple America.” —Newt Gingrich

Dezinformatsiya: “On Monday, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem buried her grandmother, who was among 13 to die over a two-week period at a top-rated nursing home swept by COVID-19. … The number makes clear the lunacy of Noem’s downplaying of the pandemic and her continued refusal to impose a statewide mask mandate.” —The Daily Beast’s Michael Daly, who admits, “The 98-year-old grandmother, Aldys Arnold, is said by Noem’s office to have tested negative for the virus.”

Non compos mentis: “I have two words for MAGA Nation: Don’t Die. Your love of and loyalty to Trump isn’t worth your life. With 73 million of you refusing to wear a mask and to social distance, there’ll be no way to eradicate this disease. And a lot of you are going to die. … Why are you doing NOTHING to stop this slaughter? What will it take for you and I to join, arm in arm, to kill Covid-19? … Look at it this way — if millions of you die off, that’s a lot less Republican voters — and that means we win every election from here on out!” —Michael Moore

Village idiot: “Humanity is waging war on nature. This is suicidal. Nature always strikes back — and it is already doing so with growing force and fury.” —UN Secretary General Antonio Gutteres

And last… “If you can loot businesses, burn down buildings, [and] engage in protest, you can also go to a Christmas party.” —White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany

Comment | Share

TODAY’S MEME

Share

For more of today’s memes, visit the Memesters Union.

TODAY’S CARTOON

Share

For more of today’s cartoons, visit the Cartoons archive.

Read Online

“The Patriot Post” (https://patriotpost.us)

Obama, Biden and Schiff committed treason against America through cyber warfare election fraud

(Natural News) The “kraken” is finally being released, and it is revealing that big Democrat names like Joe Biden, Adam Schiff and Barack Obama committed treason against the United States by engaging in cyber warfare against our election process.

Source: Obama, Biden and Schiff committed treason against America through cyber warfare election fraud

About Those Vaccine ID Cards…

Article Image
 • Zero Hedge

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

An idea that’s simple as an abstraction – vaccine ID cards – turns out to be extremely difficult once real-world operational realities must be dealt with.

Authorities around the world have made it clear that they will do “whatever it takes” to vaccinate their citizenry with one of the first available vaccines. Authoritarian states may mandate universal vaccinations while less authoritarian states will favor a “carrot and stick” approach of offering benefits to the vaccinated and exclusions from employment, education, travel and most of everyday life for those who refuse to be vaccinated.

To identify the vaccinated and unvaccinated, many nations are planning to issue ID cards or “vaccine passports.” As an abstraction, this seems straightforward, but if we start digging into the actual operational requirements of this mass ID card issuance and distribution, a number of common-sense issues arise.

Vaccination cards will be issued to everyone getting Covid-19 vaccine, health officials say (CNN)

First and foremost, it’s unknown how long the immunity offered by the vaccines will last. It’s still early days, so there is conflicting evidence: some claim the vaccines will be longer-lasting than the natural immunity of those who caught the virus and recovered, while other evidence suggests the immunity might decay after six months. Despite claims that natural immunity is long-lasting, a non-trivial number of people who had Covid have been re-infected.

Pfizer CEO “Not Certain” Vaccine Will Stop People From Spreading COVID-19 | ZeroHedge News

By Joseph Jankowski of PlanetFreeWill,

Just one day after the United Kingdom became the first western nation to approve the inoculation, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla says that he is “not certain” that the company’s vaccine will prevent people from carrying and spreading the virus to others.

In a Thursday night interview with NBC, the CEO expressed confidence in the ability “to send vaccines within 24 hours basically [anywhere] in the U.S.” after receiving emergency use authorization from the Food and Drug Administration, but he remains unconfident in the vaccine’s ability to be a silver bullet against people carrying and transmitting COVID-19.

“Even though I’ve had the protection, am I still able to transmit it to other people?” NBC’s Lester Holt asked, to which Bourla responded: “I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain about that right now.”

Last month, Pfizer announced that its vaccine – developed along side BioNTech – proved over 90% effective in giving immunity. Although this statistic on its face sounds remarkable, researchers have warned that the clinical trials did not assess whether the vaccine can prevent the virus from spreading.

“We have no knowledge about whether it prevents you from actually acquiring the infection at all,” Dr. Larry Corey, a virologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, told Business Insider.

The FDA is expected to make a decision on emergency use authorization as soon as December 10.

Moncef Slaoui, the top adviser on the US government’s Operation Warp Speed, predicted on Wednesday that more than 100 million Americans would be vaccinated against COVID-19 within the next 100 days.

Considering the lack of confidence from not only the Pfizer CEO, but also researchers in the field, about the potential inability of the vaccine to prevent infections and the spread of the virus, it will remain to be seen how many people actually take the jab.

poll from STAT and The Harris Poll showed in November that 6 in 10 Americans said they are somewhat or very likely to get a Covid-19 vaccine if doing so would lower the risk of becoming infected by about half.

Polls out of the UK show that some 67% of people say they are “likely” or “very likely” to receive the vaccine if it were voluntary, however, if the shot was to be made compulsory, this figure fell to 65%.

The UK is expected to begin giving Pfizer’s shots to a portion of the population next week.

Source: Pfizer CEO “Not Certain” Vaccine Will Stop People From Spreading COVID-19

Experts warn mRNA vaccines could cause irreversible genetic damage

Article Image
 • Natural News – Cassie B

Chief among his concerns is the fact that the messenger RNA, or mRNA, vaccines are the first vaccines in history to intervene directly in patients’ genetic material and alter it, posing problems when it comes to health, ethics and morality.

These vaccines involve injecting a sequence of genetic RNA material that was made in a lab into the body, where it invades the cells and takes over their protein-generating ribosomes to produce the coronavirus’s famous spike protein that gives it the crown-like appearance that inspired its name. Then, your body should, at least in theory, be trained to fight the virus if it encounters it later. In short, these vaccines turn your body’s cells into factories that create proteins that spur a pathogen-specific immune response.

mRNA vaccines are being hailed in some quarters for their breakthrough technology, and while they do have some advantages over traditional vaccines, the fact remains that we simply do not know anything about their long-term effects. While we definitely don’t want to downplay how devastating this disease can be to a small percentage of patients, the massive vaccination campaigns that many countries around the world wish to embark upon could be putting a huge percentage of the population at risk of a slew of unknown problems.