Daily Archives: December 23, 2020

“I Gotta Lot Of Problems” – Rand Paul’s 2020 Airing Of (Spending) Grievances | ZeroHedge News

Having been almost the lone voice of sanity this week in Washington as he lambasted the insane levels of ‘pork’ piled into the Spending/COVID Bill, Senator Rand Paul has turned his ire up to 11 with the release of his annual “airing of grievances” exposure of all that is bad and wasteful about America’s politics.

In a series of tweets, Dr.Paul offered little in the way of holiday cheer… that is sure to disgust many…

Take Congress…PLEASE! They have really outdone themselves this year with the massive special interest giveaway disguised as a relief bill. It is a disgrace in both the level of spending and the process they used to try to sneak it through. But this week’s pork-a-thon isn’t new.

My #Festivus Waste Report is now an unfortunate Holiday tradition, though a shameful one, if most legislators had any shame. Why? This one report details $54 BILLION in wasted spending.

The average taxpayer pays around $10,000 in taxes. That means they set the taxes of 5,471,368 people on fire this year. And that’s just want we could document in one little report, and doesn’t come close to counting the unconstitutional things Congress spends on.

What would $54 billion dollars of taxpayer money have funded if we had tried to use it properly?

One example, it would have built 456,221 miles of road.

It would have built TWO entire border walls with Mexico.

It could have funded the Department of the Treasury for three years, not that we really want to spend that much at Treasury.

Speaking of Treasury, I see Joe Biden says he intends to nominate Janet Yellen, former chair of the Federal Reserve to run the treasury. Talk about letting the fox in the henhouse. AUDIT THE FED! AUDIT THE TREASURY! AUDIT YELLEN AND BIDEN!! AUDIT EVERYTHING!

Ok, now that I got that off my chest, back to the waste report.

So this year, while the petty tyrants in many of our states closed the schools (against all science), Congress said oh, we can do better than that. So they spent $25 MILLION to teach English to rural, unemployed Romanians.

They also spent $36 million to study why hair turns gray. I have a few theories on that, and they all have to do with being in the U.S. Senate with people who vote for the things in this waste report.

They spent $1.5m to get Eastern Mediterranean kids to stop smoking hookah. Then they said hey, let’s go all out, and snuck a bunch of new rules about shipping vape products in the omnibus bill this week.

They spent $3m to interview San Franciscans about edible cannabis use. Really. They must not have spent a lot of time around people who love cannabis. You do NOT need to pay them to talk about it.

What’s next, government funding to get people to post more about their CrossFit and Keto programs?

The government is never content to just waste money normally. They have to really put their shoulders into it. So this year, the Defense Department spent $1 BILLION in funds intended for Covid relief on unrelated acquisitions.

In my favorite WTF moment of the #Festivus Waste report: Your government spent $4.5 million to spray alcoholic rats with bobcat urine.

I do this all day long, and I swear to God I don’t even know what that means.

Your betters have spent a lot of this year reminding you the rules don’t apply to them. French Laundry dinners. Traveling for holidays while promoting restrictions for you, the stories seem to come up all the time

It came up in the bill this week too when they spent $20 million to rebuild a runway for private planes on Nantucket.

This marks Dr. Paul’s sixth edition of the Festivus Report as he continues working to alert the American people to how their federal government uses their hard-earned money. This year, each story received a “Platinum Pig Award” that ranked the waste on a scale of 1-5 (with 5 being the most wasteful). Sections are broken down into Health Care; Foreign Aid; Environment, Energy, Science; Military; and Miscellaneous, and highlights include lizards on treadmills, losing over 100 drones in Afghanistan, and combating binge-watching.

Below is Senator Paul’s full ‘Festivus’ Report:

Source: “I Gotta Lot Of Problems” – Rand Paul’s 2020 Airing Of (Spending) Grievances

Newt Gingrich Says He ‘Will Not Accept Joe Biden As President’ | The Gateway Pundit

Millions of Americans do not accept the outcome of the 2020 election. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is one of them.

The irregularities in voting, the flooding of the country with mail-in ballots, the pausing of vote counting in the middle of the night and more. When you put it all together, it’s just too much to bear.

Gingrich made his thoughts known in a recent op-ed for the Washington Times:

Why I will not accept Joe Biden as president

A smart friend of mine who is a moderate liberal asked why I was not recognizing Joe Biden’s victory.

The friend made the case that Mr. Biden had gotten more votes, and historically we recognize the person with the most votes. Normally, we accept the outcome of elections just as we accept the outcomes of sporting events.

So, my friend asked why was 2020 different?

Having spent more than four years watching the left #Resist President Donald Trump and focus entirely on undoing and undermining the 2016 election, it took me several days to understand the depth of my own feelings.

As I thought about it, I realized my anger and fear were not narrowly focused on votes. My unwillingness to relax and accept that the election grew out of a level of outrage and alienation unlike anything I had experienced in more than 60 years involvement in public affairs.

The challenge is that I — and other conservatives — are not disagreeing with the left within a commonly understood world. We live in alternative worlds.

Read the rest here.

Trump tweeted about it:

 

Millions of Americans feel the same way.

Cross posted from American Lookout.

Source: Newt Gingrich Says He ‘Will Not Accept Joe Biden As President’

‘Significant, Credible Evidence’ Ravi Zacharias Engaged in Sexual Misconduct, Report States — ChurchLeaders

allegations of sexual misconduct

The law firm hired to investigate multiple allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse by the late Ravi Zacharias has released an interim report. While their investigation is not complete, the firm reports that they “have found significant, credible evidence that Mr. Zacharias engaged in sexual misconduct over the course of many years.”

Furthermore, the report confirms that “some” of the allegations that have been investigated and reported by news outlets this year are consistent with their findings. Most troubling in the interim report is this statement: “Some of that misconduct is consistent with and corroborative of that which is reported in the news recently, and some of the conduct we have uncovered is more serious.”

The report is written by Lynsey M. Barron of the law firm Miller & Martin. In, Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM) announced they would be hiring the firm to investigate claims multiple workers at spas formerly co-owned by Zacharias made that the world-renowned apologist had solicited them for sex. 

Barron writes that while looking into the allegations, private investigators hired by Miller & Martin spoke to “many” witnesses, including massage therapists who worked at the spas Zacharias co-owned and who wish to remain anonymous. The investigators also “reviewed numerous documents and electronic devices used by Mr. Zacharias over the years.”

The interim report emphasizes that the investigation is not complete and that the firm will continue its work. While they were originally commissioned by RZIM to address the allegations from the spa workers, Barron says they were also given “broad discretion and authority to follow leads into other sexual misconduct that might arise.” 

It is unclear whether Miller & Martin will look into the case of Lori Anne Thompson, a Canadian woman who tried to hold Zacharias to account for a relationship that turned sexual and that she describes as a predatory abuse of power on Zacharias’ part. While Barron’s letter indicates they have and will be looking into other allegations in addition to those voiced by the spa workers, a statement published by Thompson today indicates she has not been contacted.

In September of this year, RZIM reiterated their belief that Thompson and her husband, Brad, had tried to extort the founder of their ministry. At the time, they maintained Zacharias’ account of the interaction between himself and the Thompsons.

However, a statement from RZIM released today employs a different tone. The statement says they are “devastated” over Miller & Martin’s findings concerning the spa workers:

This misconduct is deeply troubling and wholly inconsistent with the man Ravi Zacharias presented both publicly and privately to so many over more than four decades of public ministry. We are heartbroken at learning this but feel it necessary to be transparent and to inform our staff, donors, and supporters at this time, even while the investigation continues.

Originally, RZIM said they would not release any more statements on the issue until the investigation was complete, but felt compelled to share the interim report, which they received on Tuesday. Additionally, the statement says that they share compassion for Zacharias’ victims, and they are asking for “your prayers for them and also for Ravi’s family who have been devastated by this information.”

When he passed away in May, Zacharias left behind his wife, Margie, two daughters, and one son. Zacharias’ daughter, Sarah Davis, is the current CEO of RZIM.


For more on this topic:

The Story Behind the Ravi Zacharias Allegations (Part 1): Lawsuits, NDAs, and Email Threads

The Story Behind the Ravi Zacharias Allegations (Part 2): ‘Cursory’ Investigations and More Accusations

RZIM Apologist: Ministry Needs to Apologize to Victims and ‘Overhaul’ Culture

‘Significant, Credible Evidence’ Ravi Zacharias Engaged in Sexual Misconduct, Report States — ChurchLeaders

Emails obtained by FBI detail how Hunter Biden landed Ukrainian gas gig in 2014 — Christian Research Network

“In the April 13, 2014 email to Archer, Hunter Biden said that he and his partner should portray Joe Biden’s visit to Ukraine as part of their consulting deliverables and to “ask for a long term agreement and across the board participation” in Burisma’s business. Joe Biden’s trip to Ukraine had been announced just a day earlier.”

(John Solomon – Just the News)  In the weeks before he landed a deal with a Ukrainian gas company in 2014, Hunter Biden strategized with his business partner on how to leverage an upcoming official trip to Kiev by his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to clinch the lucrative arrangement, according to emails obtained a year ago by the FBI.

The communications reviewed by Just the News show that the younger Biden referred to his father as “my guy” and took credit for “adding value” because the vice president made comments to Ukrainian leaders about natural gas production that might benefit his new client. View article →

Related

Articles on the Hunter Biden saga

Emails obtained by FBI detail how Hunter Biden landed Ukrainian gas gig in 2014 — Christian Research Network

December 23d The D. L. Moody Year Book

Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that heareth My word and believeth on Him that sent Me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.—John 5:24.

SALVATION is instantaneous. I admit that a man may be converted so that he cannot tell when he crossed the line between death and life, but I also believe a man may be a thief one moment and a saint the next. I believe a man may be as vile as hell itself one moment, and be saved the next. Christian growth is gradual, just as physical growth is; but a man passes from death unto everlasting life quick as an act of the will—“He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life.”[1]

 

[1] Moody, D. L. (1900). The D. L. Moody Year Book: A Living Daily Message from the Words of D. L. Moody. (E. M. Fitt, Ed.) (pp. 229–230). East Northfield, MA: The Bookstore.

December 23 Life-Changing Moments With God

Let him take hold of My strength, that he may make peace with Me.

God of Peace, the thoughts that You think toward me, are thoughts of peace and not of evil. “There is no peace,” You say, “for the wicked.”

In Christ Jesus I who once was far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For He Himself is my peace.

It pleased You, Father, that in Jesus all the fullness should dwell, and by Him to reconcile all things to Yourself, having made peace through the blood of His cross. Christ Jesus, whom You set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, demonstrated Your righteousness over the sins that were previously committed, that You might be just and the justifier of those of us who have faith in Jesus. If I confess my sins, You are faithful and just to forgive me my sins and to cleanse me from all unrighteousness.

I will trust in You, Lord, forever, for in You is everlasting strength.

Lord God, thanks to Your Son’s death on the cross, I know peace with You. I trust You for strength and forgiveness; I trust You with my life.

Isaiah 27:5; Jeremiah 29:11; Isaiah 48:22; Ephesians 2:13–14; Colossians 1:19–20; Romans 3:24–26; 1 John 1:9; Isaiah 26:4[1]

 

[1] Jeremiah, D. (2007). Life-Changing Moments With God (p. 382). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

December 23, 2020 Evening Verse Of The Day

Spiritual Impact

and having favor with all the people. And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved. (2:47b)

The dynamic corporate life and spiritual character of the church had great impact. Two features of that impact appear in this verse.

they were an attractive church

and having favor with all the people (2:47b)

Their duties and character granted them favor with all the people. They were still going to the Temple and being open about their faith, so that all could see and experience their transformed lives. Later came the intense persecution by the Jews. They proved true the words of Jesus in John 13:35, “By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.” Their unity was an answer to our Lord’s high priestly prayer “that they may all be one; even as Thou, Father, art in Me, and I in Thee, that they also may be in Us; that the world may believe that Thou didst send Me” (John 17:21).

Some of the reasons the early church found favor with the common people can be discerned from the apology written by the philosopher Aristides early in the second century:

Now the Christians, O King, by going about and seeking, have found the truth. For they know and trust in God, the Maker of heaven and earth, who has no fellow. From him they received those commandments which they have engraved on their minds, and which they observe in the hope and expectation of the world to come.

For this reason they do not commit adultery or immorality; they do not bear false witness, or embezzle, nor do they covet what is not theirs. They honor father and mother, and do good to those who are their neighbors. Whenever they are judges, they judge uprightly. They do not worship idols made in the image of man. Whatever they do not wish that others should do to them, they in turn do not do; and they do not eat the food sacrificed to idols.

Those who oppress them they exhort and make them their friends. They do good to their enemies. Their wives, O King, are pure as virgins, and their daughters are modest. Their men abstain from all unlawful sexual contact and from impurity, in the hope of recompense that is to come in another world.

As for their bondmen and bondwomen, and their children, if there are any, they persuade them to become Christians; and when they have done so, they call them brethren without distinction.

They refuse to worship strange gods; and they go their way in all humility and cheerfulness. Falsehood is not found among them. They love one another; the widow’s needs are not ignored, and they rescue the orphan from the person who does him violence. He who has gives to him who has not, ungrudgingly and without boasting. When the Christians find a stranger, they bring him to their homes and rejoice over him as a true brother. They do not call brothers those who are bound by blood ties alone, but those who are brethren after the Spirit and in God.

When one of their poor passes away from the world, each provides for his burial according to his ability. If they hear of any of their number who are imprisoned or oppressed for the name of the Messiah, they all provide for his needs, and if it is possible to redeem him, they set him free.

If they find poverty in their midst, and they do not have spare food, they fast two or three days in order that the needy might be supplied with the necessities. They observe scrupulously the commandments of their Messiah, living honestly and soberly as the Lord their God ordered them. Every morning and every hour they praise and thank God for his goodness to them; and for their food and drink they offer thanksgiving.

If any righteous person of their number passes away from the world, they rejoice and thank God, and escort his body as if he were setting out from one place to another nearby. When a child is born to one of them, they praise God. If it dies in infancy, they thank God the more, as for one who has passed through the world without sins. But if one of them dies in his iniquity or in his sins, they grieve bitterly and sorrow as over one who is about to meet his doom.

Such, O King, is the commandment given to the Christians, and such is their conduct. (The Apology of Aristides, translated by Rendel Harris [London: Cambridge, 1893])

With all of that virtue to commend them it is small wonder they were an attractive church.

they were a growing church

And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved. (2:47c)

Effective evangelism was the ultimate impact of the first fellowship’s spiritual duties and character. That the Lord was adding to the church those who were being saved reminds one that God is sovereign in salvation (cf. 5:14). The imperfect tense of the verb translated was adding, along with the phrase day by day, indicates that people were continually being saved as they observed the daily conduct of the believers. So unified, joyful, and Spirit-filled were they that their very existence was a powerful testimony to the truth of the gospel. True evangelism flows from the life of a healthy church.

This brief glimpse of the first fellowship gives valuable insight into what makes a healthy, growing church worthy of the name. The proper devotion to the duties of the Spirit produces the proper character, which in turn produces a powerful and saving impact on sinners.[1]


47b Luke’s thesis paragraph on the state of the early church at Jerusalem concludes with the triumphant note, “And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved”—a note that runs throughout this first panel but is not confined to it. It is the Lord himself who adds to his church, and thus the title ho kyrios (“the Lord”) appears first in the sentence not only for grammatical reasons but also for emphasis. The force of the present participle tous sōzomenous (“those being saved,” GK 5392) is iterative, thus suggesting that they were added as they were being saved. For a discussion of the expression “to their number” (epi to auto), see Notes, v. 41 above and v. 47 below.[2]


2:47 / Their fellowship was further characterized by their praising God. Such a manner of life could not help but impress others, and consequently the church enjoyed the favor of all the people. There was no hint as yet of any separation of church and synagogue. In this atmosphere of acceptance and good will, the number of those who were being saved grew daily. The present participle, “were being saved,” gives the sense that they were being maintained in a state to which they had already come. They had been saved (cf., e.g., Rom. 8:24) and were now being “shielded,” as Peter puts it, “by God’s power until the coming of the salvation that is ready to be revealed in the last time” (1 Pet. 1:5; cf., e.g., Rom. 8:23). The steady growth of the church was due ultimately to the Lord (Jesus; cf. v. 21; see notes on 11:20). There was much (essential) human activity, but it was he who added to their number.[3]


47. Having favour. This is the fruit of an innocent life, to find favour even amongst strangers. And yet we need not to doubt of this, but that they were hated of many. But although he speak generally of the people, yet he meaneth that part alone which was sound, neither yet infected with any poison of hatred; he signifieth briefly, that the faithful did so behave themselves, that the people did full well like of them for their innocency of life.

The Lord added daily. He showeth in these words that their diligence was not without profit; they studied so much as in them lay to gather into the Lord’s sheepfold those which wandered and went astray. He saith that their labour bestowed herein was not lost; because the Lord did increase his Church daily. And surely, whereas the Church is rather diminished than increased, that is to be imputed to our slothfulness, or rather frowardness. And although they did all of them stoutly labour to increase the kingdom of Christ, yet Luke ascribeth2 this honour to God alone, that he brought strangers into the Church. And surely this is his own proper work. For the ministers do no good by planting or watering, unless he make their labour effectual by the power of his Spirit, (1 Cor. 3.) Furthermore, we must note that he saith, that those were gathered unto the Church which should be saved. For he teacheth that this is the means to attain salvation, if we be incorporate into the Church. For like as there is no remission of sins, so neither is there any hope of salvation. Furthermore, this is an excellent comfort for all the godly, that they were received into the Church that they might be saved; as the Gospel is called the power of God unto salvation to all that believe, (Rom. 1:16.) Now, forasmuch as God doth gather only a part, or a certain number, this grace is restrained unto election, that it may be the first cause of our salvation.[4]


47. The sentence structure may indicate that the disciples ate together both in the temple and in their homes. As they did so, they praised God; this is one of the few references in Acts to the Christians worshipping God in the sense of rendering thanks to him. The fewness of such phrases reminds us that according to the New Testament witness Christian gatherings were for instruction, fellowship and prayer; in other words for the benefit of the people taking part; there is less mention of the worship of God, although of course this element was not absent. A final comment notes that the evangelistic activity of the church continued daily. As the Christians were seen and heard by the other people in Jerusalem, their activities formed an opportunity for witness. Once again Luke refers to the process of becoming a Christian as being saved, i.e. from belonging to the sinful people around who were under God’s judgment for their rejection of the Messiah (2:40, cf. 2:21).[5]


The Lord continued to add daily to their number those who were being saved.

Luke concludes this section by saying that the Lord adds new converts to the church. Note, first, that Luke uses the title the Lord for Jesus, not for God. Next, the Lord Jesus continues his work of extending the Christian community. From the inhabitants of Jerusalem he takes three thousand people, effects conversions, and adds them as believers to the church. Luke portrays the converts as “those who were being saved.” That is, the Lord is the agent in the work of saving his people, for he fulfills Joel’s prophecy: “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved” (v. 21; Joel 2:32). And last, notice the word daily. This term should be taken with the descriptive phrase “those who were being saved.” The phrase does not imply a gradual salvation of the individual believer but rather indicates that the miracle of salvation occurs daily. Today also the Lord continues to add to his church and calls people to be spiritual citizens of the city called Zion. With John Newton, the believer humbly yet triumphantly sings,

Saviour, if of Zion’s city

I, through grace, a member am,

Let the world deride or pity,

I will glory in thy Name:

Fading is the worldling’s pleasure,

All his boasted pomp and show;

Solid joy and lasting treasure

None but Zion’s children know.[6]


[1] MacArthur, J. F., Jr. (1994). Acts (Vol. 1, pp. 90–92). Chicago: Moody Press.

[2] Longenecker, R. N. (2007). Acts. In T. Longman III & D. E. Garland (Eds.), The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Luke–Acts (Revised Edition) (Vol. 10, p. 759). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

[3] Williams, D. J. (2011). Acts (pp. 61–62). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

[4] Calvin, J., & Beveridge, H. (2010). Commentary upon the Acts of the Apostles (Vol. 1, pp. 133–134). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.

[5] Marshall, I. H. (1980). Acts: an introduction and commentary (Vol. 5, p. 91). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

[6] Kistemaker, S. J., & Hendriksen, W. (1953–2001). Exposition of the Acts of the Apostles (Vol. 17, p. 114). Grand Rapids: Baker Book House.

Advent- Thirty Days of Jesus: Day 26, Jesus’ sinlessness — The End Time

By Elizabeth Prata

This section of verses that show Jesus’ life are focused on His attributes & earthly ministry. We’ve seen Him as servant, teacher, shepherd, intercessor, and healer. We looked at His attributes of omniscience, His authority, and now His sinlessness.

thirty daysof jesus 26

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Further Reading:

The Cripplegate/Nate Busenitz: In what way was Jesus ‘made sin’ on the cross?

GotQuestions: Why does Christ’s righteousness need to be imputed to us?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thirty Days of Jesus Series-

Introduction/Background
Day 1: The Virgin shall conceive
Day 2: A shoot from Jesse
Day 3: God sent His Son in the fullness of time
Day 4:  Marry her, she will bear a Son

Day 5: The Babe has arrived!
Day 6: The Glory of Jesus
Day 7: Magi seek the Child
Day 8: The Magi offer gifts & worship
Day 9: The Child Grew
Day 10: The boy Jesus at the Temple

Day 11: He was Obedient!
Day 12: The Son!
Day 13: God is pleased with His Son
Day 14: Propitiation
Day 15: The gift of eternal life
Day 16: Two Kingdoms
Day 17: Jesus’ Preeminence
Day 18: Jesus is highest king
Day 19: Jesus emptied Himself
Day 20: Jesus as Teacher
Day 21: Jesus as Shepherd
Day 22, Jesus as Intercessor

Day 23: Jesus as Compassionate Healer
Day 24: Jesus as Omniscient
Day 25: Jesus’ authority

Advent- Thirty Days of Jesus: Day 26, Jesus’ sinlessness — The End Time

December—23 The Poor Man’s Evening Portion

The day-spring from on high.—Luke 1:78.

Truly it was so when Jesus came: for a long night of Jewish darkness and ignorance had covered the earth, and gross darkness the people. Look, my soul! at Jesus under this blessed similitude. Though it be evening with thee, this day-spring will give light, and the promise will be fulfilled, “at even-time it shall be light.” Jesus was the day-spring in the everlasting counsel and purposes of Jehovah, when he stood up the light of his people from all eternity. And when, in the fulness of time, he came, it was to fulfil all the shadows of ordinances concerning him. And what is it now, in every individual instance of his visiting his people, but as “the day-spring” on their souls? When first from a state of nature, he calls them to a state of grace, is it not “the day-spring from on high?” And in all the after-stages, during a life of grace leading to glory, is not every renewed manifestation of his love as “the day-spring from on high?” And what will it be after the night of death, when Jesus shall come to be glorified in his saints, and admired in all that believe, but the same? Jesus will then be “the day-spring,” and “the morning-star” of that everlasting day, whose sun shall go down no more. Precious day-spring of my God! arise daily on my poor soul, and fill my heart with light and glory.[1]

 

[1] Hawker, R. (1845). The Poor Man’s Evening Portion (A New Edition, pp. 350–351). Philadelphia: Thomas Wardle.

December 23 – Candlesticks, Olive Trees, Ephahs and more! — VCY America

December 23
Zechariah 4:1-5:11
Revelation 14:1-20
Psalm 142:1-7
Proverbs 30:21-23

This menorah built for the Temple by the Temple Institute, is similar to the Menorah Zechariah saw.

Zechariah 4:6 – Joshua was the religious leader, a high priest, known for his robes, but they were dirty. Zerubbabel was the civil leader, a military general, is told that “not by might nor by power, but by my spirit.” The man of beautiful robes can’t trust in his robes. The leader of forces can’t trust in might or forces.

Zechariah 4:10 – “The day of small things” – Especially as we see lampstands referring to churches in Revelation 1:20, This verse is a great challenge given to every new church that starts with just a handful of people, in a rented storefront, with a tentmaker/part-time pastor. Maybe to outsiders it looks like God is doing greater things at the church down the road – but God rewards those not based on “might” or “power” but for faithfulness!

Zechariah 4:14 – Who are the anointed ones, the olive branches? We read about them in Revelation 11:4 – Moses & Elijah, the Law and the Prophets. What does the New Testament tell us about the Law & the Prophets?

  • The Golden Rule is the L&P (Matthew 7:12)
  • On the Two Great Commandments hang the L&P (Matthew 22:40)
  • The L&P were until John the Baptist (Luke 16:16)
  • The L&P did write of Jesus (John 1:45)
  • The righteousness of God without the law is witnessed by the L&P (Romans 3:21)

Zechariah 5:3 – What is cursed? 8th Commandment & 3rd Commandment. Some commentators think this 450 square foot flying scroll is the Ten Commandments (1 command from each side of the Tablets). At those dimensions (30’x15′), it is larger than the average hotel room (13’x25′) – the law will overwhelm the house of the sinner (Zechariah 5:4).

Hebrew dry measures, Hebrew liquid measures – Matson Photograph Collection – Library of Congress

Zechariah 5:6 – What’s going on here? The law has gone forth, and the ephah (a container holding about 9 gallons), has a woman in it symbolizing wickedness (a Proverbs 7-type woman, not a Proverbs 31-type woman), but a lead lid was put on the ephah, keeping the wickedness in, and two women take the ephah away to Shinar (Babylon) (Genesis 10:10 – land of Nimrod, Genesis 11:2 – tower of Babel, Daniel 1:2 – palace of Nebuchadnezzar). Yes a land of wickedness will be based in Babylon (Revelation 17:5).

Matthias Gerung, The Triumph of the Lamb, the Fall of Babylon

Revelation 14:7 – Why should God be worshipped? He is the Creator. If God created us, then we are responsible to Him. That is why people in modern times try to flip that and argue that we created God – to avoid the responsibility to Him.

Revelation 14:8 – The angel is proclaiming judgment against Babylon – the land of Shinar – that we just read about (Zechariah 5:11)

Revelation 14:10 – For those who believe the God of the New Testament is all about love, compared to the God of the Old Testament – they should have a problem with this verse. God is love, but God is just. Let’s warn people to avoid the wrath of God!

Psalm 142:3 – When I’m overwhelmed – I can trust the LORD! As Job says in Job 23:10, “But he knoweth the way that I take: when he hath tried me, I shall come forth as gold.” Not only that, but He prays for us when we don’t know what to pray! (Romans 8:26) “Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered”

Proverbs 30:22 – Is the Bible promoting class separation? No – Joseph went from prisoner to ruler (Genesis 41:41). Solomon says a man that isn’t diligent should not be ruling (Proverbs 22:29).

The odious woman seems analagous to the contentious woman of Proverbs 27:15… For a man who had 700 wives (1 Kings 11:3) – he probably had some good advice on what women to avoid!

December 23 – Candlesticks, Olive Trees, Ephahs and more! — VCY America

December 23 Waiting

But let patience have her perfect work, that ye may be perfect and entire, wanting nothing.
(James 1:4)

Are you trying to get out of something that God is trying to bring you through? Have you been asking God why the waiting period is so long? If so, here are three reasons:

Waiting brings results! “It is good that a man should both hope and quietly wait for the salvation of the Lord” (Lamentations 3:25–26). Waiting time is learning time, and as long as you’re learning, you’re not losing. God will spend time training you for the battle, because He’s a good general. “Blessed be the LORD my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight” (Psalms 144:1).

Waiting will reveal those around you. Motives are not easily discerned. Trust God, but test people! That’s scriptural. “The LORD your God led you … 40 years, to humble you and to test you, in order to know what was in your heart” (Deuteronomy 8:2, NIV). The wrong people can keep their mistakes and their motives covered for a long time, but waiting forces the truth to the surface.

Waiting gives God time to address your problem miraculously. He’s a miracle God; so don’t get ahead of Him and rob Him of an opportunity to prove His power in your life.

 

The word for you today is “Wait!”[1]

 

[1] Gass, B. (1998). A Fresh Word For Today : 365 Insights For Daily Living (p. 357). Alachua, FL: Bridge-Logos Publishers.

What Is The Incarnation? (THE BIBLICAL WITNESS TO THE PERSON OF CHRIST)

As many are aware, terms such as Trinity and incarnation are not found in Scripture. They are, however, useful and appropriate terms for describing what the Bible teaches about God and Christ. In fact, the biblical witness to the person of Christ is vast and resounding, and Christians need feel no embarrassment on this issue when they speak with those who deny that Christ is God. That being said, we can only begin to explore this matter here.

The Old Testament

The Old Testament materials, as we might imagine in the pagan and polytheistic context of the ancient Near East, are particularly focused on the oneness of the true God over against the many gods of the nations. Even so, there are striking indications that the promised Messiah was to be both human and divine. In fulfillment of the Davidic covenant he was to be the son of David who will reign on the throne of David forever (see Isa. 11:1–5). Moreover, the messianic child prophesied by Isaiah will at the same time be called “Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (see Isa. 9:6–7). In addition, the so-called “royal psalms” sometimes ascribe divine identity and qualities to the Davidic kings, and such psalms were rightly interpreted as messianic by the Jews of the later Old Testament period (see, e.g., Pss. 2:7; 45:6–7; 110:1). The richness of this Old Testament witness is such that the New Testament writers had much to work with when the Messiah finally came.

The New Testament

The New Testament materials are, as we would expect, much more extensive and complex. The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) emphasize in various ways that Jesus was fully human. For example, Matthew’s gospel begins by affirming that Jesus is the “son of David” and the “son of Abraham.” Human genealogies of Jesus are found in Matthew and Luke (see Matt. 1:2–17; Luke 3:23–38), and Luke’s gospel emphasizes that Jesus underwent a normal human process of development, that he “increased in wisdom and in stature and in favor with God and man” (Luke 2:52). At the same time, while the writers of the Synoptic Gospels do not expressly speak of Jesus as “God,” they everywhere assume his deity by ascribing divine functions to Jesus. For example, Jesus has the power to forgive sins (see Matt. 9:2–6). He is Lord of the Sabbath (Mark 2:23–27). He possesses a unique knowledge of God the Father (Matt. 11:27). He will come in glory to judge the nations and establish the eternal kingdom of God (Matt. 25:31–32), and after the resurrection he declares that “all authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me” (Matt. 28:18). All this makes little sense if Christ is not God as well as man.

Of the four gospels it is John’s that provides the most explicit witness to the deity of Christ. The opening prologue is particularly striking in that it provides important building blocks for the doctrine of the Trinity by speaking of the relationship between the divine Word and God as one of both identity and differentiation: “In the beginning was the Word (Greek: Logos), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1). In other words, while there is one God, both the Word and the Father are God, and the Word is distinct from the Father. It goes on to speak of the Word’s involvement in the divine act of creation (John 1:3), before triumphantly declaring that “the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth” (John 1:14). Quite a number of Jesus’ statements in this gospel must finally be interpreted as claims to deity. He expressly claims to be one with the Father (John 10:30–39), and particularly striking are the various “I am” sayings by Jesus where he identifies himself with the divine name I Am in the Old Testament (see, e.g., John 6:20; 8:12, 57–59; 11:25; cf. Ex. 3:13–14). Finally, at the close of this gospel Jesus’ identity as God is recognized by “Doubting Thomas” (John 20:28). At the same time, John’s gospel also presents Jesus as fully human—he is subject to human physical limitations such as fatigue, hunger, and thirst (John 4:6–8; 19:28), and his sorrow at the grave of his dear friend Lazarus demonstrates that Jesus had a genuinely human emotional life (John 11:33–35).

The Pauline epistles contain two passages that are best translated as direct ascriptions of deity to Christ (Rom. 9:5; Titus 2:13). Just as important, the Epistles of the New Testament provide further evidence that the incarnation is a foundational assumption of the New Testament writers. For example, the Greek word kurios (“Lord”) is persistently used of Christ, and this very word was used in the Greek version of the Old Testament to translate the Hebrew divine name Yahweh. Old Testament passages speaking of Yahweh are applied to Christ (see Isa. 45:23; cf. Rom. 14:9–11). There are statements that say in so many words that what God is, Christ is (see Phil. 2:6; Col. 1:19; 2:9). Similar sentiments are expressed by the author of the book of Hebrews, for whom Christ “is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power” (Heb. 1:3). At the same time, the apostle Paul emphasizes that Christ was fully human—that he suffered on the cross and died for our sins. The author of Hebrews also strongly affirms the full humanity of Christ and sees it as essential to his high priestly work: “Therefore he had to be made like his brothers in every respect, so that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in the service of God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people” (Heb. 2:17).[1]

 

[1] Evans, W. B. (2013). What Is the Incarnation?. (S. M. Lucas, Ed.) (pp. 10–12). Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing.

What Is The Incarnation? (INTRODUCTION)

This booklet is an introduction to Christology (the doctrine of the person of Christ)—a topic that lies at the center of Christian faith. As we will soon see, there is much to think about here, but at the outset a crucial point needs to be made. Although there are issues of Christology that continue to perplex and fascinate theologians, the doctrine of the incarnation is first and foremost a matter of doxology rather than an intellectual puzzle. It is something that should cause us to marvel at the matchless grace of God and to respond to that grace with worship and praise. After all, the second person of the Trinity has come to us in human form to save helpless sinners, to accomplish salvation for us, to unite us with himself, and so to raise us up into fellowship and communion with God. Even as our faith seeks understanding on this issue, may we be driven to worship and adore the God who has created us for himself, who has revealed himself to us in his written and incarnate Word, and who has by the work of that incarnate Word redeemed a people for himself.

Anyone who desires to be a Christian must answer two vital questions. The first is this: who is Jesus Christ? The second follows quickly upon the first: what has Christ done for me so that I may be saved? As we shall see, our explorations here will focus on the first question, but we must touch on the second as well.

According to the great confessional tradition of the church, in dependence upon Scripture we affirm that Christ is both truly God (vere deus) and truly human (vere homo) and that these two natures nevertheless comprise one divine-human person. Echoing the Council of Chalcedon (a.d. 451), the Westminster Confession of Faith declares “that two whole, perfect, and distinct natures, the Godhead and the manhood, were inseparably joined together in one person, without conversion, composition, or confusion. Which person is very God and very man, yet one Christ, the only Mediator between God and man.” Admittedly, this is the careful language of technical theology, but here the Westminster divines express truth that is of momentous, indeed essential, practical importance. Thus we must be careful not to dismiss these somewhat technical discussions of the person of Christ as irrelevant to the life and health of the church, or as of little consequence for our Christian lives.

SOME PRELIMINARY COMMENTS

As we suggested above, we cannot ultimately separate the doctrine of Christ’s person from the doctrine of his work. They go together, because Jesus was perfectly fitted for the work he came to do. This strong connection of person and work is evident in the two most influential theological arguments for the full deity of Christ from the early and medieval church periods. The first is by Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296–373), that stalwart hero of the faith who did more to defeat the Arian heresy (which denied the deity of Christ) than any other. He wrote in his treatise “On the Incarnation”:

The reason of his bodily appearing; that it was in the power of none other to turn the corruptible to incorruption, except the Saviour himself, that had at the beginning also made all things out of naught; and that none other could create anew the likeness of God’s image for men, save the image of the Father; that none other could render the mortal immortal, save our Lord Jesus Christ, who is the very life; and that none other could teach men of the Father, and destroy the worship of idols, save the Word, that orders all things and is alone the true only begotten Son of the Father.

Here the great bishop of Alexandria argues that sin has decisively separated humanity from God who is the source of life and immortality, that only God himself can fix the situation, and that Christ therefore must be fully God. Note also that Athanasius is pointing us to a particular aspect of Christ’s saving work—his transforming work in us.

The second great argument regarding the person of Christ was presented by that remarkable medieval theologian Anselm of Canterbury (c. 1033–1109). In his treatise entitled Cur Deus Homo (Why the God-Man), the great archbishop of Canterbury notes that human sin has resulted in alienation because God’s infinite honor has been offended and a proper satisfaction must be offered. Furthermore, only God can offer such infinite satisfaction and only man should offer satisfaction, and so the one offering such satisfaction must be the God-man. Anselm’s formulation here is worth quoting in full:

For God will not do it, because he does not owe it, and man will not do it, because he cannot. Therefore, for the God-Man to do this, the person who is to make this satisfaction must be both perfect God and perfect man, because none but true God can make it, and none but true man owes it. Thus, while it is necessary to find a God-Man in whom the integrity of both natures is preserved, it is no less necessary for these two complete natures to meet in one person—just as body and rational soul meet in one man—for otherwise the same person could not be perfect God and perfect man.

Here we see that Anselm is focusing particularly on the question of what Christ does for us. To rephrase the matter in more familiar terms, we recognize that God is just and that human sin must be punished. After all, as the apostle Paul teaches, “the wages of sin is death” (Rom. 6:23). The only way for sinners to be redeemed from this penalty of eternal death is for a perfect sacrifice to be offered, and Jesus as the God-man is this perfect and all-sufficient sacrifice for sin on our behalf as he took upon himself the penalty that we deserve. Thus Christians have rightly sensed that Jesus Christ must be exactly who the Bible says he is—God and man in a single person—in order that he might both reconcile us to God and transform us into the people God wants us to be.

This doctrine of the person of Christ is also inevitably connected with other crucial doctrines of the faith. Because Christ is fully God and fully human, it is closely related to what theologians call “theology proper” (the doctrine of God) and to theological anthropology (the doctrine of humanity). History demonstrates that it is particularly connected to our understanding of humanity in its sinful and fallen condition. Some have argued that the human condition is not grave, and that all we need is a bit of education and encouragement to do what is right. In other words, a modest savior will do. Such people often deny that Christ is God and view him as little more than a human teacher and example of moral truth. On the other hand, if the human condition in sin is not only grave but completely beyond our capacity to rectify it, if we are truly dead in trespasses and sins, then we need a grand and mighty Savior, one who is no less than God himself. In addition, the doctrine of the incarnation is related to our doctrine of salvation, for all of salvation comes to us through our spiritual union with Christ (see Eph. 1:3–14), and he is the mediator between God and human beings (1 Tim. 2:5). Finally, it is related to ecclesiology, or the doctrine of the church, for the church is the body of Christ (see Rom. 12:3–8; 1 Cor. 12:12–31). Thus we have ample reason and incentive to get this doctrine of the person of Christ right.

One final comment needs to be made. We must not suppose that we can rationally explain the incarnation, and it is with good reason that Christians have long spoken of the “mystery” of the incarnation. As we will see later in this booklet, this fact has been a stumbling block for some, but we should not be surprised in the least that there is mystery involved here. If the incarnation—the union of infinite deity and finite humanity in a single person—is a reality, then we should not expect fully to comprehend this fact. It is by definition a unique event, and thus we ought not to use the categories of our ordinary experience as arguments against it. As the late Scottish theologian Thomas F. Torrance notes,

We cannot compare the fact of Christ with other facts, nor can we deduce the fact of Christ from our knowledge of other facts. The fact of Christ comes breaking into the continuity of our human knowledge as an utterly distinctive and unique fact, which we cannot understand in terms of other facts, which we cannot reduce to what we already know. It is a new and unique fact without analogy anywhere in human experience or knowledge.

At the same time, we should also recognize that the incarnation is a mystery with great explanatory power, for the New Testament everywhere presupposes it and makes little sense without it. Theologian J. I. Packer writes,

Once we grant that Jesus was divine, it becomes unreasonable to find difficulty in any of this [i.e., other teachings of the New Testament]; it is all of a piece and hangs together completely. The Incarnation is in itself an unfathomable mystery, but it makes sense of everything else that the New Testament contains.[1]

 

[1] Evans, W. B. (2013). What Is the Incarnation?. (S. M. Lucas, Ed.) (pp. 5–9). Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing.

Mid-Day Snapshot · Dec. 23, 2020

THE FOUNDATION

“During the course of administration, and in order to disturb it, the artillery of the press has been levelled against us, charged with whatsoever its licentiousness could devise or dare. These abuses of an institution so important to freedom and science are deeply to be regretted, inasmuch as they tend to lessen its usefulness and to sap its safety.” —Thomas Jefferson (1805)

Comment | Share

PUBLISHER’S NOTE

At the end of each year, I ask my editors and staff to take leave between Christmas and New Year’s Day in order to be with their families. Moreover, I want each of our team members to step back from the rigors of relentless daily deadlines so that they can begin January with a fresh perspective.

As always, I’ll remain on the wall with our Managing Editor, Nate, keeping watch for any mischief from the adversaries of Liberty. And our News Editor, Jordan, will be updating our Top Headlines section and Columnist/Opinion pages every day, and our regular editions will return on January 4th.

Pro Deo et Constitutione — Libertas aut Mors
Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis

Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post

IN TODAY’S DIGEST

FEATURED ANALYSIS

A Year’s Worth of Media Malfeasance

Douglas Andrews

Putting one’s finger on the five biggest media failures in any one year is a daunting task. It’s like trying to list the five worst plays during a Detroit Lions football season or Hollywood’s five worst movies of the year — there’s just too much terrible material to sift through.

The Daily Wire’s Hank Berrien, though, has given it a thoughtful effort, while The Federalist’s Tristan Justice took the “easy” way out and built a list of 20 journalistic failures.

As an aside, if there’s a first prize for Photojournalistic Failure of the Year, it has to go to CNN, whose “mostly peaceful” footage of the Kenosha riots was mostly accurate in the same way that Baghdad Bob was mostly credible:

It’s hard to quibble with Berrien’s top five, though one might move them around a bit in order of importance and impact. There can be no argument, though, with his choice as worst of the worst: the media’s utter refusal to cover the Hunter Biden story in the weeks just prior to the election. In doing so, the media didn’t just put its finger on the scale; it put its shoulder on the scale.

“If the media were truly unbiased agents of truth and fact-finding,” Berrien writes, “they would’ve been all over the Hunter Biden story. Allegations of unethical business dealings and unsavory relationships with corrupt officials abroad are usually enough to leave any reporter chomping at the bit. Throw in the sex and drugs (of which there was plenty) and you’ve got a story destined for the front page. Call it willful ignorance, call it bias, or call it a good old-fashioned cover-up.”

We’ll take Door Number Three: It was a good old-fashioned cover-up. And it decided a presidential election. As a Newsbusters poll pointed out, “Full awareness of the Hunter Biden scandal would have led 9.4% of Biden voters to abandon the Democratic candidate, flipping all six of the swing states he won to Trump, giving the President 311 electoral votes.”

The media’s Hunter Biden cover-up — which included Big Tech’s censorship of its users’ ability to share the story — thus changed history. It was, in short, the stealing of the presidency. And if anyone’s looking for a smoking gun, CNN provided it in the form of comments made by the network’s political director, David Chalian, during an October 14 conference call: “Obviously, we’re not going with the New York Post story right now on Hunter Biden.”

Obviously.

The rest of Berrien’s Top Five includes the media’s willful gullibility in falling for the anonymous agent within the Trump administration back in 2018 (“anonymous” came forward in October); its refusal to give Joe Biden the Brett Kavanaugh treatment when Tara Reade came forward with credible allegations of sexual assault; its laughable categorization (see above) of full-out urban riots as “mostly peaceful” protests; and its wishful prediction of a “blue wave” election — an election that delivered losses to the Democrats up and down the ballot, all across the land, including a remarkable 27-for-27 running of the table in congressional races that the once-vaunted Cook Political Report called “toss-ups.”

The Top 20 collected by Justice dives a bit more deeply, recalling how the media portrayed Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani as a “war hero,” how it celebrated the phony impeachment of President Trump, how it downplayed the seriousness of COVID-19 before assailing the president for doing the same thing, how it called violent protests “peaceful” and peaceful protests “violent,” how it fell for the Bubba Wallace “noose” hoax, how it got played repeatedly by CNN’s Chris Cuomo and his bloody-handed brother Andrew, and the like.

We would be remiss to not mention the festering “fact-checker” genre that exploded in 2020 to yield rampant censorship by social media.

Lastly, if you’re as mad for media bias as we are, you might check out the work of Newsbusters’ Geoffrey Dickens, who’s pulled together a three-part collection of media gushing, pandemic politicking, and trashing of Trump supporters.

Enjoy the lumps of coal, fellow Patriots — and have a peaceful and blessed holiday.

Comment | Share

The President’s Populist Plea on COVID Relief

Nate Jackson

Just yesterday, we knocked Congress for its bipartisan spendthrift ways with COVID relief and the omnibus spending bill for 2021. After the combined behemoth passed both houses with veto-proof majorities, President Donald Trump likewise hammered the bill for its inclusion of wasteful and totally non-COVID spending. While demanding “wasteful and unnecessary items” be removed, he also demanded even more spending for American families. He wants it known that he is the real “man of the people” and that someone in Washington is fighting for Americans.

“Throughout the summer, Democrats cruelly blocked COVID relief legislation in an effort to advance their extreme left-wing agenda and influence the election,” Trump recalled, even borrowing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s favorite word: cruel. “Then, a few months ago, Congress started negotiations on a new package to get urgently needed help to the American people. It’s taken forever. However, the bill they are planning to send back to my desk is much different than anticipated. It really is a disgrace.”

There are “more than 5,000 pages in this bill, which nobody in Congress has read because of its length and complexity,” he said. “It’s called the COVID relief bill, but it has almost nothing to do with COVID.”

He then highlighted a litany of provisions — albeit from the $1.4 trillion omnibus, not the $900 billion COVID relief — that would make any red-blooded American angry. Money for the Egyptian military to buy Russian equipment, for “democracy and gender programs in Pakistan,” for reef fish and Asian carp, for FBI construction projects, and on and on.

Worse, Trump noted, “The bill also allows stimulus checks for the family members of illegal aliens, allowing them to get up to $1,800 each. This is far more than the Americans are given.”

He should have mentioned all the states, many of them blue, that are getting bailouts despite rolling in revenue, all while once again tightening lockdowns.

“Congress found plenty of money for foreign countries, lobbyists, and special interests, while sending the bare minimum to the American people who need it,” the president said. “It wasn’t their fault; it was China’s fault, not their fault.”

“I’m asking Congress to amend this bill and increase the ridiculously low $600 to $2,000 or $4,000 for a couple,” Trump concluded. “I’m also asking Congress to immediately get rid of the wasteful and unnecessary items from this legislation and to send me a suitable bill or else the next administration will have to deliver a COVID relief package.”

“And maybe that administration will be me,” he added, “and we’ll get it done.”

Pelosi and her pal Chuck Schumer immediately jumped on the bandwagon. She declared, “At last, the President has agreed to $2,000 — Democrats are ready to bring this to the Floor this week by unanimous consent. Let’s do it!”

Schumer added, “We spent months trying to secure $2000 checks but Republicans blocked it. … Maybe Trump can finally make himself useful and get Republicans not to block it again.”

Perhaps Trump’s last-minute demands didn’t happen without the knowledge of key members of Congress. He is, however, known for erratic negotiations, and he’s apparently throwing Republicans under the bus — particularly Georgia Senators Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue, who supported the package and face critical runoffs in two weeks. Ultimately, it’s highly unlikely that Congress will remove a single item; if anything, it will only add spending. So, what’s Trump’s strategy?

Maybe it’s as simple as reminding members of Congress that they’re supposed to represent the American people, and to let the people know that gargantuan and unread bills passed in the dead of night don’t put their interests first.

Comment | Share

Racism Injected Into COVID Vaccination Plan

Thomas Gallatin

After nearly a year of dealing with the coronavirus pandemic, it has been well established that the people most at risk of dying from the novel virus are the elderly. Thus, it came as quite a surprise when the initial (and now scuttled) plan for administering the newly developed COVID-19 vaccine did not have elderly Americans at the front of the line. Instead, it was healthcare workers. While they arguably have a higher chance of contracting the virus due to the nature of their jobs, they also largely make up a lower-risk population.

When the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices was questioned on the rationale behind the vaccination prioritization, it was exposed that racism — actual racism arising from the Left’s Critical Race Theory logic — played a significant role in the decision.

As reported by The Washington Free Beacon, “The committee openly acknowledged that its initial plan would result in more deaths than ‘vaccinating older adults first.’ But, the panel said, the plan would reduce racial disparities — something they deemed more important than saving lives — because essential workers, unlike adults over 65, are disproportionately black and Hispanic, the two groups that have borne the brunt of the pandemic.”

So it’s okay if grandma dies from COVID before getting the vaccine because, statistically, she’s most likely white and therefore her death serves to “level the playing field.” That’s what Dr. Harald Schmidt, an ethics and health professor at the University of Pennsylvania, essentially implied in a recent New York Times article. “Older populations are whiter. Society is structured in a way that enables them to live longer. Instead of giving additional health benefits to those who already had more of them, we can start to level the playing field a bit.”

Underscoring this racist mindset was one member of the 11-person committee that helped craft the ethical framework for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That would be “health equity” consultant Dayna Bowen Matthew, who also serves as dean of George Washington University Law School. Matthew perfectly parrots the CRT narrative of “systemic racism,” as she argued that racial inequity “requires us to prioritize by race.” Requires?

The Federalist’s David Marcus insightfully observes, “Nothing, it seems, is more important than protecting the lives of the oldest among us, except for fighting racism. The great irony of course is that the lockdowns themselves have disproportionately destroyed minority-owned businesses. Yet, for the Marxists on the radical left, this doesn’t matter. They don’t fight racism by giving people tools to lift themselves up, they purport to do it by making people dependent on the state.”

And that is really what this is all about — working to garner greater controlling power for the government. Declare a problem where none really exists, i.e. systemic racism, find it in everything from education to vaccines, and then push “solutions” that invariably require more government infringement on Americans’ individual rights and freedoms.

Can’t we just fight a global pandemic with a vaccine that’s quickly distributed to everyone? Not without a political fight.

Comment | Share

Thankful for your impact

As our team prepares to celebrate Christmas this week, we are grateful to you — our readers and supporters — who stand with us to preserve the freedoms our Founders fought so hard to win at great price.

To our readers who have financially supported us, and to those who have written kind notes explaining their inability to do so — thank you. Your commitment to Liberty is not measured by a financial contribution.

If you are still planning to make a gift to benefit The Patriot Fund’s Year-End campaign, you may make a secure online donation here. This morning we have about $168,300 left to raise.

Thank you for standing with us in support of Liberty. Our work is not possible without you.

From the entire Patriot Post staff, we wish you and your family a blessed Christmas season!

 

Swalwell Just the Tip of Dems’ China Iceberg

Thomas Gallatin

Congressman Eric Swalwell (D-CA) should be classified as persona non grata, asserted House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy following the bombshell revelation that Swalwell for years was targeted and potentially compromised via an almost certainly sexual relationship by Chinese spy Christine Fang, or Fang Fang. Furthermore, Swalwell has remained mum over the scandal, refusing to answer reporters the multiples times they’ve raised questions.

“No one that was in that room could walk out and say Eric Swalwell should be on the intel committee,” McCarthy argued. “The one answer that I got out of that briefing was there is no way Eric Swalwell should continue to serve on the intel committee.”

McCarthy also pointed out the abject hypocrisy displayed by Democrat leadership as it attacks President Donald Trump over the Russia hoax while Swalwell was given the green light to oversee the CIA. “And that exact same year when the FBI came to brief the Intel Committee because they were concerned of what they saw, he gets put as the ranking Democrat over the CIA,” McCarthy said. “I do not understand how this has continued this long. … And I would never, never allow him on that committee.”

So, despite likely knowing Swalwell’s compromised status, why did Nancy Pelosi still put him on Intel? As Gary Bauer asks, “Does Eric Swalwell have something on Nancy Pelosi?” Or maybe the better question is, what does China have on Pelosi? She certainly seems to be quite favorable toward Beijing — to the point of gutting provisions within the Senate’s National Defense Authorization Act that withheld funding from the Beijing-backed Confucius Institutes on U.S. college campuses. As Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) stated, “Communist China is still buying influence on U.S. campuses. Yet Democrats gutted an NDAA amendment that would protect academic freedom and give U.S. colleges control over what Confucius Institutes teach on our soil.”

Representative Jim Banks (R-IN) contends, “Who could be surprised by Speaker Pelosi’s refusal to crack down on China’s infiltration of universities? She won’t even crack down on Chinese Communist infiltration of the Democratic Party. Speaker Pelosi only cares about national security if it furthers her narrow political interests, and again and again, those interests align with Chairman Xi’s.”

Swalwell, Pelosi, Joe Biden… Just how much of the Democrat Party has been bought by China?

Comment | Share

A First-Class First Lady

Douglas Andrews

Throughout his tenure in office, Donald Trump’s treatment by the mainstream media has been a deep and well-documented disgrace. But even more disgraceful has been its treatment of First Lady Melania Trump, a woman of surpassing class, beauty, intelligence, and grace.

Only in America could the daughter of a Slovenian factory worker or a Chicago city pump operator become first lady of the United States. But, sadly, only in America could the unhinged hatred and bigotry of our mainstream press cause two women to be treated so differently.

A 2018 New York Post article noted the double standard between the media’s treatment of Melania Trump and her predecessor as first lady. During Barack Obama’s eight years in office, Michelle Obama appeared on at least 30 U.S. magazine covers. The actual number is probably much higher. And supermodel Melania Trump, elegant speaker of five languages? As of this article’s publication: 0.

As her White House profile page notes, “[Melania] is the second First Lady born outside of the United States [John Quincy Adams’s wife was the first], and she is the only First Lady to become a naturalized U.S. citizen. … In 1996, Mrs. Trump moved to New York and 10 years later, she proudly became a United States citizen. Mrs. Trump has always been an active member of her community. In 2005, she was Honorary Chairwoman for the Martha Graham Dance Company. That same year, she was awarded Goodwill Ambassador by the American Red Cross — a role she served in for four years. Mrs. Trump served five years as Honorary Chairwoman for the Boys’ Club of New York and was named Woman of the Year in 2006 by the Police Athletic League.”

Her biography goes on and on in this vein, which tells us that she valued service to others long before she became first lady. A brief scroll through her Twitter feed confirms just how fortunate we’ve been to have her in this role.

And yet.

“Vegas may be betting on a post-presidential divorce, but Melania Trump seems all in for her husband,” read the headline of a recent Washington Post piece.

The article itself wasn’t any better. “Is Melania Trump really looking forward to being rid of President Trump as much as tens of millions of Americans are?” authors Mary Jordan and Jada Yuan maliciously ask. “Or is it just another fantasy that Trump critics are projecting on a first lady who has succeeded in shrouding her true self in mystery?”

“Mrs. Trump deserves to be recognized as an exceptional first lady,” writes former Republican Congressman and Fox News contributor Jason Chaffetz. “With little fanfare and tremendous pushback from some of the most vocal segments of society, she managed to launch a successful anti-bullying campaign, conduct important outreach abroad, protect her teenage son from relentless bullying, and serve as an inspiration to those trying to integrate into American culture. … I find it sad that an unscrupulous liberal media treated Mrs. Trump so unfairly compared to their obsequious coverage of former first lady Michelle Obama and now Jill Biden. Even traditionally nonpolitical outlets ignored Mrs. Trump and dismissed her.”

“If the Trumps were Democrats,” actor James Woods once tweeted, “Melania would be on every cover of every chic women’s magazine in the world every month.”

It’s hard to argue with Woods’s assessment. Somehow, though, we don’t think any of this matters much to Mrs. Trump. She seems quietly confident and comfortable in her skin. Melania has been a singular addition to our pantheon of first ladies, and we’ll miss her greatly when she goes.

Comment | Share

The Miracle of Christmas

Roger Helle

My mind was reeling. How long had it been? Everything was happening in slow motion. The explosion, bullets hitting me, the smell of charred skin, everything around me spinning. Now I’m on a hospital gurney in a triage room in a field hospital in Da Nang Vietnam. There was confusion as casualties from various firefights were brought into the room. Sights and smells that would haunt me for years assaulted my senses.

Then I saw the kind eyes of an Army doctor telling me they were taking me to surgery. The next few days were mostly a drug-induced blur mixed with moments of intense pain.

One day, I was aware of a doctor talking to my brother, who was also serving in Vietnam. I heard him telling my brother I was going to die; there was nothing else they could do. As my brother wept by my bed, not knowing I was conscious, I felt a fear I had never known during my times in combat. I was afraid! I didn’t want to die. I cried out silently to a God I neither knew nor believed in: “God, if you let me live, I’ll do anything You want!” He did, I didn’t!

Several months later, when I was able to communicate, they explained the extent of my injuries and how long it would take to recover. Among the different realities, they told me I would be unable to have children. Not married at that time, the news did not really impact me.

Later, after I did get married and spent years having nightmares, drinking, and being unfaithful to my wife, the God I cried out to in Vietnam became real and personal to me. Shirley and I asked Jesus to come into our lives and save us. Over a period of time, our marriage was healed and our lives were being restored with new purpose. Two years later, my wife informed me I was going to be a father. I was filled with joy! When our baby arrived, the doctor announced we had a son. Three days later we took Joshua home from the hospital on Christmas Eve.

That evening, after Shirley nursed Josh, I put him to bed in his crib. I remember standing there looking down at my son who was helpless and vulnerable. Suddenly, I flashed back and was hearing the doctor telling me, “You won’t be able to have children.”

It was only a moment and then I was back looking down at my son in the crib. Then I heard the still small voice of God my Father saying, “That’s how much I love you!” Christmas took on a whole new meaning for me. While I would die to protect my son, God sent His Son to die a horrible death to pay for my sins, to remove the guilt and shame of my past.

This Christmas, so many around us are confused, fearing the future, feeling hopeless and without peace or joy. Let’s remember Christmas is about giving. It’s also receiving the gift of God’s only Son. Jesus said, “I come that you might have joy and that your joy would be full.” His joy will give you hope in the midst of life’s storms. Rest in His love and receive His hope!

Merry Christmas!

Comment | Share

NEWS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Jordan Candler

Election Debrief

  • Gavin Newsom taps California election chief Alex Padilla for U.S. Senate (AP)
  • Biden names Bruce Reed, fiercely opposed by the “Squad,” as deputy chief of staff (Fox News)
  • Team Biden gently walking back election-year immigration promises (Washington Examiner)
  • Newsmax, OAN, and Trump campaign sued by voting systems worker who says false claims led to death threats (AP)

Georgia Runoff

  • Raphael Warnock’s wife told officer that her husband is “a great actor” after domestic dispute (Fox News)

Government & Politics

  • Sen. Rand Paul’s “Festivus Report” reveals $54 billion in tax dollars was “totally wasted” (Fox News)
  • Tulsi Gabbard justifiably rips young Congress members for taking vaccine before elderly (NY Post)
  • D’oh! Biden calls reporter asking about Hunter Biden a “one-horse pony” (Washington Examiner)
  • Trump announces slew of pardons (National Review)

Leftmedia

  • Washington Post depicts Republicans as rats in editorial cartoon eerily similar to anti-Semitic Nazi propaganda (Not the Bee)

Health

  • U.S. deaths in 2020 top three million, by far most ever counted (AP)

Education

  • Cambridge Public School System identifies “white, middle-class norms” as a problem that needs addressing (Not the Bee)
  • Cornell student government members expel fellow senators who voted against disarming police (College Fix)

National Security

  • Acting defense secretary accepts Inclusion Board’s 15 woke recommendations (Defense.gov)

Business & Economy

  • Walmart sued by the Justice Department for allegedly fueling opioid crisis (CBS News)
  • November existing home sales fall 2.5%, following record summer (AP)
  • In final reading, GDP increased at record 33.4% annual rate in third quarter (Washington Examiner)

Around the Nation

  • After SCOTUS rulings, Los Angeles County lifts ban on indoor worship services (Disrn)
  • Homicides hit all-time high in Memphis (Fox News)

“Memphis was just one many cities in which violent crime spiked this year. Data released earlier this month showed that 21 cities — including Los Angeles, Chicago, and Philadelphia — had an increase of 610 homicides, or 34% more, in the fall. That was slightly lower than the 42% jump seen in the summer.”

Annals of the “Social Justice” Caliphate

  • Detroit suing Black Lives Matter activists for “civil conspiracy” (Fox News)

“Theater of the Absurd” Headline Award

  • Face masks significantly reduce brain’s ability to recognize people (StudyFinds)

We’re gonna need a fact-check on this one…

American Spirit

  • These neighbors planned a heartwarming surprise for their kind UPS driver (Not the Bee)

Belly Laugh of the Week

  • Someone inserted Tom Cruise’s viral meltdown into “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” and the hilarious result is Santa cursing out his elves and reindeer (Not the Bee)
  • Merry Christmas! Here’s the worst-ever rendition of “O Holy Night” (Not the Bee)

Closing Arguments

  • Policy: How the Centers for Disease Control went woke (Free Beacon)
  • Policy: Maximizing equality of opportunity is the only way to avoid lowering standards (City Journal)
  • Humor: Everyone in Congress getting $100,000 bonus for coming up with such a great relief bill (Babylon Bee)

For more of today’s editors’ choice headlines, visit Headline Report.

The Patriot Post is a certified ad-free news service, unlike third-party commercial news sites linked on this page, which may also require a paid subscription.

Comment | Share

VIDEOS

Merry Christmas! — A collection of Christmas songs to celebrate Christ’s birth.

Humor: Best News Bloopers of the Year — “This is peak 2020, is it not?”

BEST OF RIGHT OPINION

 

 

For more of today’s columns, visit Right Opinion.

SHORT CUTS

For the record: “Robert E Lee was a far better and more impressive man than all of the people pulling his statues down.” —Matt Walsh

Double standards: “So $1,200 in Trump tax cuts is crumbs, but $600 in covid stimulus is significant, according to Pelosi?” —Liz Wheeler

Observations: “The covid relief bill is indeed a crap sandwich. All bills now are. The size and scope of government is the problem; there’s a case to be made that the earmark ban actually effectuates MORE pork barrel spending.” —Ben Shapiro

Interesting insight: “[Democrats are] trying to essentially use the COVID lockdown model for the climate emergency model. And they are going to go from COVID lockdowns to climate lockdowns.” —Marc Morano

The Grinch: “Here is the simple truth: Our darkest days against COVID are ahead of us, not behind us.” —Joe Biden

Braying jackass: “I’m counting down the hours ‘til [Trump’s] gone. I plan to pull him out of there by his hair, his little hands, and his feet.” —Nancy Pelosi

And last… “[Democrats] want to make rich people poorer, and poor people more comfortable.” —Mike Pence

Comment | Share

TODAY’S MEME

Share

For more of today’s memes, visit the Memesters Union.

TODAY’S CARTOON

Share

For more of today’s cartoons, visit the Cartoons archive.

Read Online

“The Patriot Post” (https://patriotpost.us)